This is a bilingual snapshot page saved by the user at 2024-9-15 19:49 for https://app.immersivetranslate.com/word/, provided with bilingual support by Immersive Translate. Learn how to save?

贸仲杯面试
CIETAC Cup interview

首先,我将陈述关于《仲裁和诉讼的区别》方面我的意见,仲裁和诉讼是两种不同的纠纷解决方式,二者主要存在以下区别:
First of all, I would like to state my opinion on the difference between arbitration and litigation, arbitration and litigation are two different forms of dispute resolution, and the main differences between the two are as follows:

适用前提,仲裁需双方当事人达成仲裁协议,自愿将争议提交仲裁机构,而在诉讼中,只要有一方认为自己的合法权益受到侵害即可向法院提起诉讼;
The premise of application is that arbitration requires both parties to reach an arbitration agreement and voluntarily submit the dispute to an arbitration institution, while in litigation, as long as one party believes that its legitimate rights and interests have been infringed, it can file a lawsuit with the court;

管辖,仲裁实行协议管辖,不受地域、级别限制,诉讼则实行地域管辖、级别管辖、专属管辖等;
Jurisdiction: Arbitration shall be governed by agreement and shall not be restricted by geography or level, while litigation shall be subject to territorial jurisdiction, hierarchical jurisdiction and exclusive jurisdiction;

管理及程序,仲裁中当事人可自选或令委员会主任指定仲裁员,首席仲裁员意见为最终意见,诉讼中当事人无权选择审判人员或陪审人员,并采用合议制和审判委员会讨论制;
management and procedures, in the arbitration, the parties may choose themselves or have the chairman of the committee appoint arbitrators, the presiding arbitrator's opinion is final, the parties have no right to choose adjudicators or jurors in the litigation, and adopt the collegial system and the adjudication committee discussion system;

保密程度,仲裁不公开进行,裁决也不公开(除非双方协议公开),诉讼理应公开(但涉密,个人隐私、或法律其他规定除外);
the degree of confidentiality, the arbitration shall not be conducted in public, the award shall not be made public (unless the parties agree to make it public), and the litigation shall be open (except for confidentiality, personal privacy, or other legal provisions);

救济程序,仲裁实行一裁终局制,裁决及最终裁决,诉讼是两审终审制,当事人有权上诉或申诉;
Relief procedures, arbitration implements a final system of one award, award and final award, litigation is a two-instance final system, and the parties have the right to appeal or appeal;

费用,仲裁费用高,但可协商减免,仲裁费用较低,但不能减免;
costs, the cost of arbitration is high but can be reduced negotiated, and the cost of arbitration is lower but not reduced;

执行,仲裁在境外须满足一定条件,如《纽约公约》缔约国之间可以实行,诉讼的境外执行要司法协助条约或互惠原则;
For enforcement, arbitration must meet certain conditions abroad, such as the New York Convention can be implemented between the contracting states, and the overseas enforcement of litigation requires a judicial assistance treaty or the principle of reciprocity;

效率,仲裁灵活高效,可用于复杂的商业纠纷,诉讼繁琐,适用于一般民事纠纷。
Efficiency, arbitration is flexible and efficient, can be used for complex commercial disputes, litigation is cumbersome, and is suitable for general civil disputes.

这就是我关于两者区别的所有看法和总结。
That's all I have to say and summarize about the difference between the two.

关于正式合同的必要要素,我认为主要有8点:当事人信息(即姓名、住所、联系方式等)、标的(即合同为何而立)、价款(即实现标的交易要支付的介款,包括付款方式、条件、定金等)、履行因素(即期限、地点、方式)、违约责任(即违约金、定金、赔偿金、免责等)、解决争议的方式(仲裁或诉讼)、合同生效条款:生效或失效条件及无效免责、附件(记载本合同的附件种类、数量、效力)。
Regarding the necessary elements of a formal contract, I believe that there are eight main points: information of the parties (i.e., name, address, contact information, etc.), subject matter (i.e., why the contract is established), price (i.e., the intermediary payment to be paid to realize the subject transaction, including payment method, conditions, deposit, etc.), performance factors (i.e., period, place, method), liability for breach of contract (i.e., liquidated damages, deposits, compensation, exemptions, etc.), ways to resolve disputes (arbitration or litigation), contract entry into force: effective or invalid conditions and invalidity exemptions, Attachment (indicating the type, quantity, and effect of the annexes to this contract).

在案情部分和程序部分之间,我认为案情部分更重要。立案、裁决、结案等程序是仲裁的流程,而案情是仲裁的基本要素,仲裁基于案情受理。
Between the merits part and the procedural part, I think the merits part is more important. Procedures such as case filing, adjudication, and closure are the process of arbitration, and the facts of the case are the basic elements of arbitration, and arbitration is accepted on the basis of the merits of the case.

印象较深的案例:《上海仲裁委员会关于某建材公司与被申请人某建筑公司就货物买卖合同纠纷仲裁案 》,大致如下,19年11月双方签订《物资采购合同》约算800万,但被申请人以“付款条件尚未成立”未予支付197万,故此申请人提起仲裁,经委员会最终协商决定仲裁费减免50%与退至申请人剩余50%由被申请人结余,被申请人全款付清,申请后3个工作日结束保金。这切实减轻了市场主体纠纷解决负担,也体现了仲裁为民服务大局的公益属性。
A case with a deep impression: "Shanghai Arbitration Commission on the Arbitration Case of a Building Materials Company and the Respondent a Construction Company on a Contract for the Sale of Goods", roughly as follows, in November 19, the two parties signed the "Material Procurement Contract" for about 8 million, but the respondent did not pay 1.97 million yuan on the grounds that "the payment terms have not yet been established", so the claimant initiated arbitration, and the committee finally decided to reduce the arbitration fee by 50% and refund the remaining 50% to the claimant by the respondent, and the respondent paid in full. The deposit will end within 3 working days after application. This effectively reduces the burden of dispute resolution on market entities, and also reflects the public welfare attribute of arbitration to serve the overall situation of the people.

针对AI取代法官的问题,我的意见是不会,公平正义难以进行定量分析,个案公正也无法通过分析以往案例和算法就能必然实现,其中秩序、公正、自由是只有人能领会和共情的价值,法学产生于人、服务于人,是典型的人学,有不可磨灭的主观性这都是AI无法办成的。
In response to the problem of AI replacing judges, my opinion is no, fairness and justice are difficult to quantitatively analyze, and individual justice cannot be necessarily achieved through the analysis of past cases and algorithms, among which order, justice, and freedom are values that only people can understand and empathize, and law is born from people and serves people, which is a typical anthropology, and has indelible subjectivity, which cannot be done by AI.

选择法学的原因,法学是关于法律规则和制度的研究,对于在社会正义、个人权利和法律体系及其影响上有兴趣的人,法学莫过于最佳选择,其次,它具有学术与职业的广泛性可以同时培养逻辑思维能力和批判性思维能力,当然,还有最重要的一个原因:“让手无权利之人有声可发,有法可依”。
The reason for choosing jurisprudence, jurisprudence is the study of legal rules and institutions, for those who are interested in social justice, individual rights and legal systems and their impacts, jurisprudence is the best choice, secondly, it has a wide range of academic and professional skills that can cultivate logical thinking and critical thinking skills at the same time, and of course, the most important reason: "let those who have no rights have a voice and a law to follow".

学习法律的目的,维护社会秩序,保障社会群众的人身安全与利益,充分尊重和保障人权,促进社会的公平与正义,并推动社会的和谐稳定发展。
The purpose of studying law is to maintain social order, protect the personal safety and interests of the public, fully respect and protect human rights, promote social fairness and justice, and promote the harmonious and stable development of society.

“正义永远不会缺席,只会迟到”这句话更多体现的是人们对正义的渴望,但是所谓的“正义”迟到不再是相对于受害者的正义,因为在当时的时间点上,没有人可以确认这是已故的正义还是没有争议,受害人的伤害已经产生,无法逆转。
The phrase "justice will never be absent, will only be late" reflects more people's desire for justice, but the so-called "justice" late is no longer justice relative to the victim, because at that point in time, no one can confirm whether this is the justice of the deceased or not disputed, and the victim's harm has been produced and cannot be reversed.

我最喜欢《民法典》,我认为其创新之处主要在于四个方面,其一体系结构的创新,它是将各个独立法中的民事法律进行整合和统一形成的法典;其二内容的创新,将人格权独立成编、引入居住权、明确禁止性骚扰等,突出对人权的保护;其三原则上的创新,明确突出平等、自愿、公平、诚信等,其四诉讼时效的创新,它将诉讼时间改为3年。
I like the Civil Code the most, I think its innovation mainly lies in four aspects, one is the innovation of architecture, it is the integration and unification of civil laws in various independent laws to form a code; Second, the innovation of content highlights the protection of human rights, such as the independent compilation of personality rights, the introduction of the right of residence, and the explicit prohibition of sexual harassment; The third innovation in principle clearly highlights equality, voluntariness, fairness, good faith, etc., and the fourth innovation of the statute of limitations, which changes the time of litigation to 3 years.

以上就是我关于面试材料中提及问题的所有见解,谢谢聆听。
That's all I have to say about the questions mentioned in the interview materials, thank you for listening.