Case study creation: Questions and refined questions
案例研究创建：问题和精炼问题 | The questions are unclear, vague, or irrelevant to the case study
问题不清楚、模糊或与案例研究无关 0 points
0分 | The questions are somewhat relevant but still vague or poorly defined. Minimal refinement is shown
这些问题有些相关，但仍然模糊或定义不清。显示了最小的细化 1 points
1分 | The questions are relevant but lack specificity and depth, Some improvement in clarity and focus in refined questions
问题相关，但缺乏针对性和深度，在细化问题的清晰度和重点方面有所改进 2 points
2分 | The questions are mostly clear, relevant. There is noticeable improvement in refinement, showing thoughtfulness and creativity
这些问题大多是明确的，相关的。在精致方面有明显的进步，表现出深思熟虑和创造性 3 points
3分 | The questions are highly clear, specific, Significant improvement is evident in refinement. The refined questions are original and thoughtful
问题高度清晰、具体，在细化方面有明显改进。精炼的问题，有独创性，有思想性 4 points
4分 |
|
| Refined case study 精炼案例研究 | The case study is completely missing, irrelevant, or lacks any coherent structure.
案例研究完全缺失，不相关，或缺乏任何连贯的结构。 0 points
0分 | The case study provides minimal context but is highly underdeveloped.
案例研究提供了最低限度的背景，但高度欠发达。 1 points
1分 | The case study provides a very basic scenario with minimal explanation of the context or organization.
案例研究提供了一个非常基本的场景，对背景或组织的解释很少。 2 points
2分 | The case study outlines a basic scenario with some relevant organizational details (e.g., number of locations, users, or network needs), but the explanation lacks depth.
案例研究概述了一个基本场景，其中包含一些相关的组织细节（例如，位置、用户或网络需求的数量），但解释缺乏深度。 3 points
3分 | The case study presents a clear scenario with some level of detail about the organization’s structure and needs (e.g., locations, users, and network requirements). The scenario is mostly relevant, but it may lack specificity or originality.
该案例研究提供了一个清晰的场景，详细说明了组织的结构和需求（例如，位置、用户和网络要求）。场景大多是相关的，但它可能缺乏特异性或独创性。 4 points
4分 | The case study is well-developed with a clearly defined scenario that includes all relevant organizational details (e.g., locations, purpose, users).
该案例研究是完善的，具有明确定义的场景，包括所有相关的组织细节（例如，位置、目的、用户）。 5 points
5分 | The case study is highly detailed, realistic, and thoroughly refined. It clearly defines the organization’s structure, multiple locations, and specific network-related needs.
该案例研究非常详细，现实，并彻底完善。它清楚地定义了组织的结构、多个位置和特定的网络相关需求。 6 points
6分 |
|
Logical Design: Network Architecture Components
逻辑设计：网络架构组件 | No mention or integration of network architecture components.
未提及或集成网络架构组件。 0 points
0分 | Minimal reference to network architecture components.
对网络架构组件的引用最少。 1 points
1分 | Some basic components are included (3-4), but the design lacks clarity in how these components interact. The explanation of their roles is weak or incomplete
一些基本组件包括在内（3-4），但设计缺乏这些组件如何相互作用的清晰度。对他们的作用的解释是薄弱的或不完整的 2 points
2分 | Most network architecture components (5-6) are addressed with some clarity, but the integration of these components into the overall network design lacks depth. Further detail or justification is needed.
大多数网络体系结构组件（5-6）都有一定的清晰度，但将这些组件集成到整体网络设计中缺乏深度。需要进一步的细节或理由。 3 points
3分 | All network architecture components are included and integrated into the design. Minor improvements in explanation or structure may be needed.
所有网络架构组件都包含并集成到设计中。可能需要在解释或结构上稍作改进。 4 points
4分 | All seven network architecture components are thoroughly integrated into the design, with clear, detailed explanations of their roles and interactions. considers scalability, performance, and growth
所有七个网络架构组件都完全集成到设计中，并对其角色和交互进行了清晰详细的解释。考虑可扩展性、性能和增长 5 points
5分 |
|
Logical Design: Application Systems and Network Users
逻辑设计：应用系统和网络用户 | No consideration of application systems or network users in the design.
在设计中不考虑应用系统或网络用户。 0 points
0分 | Minimal mention of application systems or network users, but their integration into the design is unclear or incomplete
很少提及应用程序系统或网络用户，但它们与设计的集成不清楚或不完整 1 points
1分 | Basic understanding of application systems and network users is demonstrated. Some systems and user needs are identified
对应用系统和网络用户有基本的了解。确定了一些系统和用户需求 2 points
2分 | Good understanding of the relationship between application systems and network users. Most systems and user types are included in the design
对应用系统和网络用户之间的关系有很好的理解。大多数系统和用户类型都包含在设计中 3 points
3分 | Excellent integration of application systems and network users into the design. All key systems and user types are clearly defined
出色地将应用系统和网络用户集成到设计中。所有关键系统和用户类型都有明确的定义 4 points
4分 |
|
Logical Design: Categorizing Network needs
逻辑设计：网络需求分类 | No clear categorization of network needs.
没有明确的网络需求分类。 0 points
0分 | Limited categorization of network needs.
网络需求分类有限。 1 points
1分 | Adequate categorization of network needs, with some clear prioritization of key factors like performance, security, and scalability. However, the categorization may lack depth or thoroughness.
对网络需求进行适当的分类，并对性能、安全性和可扩展性等关键因素进行明确的优先级排序。然而，分类可能缺乏深度或彻底性。 2 points
2分 | Well-organized categorization of network needs, with a clear understanding of business priorities. Performance, security, scalability, and other critical factors are thoughtfully addressed
对网络需求进行组织良好的分类，清楚地了解业务优先级。性能、安全性、可扩展性和其他关键因素都得到了周到的解决 3 points
3分 |
|
Logical Design: Deliverables
逻辑设计：可扩展 | No deliverables are presented, or the deliverables are incomplete and unclear.
未提交可交付成果，或可交付成果不完整或不明确。 0 points
0分 | Basic deliverables are provided, such as network diagrams, but they are poorly organized or lack sufficient detail. Some design decisions may be left unjustified.
提供了基本的可交付成果，如网络图，但它们组织得很差或缺乏足够的细节。一些设计决策可能是不合理的。 1 points
1分 | Adequate deliverables are provided, including clear network diagrams and explanations of design decisions. Some areas may need more detail or refinement.
提供了充分的可交付成果，包括清晰的网络图和设计决策的解释。有些领域可能需要更多的细节或改进。 2 points
2分 | Excellent deliverables are presented. The network diagrams are clear, well-organized, and detailed, with thorough explanations and justifications for all design decisions.
提供了出色的交付成果。网络图清晰，组织良好，详细，并对所有设计决策进行了全面的解释和论证。 3 points
3分 |
|
Physical Design: Designing clients and servers
物理设计：设计客户端和服务器 | No mention or consideration of clients or servers
不提及或考虑客户端或服务器 0 points
0分 | Minimal reference to clients and servers.
对客户端和服务器的引用最少。 1 points
1分 | Some clients and servers are identified, but the design lacks clarity or detail.
一些客户端和服务器被识别，但设计缺乏清晰度或细节。 2 points
2分 | The design includes most necessary clients and servers. But the level of detail is lacking.
该设计包括大多数必要的客户端和服务器。但细节的层次是缺乏的。 3 points
3分 | A clear and detailed design of clients and servers. Minor improvements may needed
清晰详细的客户端和服务器设计。可能需要小的改进 4 points
4分 | Excellent design of clients and servers. All necessary components are included. The design anticipates future growth and performance needs.
优秀的客户端和服务器设计。包括所有必要的组件。该设计预期了未来的增长和性能需求。 5 points
5分 |
|
Physical design: Designing circuits (include configuration information)
物理设计：设计电路（包括配置信息） | No mention of circuits, or network connections
没有提到电路或网络连接 0 points
0分 | Minimal mention of circuits or network connections.
很少提及电路或网络连接。 1 points
1分 | Basic circuit design is present. A few details on routers, switches, bandwidth, or cable types are mentioned. Layout lacks clarity
给出了基本的电路设计。还提到了路由器、交换机、带宽或电缆类型的一些细节。布局不够清晰 2 points
2分 | Good circuit design with appropriate routers and switches. Most necessary connections between clients, servers, and network components are included,. More details are required
良好的电路设计与适当的路由器和交换机。包括客户端、服务器和网络组件之间最必要的连接。需要更多细节 3 points
3分 | Very good circuit design. All necessary circuits, routers, and switches are well-planned and configured, with clear bandwidth allocation and cable types. Advanced considerations are minimal
非常好的电路设计。所有必要的电路、路由器和交换机都经过精心规划和配置，具有明确的带宽分配和电缆类型。高级注意事项最少 4 points
4分 | Excellent circuit design. All circuits, routers, and switches are thoroughly integrated and configured, with detailed specifications for bandwidth, cable types, and layout. and considers scalability
出色的电路设计。所有电路、路由器和交换机都经过全面集成和配置，并具有详细的带宽、电缆类型和布局规格。并考虑到可扩展性 5 points
5分 |
|
Physical Design: Deliverables
物理设计：可折叠 | No deliverables provided 未提供可交付成果 0 points
0分 | Basic deliverables are presented, but they lack organization or detail. Some components (e.g., diagrams, hardware lists) may be missing,
提出了基本的可交付成果，但缺乏组织或细节。一些组件（例如，图表、硬件列表）可能缺失， 1 points
1分 | Adequate deliverables provided. Many areas need more details or refinement
提供了充分的可交付成果。许多领域需要更多的细节或细化 2 points
2分 | Good deliverables. Some items are missing
很好的可交付成果。有些东西不见了 3 points
3分 | Very good deliverables. The physical design is clearly and thoroughly documented, with organized diagrams, comprehensive hardware lists, and clear explanations.
非常好的交付。物理设计有清晰、完整的文档记录，包括有组织的图表、全面的硬件列表和清晰的解释。 4 points
4分 | The physical design is thoroughly documented, with highly detailed and well-organized diagrams, hardware lists, and clear explanations of all design decisions.
物理设计是完全文档化的，具有非常详细和组织良好的图表，硬件列表以及对所有设计决策的清晰解释。 5 points
5分 |
|
Minimising the interference from Wi-Fi access points
最大限度地减少Wi-Fi接入点的干扰 | No relevant content 无相关内容 0 points
0分 | Vague or incorrect suggestions and minimal understanding
模糊或不正确的建议和最低限度的理解 1 points
1分 | Basic explanation, unclear understanding
基本解释，理解不清 2 points
2分 | Shows acceptable understanding, provides diagrams, demonstrates understanding
显示可接受的理解，提供图表，演示理解 3 points
3分 | Explains major causes, remedies with necessary diagrams and demonstrates good understanding
解释主要原因，用必要的图表进行补救，并表现出良好的理解力 4 points
4分 | Provides a clear explanation with necessary diagrams, and demonstrates clear understanding
用必要的图表提供清晰的解释，并展示清晰的理解 5 points
5分 |
|
Assumptions and justification
假设和理由 | No relevant assumptions provided.
未提供相关假设。 0 points
0分 | Assumptions are unrealistic or irrelevant, with minimal coverage and little to no justification.
假设是不现实的或不相关的，覆盖面很小，几乎没有理由。 1 points
1分 | Assumptions are unclear or incomplete, with little justification. Covers only one aspect (logical or physical) or lacks depth in both.
假设不明确或不完整，理由不充分。只涵盖一个方面（逻辑或物理）或缺乏深度。 2 points
2分 | Assumptions are reasonable but lack depth or detail. Justifications are present but may be weak or incomplete.
假设是合理的，但缺乏深度或细节。存在理由，但可能不充分或不完整。 3 points
3分 | Assumptions are mostly realistic and relevant, with clear justifications. Covers both aspects, though some minor details may be missing
这些假设大多切合实际，具有相关性，理由明确。涵盖了这两个方面，尽管可能缺少一些小细节 4 points
4分 | Assumptions are well-reasoned, relevant, and justified. Covers both logical and physical design comprehensively.
假设是合理的、相关的和合理的。全面涵盖逻辑和物理设计。 5 points
5分 |
|
Simulation using Packet Tracer: Network design configuration
使用Packet Tracer进行仿真：网络设计配置 | No valid network design or configuration provided
未提供有效的网络设计或配置 0 points
0分 | Barely any functioning configuration
几乎没有任何功能配置 1 points
1分 | Incomplete or incorrect network
网络不完整或不正确 2 points
2分 | Significant configuration errors
重大配置错误 3 points
3分 | Mostly correct design but with some noticeable errors (e.g., IP addressing)
大多数设计正确，但有一些明显的错误（例如，IP地址） 4 points
4分 | Well-configured network with minor issues
配置良好的网络，但存在一些小问题 5 points
5分 | Fully correct network with all devices (router, switches, access points) accurately configured
完全正确的网络，所有设备（路由器、交换机、接入点）均已准确配置 6 points
6分 |
|
Simulation using Packet Tracer: Testing and Functionality
使用Packet Tracer进行模拟：测试和功能 | No testing done 未进行测试 0 points
0分 | All tests failed 所有测试均失败 1 points
1分 | Limited testing, with significant connectivity problems not addressed
测试有限，未解决重大连接问题 2 points
2分 | Basic testing done, but connectivity issues remain unsolved (e.g., wired clients can connect, but wireless clients cannot
基本测试完成，但连接问题仍未解决（例如，有线客户端可以连接，但无线客户端不能 3 points
3分 | Testing mostly successful, but minor issues in communication or routing
测试大部分成功，但通信或路由方面存在小问题 4 points
4分 | Thorough testing performed including wired and wireless. Ping or other tests connectivity. Routing correctly implemented
进行了全面测试，包括有线和无线测试。Ping或其他测试连通性。正确执行工艺路线 5 points
5分 |
|
Simulation using Packet Tracer: How close the simulation to reality (to the physical design)
使用Packet Tracer进行仿真：仿真与现实（与物理设计）的接近程度 | totally unrealistic 完全不现实 0 points
0分 | Very basic or incomplete simulation
非常基本或不完整的模拟 1 points
1分 | Simplified simulation with many unrealistic or missing elements
简化的模拟，包含许多不切实际或缺失的元素 2 points
2分 | Simulation captures basic elements but lacks complexity
模拟捕捉基本元素，但缺乏复杂性 3 points
3分 | Realistic network setup, but with some simplifications or missing features
现实的网络设置，但有一些简化或缺少功能 4 points
4分 | Simulation realistically models an enterprise campus LAN with appropriate use of wired and wireless networks, routers, switches, and access points.
仿真通过适当使用有线和无线网络、路由器、交换机和接入点，逼真地模拟企业园区LAN。 5 points
5分 |
|
Simulation using Packet Tracer: Documentation
使用Packet Tracer进行模拟：文档 | No documentation provided.
未提供文件。 0 points
0分 | Minimal or poor documentation, unclear or insufficient explanation of design and testing.
文档很少或不完整，设计和测试的解释不清楚或不充分。 1 points
1分 | Basic documentation, with significant missing information or unclear explanations
基本文档，存在重大信息缺失或解释不清 2 points
2分 | Good documentation but lacks some details or clarity (e.g., missing screenshots or incomplete explanation of testing).
良好的文档，但缺乏一些细节或清晰度（例如，缺少屏幕截图或测试解释不完整）。 3 points
3分 | Clear and detailed documentation of the network design, configuration steps, and testing process. Screenshots and diagrams provided where needed
清晰详细的网络设计、配置步骤和测试流程文档。必要时提供屏幕截图和图表 4 points
4分 |
|
Video Presentation: Content Understanding
视频演示：内容理解 | No presentation or irrelevant presentation
没有介绍或不相关的介绍 0 points
0分 | Very little understanding of the topic demonstrated.
对主题的理解很少。 1 points
1分 | Limited understanding with several missing or misunderstood concepts.
理解有限，有几个缺失或误解的概念。 2 points
2分 | Satisfactory understanding but some key concepts are missing or not well-explained.
令人满意的理解，但一些关键概念缺失或解释不清。 3 points
3分 | Good understanding with minor omissions or unclear points.
理解良好，有轻微遗漏或不清楚的地方。 4 points
4分 | Demonstrates an excellent understanding of both logical and physical design concepts. Explains key components clearly and concisely.
对逻辑和物理设计概念有很好的理解。清晰简洁地解释关键组件。 5 points
5分 |
|
Video Presentation: Structure and Organization
视频演示：结构和组织 | Totally haphazard 完全是偶然的 0 points
0分 | Lacks clear structure and is difficult to follow.
缺乏清晰的结构，难以理解。 1 points
1分 | Reasonably well-structured but some points may be slightly disorganized or unclear.
结构合理，但有些要点可能有点混乱或不清楚。 2 points
2分 | Presentation is well-structured with a clear introduction, logical flow of ideas, and conclusion. Transitions between points are smooth.
演示文稿结构良好，具有清晰的介绍，逻辑的思想流程和结论。点之间的过渡是平滑的。 3 points
3分 |
|
Video Presentation: Creativity and Engagement
视频演示：创造力和参与 | Not engaging at all 一点都不投入 0 points
0分 | Some engagement, but limited creativity or interest in delivery.
有些参与，但有限的创造力或交付的兴趣。 1 points
1分 | Presentation is engaging and shows creativity in how the information is delivered (e.g., interesting examples, analogies).
演示文稿具有吸引力，并在如何传递信息方面表现出创造性（例如，有趣的例子，类比）。 2 points
2分 |
|
Video Presentation: Visual Design & Aids
视频演示：视觉设计与辅助工具 | No visuals or irrelevant visuals used
未使用视觉效果或不相关视觉效果 0 points
0分 | Minimal or ineffective use of visuals that do not enhance the understanding.
很少或无效地使用不能增强理解的视觉材料。 1 points
1分 | Good use of visual aids, though some could be improved or more relevant.
良好地使用视觉辅助工具，尽管有些可以改进或更相关。 2 points
2分 | Excellent use of visual aids (e.g., diagrams, charts) that effectively support the explanation. Graphics are clear and relevant.
出色地使用视觉辅助工具（例如，图表，图表），有效地支持解释。图形清晰且相关。 3 points
3分 |
|
Video Presentation Skills
视频演示技巧 | Speaker is not confident 发言人不自信 0 points
0分 | Speaker is somewhat unclear or difficult to understand at times; pacing is inconsistent.
说话者有时有点不清楚或难以理解;节奏不一致。 1 points
1分 | Speaker is confident, speaks clearly, and maintains good pacing. Engages the audience.
演讲者自信，说话清晰，并保持良好的节奏。吸引观众。 2 points
2分 |
|
