Correlation analysis of each variable
Table 1 presents the Pearson correlation coefficients and means of the research variables. The results show that parental rejection is significantly negatively correlated with the sense of meaning in life (r=-0.147, p<0.01), psychological resilience (r=-0.209, p<0.01), and perceived social support (r=-0.331, p<0.01); parental emotional warmth is significantly positively correlated with the sense of meaning in life (r=0.417, p<0.01), psychological resilience (r=0.435, p<0.01), and perceived social support (r=0.603, p<0.01); parental overprotection is not significantly correlated with the sense of meaning in life (r=0.007, p>0.05). According to Baron and Kenny's recommendations, the existence of a mediating effect requires a significant correlation between the independent variable and the dependent variable,therefore only the mediating effects of parental rejection and parental emotional warmth dimensions are further analyzed here.[46]
Table 1 Correlation Analysis of Variables
Variable
| Mean ± Standard Deviation
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
1Parents refuse
| 17.9052 | 1 | | | | | | | |
2Parental affection is warm
| 33.9038 | -0.363** | 1 | | | | | | |
3Overprotective Parents
| 31.9976 | 0.561** | -0.042 | 1 | | | | | |
4Sense of Meaning in Life
| 41.64 | -0.147** | 0.417** | 0.007 | 1 | | | | |
5Perceiving the Meaning of Life
| 22.94 | -0.209** | 0.465** | -0.072** | 0.917** | 1 | | | |
6Seeking the meaning of life
| 18.7 | -0.035 | 0.260** | 0.103** | 0.869** | 0.601** | 1 | | |
7Psychological Resilience
| 51.09 | -0.209** | 0.435** | -0.060** | 0.339** | 0.385** | 0.204** | 1 | |
8Insightful social support
| 56.9 | -0.331** | 0.603** | -0.111** | 0.543** | 0.582** | 0.369** | 0.393** | 1 |
Note:** Significant correlation at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). * Significant correlation at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
3.3 Mediation Effect Analysis
Table 2 shows the results of the mediation effect analysis, and Figure 2 represents Model 1. Model 1 indicates that parental emotional warmth can significantly positively predict the meaning of life (β=0.113, p<0.01), significantly positively predict psychological resilience (β=0.429, p<0.01), and significantly positively predict perceived social support (β=0.537, p<0.01); psychological resilience significantly positively predicts perceived social support (β=0.162, p<0.01) and significantly positively predicts the sense of meaning in life (β=0.124, p<0.01); perceived social support significantly positively predicts the sense of meaning in life (β=0.428, p<0.01). The indirect effects of psychological resilience and perceived social support between parental emotional warmth and the sense of meaning in life among middle school students are significant, with an effect value of 0.358 (95% CI [0.314, 0.404]). These results suggest that psychological resilience and perceived social support play a partial mediating role between parental emotional warmth and the sense of meaning in life.
Table 2 Testing the mediation effect (Model 1 emotional warmth from parents)
| | Effect size
| SE | LLCI | ULCI | Effect proportion
|
Total effect
| | 0.488 | 0.023 | 0.443 | 0.532 | |
Direct effect
| | 0.130 | 0.027 | 0.077 | 0.182 | 26.62% |
Indirect effects
| Total Mediating Effect
| 0.358 | 0.023 | 0.314 | 0.404 | 73.38% |
| Path 1
| 0.061 | 0.012 | 0.038 | 0.085 | 12.51% |
| Path 2
| 0.263 | 0.022 | 0.219 | 0.306 | 53.90% |
| Path 3
| 0.034 | 0.005 | 0.024 | 0.045 | 6.97% |
Path 1: FatherMotherEmotional Warmth -> Psychological Resilience -> Sense of Life Meaning
Path 2: FatherMotherEmotional Warmth -> Insightful Social Support -> Sense of Life Meaning
Path 3: FatherMotherEmotional Warmth -> Psychological Resilience -> Insightful Social Support -> Sense of Life Meaning
Figure 2: The chain mediation effect of psychological resilience and perceived social support between parental emotional warmth and sense of life meaning
Table 3 shows the results of the mediation effect analysis, and Figure 3 represents Model 3. Model 2 indicates that parental rejection significantly positively predicts meaning in life (β=0.052, p<0.01), significantly negatively predicts psychological resilience (β=-0.201, p<0.01), and significantly negatively predicts perceived social support (β=-0.26, p<0.01); psychological resilience significantly positively predicts perceived social support (β=0.339, p<0.01) and significantly positively predicts meaning in life (β=0.155, p<0.01); perceived social support significantly positively predicts meaning in life (β=0.501, p<0.01). The indirect effects of psychological resilience and perceived social support between parental rejection and high school students' meaning in life are significant, with an effect value of-0.399(95% CI[-0.455, -0.343]). Since the direct effect is positive and the indirect effect is negative, the signs of the effect values are opposite, indicating that the direct and indirect effects predict opposite directions, which suggests that psychological resilience and perceived social support play a masking role between parental rejection and meaning in life.[47].
Table 3 Testing the mediation effect (Model 2< span data-dl-uid="299">pparents refuse)
| | Effect size
| SE | LLCI | ULCI | Effect proportion
|
Total effect
| | -0.293 | 0.044 | -0.379 | -0.207 | |
Direct effect
| | 0.106 | 0.039 | 0.029 | 0.182 | -36.18% |
Indirect effects
| Total Mediating Effect
| -0.399 | 0.029 | -0.455 | -0.343 | 136.18% |
| Path 1
| -0.063 | 0.011 | -0.088 | -0.042 | 21.50% |
| Path 2
| -0.266 | 0.024 | -0.314 | -0.219 | 90.78% |
| Path 3
| -0.07 | 0.009 | -0.088 | -0.052 | 23.89% |
Path 1: Parental rejection → Psychological resilience → Sense of meaning in life
Path 2: Parental rejection → Insightful social support → Sense of meaning in life
Path 3: Parental rejection → Psychological resilience → Perceived social support → Sense of meaning in life
Figure3The masking effect of psychological resilience and perceived social support between parental rejection and the sense of meaning in life
Discussion
This study aims toexplorethe predictive role of parenting styles on the sense of meaning in life among middle school students and further analyze the mechanisms of psychological resilience and perceived social support in the relationship between parenting styles and the sense of meaning in life. The results indicate, that psychological resilience and perceived social support are significantly positively correlated with the sense of meaning in life among middle school students, and they play a role in the influence between parenting styles and the sense of meaning in life. In this model, parental emotional warmth and parental rejection can positively predict the sense of meaning in life among middle school students.
The parenting styles of parents predict the sense of meaning in life for middle school students
The data shows that the warm parenting style of parents is significantly correlated with and positively predicts the sense of meaning in life for middle school students, indicating that the warm support provided by parents during the upbringing process can have a long-term positive effect on the sense of meaning in life for middle school students, which is similar to previous results[48-51]. This validates the hypothesis 1 of this study, “parenting styles can significantly predict the sense of meaning in life”.
Similar to other studies, parental rejection is significantly negatively correlated with the sense of meaning in life, while also indicating that enhancing middle school students' psychological resilience and perceived social support can mitigate the negative effects brought about by poor parenting styles.[52]However, after incorporating psychological resilience and perceived social support, parental rejection positively predicts the sense of meaning in life for middle school students.Since both psychological resilience and perceived social support are significantly positively correlated with the sense of meaning in life, they may obscure the negative impact of parental rejection on middle school students' sense of meaning in life.[23,37][53-54]
However, some studies suggest that the impact of negative parenting styles on adolescents' sense of meaning in life does not follow a fixed pattern.Parental control predicts adolescents' sense of meaning in life in different ways, showing negative predictions in early and mid-adolescence, but positive predictions in late adolescence.[55].Adolescents' perceptions of parenting mainly depend on theirparents' parenting style coping and views.[55].Additionally, sociocultural factors may also influence adolescents' understanding of parenting. In Chinese culture, some adolescents believe that parental rejection or control is a sign of responsibility and care; when parental control is lacking, they may feel emotionally neglected.[56-57].
The mediating role of psychological resilience
This study verified Hypothesis 2 “parenting styles can indirectly affect the sense of meaning in life through psychological resilience” that parenting styles have a direct impact on psychological resilience, and can indirectly influence the sense of meaning in life of middle school students through psychological resilience. Mediating analysis results indicate that parental rejection reduces the psychological resilience of middle school students, while parental emotional warmth can enhance their psychological resilience. Good psychological resilience can improve an individual's sense of meaning in life. These results are similar to the research by Rosenberg AR and Hongfei Du et al., which found that psychological resilience effectively enhances the sense of meaning in life for children from dysfunctional families.[58-59].Family warmth[60] and good parent-child relationships are beneficial for children to develop positive and stable emotions and attitudes, thereby forming high levels of psychological resilience and a good sense of meaning in life. Individuals with high levels of psychological resilience are more likely to seek external help when encountering sudden events, thus maintaining their balance and facing life with a positive mindset..[55][61]
The mediating role of perceptual social support
This study supports Hypothesis 3 “parenting styles can indirectly influence the sense of meaning in life through perceived social support”. The perceived social support of middle school students is positively correlated with parental affection and negatively correlated with parental rejection, but significantly positively correlated with the sense of meaning in life. This result is similar to the research of Bao Xinzhe, Chen Jing, and others.[25,62].
Brownell and Shumaker believe that the purpose of social support is to increaseindividualwell-being[63]and that perceived social support isa belief that one may receive social support,which also includes the perception process of surrounding social support[64], expected evaluationand emotional experience. High perceived social support among high school students allows them to better feel the positive impact of support from family, classmates, teachers, or friends, leading to a higher self-perceived value and meaning of life[65][66][25].This pathway explains the indirect effect of parenting styles on the sense of meaning in life through perceived social support. Mediation analysis results also show that the effect size of this pathway (over 50%) is greater than that of direct effects and other indirect effect pathways, indicating its key role between parenting styles and the sense of meaning in life.
Psychological resilience and perceived social support have a chain mediation effect
Hypothesis 4 “Psychological resilience and perceived social support play a chain mediating role between parenting styles and sense of life meaning” is partially accepted. The results of this study indicate that psychological resilience and perceived social support have a partial mediating effect between parental emotional warmth and sense of life meaning, while they have a masking effect between parental rejection and sense of life meaning[47,67]. In other words, parental rejection still has a negative impact on middle school students' sense of life meaning, but this is altered under the influence of psychological resilience and perceived social support.
Psychological resilience and perceived social support are both significantly positively correlated with the sense of meaning in life among middle school students. For negative stimuli, highly resilient individuals are more likely to detach from negative information[68], can evaluate situations more positively, and require fewer psychological resources to cope with crisis events. Psychological resilience serves as a personality trait and a sense of self-worth.[69].Functionally, in the brain, the anterior cingulate cortex and limbic areas, including the amygdala and ventral striatum, are closely related to individual psychological resilience[70][71], which can influence their perception of social support. Children with strong psychological resilience are characterized by high confidence and optimism, which easily elicits supportive responses from others[72], and establish positive relationships with others beyond their parents, such as teachers, classmates, and friends.[73].This relationship is especially important for middle school students in their adolescence, during which they gradually detach from their parents, to some extentreducing the negative influences from their families; while frequent interactions with teachers and peers at school enhance their ability to solve various problems, further supporting the development of students' confidence and good psychological adaptability[72][74]
This study brings certain insights, suggesting that different parenting styles may have multimodal effects on middle school students' sense of meaning in life. The interaction between parenting styles and individual developmental stages, environmental factors, and personal traits produces different effects. Therefore, future research could consider longitudinal studies on other individual factors, family, or cultural variables that influence an individual's sense of meaning in life, in order to explore the mechanisms of its formation over a longer time frame. This study also indicatesthe positive role of psychological resilience and perceived social support in the formation of an individual's sense of meaning in life. Improving individual psychological resilience and perceived social support can, to some extent, mitigate the negative impacts caused by adverse environmental factors, including unfavorable family conditions.
Conclusion
The parenting style significantly affects an individual's sense of meaning in life.
Different parenting styles affect the mechanisms of individuals' sense of meaning in life in various ways.
Parental emotional warmth positively predicts individual life meaning, with psychological resilience and perceptual support playingchainmediating roles.
Psychological resilience and perceived social support, as positive factors, can mitigate the negative impact of parental rejection on an individual's sense of life meaning.
References
Sterger M F, Frazier P, Oishi S, et al. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2006, 53(1): 80-93.
Littman-Ovadia H, Steger M. Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model[J]. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2010, 5(6): 419-430.
Xiang, S. Y., Wei, E. W., Zheng, S. D., Yang, H., and Li, B. Q.. Social boredom, meaning of life and suicidal ideation among college students. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology. 2016(4):522-6.
Deng, Gongming. Causes, diversion and prevention of self-injurious behavior in high school students. Teaching and Management. 2021.
ZHANG Zhixue. Development and current status of family systems theory[J]. Psychology, 1990(01):31-34+20.
Shorey S, Ng E D, Wong C H J. Global prevalence of depression and elevated depressive symptoms among adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2022, 61(2): 287-305.
Yu Guoliang. The Detection Rate of Mental Health Issues Among Chinese Students and Its Educational Implications [J]. Tsinghua University Educational Research, 2022, 43(04): 20-32.
Liu Lijuan. The Influence of Parenting Styles on College Students' Sense of Meaning in Life - A Mediating Effect Study Based on Emotion Regulation Strategies. Journal of Yuzhang Normal College. 2021.
Wang Li, Fu Jinzhi. Research on Parenting Styles and Child Development in China [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2005, (03): 298-304.
Li Yan, He Wei, Zhang Xian, et al. The correlation between college students' sense of meaning in life and parental upbringing styles, coping strategies, and happiness index. Journal of Health Psychology in China, 2014, 22(11): 1683-1685.
Li Xiuya, Liu Lihua, Fang Yanhong. Effects of parenting styles on college students' sense of meaning in life: the mediating role of filial piety beliefs. Psychological Research. 2021;14(2):162-8.
Chapman A L, Gratz K L, Brown M Z. Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: The experiential avoidance model[J]. Behaviour research and therapy, 2006, 44(3): 371-394.
Liu Huiying, Wang Wan. The Role of Self-Esteem, Experiential Avoidance, and Depression in the Formation of Suicidal Ideation [J]. Psychological Science, 2017, 40(06): 1498-1503.
Kathleen T, Janyce D. Resilience: A historical review of the construct [J]. Holist Nurs Pract, 2004, 8(1): 3-10.
Dursun P, Alyagut P, Yılmaz I. Meaning in life, psychological hardiness and death anxiety: individuals with or without generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Curr Psychol. 2022;41(6):3299-3317.
Ding X, Zheng L, Liu Y, Zhang W, Wang N, Duan H, Wu J. Parenting styles and psychological resilience: The mediating role of error monitoring. Biol Psychol. 2023 May;180:108587.
Qiu Z, Guo Y, Wang J, Zhang H. Associations of Parenting Style and Resilience With Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Chinese Middle School Students. Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 1;13:897339.
Tsibidaki A. Anxiety, meaning in life, self-efficacy, and resilience in families with one or more members with special educational needs and disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece. Res Dev Disabil. 2021 Feb;109:103830.
Du H, Li X, Chi P, Zhao J, Zhao G. Meaning in life, resilience, and psychological well-being among children affected by parental HIV. AIDS Care. November 2017; 29(11): 1410-1416.
Mandleco B. L., Peery J. C. (2000). An organizational framework for conceptualizing resilience in children. J. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Nurs. 13 99–111.
Kritzas N., Grobler A. A. (2005). The relationship between perceived parenting styles and resilience during adolescence. J. Child Adolesc. Ment. Health 17 1–12.
Zakeri H., Jowkar B., Razmjoee M. (2010). Parenting styles and resilience. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 5 1067–1070.
Wang Jiecong. A study on the relationship between comprehending social support, psychological resilience and sense of meaning in life among middle school students [D]. Shaanxi University of Science and Technology,2022.
LI Yuxin, FAN Qiujun, HUANG Fengying, LIU Yannan. Existential loneliness and sense of meaning in life: navigating the mediating role of social support[J]. Advances in Psychology, 2024, 14: 714.
BAO Xinzhe, ZHAO Cailing, REN Qin. Relationships among college students' perceptions of social support, sense of meaning in life, and career choice anxiety[J]. Advances in Psychology, 2020, 10: 1145.
Jiao Can. "Older Bleachers" Navigating the Effects of Social Support on Subjective Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 37(5): 104-112.
Labrague; Janet Alexis deLosSantos; COVID-19 anxiety among front line nurses: predictive effects of organizational support, personal resilience, and social support ", Journal of Nursing Management, 2020.
Liu L, Meng W, Liu B. The Mediating Role of Social Support in the Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Adolescent Drug Abuse Identification. Front Psychol. 2022;12:802408. Published 2022 Jan 10.
Ran Mengjie. The Impact of Negative Parenting Styles on Depression in Vocational College Students: The Role of Perceived Social Support and Psychological Rigidity [D]. Southwest University, 2023.
Wang Helin. The Impact of Parenting Styles on College Students' Mental Health [D]. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 2021.
Wang Xiangdong. Handbook of Mental Health Assessment Scales (Revised Edition) [M]. Beijing: China Journal of Mental Health Press, 1999, 35-45.
Fu Yaqiang, Wei Xuan. The relationship between psychological resilience, stress perception, coping, and the mental health of primary and secondary school students [J]. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 2013, 21(05): 735-738.
Wang Jinhua, Zhang Fuli, Ye Hong, et al. Research on the Correlation between Psychological Resilience of Trainee Nurses and Perceived Social Support [J]. Psychological Monthly, 2023, 18(21): 50-52.
Guo Yinan, Xu Le, Xie Nana, et al. The status of psychological resilience and social support among low-seniority nurses and its correlation [J]. Journal of the PLA Nursing, 2017, 34(13): 26-29.
Zhang Zhenming, Lin Lin. The relationship between psychological resilience and suicidal ideation in patients with depression: The mediating effect of perceived social support [J]. Journal of Southeast University (Medical Edition), 2023, 42(05): 736-740.
Xia Wangjie, He Huihui, Wang Suhang, et al. Understanding the Mediating Effect of Social Support between Psychological Resilience of Undergraduate Nursing Students and Age Discrimination [J]. Health Vocational Education, 2023, 41(11): 144-147.
Hu Minghui, Chen Yu, Zhang Xiaowen. The relationship between college students' psychological resilience and sense of meaning in life: The mediating role of perceived social support [J]. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 2020, 28(05): 776-779.
Jiang Jiang, Lu Zhengrong, Jiang Bijing, et al. Preliminary revision of the simplified parenting style questionnaire in Chinese [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(01): 94-99.
Jiang Jiang, Lu Zhengrong. Preliminary revision of the Chinese version of the simplified parenting styles questionnaire (s-EMBU-C) [C] // Beijing Society of Social Psychology. Proceedings of the 2009 Academic Annual Meeting of the Beijing Society of Social Psychology. Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing Normal University; 2009:1.
Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82.
YU Xiaonan, ZHANG Jianxin. Comparison of the application of the Self-Toughness Scale and the Connor-Davidson Toughness Scale[J]. 2007.
Kang, Qianjin. The Perception Social Support Scale (PSSS). In Wang, X. D., Wang, X. L., Ma, H. (Eds.). Handbook of Mental Health Rating Scales (pp. 131-133)[J]. 1999.
YANG Qiang, YE Baojuan. The effects of navigating social support on adolescents' life satisfaction[J]. Psychological Science, 2014, 37(3): 610.
Liu S., Gan Y. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire. Chin. Ment. Health J. 2010;24:478–482.
Yang X., Fan C., Liu Q., Lian S., Cao M., Zhou Z. The Mediating Role of Boredom Proneness and the Moderating Role of Meaning in Life in the Relationship between Mindfulness and Depressive Symptoms. Curr. Psychol. 2021;40:4635–4646.
WEN Zhonglin, YE Baojuan. Mediation effects analysis: methodology and model development[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, Vol. 22(5):731-745.
Liu Zhenliang, Liu Tiantian, Mu Shoukuan. Statistical Analysis Framework of the Concealment Effect and Its Application [J]. Psychological Technology and Application, 2021, 9(10): 610-618.
Zhou Juan. A study on the correlation between students' sense of meaning in life and parenting styles in higher vocational colleges and universities. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology. 2009;17(1):32-5.
Zhu ZH, Sun XJ, Zheng Xue, Wang XC. Parenting styles and meaning in life among high school students: the mediating role of self-esteem. Chinese Journal of Mental Health. 2011;25(9):695-9.
Tan Jingyi. The influence of parenting styles on high school students' sense of meaning in life[D]. Central China Normal University,2021.
Shek DTL, Chai CWY, Dou D. Parenting factors and meaning of life among Chinese adolescents: A six-wave longitudinal study. J Adolesc. 2021 Feb;87:117-132.
Chen, Xiaoyan. The relationship between parenting style and meaning in life: the mediating role of self-esteem. Advances in Psychology. 2022 Aug 4;12:2678.
Sobhani S, Jamilian H, Paknejad I. Prediction of resilience based on parenting and coping strategies in patients with psychosomatic disorders. BMC Psychol. 2024 May 19;12(1):280.
Zhao M, Fu W, Ai J. The Mediating Role of Social Support in the Relationship Between Parenting Stress and Resilience Among Chinese Parents of Children with Disability. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Oct;51(10):3412-3422.
Barber B.K., Harmon E.L. Violating the self: Parental psychological control of children and adolescents. In: Barber B.K., editor. Intrusive Parenting: How Psychological Control Affects Children and Adolescents. American Psychological Association; Washington, DC, USA: 2002. pp. 15–52.
Qin D.B., Chang T.F., Han E.J., Chee G. Conflicts and communication between high-achieving Chinese American adolescents and their parents. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development. 2012;2012:35–57.
R.A. Bean, B.K. Barber, D.R. Crane Parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control among African American youth: The relationships to academic grades, delinquency, and depression Journal of Family Issues, 27 (10) (2006), pp. 1335-1355.
Rosenberg AR, Bradford MC, Junkins CC, Taylor M, Zhou C, Sherr N, Kross E, Curtis JR, Yi-Frazier JP. Effect of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management Intervention for Parents of Children With Cancer (PRISM-P): A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911578.
Du H, Li X, Chi P, Zhao J, Zhao G. Meaning in life, resilience, and psychological well-being among children affected by parental HIV. AIDS Care. November 2017; 29(11): 1410-1416.
Dong, Jinhua. The effects of parenting styles on test anxiety in middle school students: The mediating role of psychological resilience. Psychology Monthly. 2020.
Shen Chengchun. Discussion on the Relationship between College Students' Psychological Resilience and Sense of Life Meaning [J]. Industry and Technology Forum, 2022, 21(08): 94-95.
Chen, Jing, and Zhao, Lixi. A Study on College Students' Social Support for Appreciation and Its Correlation with Parenting Styles. Collections. 2018;2.
Shumaker S A, Brownell A. Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps[J]. Journal of social issues, 1984, 40(4): 11-36.
Zhang, Zixuan, Liu, Yannan (2024). Appreciating the effects of social support on sense of meaning in life: the mediating role of self-concept clarity and self-identity. Advances in Psychology, 14(8), 766-774.
Zhao Jiayi. Research on the Relationship between Social Support, Psychological Resilience, and Coping Strategies in High School Students and Educational Strategies [D]. Shaanxi University of Technology, 2024.
Li Yanchun. A survey on the current situation of college students' sense of social support and sense of attachment and its relationship research [D]. Chongqing:Southwest University,2011.
WANG Dongyan, ZHANG Xiqin, ZHOU Ju. Comparison and application of masking effect and mediation effect[J]. Science and Technology Wind, 2022, (33):141-143.
Yi F, Li X, Song X, Zhu L. The Underlying Mechanisms of Psychological Resilience on Emotional Experience: Attention-Bias or Emotion Disengagement. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 17;11:1993.
Schiele MA, Domschke K. Epigenetics at the crossroads between genes, environment and resilience in anxiety disorders. Genes Brain Behav. 2018 Mar;17(3):e12423.
Wood NE, Tost H, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Resilience and the brain: a key role for regulatory circuits linked to social stress and support. Mol Psychiatry. February 2020; 25(2): 379-396.
Block J.H., Block J. The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In: Collins W.A., editor. Development of Cognition, Affect, and Social Relations, the Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. Volume 13. Erlbaum; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1980. pp. 39–101.
Block J., Kremen A.M. IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1996;70:349–361.
Klohnen E.C. Conceptual analysis and measurement of the construct of ego-resiliency. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1996;70:1067–1079.
Zhang L, Jiang M, Wang L, Zheng J, Wang W. The Mediating Effect of Perceived Social Support and Medical Coping Modes Between Psychological Resilience and Meaning in Life in COVID-19 Patients. Patient Prefer Adherence. March 7, 2023; 17: 571-582.