Marking Rubrics
标记细则
Evaluation Criteria
评价标准 | Excellent | Good | Average | Weak/Fail
弱/失败 | Marks Allocated
分配分数 |
| | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Application of relevant Ethical theories and
相关伦理理论的应用和 models.
楷模。 | 18-20 | 15-17 | 10-14 | 0-9.9 | | | |
Critical evaluate the theories and models with the connection to the case question.
批判性地评估与案例问题相关的理论和模型。 | 18-20 | 15-17 | 10-14 | 0-9.9 | | | |
Recommendations and suggestions for
意见和建议 improvements/ Constructive draft of conclusion.
改进/建设性结论草案。 | 18-20 | 15-17 | 10-14 | 0-9.9 | | | |
Structuring, formatting, writing style and overall
结构、格式、写作风格和整体 Presentation.
推介会。 | 18-20 | 15-17 | 10-14 | 0-9.9 | | | |
Use of appropriate references. Quality of references. Width and
使用适当的参考文献。参考文献的质量。宽度和 depth of references.
参考文献的深度。 | 18-20 | 15-17 | 10-14 | 0-9.9 | | | |
TOTAL MARKS
总分 | | | | | /100 |
Weightage: 30%
权重：30%
You are required to read the article by Nazanin Mansouri (2016) titled “A Case Study of Volkswagen Unethical Practice in Diesel Emission Test”.
您需要阅读 Nazanin Mansouri (2016) 题为“大众汽车柴油排放测试不道德实践案例研究”的文章 1 。
Based on the discussions in the article, you are required to answer (approximately 3000 words) the following questions:
根据文章中的讨论，您需要回答（约3000字）以下问题：
Questions:
问题：
(a). Do you think the diesel dupe scandal can be defended by the notion of Utilitarian pain and pleasure calculus? Does the defense of moral sanctuary apply in this case?
（A）。您认为柴油欺骗丑闻可以用功利主义痛苦和快乐计算的概念来辩护吗？道德庇护的辩护是否适用于本案？
(30 marks)
（30 分）
(b). Based on the case, explain when and how Volkswagen has breached the minimum Kantian value of altruism?
（二）。根据案例，解释一下大众汽车何时以及如何违反了康德的最低利他主义价值观？
(40 marks)
（40 分）
(c). Do you think the solutions implemented by Volkswagen in this case are adequate? If not, what would you suggest?
（C）。您认为大众汽车在此案例中实施的解决方案是否足够？如果没有，你有什么建议？
(30 marks)
（30 分）
Guidelines:
指南：
Part (a):
(一)部分：
This requires students to have an in-depth understanding of utilitarianism, particularly the application of its pain and pleasure calculus. By using this calculus, students would be able to discern a rational response. Students should evaluate in detail the pain and pleasure and a sensible answer would be to acknowledge the limitations of this calculus. VW lacks foresight and overestimated its technological prowess and at the same time underestimated the influence of the stakeholders.
这就要求学生对功利主义有深入的理解，特别是其痛苦与快乐演算的应用。通过使用这种微积分，学生将能够辨别出理性的反应。学生应该详细评估痛苦和快乐，明智的答案是承认这种计算的局限性。大众缺乏远见，高估了自己的技术实力，同时低估了利益相关者的影响力。
Part (b):
(b) 部分：
This is a difficult question. VW suffered an ethical dissonance, a punctuation of ethics where their oversight and down driven utilitarian values breach the minimum content of Kantian altruism. This clearly is the case when a product causes harm and injury to the public, breaching also the three maxims of Kantianism. Students should be able to pinpoint and use graphical illustrations to examine the ethical inflection point leading to its dissonance.
这是一个很难的问题。大众汽车遭受了道德失调，道德标点符号，他们的监督和受压制的功利主义价值观违反了康德式利他主义的最低内容。当产品对公众造成伤害并违反康德主义的三大格言时，显然就是这种情况。学生应该能够查明并使用图形插图来检查导致其不和谐的道德拐点。
Part (c)
(c) 部分
Students are required to critically evaluate if the steps and actions taken by VW is morally and ethically adequate. Systemic changes may be inadequate, and in a case of ethical inflection and dissonance, a corporate renewal and moral reboot is necessary. Is that evident in this case?
学生必须批判性地评估大众汽车采取的步骤和行动在道德和伦理上是否充分。系统性变革可能还不够，在道德扭曲和不和谐的情况下，企业革新和道德重启是必要的。在本案中这一点很明显吗？
沉浸式翻译