Through active reflection and self-audit, development planning and application of theory, the module assists in developing skills whilst encouraging students to better appreciate key strategic, cultural, and organisational issues and opportunities in the global market.
Learning Outcomes
(as taken from the Modules specification)
評估(用於人)
Evaluate the key traits of a global manager and analyse the relevance of adapting management styles in today's rapidly changing global environments.
Appraise an understanding of practical applications of intercultural competency.
Analyse the complexities of global organisations and cultural, ethical and value-based considerations for managers wishing to pursue global strategies.
Undertake a self-audit on to identify skills and competencies and based on audit findings, prepare a development plan.
Assignment Brief
Assignment method:
An approximate -word portfolio weighting of the final mark
Deadline:
Class A: Saturday July 2024
Class B: Saturday July 2024
Required task:
Using academic theories and a case study, evaluate and analyse key traits of a global manager from a global mindset perspective, include elements of cultural, ethical and value-based considerations, following which carry out a self-audit of your global mindset skills and a personal development plan.
Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words) 2 pages
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
2pages
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of 10-15 academic references are required.
Reading List
Main textbook:
Lane & Maznevski (2014)
Henry W. Lane and Martha L. Mazneuski
Wider Reading List
International Management Behavior
Articles on Moodle page
Module/Lectures Theme Overview
Today's complex and highly dynamic global business environment
Managers expected to possess and utilise requisite skills to meet goals
Understanding of global issues affecting managers today
Key Management and Leadership principles in the global context
Intercultural competencies withing global business culture
Ethical and value-based considerations in a global context
Transferable employability skills - practitioner based approach
Preparing you to be global managers of the future
Additional Tutorials Theme Overview
(these will be integrated into the weekly lecture sessions)
How to write a literature review
How to avoid plagiarism
How to reference correctly
How to do the self-assessment of a global mindset
How to structure the assignment
Introduction to the course - Referencing
The tutorials include guidance about
Finding and citing academic evidence
How to develop a critical literature review
Harvard referencing format requirements
Plagiarism avoidance
Session Plan indicative: changes in sequence possible
Course
Session
Study Topics
Preparatory Work/ Revision
1
An Introduction to the Course and to the Context
Read book chapter and related
sources
2
Understanding culture Through the Looking Glass
Read book chapter and other
sources
3
Cross-cultural Skill Development Tools for Global Managers
Read book chapter and other
sources
4
Managing global teams and networks
Development of a global mindset
Read book chapter and other
sources, must read the provided
article (Bowen 2013 )
5
Implementing Strategy Structure and Systems / Value-based Considerations
Read the book chapter and other
6
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Effectiveness and Culture Shock and expats
Read the book chapter and other
7
Leading Innovation and Change / further Value-based Considerations
Read the book chapter and other
8
Competing with Integrity: Personal Integrity / Ethical Considerations
Read the book chapter and other
9
Competing with Integrity Corporate Sustainability / More Ethical
Considerations
Read the book chapter and other
BIRMINGHAM CITY
J3 University
MAN6038
The Global Manager
Session 1
An Introduction to the Context of Global Business Management
Developing a Global Mindset this module's core concept/ "red thread"
What is GLOBAL BUSINESS?
Global business, also called international business, is the production and sale of goods and services between countries. The term can also encompass the nulances, politics, and dynamics of doing business in a
Global business leads to high-level competition among businesses. When any company enters the foreign markets, they have to compete with the local business in that country. Therefore, the foreign businesses must produce high-quality products.
What is GLOBALISATION?
Globalisation is the word used to describe the growing interdependence of the world's economies, cultures, and populations, brought about by cross-border trade in goods and services, technology, and flows of investment, people, and information.
McDonald's is the most prominent representation and symbol of globalization. Of all the fast-food chains in the fast-food industry, Mcdonald's is the largest one and is on the top of all global markets.
Globalisation
Globalisation of markets
trade liberalisation, denationalisation, pressures to grow
Globalisation of customers
Globalisation of production & supply chains
made possible by telecommunications, Internet and cheap transportation
Global competitors
Consolidation
global joint ventures (i.e.Tesco in South Korea), global alliances, mergers & acquisitions
Globalisation
Cross border M&As, joint ventures and alliances fail about onehalf the time
of bank mergers in the US failed to create significant value
Cultural differences (35%)
Poor planning & execution (20%)
Unrealistic targets (13%)
Inadequate due diligence (11%) Information research
De-motivating employees (10%) 被收理公司員工
Defection (8%) Business detection
Other
Is Company X a global company?
In addition to and regional offices shown above - R&D and manufacturing facilities and distribution and education centers in The Netherlands, India, Germany, France, Ireland, Hong Kong, Mexico, UK, Australia, Italy, Argentina and Spain
Global companies
Only by operating in multiple locations is not globalisation
Executing global strategy is done by people (on the ground)
You don't globalise companies unless you "globalise" people
What are some famous global companies that you know?
Are they in almost every country in the world?
In a specific region only?
In very few countries?
Have you heard if they do well or had any business troubles globally or regional or only at home?
Are global companies always large?
Which country/ies is/are headquarters to most of the global companies?
Analysing « Globalization » at a micro level
The Transnationality Index (TNI) is a means of ranking multinational corporations that is employed by economists and politicians. It is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the following three ratios (where "foreign" means outside of the corporation's home country).
the ratio of foreign assets to total assets
the ratio of foreign sales to total sales
the ratio of foreign employment to total employment
The Transnationality Index was developed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
BIRMINGHAM CITY
University
Ranking by:
Corporation
Home economy
Industry
Assets
Sales
Employment
TNI
(Per cent)
Foreign
assets
Foreign
Total
Foreign
Total
Foreign
Total
1
19
Hutchison Whampoa Limited
Hong Kong, China
Diversified
85721
103715
24222
31339
206986
250000
80,9
2
93
CITIC Group 中信
China
Diversified
78602
565884
9561
55487
25285
17,1
3
16
Hon Hai Precision Industries
Taiwan Province of China
Electrical & electronic equipment
65471
70448
128650
132429
810993
1290000
84,3
4
70
Petronas - Petroliam Nasional Bhd
Malaysia
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
49072
163275
71939
94543
46145
39,2
5
63
Vale SA
Brazil
Mining & quarrying
45721
131478
38326
47694
15680
85305
44,5
6
59
China Ocean Shipping (Group) Company
China
Transport and storage
43452
56126
19139
29101
4400
130000
48,9
7
91
China National Offshore Oil Corp
China
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
34276
129834
21887
83537
3387
102562
18,6
8
58
América Móvil SAB de CV
Mexico
Telecommunications
32008
75697
37395
58950
67525
158719
49,4
9
67
Lukoil OAO
Russian Federation
Petroleum and natural gas
31174
98961
113801
139171
18144
120300
42,8
10
20
Cemex S.A.B. de C.V.
Mexico
Non-metalic mineral products
30730
36808
11717
14986
35387
45087
80,1
11
92
Petróleos de Venezuela SA
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
27462
218424
46899
123223
4877
126945
18,2
12
80
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Korea, Republic of
Electrical & electronic equipment
26077
169702
19294
179060
123563
227000
26,9
13
39
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd
Singapore
Telecommunications
25768
32242
9541
14633
10496
23176
63,5
14
83
Hyundai Motor Company
Korea, Republic of
Motor vehicles
25443
113906
11754
75211
38318
98348
25,6
15
44
Jardine Matheson Holdings Ltd
Hong Kong, China
Diversified
24284
63460
29732
39593
217556
360000
57,9
16
54
Sabic - Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
Saudi Arabia
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
23540
90089
33377
50422
25391
40000
51,9
17
85
Gazprom JSC
Russian Federation
Petroleum and natural gas
23425
396454
92016
153863
27400
431200
24,0
18
24
Wilmar International Limited
Singapore
Food, beverages and tobacco
23088
41920
33622
45463
90575
93000
75,5
19
2
China Resources Power Holdings Company Ltd
Hong Kong, China
Energy
22938
22938
8049
8049
38018
38118
99,9
20
42
Tata Motors Ltd
India
Automobile
21575
31281
26519
34765
20379
62716
59,2
21
17
Ooredoo QSC
Qatar
Telecommunications
20304
26104
7601
9303
15289
17130
82,9
22
88
Formosa Plastics Group
Taiwan Province of China
Chemicals
19994
101998
14405
78130
24287
102763
20,6
23
62
New World Development Ltd
Hong Kong, China
Diversified
19857
36918
2411
4582
14751
47000
45,9
24
100
China National Petroleum Corporation
China
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
19284
541083
11296
425720
31442
1656465
2,7
25
29
CapitaLand Ltd
Singapore
Construction and real estate
18926
30885
1706
2642
10500
12000
71,1
Web table 28. The world's top 100 non-financial TNCs, ranked by foreign assets, (Millions of dollars and number of employees)
Ranking by: 排名:
Corporation
Home economy
Industry
Assets
Sales
Employment
Foreign
assets
Foreign
Total
Foreign
Total
Foreign
Total
1
79
General Electric Co
United States
Electrical & electronic equipment
338157
685328
75640
144796
171000
305000
52,5
2
32
Royal Dutch Shell plc
United Kingdom
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
307938
360325
282930
467153
73000
87000
76,6
3
22
plc
United Kingdom
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
270247
300193
300216
375580
69853
85700
83,8
4
77
Toyota Motor Corporation
Japan
Motor vehicles
233193
376841
170486
265770
126536
333498
54,7
5
28
Total SA
France
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
214507
227107
180440
234287
62123
97126
78,5
6
45
Exxon Mobil Corporation
United States
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
214349
333795
301840
420714
46361
76900
65,4
7
8
Vodafone Group Plc
United Kingdom
Telecommunications
199003
217031
62065
70224
78599
86373 e
90,4
8
62
GDF Suez
France
Utilities (Electricity, gas and water)
175057
271607
78555
124711
110308
219330
59,2
9
61
Chevron Corporation
United States
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
158865
232982
132743
222580
31508
62000
59,5
10
64
Volkswagen Group
Germany
Motor vehicles
158046
409257
199129
247624
296000
533469
58,2
11
51
Eni SpA
Italy
Petroleum expl./ref./distr.
133445
185493
85867
163566
51034
77838
63,3
12
1
Nestlé SA
Switzerland
Food, beverages and tobacco
132686
138212
96849
98468
328816
339000
97,1
13
71
Enel SpA
Italy
Electricity, gas and water
132231
226878
65966
109098
37588
73702
56,6
14
48
E.ON AG
Germany
Utilities (Electricity, gas and water)
128310
185601
117973
169764
40535
72083
65,0
15
4
Anheuser-Busch InBev NV
Belgium
Food, beverages and tobacco
115913
122621
36013
39758
109566
117632
92,8
16
6
ArcelorMittal
Luxembourg
Metal and metal products
112239
114573
83996
84213
185319
244890
91,1
17
29
Siemens AG
Germany
Electrical & electronic equipment
111570
139252
87236
101604
250000
369000
77,9
18
36
Honda Motor Co Ltd
Japan
Motor vehicles
110142
144811
95792
118983
118923
187094
73,4
19
92
Mitsubishi Corporation
Japan
Wholesale trade
109657
153044
49052
243401
18915
40,6
20
98
EDF SA
France
Utilities (Electricity, gas and water)
103015
330582
38840
93470
30412
154730
30,8
BIRMINGHAM CITY
University
1
Global MNEs
of total sales
BIRMINGHAM CITY
University
Home-region based
of total sales
To conclude
A GLOBAL industry: when competition takes place at the global level with high pressures on standardization(opposed to Multidomestic industry) 多國内市場行業
全球影響力
A GLOBAL company: with a global presence, i.e. in Triad / regional and emerging markets (opposed to local company)
A GLOBAL strategy: with a global reach (opposed to local strategy)
A company can be « global, » working in a « multidomestic » industry, developing « local » strategies!
Again: What is Globalization?
Globalization of markets
trade liberalization, deregulation
pressures to grow
Globalization of customers
Globalization of production & supply chains
made possible by telecommunications, Internet and cheap transportation (e.g. HP)
Global competitors
Consolidation
global joint ventures, global alliances & M & A's
Then: What is deglobalization?
Deglobalization or deglobalisation is the process of diminishing interdependence and integration between certain units around the world, typically nation-states. It is widely used to describe the periods of history when economic trade and investment between countries decline.
Have we entered such period of deglobalization?
What indicates a deglobalization trend?
Trade Wars
Increase of sanctions/ embargoes/ import tariffs
Supply chain problems
International mobility problems
Increased protection of local labor (restrictions on work visas)
Political (i.e.: “de-coupling")
Other
Globalisation is really about complexity
- Complexity
Multiplicity (M) 多傆性
Interdependence (I) 互相恠頪
Ambiguity (A) 不明维镖情
And continuous, rapid change
Implications of globalization
Globalization is easy to talk about but difficult to accomplish
Some people in the parent company are going to have to work with people from other cultures
Someone in the company may have to travel to or live in another country
Decisions have to be made about how to operate - our way, their way, a new way?
"We" may have to change as well as "them"
Global Mindset
"The ability to develop and interpret criteria for personal and business decisions that are not dependent on the assumptions of a single country, culture or context; and to implement those decisions appropriately in different countries, cultures, and contexts"
Four Types of Understanding Required to Develop a Global Mindset
What do managers do in general?
Mintzberg published his Ten Management Roles in his book, "Mintzberg on Management: Inside our Strange World of Organizations," in 1990
Managerial roles
Differences across cultures
Interpersonal roles
Figurehead
Figureheads have considerable symbolic value in some cultures; in
others, being described as a figurehead is not seen as a compliment.
collectivistic cultures prefer more consultative leaders.
Liaison
Some cultures prefer informal contacts based on long-standing
personal relationships; others prefer to use official representatives.
Informational roles
Monitor
Culture often influences both the extent of information monitoring and
which specific information sources receive greatest attention.
Disseminator
In some cultures, the context surrounding a message is more important
than the message itself; in others, the reverse is true.
Spokesperson
Culture often influences who is respected and seen as a legitimate
spokesperson for an organization.
Decisional roles
Entrepreneur
Some cultures are highly supportive of innovation and change; others
prefer the status quo and resist change.
Disturbance handler
Some cultures resolve conflict quietly; others accept and at times
encourage a more public approach.
Resource allocator
Hierarchical cultures support differential resource allocations;
egalitarian cultures prefer greater equality or equity in distributions.
Negotiator
Some cultures negotiate all items in a proposed contract
simultaneously; others negotiate each item sequentially.
What is a GLOBAL MANAGER?
A global manager is defined by the work he or she is doing, frequently within a company with global presence or operations.
A global manager is responsible for managing teams of employees or business operations across diverse cultures and time zones, calls for new skill sets and capabilities.
Having a degree in global business management can help you develop problem-solving skills and make you able to think on a global scale. Pursuing courses in Global business management provides opportunities to establish your career in finance, international management, trade or in different multinational companies.
How do you learn to conduct international business effectively?
You need to acquire a set of skills that help you work across regional, national and subnational boundaries to propel your business forward. Those skills include the following:
Overseas experience
Deep self-awareness
Sensitivity to cultural diversity 8
Humility
Lifelong curiosity
Cautious honesty
Global strategic thinking
Patiently impatient
Well-spoken
Good negotiator 6
Presence
The Global Mindset
"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new
landscapes, but in having new eyes"
Marcel Proust (French novelist, 1871-1922)
Developing a Global Mindset
Skill-Development for Global Managers (1)
- OVERSEAS EXPERIENCE
Many global executives understand what doing business in a flat world is like because they've lived overseas, sometimes for decades at a time. If you want to become a successful international business leader, transcending your own cultural perspective and learning how business is done in different contexts is essential.
- DEEP SELF-AWARENESS
Understanding your beliefs and knowing where they might differ from others' is critical to global executive success. Without this key characteristic, you will not be able to adapt to and tolerate the deepseated beliefs of others - and business opportunities will evaporate. Beware of the "I'm right; you're wrong" assumption.
Skill-Development for Global Managers (2)
- SENSITIVITY TO CULTURAL DIVERSITY
Are you willing to eat raw fish? Snake? Raw monkey brains? Can you adjust your eating and sleeping habits to match the local executives' routines and patterns? In other countries, seemingly minor things can be off-putting, such as sticking your chopsticks in your rice or touching someone with your left hand.
Much of this insight comes from experience. You must have an intense interest in the lives and cultures of others, recognizing that your culture and background are not inherently superior, to master the global business arena.
- HUMILITY
Being interested in other cultures and how people in those cultures do things, especially with regard to business, implies a certain humility. Humility here means a belief that other lands and cultures have figured out very interesting answers to life's problems. As a good international business person, you must be open to and fascinated by those answers. This trait requires a willingness and ability to listen well and with real intention.
Skill-Development for Global Managers (3)
LIFELONG CURIOSITY
The world is constantly evolving. Without an intense curiosity and a desire to learn, you will be left behind and increasingly unable to converse, much less keep up, with your peers. Staying abreast of new learning opportunities requires a humble awareness that what you know is not enough and that you always have more to learn.
- CAUTIOUS HONESTY
Surprisingly, the definitions of "honesty" and "truth" vary widely in the business arena. People sometimes omit information or only tell the truth they think other people need to know. However you design your ethics and morality in your personal life, in global business settings, executives need to know they can count on you. If you don't deliver on your business promises, your reputation will suffer. Effective global leaders can balance the need to be cautious in different contexts while demonstrating they can follow through.
When you have a global perspective, you think strategically about managing business using the best people from around the planet. Much of your ability to do this comes from a lifetime of networking at the highest levels in global boardrooms and your aptitude for seeing how various pieces of global industries play out internationally. To make strategic decisions for your company, you need to understand how the business world works on a global scale.
PATIENTLY IMPATIENT
How do you become patiently impatient? You must be in a hurry and yet be patient enough to allow the local and regional processes to unfold as they are meant to. Time and pace are not the same in every country. Balancing the demands of hot competitive and technological trends with the pace of local cultures can be frustrating to the uninitiated.
WELL-SPOKEN
Given the challenges of working via interpreters or fumbling through conversations in more than one language, the ability to say clearly what you mean is a key global business skill. If you converse with others in their native language, you usually earn brownie points - however, if what you have to say is obscure or unintelligible, you'll quickly be in a deficit balance. Clear communication is a powerful leadership trait to have on the global stage.
Doing business across ethnic, national and regional boundaries requires strong negotiating skills. If you can add these skills to an innate enjoyment of the gamesmanship involved in negotiating, you will become a highly effective negotiator.
PRESENCE
A certain chatists as surrounds you if you are an influential global leader. Part of it - but only part - is position or title. The bigger portion is dress, self-confidence, energy level, interest in other people and comfort with the challenges at hand. You may not want to believe these things matter, but they do.
As a global business leader, you must respect the identities and affiliations of others. Some people can do that; many or most cannot. Do you have what it takes to become a global business leader?
Skill-Development for Global Managers
Further suggestions about global management skill development can be found in the internet!
Understanding of business management in a global context
What works in one country might not work in the other
What a message means in one country might not have the same meaning in another.
Context matters.
Knowing and understanding the context is pre-requisite when managing across borders.
Traditional 'logic' of organization and management
Different cultures have different expectations from their supervisors? Taken-for-granted!
Example: Jepsen Company: Expatriates face Differences
Rethinking management models
Country
Percentage of managers who agree with each statement
"Managers must have
the answers to most
questions asked by
subordinates"
"The main reason for a
chain of command is so
people know who has
authority"
"It is OK to bypass
chain of command to
get something done
efficiently"
China
74
70
59
France
53
43
43
Germany
46
26
45
Indonesia
73
83
51
Italy
66
-
56
Japan
78
50
Netherlands
17
31
44
Spain
-
34
74
Sweden
10
30
26
United Kingdom
27
34
35
United States
18
17
32
Country
Manager's sense of drive
and initiative (percentage
of agreement by managers)
Country
Manager's willingness to
delegate authority (percentage
of agreement by managers)
United States
74
Sweden
76
Sweden
72
Japan
69
Japan
72
Norway
69
Finland
70
USA
66
South Korea
68
Singapore
65
Netherlands
67
Denmark
65
Singapore
66
Canada
64
Switzerland
66
Finland
63
Belgium
65
Switzerland
62
Ireland
65
Netherlands
61
France
65
Australia
61
Austria
63
Germany
61
Denmark
63
New Zealand
61
Italy
62
Ireland
60
Australia
62
UK
59
Canada
62
Belgium
55
Spain
62
Austria
54
New Zealand
59
France
54
Greece
59
Italy
47
UK
58
Spain
44
Norway
55
Portugal
43
Portugal
49
Greece
38
Expatriates
Frequent flyers
Virtual managers
Face-toface
Virtual
Types of global managers
Characteristics
and management
challenges
Expatriates
Types of global managers (cont'd)
Characteristics
and management
challenges
Expatriates
Obviously, global management is not that easy!
Cross border M & A's, joint ventures and alliances fail about one-half the time.
of bank mergers in the US failed to create significant value
Cultural differences (35%)
Poor planning & execution (20%)
Unrealistic targets (13%)
Inadequate due diligence (11%)
De-motivating employees (10%)
Defection (8%)
Other (3%)
\section*{The reasons why M&A's and joint ventures "fail"
- May start at the top...
- "M & A's are illusions"
Paying attention to only half the challenge:
strategy formulation (ideal, big picture) without execution (reality, details)
What levels of global managers are involved?
The reasons why M&A's and joint ventures "fail"(continued)
Tendency to focus on "visible" inputs vs. "invisible" relationships
legal, financial, market data vs. trust, commitment
Ignoring culture (national and organizational)
The "visible" issues are necessary but not sufficient for success
Example: How Culture ended the DaimlerBenz Chrysler Merger
The Daimler-Benz merger with Chrysler in 1998 is probably the most famous of all international mergers then ended in failure.
Cultural differences and organisational culture are both acknowledged to have played their part.
It was this failed partnership that first rang the alarm bells that cultural factors just cannot be ignored on a global level, especially not within mergers and acquisitions.
Analysts agree that the cultural gap in corporate cultures was one of the main reasons for the Daimler-Chrysler failure. Daimler was a German company which could be described as "conservative, efficient and safe", while Chrysler was known as "daring, diverse and creating" (Appelbaum, Roberts and Shapiro, 2009:44)
Daimler was a very hierarchical company with a clear chain of command and respect for authority.
Chrysler, on the other cultural hand, favoured a more team-oriented and egalitarian approach.
The other cultural difference lay in what the companies valued in terms of their clients. Daimler valued reliability and achieving the highest levels of quality, while Chrysler was placing its bets on catchy designs and offering their cars for competitive prices. These two factors resulted in conflicting orders and goals in different departments. American and German managers had different values which drove and directed their work. Different departments were heading in opposing directions.
Employees on both sides felt reluctant to work with each other. During the initial stages of organisational integration, huge bulks of Chrysler's key executives either resigned or were replaced by Germans counterparts.
Moreover, Daimler was much more imposing and tried to dictate the terms on which the new company should work (Appelbaum, Roberts and Shapiro, 2009:44). Such a situation didn't inspire trust in Chrysler's employees and raised some serious communication challenges.
So to summarise the cultural factors in play here:
differences in corporate cultures and values
lack of coordination and severe lack of trust among the employees
All three resulted in communication failures which in turn caused a sharp reduction in productivity.
In this case Daimler failed to acknowledge any local practices and principles of Japan business culture.
In Japanese culture, trust and attention to others' feelings are essential. This means that Japanese business people value personal relationships more than dry facts. What is important is how you value your client and how you treat him. This differs greatly with a strictly fact-based and pragmatic approach of the German counterpart.
Not paying any attention to the concept of "localization", Daimler appointed German managers who immediately started giving orders as if they were in Germany. As a result, Japanese subordinates felt extremely reluctant to take orders from them (Froese and Goeritz, 2007: 98), which in turn had a negative impact on overall efficiency. Moreover, most Germans were seen as guests which exacerbated the situation since guests usually don't have authority in Japan and on top of that it's hard to be "rude" to a guest.
Cross-department communication was very weak as well. Apart from the R&D department, communication mechanisms weren't installed properly and a chain of command was not clearly defined (Froese and Goeritz, 2007: 101).
The last cultural difference which will be mentioned here is the conflict between cultures that value long-term orientation over short-term orientation and vice-versa. One of the founders of the intercultural theoretical framework, Professor Hofstede, used this difference as one of the key dimensions of culture. Generally speaking, countries in the West tend to be more short-term goal oriented while the countries of the East strive for more long term goal orientation
DaimlerChrysler after some time started feeling reluctant to make any further investments into Mitsubishi. They didn't see any short-time profits which eventually led to "pulling the plug" on their Japanese partner. Mitsubishi on the other hand, wasn't really concerned with the losses. They were more long-term oriented. They perceived the difficulties to be an obstacle to overcome, but not as a reason to dismantle the alliance. That is why, when DaimlerChrysler announced, that it refused to make any further investments, that the little shreds of trust dissapeared.
The joint venture didn't work as intended because of the lack of consideration given to cultural factors. The inability to establish proper communication, build trust and recognise the goals of one's counterpart played a significant role in the outcome of the cooperation.
Moreover, just as in the DaimlerChrysler merger, a German company was imposing its own terms on their partners. Once again this "bargaining in" and "do-it-our-way" attitude proved incapable of delivering results.
Example: Success-Story of Tata's M&A of Jaguar Land Rover
TATA Jaguar Land Rover In 2008, TATA finalised the deal and acquired Jaguar Land Rover (JLR). However, the outcome was quite different from the previous case studies which ended in failure. This one is a success story.
One can attribute the difference in the outcomes to the difference in approaches to the merger, acquisition and integration process. TATA employed directly opposite methods to Daimler. The essence of this method lay in respecting the existing culture rather than imposing a foreign culture.
At the start of the process the Managing Director openly stated that "change of ownership has little to do with the changing of culture". This had several consequences on TATA's management style.
Firstly, TATA, in contrast with Daimler, decided to leave the existing management structure intact and leave the national British managers. There wasn't any attempt to impose Indian managers on JLR. All the key personnel retained their positions.
Secondly, TATA didn't just leave the current managers on their own. TATA managed to motivate them through constantly challenging them and working with them. In other words, help was offered only when it was needed and existing practices remained in place, but at the same time managers couldn't afford to be idle because they had goals to reach and plans to implement.
Thirdly, unlike in the DaimlerChrysler and Mitsubishi alliance, TATA managed to inspire trust in JLR. First of all, the fact that most of JLR's personnel were left on their positions showed that TATA trusts JLR, and believed that it is capable of solving their problems. Moreover, more than once in interviews the Managing Director stated that "it is TATA's responsibility" to take care of JLR and that "TATA won't shy away from investments, if it is required". Such clear statements of loyalty contributed positively on the cooperation between the companies.
Finally, TATA kept an open-mind and never hesitated to listen to feedback from subordinates. TATA's top level officials often make trips to their factories and dealerships outside India and collect feedback from local employees. These opinions are being used in the developing company's strategy.
Successful Global Managers must develop Cross-cultural effectiveness
Cross-cultural effectiveness = ability to live and work effectively in the cultural setting of your assignment
To be effective we need to have an understanding of culture OURS and THEIRS.
This course concentrates on the following global management issues:
Impact of cultural differences and how to develop a global mindset
Ethical issues / How to be an ethical player / What ethical dilemmas do global managers face and how do they/should they handle those?
Value creation through globalization of markets, supply chain, labor force, financial markets to sell more, to safe cost, to increase profits, to enhance quality, to enhance innovation, etc.
FINALLY: Self-evaluate your own global mindset. How would you further develop it?
MAN6038 The Global Manager Session 1 SUMMARY
Course Structure Overview
What is Global Business
What are typical Reasons for Failures of Global Alliances
What are Differences between Global Managers and solely Local Managers
Why is a Global Mindset so important for the Success of Global Managers
MAN6038 The Global Manager
Session 2
Understanding culture through the looking glass
Revision
-What are the key take aways from the previous session?
How does the content of the previous session relate to the assignment and global mindset development?
Any relevant examples to share?
Any clarifying questions?
Once again: The Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of academic references are required.
2.5pages
Your assignment and how the session content is related
"Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words) Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)"
The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights and concepts that you can use for your assignment and when choosing a relevant case.
A definition of culture
Culture is a commonly-held body of beliefs and values which define the shoulds and the oüghts of life for those who hold them.
Researcher Geert Hofstede called it the
"Software of the mind" that distinguishes members of one group from those of another.
Culture is...
Behaviors
and artifacts.
Visible, tangible.
like an iceberg: is below the surface
Usually not visible and rarely (if
ever) questioned until a conflict.
Culture
Learned: acquired from our social environment so early that we are usually unaware of its influence
Shared: a collective phenomenon
Not random: patterns exist
NOTE: CULTURE DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN COUNTRY
Personality and culture
Be aware of Stereoretyping. Be careful not to:
Project from groups to individuals, or
Project from individuals to groups
Variations exist within cultures - not everyone is the same Free from stereotyping
Personality is an individual characteristic
Culture is a group characteristic
Like fingerprints, you can still be unique and display characteristics of a larger cultural group
Multicultural competence and managerial success
Global leaders understand culture more deeply than the superficial differences
It is important to recognizing and respect differences in greeting rituals, titles, business cards, meals, but it is not enough.
Global leaders must understand deeper levels of culture, that influence how people approach work and collaborate with each other
Global leaders need high Cultural Intelligence (CQ)
Cultural Intelligence (CQ)
The capacity to act effectively in multiple cultural environments
System of interacting knowledge and skills linked by mindfulness
Ability to adapt and work effectively and respectfully with people of other cultures while
正念 maintaining one's own identity
Is related to Emotional Intelligence (EQ) and adds the condition of working across boundaries
CQ is a critical part of the global mindset
Gives the cultural context of self- and other- awareness
Has a knowledge and a skills component
CQ requires two different types of cultural knowledge
General cultural knowledge (examined in the first part):
how culture works and how to observe and gain insights about the effect of culture in different settings
Specific cultural knowledge (examined in the second part):
a set of facts and information about a specific culture (e.g., China, India, Nigeria)
Understanding cultures Part 1: How cultures work.
Understanding culture: Through the Looking Glass
Culture is a shared set of assumptions, beliefs and values.
Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck
a shared, commonly held body of beliefs and values that define the "shoulds" and "oughts" of life
"the culture of a country - or other category of people -
is not a combination of the properties of the 'average citizen'
is not a 'modal personality'
is a set of likely reactions of citizens with a common mental programming"
Hofstede
"the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes one group or category from another"
Culture
can be seen in norms and practices: language, clothing, behavior
meaning and important influence much deeper
shapes assumptions, perceptions, behavior
is passed on through generations formally (school) and informally (stories and social reinforcement)
All Groups Have Cultures
For any group, culture
Makes action more simple and efficient
Provides an important source of identity for its members
Culture and individuals interact
Group culture defined by what group members share
Individual members differ and subscribe to culture's assumptions and values to a greater or lesser extent
Every individual belongs to different groups with their distinct cultures: national, regional, professional, organizational, age, gender, religion, hobby, etc.
Culture provides an important context for people's behavior in a group
Hall: culture is to people like water is to fish
Fish out of water can't function normally... Fish does not now this till out of water
Culture affects individuals within groups in many ways
Individuals are usually unaware of their own culture
In fact: Learned, shared assumptions and values provide context for interactions and influences
What is considered to be successful and what not
What are the priorities of the group
How people should behave
Simplifies action
Provides source of social identity
At the surface: Language, clothing, behavior
An individual becomes much more aware of own culture when visiting other culture(s)
Critical to leading in an international context
Necessary to over come the "fish out of water" syndrome
Is a group characteristic, but individuals are all different
Individuals are rarely "typical" all the time
Understanding culture is fundamental to being an effective global leader.
Two fundamental characteristics distinguish "international management" from "normal" domestic management
working across varying cultures
strategic complexity
To lead effectively in the complexity of globalization
empower people to make decisions
implement these in ways consistent with the company's priorities
understand the relationship between
people and organizations
organizations and their context
All of this complexity involves working across cultures effectively
Are cultures converging?
If cultures are converging, then it will become less important to understand cultural differences
Is business the same everywhere? Are people basically the same all over the world?
In some ways, yes:
Jeans, Nike, PlayStation, Pokemon, Harry Potter, vuvuzelas, popular music
Globally and instantly traded currencies, global norms and infrastructures for conducting business
In some ways, no:
Number of countries increasing
Genres of music, movies, culture fragmenting
The answer is "they are both converging and diverging"
Convergence allows us to do business together
Divergence manifests itself when people have to interact day-to-day
"To say that we're (Chinese) becoming Westernized because McDonald's does well in Shanghai, is like saying that the U.S. is becoming Easternized because there are a lot of Chinese restaurants there."
Why Focus on Country Cultures?
In International Management we often focus on the role of country cultures
institutions that carry culture are powerful and consistent with "country"
one "official" language is taught in state schools, is the language of government, is used by most official and unofficial media
one legal system
system of government consistent across regions
single relationship between church and state
Beliefs and values associated with these institutions are taught to people early and unobtrusively
through family norms and institutional practices
most people are unaware of their influence
It is important to remember that there are many other types of culture: regional, religious, local, professional, organizational, etc.
Culture Influences How We See The World
Assumptions and Perceptions influence our thoughts
Some assumptions are deeply ingrained and it is difficult to ever surface them
taken-for-granted beliefs about the world and how it works
create our world view
define the cognitive environment in which we work
some are deeply
Other assumptions are learned at various stages of our lives
"We see what we want to see and hear what we want to hear"
Or, "I'll see it when I believe it" rather than “'Ill believe it when I see it"
For example
The financial accountant focuses on financial ratios, earnings growth, dividends; may not focus on programs with long lead time that may enhance the company's reputation for social responsibility
The advertising account manager will likely focus on product features that fit into assumptions about the target audience's motivation, may miss other features
Assumptions are necessary
They eliminate a constant need to inquire about the meaning of events and the motives of others
The more we share assumptions with others, the more easily we interact and communicate effectively
Clearer Vision With D-I-E Describe, Interpret, Evaluate
Our actions are influenced by a cognitive process, filtered by our assumptions
D: We notice something and describe / observe its characteristics
I: We interpret, or give meaning to what we observed
E: We evaluate the facts, characteristics, dimensions of what we observed and then we take action
We perceive the world based on our assumptions through the D-I-E sequence
When we cross cultural barriers we need to be aware that our D-I-E is based on assumptions that may not apply to the local conditions
Spend more time on description, treat interpretations as hypotheses, defer evaluation until we have explored multiple possible interpretations
Culture and Individual Behavior (fig. 2.1)
When Cultures Meet:
Question the Other or Question Ourselves?
When people from two or more cultures meet or work together they start from a different set of assumptions based on their value systems (cultures) that may direct them to
notice the same characteristics of a situation or different ones
describe the situation they notice differently
interpret what they notice differently
evaluate what they interpreted differentlv
take different actions
When Cultures Meet Question the Other or Question Ourselves?
How to regain consistency?
Question the other
change our perception of the evidence to match the assumptions
Question ourselves
Change our assumptions to match the evidence
It is generally easier to question the other
less energy
reinforced by others with the same assumptions (boss at headquarters)
is less confusing
we distort what we've perceived to make it fit our assumptions
To question ourselves is less common and more difficult
need to stand back and identify the holes in our own assumptions
energy needed to change our assumptions and those of others too
overcome a tendency to base one's own identity to one's culturally induced assumptions
Key to effective communication: Fit between assumptions and perceptions
then, -> distortion of perceptions to achieve consistency with assumptions and false comfort
i.e., we seek pleasure to avoid pain
good fit: cognitive consistency -> justified "harmony, comfort"
cross-cultural situations: assumptions are likely to have no fit with perceptions -> misunderstanding
What's more important, rules or relationships?
Global and local?
Understanding Cultures Part 2: Acquiring & Organizing CultureSpecific Knowledge
Understanding culture: Through the Looking Glass
Cultural frameworks compare different
aspects of culture
Hall & Hall
V
Hofstede
Cultural Orientations Framework Kluckhohn & Strodtbeck
Is one tool for "mapping" differing patterns of beliefs held by different cultures
Highlights deep assumptions important for international management
Can promote deeper cultural awareness
BUT, must be used prudently
Presupposes understanding of:
concepts underlying culture
assumptions underlying the framework itself (see next slide)
The Cultural Orientations Framework is based on well-tested assumptions about culture.
There are universal themes in the challenges that different societies face over time
Kluckhohn & Strodtbeck identified six universal challenges faced by all societies, and a limited number of basic ways of responding to each of the challenges
Different societies developed different shared preferences for coping with each of these issues
The rank ordering of the society's preferences is what creates differences among cultures
All variations of a particular value orientation exist in a given culture
All variations provide good solutions and good ways forward for different situations; there is no such thing as a "better" cultural configuration
People believe there are different ways to deal with a given situation; the society agrees there a preferred way to start
The variation among individuals within a culture provides resources for cultural change and adaptation over time
The Six Cultural Orientations: Questions every culture must answer, and categories of responses
Environment: What is our basic relationship with the world around us?
Harmony, Mastery, Subjugation
Relationships: To whom and for whom do we naturally have responsibility?
Collective, Hierarchical, Individual
Activity: What is our basic or natural approach to activity?
Being, Doing, Thinking
Time: How do we think about time?
Monochronic, Polychronic (from Hall & Hall)
Human Nature: What is the basic nature of humans?
Good, Evil, Mixed or Neutral
The first four have the most impact on business interactions, and we focus our discussion on these.
Space: How do we think about and use space?
Public, Private, Mixed
Relationship with the Environment: How should we work with the environment around us?
Includes the physical, economic and social worlds.
Two most influential responses in business are Mastery and Harmony (see text for Subjugation). Both are effective, but take different routes.
Mastery: The environment is separate from us, and something to be managed. Our actions should influence and control the environment to get things to work well.
Examples: Pioneering, colonizing. High pay for CEOs (assumption that the CEO should control / master the business). Goal setting to produce results.
Harmony: The environment is a complex system of which we are one part. Our actions should keep the system in balance, then everything will work well.
Examples: Traditional hunting and gathering. Business systems of engaging many small actions in a coordinated way to bring about a comprehensive result over time. Goal setting to try actions and get feedback.
Relations among People: How should we think about relationships of power and responsibility? (Examples see next PPT slide)
Three approaches to relationships combine differently in each society. All are effective, but take different routes.
Collectivism: People in the group should be responsible for each other, and everyone is responsible to fulfil the group's needs. The group may be the extended family, the community, or any other large group.
Examples: Ubuntu, extended families, strong company cultures,
個人主義
Individualism: Each of us should be responsible for him- or herself alone, and perhaps the immediate family if necessary. Society works better if everyone looks after him- or herself.
Examples: Strict democracy, teams with specific and separate roles
等級制
Hierarchy: Power and responsibility are arranged such that those above have power over those below, and responsibility for them. Those below should obey the wishes of those above.
Examples: Strict communication and responsibility through an organization chart, privileges by hierarchical level.
Examples (real life stories)
Collectivism vs Individualism:
Example of International Joint venture of German MNC with Japanese Family Business: Top Management Meeting of the JV Partners
German: direct, critical, individualistic
Japanese: silent, consent seeking among peers, collectivistic
Hierarchies:
Example of German GM asking Chinese Accounting to prepare an analysis where he needs inputs from other departments
Mode of Activity: What is the basic sequence of activity we agree to use together? (Examples see next PPT slide)
Two most influential responses in business are Doing and Thinking. All societies engage in both modes, but prioritize them differently.
Doing: We agree it is important to jump into action. When in doubt, do something.
Examples: Quick pilot testing, short-term results focus, budgeting as a way to determine activities.
Thinking: We agree it is important to plan carefully, before taking action. When in doubt, plan and analyze.
Examples: Careful data analysis and re-analysis, planning of incremental milestones, budgeting as a way to engage in planning
Examples (real life stories)
Careful planning and preparation by German manager vs "flexibility" of Asian partners (i.e. Chinese supplier, Japanese sales executive)
Approach to Time: Is it linear or flexible?
How do we measure and use time in an ongoing way?
Monochronic: We measure time in linear, equal units. We prefer to do one thing at a time, then move to the next.
Examples: Punctuality, schedule-driven cultures, watches and clocks are important.
Polychronic: We think of time as flexible, and we do many things at a time.
Examples: Doing things in their time, adjust sequencing and schedules according to needs of the moment.
Globalization is creating a shift towards monochronic time as the common language of time; however, many cultures operate polychronically within the culture.
Remember? Where would you put the partners of the Daimler-Chrysler M&A?
Cultural orientations contribute differently to task and process.
Cultural Variable
Contribution to Task
Focus on the immediate problem
Contribution to Process
- Drive to solution
Environment
Mastery
Harmony
- Understand the problem from a holistic
view
- Don't come to closure too quickly
Relations
High Collectivism
- See the problem from different
stakeholders' perspectives
- Help the group converge and commit
Low Collectivism
- See the problem from different individuals'
perspectives
- Help the group value minority
contributions
High Hierarchy
- Anticipate implementation challenges
- Efficient communication, not endless
communication
Low Hierarchy
- Openly approach information sources
- Encourage ideas regardless of source
Activity
Doing
- Suggest actions
- Pilot test, try it out
Thinking
- Conduct in-depth analysis
- Team reflection, careful prototype
Data from a multi-country study helps map cultural differences.
Cultural orientations and variations study Measures Cultural Orientations
Data gathered at IMD from 10,000+ businesspeople from around the world show differences among countries.
Sample is businesspeople, about managers, MBA students; may not be representative of the general culture!
Everyone included in the following charts was (a) born in their country, and (b) still lives there or lived there longest and (c) identifies with it most closely
Warning: the smaller the sample size, the less reliable the map!
Samples shown here are (with sample size in this database): Argentina (73), Australia (282), Austria (295), Bangladesh (393), Belgium (218), Brazil (328), Canada (967), Chile (50), China (709), Colombia (69), Czech Republic (39), Denmark (281), Finland (115), France (629), Germany (751), Greece (52), Hong Kong (258), India (592), Indonesia (45), Ireland (86), Israel (39), Italy (358), Japan (625), Malaysia (88), Mexico (248), New Zealand (66), Netherlands (493), Nigeria (81), Norway (473), Pakistan (34), Peru (44), Poland (67), Portugal (140), Romania (171), Russia (226), Saudi Arabia (45), Singapore (113), South Africa (212), South Korea (180), Spain (302), Sweden (143), Switzerland (478), Taiwan (134), Thailand (140), Philippines (75), Turkey (64), Ukraine (58), United Kingdom (785), United States (3557), Vietnam (48).
Figure 2.3. Environment Orientation: Extent to which businesspeople prefer Mastery over Harmony.
Figure 2.4. Lateral Relations Orientation: Extent to which businesspeople prefer Collectivism over Individualism.
Figure 2.5. Vertical Relations Orientation: Extent to which businesspeople prefer Hierarchy.
Figure 2.6. Activity Orientation: Extent to which businesspeople prefer Thinking over Doing.
Remember, individuals within cultures varv greatly from each other...
Distribution of Mastery Scores in
... and countries vary in their level of cultural diversity.
High Cultural
Homogeneity
Mod. Cultural
Homogeneity
Mixed
Mod. Cultural
Diversity
High Cultural
Diversity
Belgium
Austria
Australia
Greece
Brazil
Japan
Finland
Denmark
India
Canada
Korea
France
Hong Kong
Ireland
China PRC
Saudi Arabia
Germany
Italy
Switzerland
Philippines
Singapore
Malaysia
UK
Romania
Taiwan
Mexico
USA
Russia
Thailand
Netherlands
South Africa
New Zealand
Nigeria
Norway
Spain
Sweden
New research: Diversity has implications for a country's competitiveness. Competitiveness highest with homogeneity on Individualism-Collectivism preference and diversity on Hierarchy preference. 新研究:多元化對國家競爭力有影響。在個人主義-集體主義偏好方面,同質性的競爭力最高;在等級偏好方面,多樣性的競爭力最高。
The map is not the territory! 地圖不是領土!
A cultural map is a snapshot of some aspects of the way people prefer to do things in the culture 文化地圖是人們喜歡的文化做事方式的某些方面的縮影
A great "first guess" to guide your expectations 一個很好的 "初步猜測",為您的期望提供指導
A set of hypotheses to test as you meet unexpected responses 當您遇到意想不到的反應時,有一套假設可供檢驗
Once your knowledge of the territory is better than the map, put the map away 一旦你對領土的了解勝過地圖,就把地圖收起來吧
Bring it out again when you need to navigate again 當您需要再次導航時,再把它拿出來
Your assignment and how the session content is related 您的任務以及會議內容的相關性
Using academic theories and a case study of your own choice, evaluate and analyse key traits of a global manager, such as, the appraisal of international culture, ethics and value-based considerations following which you should carry out a self-audit followed by a development plan. 利用學術理論和自己選擇的案例研究,評估和分析全球經理人的關鍵特徵,例如對國際文化、道德和價值考慮的評估,然後進行自我評估,並制定發展計劃。
It requires for example (these are not yet all tasks): 例如,它要求(這些還不是全部任務):
A critical literature review about international culture, ethics and values-based considerations (1200 words) 關於國際文化、倫理和價值觀的重要文獻綜述(1200 字)
A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has / not benefited from international culture, ethics and values-based considerations (1000 words) 自選一家企業進行案例研究,重點說明該企業如何從國際文化、道德和價值觀中獲益(1000 字)
"Homework" "家庭作業"
On your way home today or on your way to work tomorrow, think about any situations you encountered at work or at holidays with people from other cultures and/or when traveling to other countries. 在今天回家的路上或明天上班的路上,想想你在工作或假日與來自其他文化背景的人相處和/或去其他國家旅行時遇到的任何情況。
Have you noticed that they do something different from what you would have done or what you would have expected as "normal"?
Tomorrow, we are interested in listen to some of your and your classmates' observations in encounters with other cultures.
We will see how we can use the cross-cultural research models to explain these differences. We will find out if these models are useful and where their limitations are.
MAN6038 The Global Manager Session 2 SUMMARY
What are cultural differences
What are problems arising from such differences
How to apply cultural difference frameworks
How do the frameworks help developing a global mindset?
MAN6038 The Global Manager
Session 3
Cross-cultural skill development tools for global managers
Revision
-What are the key take aways from the previous session?
How does the content of the previous session relate to the assignment and global mindset development?
Any relevant examples to share?
Any clarifying questions?
Once again: The Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of academic references are required.
Your assignment and how the session content is related
"Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words) Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)"The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights
and concepts that you can use for your assignment
and when choosing a relevant case.
The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights and concepts that you can use for your assignment and when choosing a relevant case.
On your way home today or on your way to work tomorrow, think about any situations you encountered at work or at holidays with people from other cultures and/or when traveling to other countries.
Have you noticed that they do something different from what you would have done or what you would have expected as "normal"?
Tomorrow, we are interested in listen to some of your and your classmates' observations in encounters with other cultures.
We will see how we can use the cross-cultural research models to explain these differences. We will find out if these models are useful and where their limitations are.
Hofstede dimensions
Dimensions
Scale anchors
Power distance: beliefs about
the appropriate distribution of
power in society
Low power distance: belief
that effective leaders do not
need to have substantial
amounts of power compared
to their subordinates
High power distance: belief
that people in positions of
authority should have
considerable power compared
to their subordinates
Uncertainty avoidance: degree
of uncertainty that can be
tolerated and its impact on rule
making
Low uncertainty avoidance:
tolerance of ambiguity; little
need for rules to constrain
uncertainty
High uncertainty avoidance:
intolerance of ambiguity; need
for many rules to constrain
uncertainty
Individualism/collectivism:
relative importance of
individual versus group
interests
Collectivism: group interests
generally take precedence
over individual interests
Individualism: individual
interests generally take
precedence over group
interests
Masculinity/femininity:
assertiveness versus
passivity; material
possessions versus quality of
life
Masculinity: values material
possessions, money, and the
pursuit of personal goals
Femininity: values strong
social relevance, quality of life,
and the welfare of others
Long-term versus short-term
orientation: outlook on work,
life, and relationships
Short-term orientation: past
and present orientation; values
traditions and social
obligations
Long-term orientation: future
orientation; values dedication,
hard work, and thrift
Indulgence versus restraint:
Relative emphasis on
individual happiness, leisure
and personal control.
Indulgence: Societal
emphasis on enjoyment and
need gratification
Restraint: Strict societal
control to suppress or
regulate gratification
of uncertainty that can be tolerated and its impact on rule
dididualism/collectivism
elative importance of interests
Masculinity/femininity
assertiveness versus
passivity; materia
possessions versus quality of iff
Long-term versus short-term and present orientation; values traditions and social obligations emphasis on enjoyment and need gratification
Here is a tool to identify some possible (!) cultural differences:
Identify some cultural differences that affect the communication by using the Hofstede-insights-tool!
Think what each of the involved managers should have done to improve communication to a more effective level!
Mexico Netherlands
FIGURE 4.1. LEADING
Egalitarian cultures
It's okay to disagree with the boss openly even in front of others
People are more likely to move action without getting the boss's okay.
If meeting with a client or supplier, there is less focus on matching hierarchical levels
It's okay to e-mail or call people several levels below or above you.
With clients or partners you will be seated and spoken to in no specific order.
Hierarchical cultures
An effort is made to defer to the boss's opinion especially in public.
People are more likely to get the boss's approval before moving to action.
If you send your boss, they will send their boss. If your boss cancels, their also may not come.
Communication follows the hierarchical chain.
With clients or partners you may be seated and spoken to in order of position.
Directness: How straightforwardly do people typically communicate in this culture?
Van den Bosch's intentions
Cleaning up the email
Sticking to facts and figures
Being direct and clear about what steps are necessary to meet the client's needs.
Insisting on having information on five items "today
Menedez' possible perceptions
Focusing on facts and figures, not on establishing an empathetic appreciation of difficulties the Mexican partner is probably facing
Not asking any questions to understand the situation from Menendez's point of view
Being treated like a subordinate by his Dutch equal
Task-based v. relationship-based cultures
FIGURE 2.2. EVALUATING
FIGURE 2.3.
The GLOBE Project Model Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness
A unique large-scale study of cultural practices, leadership ideals, and generalized and interpersonal trust in 150 countries in collaboration with nearly 500 researchers.
An attempt to develop an empirically based theory to describe, understand, and predict the impact of specific cultural variables on managerial and organisational processes and the effectiveness of these processes
Conceived in 1991 by Professor Robert House, supported by Dr. Ali Dastmalchian and Prof. Mansour Javidan as the first to begin the data collection in the Middle East
Has become a leader with award-winning books, more than 400 academic and practice-oriented journal articles, a massive database, and GLOBE has been adopted by university scholars, diplomats and consulting agencies around the world.
The GLOBE Project Model
Multi-country study and evaluation of cultural attributes and leadership behaviour
Based on beliefs that:
Certain attributes that distinguish one culture from others can be used to predict the most suitable, effective and acceptable organisational and managerial practices within that culture
Societal culture has direct impact on organisational culture
Leader acceptance stems from tying leader attributes and behaviours to subordinate norms
Please visit GLOBE Project website for more information
The GLOBE Project Model - 9 Cultural Dimensions
Power distance
Uncertainty avoidance
Collectivism I: Social collectivism
Collectivism II: In-group collectivism
Gender egalitarianism
Assertiveness
Future orientation
Performance orientation
Humane orientation
More about the 9 Culturall Dimensions you can find on the GLOBE Project webpage.
The GLOBE Project Model
Corresponds generally with those of Hofstede's Model (studied in other modules)
However, different from Hofstede:
many more researchers with varied perspectives were involved vs. Hofstede working alone
and it studied many companies vs. Hofstede's IBM only
GLOBE provides a comprehensive overview of general stereotypes that can be further analysed for greater insight
A comparison of The GLOBE Project & Hofstede's Model
The GLOBE Project Model - 9 Cultural Dimensions
Dimension
Highest
Lowest
Power distance
Morocco, Argentina, Thailand, Spain,
Russia
Denmark, Netherlands, South
Africa-black sample, Israel, Costa
Rica
Uncertainty avoidance
Switzerland, Sweden, Germany-
former West, Denmark, Austria
Russia, Hungary, Bolivia, Greece,
Venezuela
Institutional collectivism
Sweden, South Korea, Japan,
Singapore, Denmark
Greece, Hungary, Germany-
former East, Argentina, Italy
In-group collectivism
Iran, India, Morocco, China, Egypt
Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand,
Netherlands, Finland
Gender egalitarianism
Hungary, Poland, Slovenia, Denmark,
Sweden
South Korea, Egypt, Morocco, India,
China
Assertiveness
Germany-former East, Austria,
Greece, United States, Spain
Sweden, New Zealand, Switzerland,
Japan, Kuwait
Future orientation
Singapore, Switzerland, Netherlands,
Canada-English speaking, Denmark
Russia, Argentina, Poland, Italy,
Kuwait
Performance orientation
Singapore, Hong Kong, New Zealand,
Taiwan, US
Russia, Argentina, Greece,
Venezuela, Italy
Humane orientation
Philippines, Ireland, Malaysia, Egypt,
Indonesia
Germany-former West, Spain,
France, Singapore, Brazil
The GLOBE Project Model
Figure 4-9
GLOBE Analysis:
Managerial Perspectives
in the United States and Brazil
The GLOBE Project Model -9 Cultural Dimensions - Questions for Reflection
Power distance
How much unequal distribution of power should there be in organisations and society?
Uncertainty-avoidance
How much should people rely on social norms and rules to avoid uncertainty and limit unpredictability?
Institutional collectivism
How much should leaders encourage and reward loyalty to the social unit, as opposed to the pursuit of individual goals?
The GLOBE Project Model -9 Cultural Dimensions - Questions for Reflection
In-group collectivism
How much pride and loyalty should individuals have for their family or organisation?
Gender egalitarianism
How much effort should be put into minimizing gender discrimination and role inequalities?
Assertiveness
How confrontational and dominant should individuals be in social relationships?
The GLOBE Project Model -9 Cultural Dimensions - Questions for Reflection
Future orientation
How much should people delay gratification by planning and saving for the future?
Performance orientation
How much should individuals be rewarded for improvement and excellence?
Humane orientation
How much should society encourage and reward people for being kind, fair, friendly, and generous?
The global manager as EXPATRIATE
Managing subordinates and handling peers, customers, suppliers, institutions in most appropriate ways is best learned when living and working outside the own familiar cultural environment.
People in other cultures do not necessarily take for granted what managers are used to assume in their own cultural environment.
Managers who live and work in a different country/ in a different cultural environment than their familiar home, are called EXPATRIATES!
Pros and Cons of using expatriates
For Company
For Indiv. Expatriates
Advantages
- Transfer management
practices
- Bring expertise to host country
- Disseminate global vision
- Closer control & coordination
- Boundary spinning
- Develop personnel & future
executives
- Develop broader global
perspective
- Financial gain
- Career advancement
Disadvantages
- High costs associate with
failure of international
assignments
- Increases the "foreignness" of
subsidiary
- Lower local-management
morale & motivation
- Problems of adaptability to
a foreign environment
- Personal and family
problems
- Career blockage
- Repatriation readjustment
Considerations in living and working globally
Success for international assignment
What Is challenging for expatriates?
Host country language
Lack of social network
Unfamiliar customs & cultural norms
Accommodation
Transportation
Healthcare
Food
Climate
Family problems
New work role
Culturally-bound professional vocabulary
Value incongruence
Future career path
Career blockage
What helps them adjust more quickly and better?
Supervisor support
Coworker support
Logistic support
Cultural novelty
Spouse adjustment
Role clarity
Role discretion
Role conflict
Role novelty
Experience
Language fluency
Personality
Competence
Efficacy
Acculturative strategy
some previous culture-specific work experiences no previous culture-specific work experience
Figure 4. Work adjustment trajectories for expatriates with high and low previous culture-specific work experience.
Cultural empathy The ability to empathize with the feelings, 文化同理心 文化同理心是一種對情感感同身受的能力、
thoughts and behaviors of members from
different cultural groups.
Emotional stability A tendency to remain calm in stressful situations
versus a tendency to show strong emotional
reactions under stressful circumstances.
Open mindedness An open and unprejudiced attitude towards
outgroup members and towards different
cultural norms and values.
Social initiative A tendency to approach social situations in an
active way and to take initiatives.
Flexibility
A tendency and ability to adjust one's behavioral
strategies to different or more restricted
circumstances within a foreign culture.
Factors that influence the performance of international managers
Expat management
HR Practive
Expat selection
- Establish a selection board of expatriates
-
Selection criteria: multicultural personality, efficacy, cultural sensitivity,
language fluency, prior experience (!)
Screen candidates' spouses and families
Expat training
- Conduct training 9-12 months before assignment
- Cultural intelligence training
- At least some training should go to the expatriate's family
Expat development
- Position the international assignment as a step toward advancement within
the firm
Expat reward
- Repatriation programme
- Rrovide career support for spouses
management
- Provide a disposable income equivalent to what the expatriate would
receive at home
Provide an explicit "add-on" incentive for accepting an international posting
The MBI Model for High Performance
The MBI Model:
Managing Cultural Diversity for Personal and Team Effectiveness
High Performance
MAP
Understand the differences
Cultural Orientations Framework
BRIDGE
Communicate across the differences
-Prepare:
Motivation, Confidence
-Decenter:
Perspective taking, Explain without blame
-Recenter:
Common view, common norms
INTEGRATE Manage the
differences
-Build Participation -Resolve Conflicts -Build on Ideas
Differences
Map differences as a foundation for understanding.
Mapping is the skill of describing differences objectively
... without inherent judgment
... based on data, and changing with new observations
... comparing with a "you are here" point
Remember that the Map is not the Territory, it is a tool to help you navigate the territory
Stop using the Map once you understand the Territory well
Chapter 2 of the textbook is about Mapping Culture
Bridge gaps to communicate, transmit meaning as it was intended.
Communicate effectively across differences by
Preparing
Motivation to understand and communicate across differences
Confidence in the ability to communicate effectively and that the outcome will be positive
Decentering without blame
Blame-free explanations: attribute problems and
B
conflicts correctly
Bridge
Communicate
De-centering: send and receive messages with the other person's "code" in mind
Recentering
Common reality: foundation for effective communication. Find something you can agree on.
Common rules: agree on norms of behavior
Integrate to get synergy - build from Maps and Bridges
Bring the differences together in a synergistic way
Engage participation
Actively seek to involve people
Establish routines to facilitate participation
Vary the modes of participation
Resolve conflicts
Detect disagreement (indirectly expressed?)
Resolve conflicts using bridging skills
Agree on ways to avoid destructive conflict
Build on ideas
Explore differences; build on each other's ideas; try to invent new ideas
Do more than combine and compromise
You don't need to love each other, just bring out the best in each other!
Good bridging is possible only with good mapping.
Map-Bridge-Integrate
Teams that engage in the MBI behaviors well:
are more creative
generate more and better alternatives and criteria for evaluating them
perform better on complex, multi-faceted decision-making tasks
create value through effective innovation and change
Culturally diverse teams have great potential for performance.
Diverse teams are creative (generate ideas), but don't necessarily turn the creativity into performance (viable business).
Most culturally diverse teams suppress the diversity to avoid the problems.
Manage cultural differences effectively to overcome the barriers and achieve the benefits
Cultural diversity helps the divergent processes - this is obvious
Cultural diversity makes it hard to get the convergent process, but good team and leadership processes can overcome this
Culturally diverse teams tend to have higher satisfaction and motivation to be together than mono-cultural teams - this can be put to work
People like to be in culturally diverse teams to learn, for variety
MAN6038 The Global Manager Session 3 SUMMARY
Practical applications of cultural difference frameworks
Understanding factors, not only culture, that affect the performance of global managers
MBI model
MAN6038 The Global Manager
Session 3 TUTORIAL
How to find Academic Evidence for the Assignment
Your assignment and how to deal with literature sources
Using academic theories and a case study of your own choice, evaluate and analyse key traits of a global manager, such as, the appraisal of international culture, ethics and value-based considerations following which you should carry out a self-audit followed by a development plan.
It requires for example (these are not yet all tasks):
A critical literature review about international culture, ethics and valuesbased considerations (1200 words)
A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has / not benefited from international culture, ethics and values-based considerations (1000 words)
In-text citations and the list of references should follow Harvard style. A minimum of 15 academic references are required.
Your assignment and how to deal with literature sources
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of 10-15 academic references are required.
Evidence-Based Arguments
What is valued in academic writing is that opinions are based on a sound understanding of the pertinent body of knowledge and academic debates that exist within, and increasing external to, your discipline. You need to support your opinion with evidence from scholarly sources. It should be an objective stance presented as a logical argument. The quality of your evidence will determine the strength of your argument. The challenge is to convince the reader of the validity of your opinion through a welldocumented, coherent, and logically structured piece of writing. This is particularly important when proposing solutions to problems or recommended courses of action.
Ways to Construct a Compelling Argument
Keep it simple. Keep your argument concise.
Make your assumptions clear.
Rest your argument on solid foundations.
Use evidence your readers will believe.
Avoid platitudes and generalisations, and be specific.
Understand the opposing point of view.
Creating an Introduction
The argumentative essay begins with an engaging introduction that presents the general topic. The thesis typically appears somewhere in the introduction and states the writer's point of view.
Avoid forming a thesis based on a negative claim. For example, "The hourly minimum wage is not high enough for the average worker to live on." This is probably a true statement, but arguments should make a positive case that affirms something. Instead of arguing something "is not...", an argument essay is stronger when it asserts something "is..." Returning to the example above, a stronger thesis could focus on how the hourly wage is low or insufficient.
Acknowledging Opposing Ideas and Limits to Your Argument
Because an argument implies differing points of view on the subject, you must be sure to acknowledge those opposing ideas. Avoiding ideas that conflict with your own gives the reader the impression that you may be uncertain, fearful, or unaware of opposing ideas. Thus, it is essential that you not only address counterarguments but also do so respectfully.
Try to address opposing arguments earlier rather than later in your essay. Rhetorically speaking, ordering your positive arguments last allows you to better address ideas that conflict with your own, so you can spend the rest of the essay countering those arguments. This way, you leave your reader thinking about your argument rather than someone else's. You have the last word.
Bias in Writing
The strength of a personal bias is that it can motivate you to construct a strong argument. If you are invested in the topic, you are more likely to care about the piece of writing. Similarly, the more you care, the more time and effort you are apt to put forth and the better the final product will be.
The weakness of bias is when the bias begins to take over the essaywhen, for example, you neglect opposing ideas, exaggerate your points, or repeatedly insert yourself ahead of the subject by using Itoo often. Being aware of all three of these pitfalls will help you avoid them.
Fact and Opinion
Facts are statements that can be definitely proven using objective data. The statement that is a fact is absolutely valid. In other words, the statement can be pronounced as true or false. For example, . This expression identifies a true statement, or a fact, because it can be proved with objective data.
Opinions are personal views, or judgments. An opinion is what an individual believes about a particular subject. However, an opinion in argumentation must have legitimate backing; adequate evidence and credibility should support the opinion. Consider the credibility of expert opinions. Experts in a given field have the knowledge and credentials to make their opinion meaningful to a larger audience.
Example of argument/conclusion based on academic journal sources
Many researchers studied and assessed brand equity based on Aaker's (1991) four-dimensional theory and Keller's (1993) consumer-based brand equity model and their results supported Aaker's and Keller's findings (Cobb-Walgren et al., 1995; Pappu et al., 2005). Yoo et al., (2000) also opened up their study in evaluating brand equity. They combined the two attributes of brand awareness and brand association in Aaker's (1991) four-dimensional model into a threedimensional construct and employed the statistical method of confirmatory factor analysis for assessment. This three-dimensional construct was further finetuned through refining the dimensions. It was later confirmed and supported the three-dimensional brand equity theory for empirical studies (Yoo and Donthu, 2001; Washburn and Plank, 2002).
By reviewing the previous literatures on brand equity evaluation, it is observed that different researchers proposed different approaches from different perspectives for estimating the brand value for different purposes.
The purposes of brand equity valuation are .....
Example of argument relevant sources
Examples of research on digital disruption or transformation are:
Matzler, K., Friedrich Von Den Eichen, S., Anschober, M., & Kohler, T. (2018).
The crusade of digital disruption. Journal of Business Strategy, 39(6), 13-20. doi:10.1108/jbs-12-2017-0187
Zaki, M. (2019). Digital transformation: harnessing digital technologies for the next generation of services. Journal of Services Marketing, 33(4), 429435. doi:10.1108/jsm-01-2019-0034
D'Ippolito, B., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Panniello, U. (2019). Archetypes of incumbents' strategic responses to digital innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(5), 662-679. doi:10.1108/jic-04-2019-0065
Choi, J. J., & Ozkan, B. (2019). Innovation and Disruption: Industry Practices and Conceptual Bases. In (pp. 3-13): Emerald Publishing Limited.
How to recognize peer-reviewed (refereed) journals
Universities often require that students utilize articles from "peerreviewed" journals.
But what are peer-reviewed journal articles, and why do faculty require their use?
What is peer review?
Joumal Editor includes in
Three categories of information resources:
Newspapers and magazines containing news - Articles are written by reporters who may or may not be experts in the field of the article. Consequently, articles may contain incorrect information.
Journals containing articles written by academics and/or professionals Although the articles are written by "experts," any particular "expert" may have some ideas that are really "out there!"
Peer-reviewed journals - Articles are written by experts and are reviewed by several other experts in the field before the article is published in the journal in order to ensure the article's quality. (The article is more likely to be scientifically valid, reach reasonable conclusions, etc.) In most cases the reviewers do not know who the author of the article is, so that the article succeeds or fails on its own merit, not the reputation of the expert.
How do you determine whether an article qualifies as being a peer-reviewed journal article?
Limiting a database search to peer-reviewed journals only. Some databases allow you to limit searches for articles to peer reviewed journals only.
In some databases you may have to go to an "advanced" or "expert" search screen to do this. Some databases do not allow you to limit your search in this way.
Or alternatively: Find the official web site of the journal on the internet, and check to see if it states that the journal is peer-reviewed. Be careful to use the official site (often located at the journal publisher's web site), and, even then, information could potentially be "inaccurate."
Data presented in academic journal research articles
(careful: do you use the raw data for your own argument or do you follow the interpretation/conclusion of the researcher?)
Data from government / company / association websites
Data from Wiki (?)
Data from newspapers, magazines
Data from internal sources (not public)
Data gathered by yourself (primary)
Identify the literature which is relevant to the study.
Locate your present study/argument in relation to the literature.
Different research areas and topics will have different quantities of relevant literature.
In some areas the volume can be vast, in some relatively small. More than one body of literature might be relevant
A good literature review needs to present the overall academic context and how it relates to the research theme.
It must provide an overview of the history of the development of academic contributions from early theories up to recent research.
Using theories from the 1960s or 1980s is not enough. Recent research publications (last 5-10 years) that refer to these theories need to be investigated.
The literature review is a review and not a list of descriptions.
It provides an overview of the key contributions of VARIOUS authors to the SAME key issue.
Commonly the most popular or first contributor is cited and then other authors' additions, applications, critique or support are compiled to discuss the issue.
Only re-telling a theory/research from one and the same source is not a literature REVIEW.
Remember! LITERATURE REVIEW
What are the relevant theories?
How are these theories applied?
What do they find? (i.e. their outcome)
What evidence / data do they use?
What are the controversial issues? (What does one author write and other author/s disagree or add?)
How is your assignment going to be inspired by and link-up with the work you are reading?
How to phrase in-text references: CHECKLIST OF WORDS (1)
Wiatt (2009) analysed - examine in very close detail; identify important points and chief features
Horshel et al (1999) comment on - identify and write about the main issues, giving your reactions based upon what you have read or heard in lectures. Avoid purely personal opinion
Trompenaars (1997) compared - show how two or more things are similar. Indicate the relevance or consequences of these similarities
Michels and Blant (2010) contrast - set two or more items or arguments in opposition so as to draw out differences. Indicate whether the differences are significant. If appropriate, give reasons why one item or argument may be preferable
Beer et al (1998) critically evaluated - weigh arguments for and against something, assessing the strength of the evidence on both sides. Use criteria to guide your assessment of which opinions, theories, models or items are preferable
Schein (1960) defined - give the exact meaning of. Where relevant, show that you understand why the definition may be problematic
Yin (1996) describe - give the main characteristics or features of something, or outline the main events
Porter (2000) discussed - write about he most important aspects of (probably including criticism); give arguments for and against; consider the implications of
Hofstede (1980) distinguished - bring out the differences between two (possible confusable) items
CHECKLIST OF WORDS (2)
Miller (1978) evaluated - assess the worth, importance or usefulness of something, using evidence. There will probably be cases to me made both for and against
Stein et al (2010) examined - put the subject 'under the microscope', looking at it in detail. If appropriate, 'critically evaluate' its as well
Wilkinson (2005) explains - make clear why something happens, or why something is the way it is
French (2012) illustrates - make something clear and explicit, giving examples or evidence
Block et al (2013) interpret - give the meaning and relevance of data or other material presented
Julianek (2000) justifies - give evidence which supports an argument or idea; show why a decision or conclusions were made, considering objections that others might make
Holtz (1999) narrates - concentrate on saying what happened, telling it as a story
Vanders (2001) outlines - give only the main points, showing the main structure
Marshal (2000) relates - show similarities and connections between two or more things
Watson (1999) states - give the main features, in very clear English (almost like a simple list but written in full sentences)
Raven (1985) summarises - draw out the main points only (see 'outline'), omitting details or examples
Phatek (2000) points out to what extent - consider how far something is true, or contributes to a final outcome. Consider also ways in which the proposition is not true (the answer is usually somewhere between 'completely' and 'not at all')
Harzing (2001) traced - follow the order of different stages in an event or process
and
Wrap-Up WEEK 1 (Session 1 -3)
What you should do in the next days before we continue with session 4:
1.) Read the chapters in the assigned textbook!
2.) Identify some major theories/concepts to manage cultural differences (summarize each to 1-2 sentences and write down the full HARVARD reference)!
3.)Find (in the internet) a global company about which is something written about any cultural management problem or how they manage cultural differences well. Apply some theory (not all) to explain the case incident/s.
4.) Reflect on your own global mindset: are you already fit to manage cultural diverse teams or to work in foreign countries? If not, what would you do to improve the skill level?
MAN6038
The Global Manager
Session 4a
Managing global teams and networks
Revision
-What are the key take aways from the previous session?
How does the content of the previous session relate to the assignment and global mindset development?
Any relevant examples to share?
Any clarifying questions?
Once again: The Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of academic references are required.
Your assignment and how the session content is related
"Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words) Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)"
The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights and concepts that you can use for your assignment and when choosing a relevant case.
WORKING IN AND WITH GLOBAL TEAMS: Consider
In what ways can global team synergy be developed and sustained over the long run?
If your boss asked you to develop a two-day team-building workshop for members of several new dispersed global teams, how would you structure the program? What would you include, and why?
In your view, what are the principal qualities for a global team leader? Are these leadership qualities the same or different for co-located and dispersed teams? Why?
Are some people better suited to participate in dispersed global teams than others? How might a company train employees to participate in such teams?
Global teams
A global team is a group of heterogeneous employees from two or more countries, and sometimes two or more companies, who work together to coordinate, develop, or manage some aspect of a firm's global operations.
Why a global team?
Companies use global teams when they need specific crosscultural expertise on some aspect of the business or when they partner with a foreign firm.
Many firms prefer using such teams because they can often do a better job than homogeneous teams consisting exclusively of either home- or host-country nationals.
Global teams can provide an opportunity to incorporate widely differing social, cultural, and business perspectives into key decisions affecting the success of international operations.
Tuckman's stages of team development
Forming
confusion
uncertainty
assessing situation
testing ground
rules
feeling out other
defining goals
getting acquainted
establishing rules
disagreement over
priorities
struggle for
leadership
tension
hostility
clique formation
Peforming
successful
performance
flexible, task roles
openness
helpfulness
delusion,
disillusion and acceptance
Adjourning
disengagement
anxiety about separation and ending
positive feeling
towards leader
sadness
self-evaluation
Cultural diversity & team performance
The performance of multicultural groups at work was typically either much better than that of mono-cultural groups, or significantly worse (French, 2010).
I-P-O model of team effectiveness (McGrath)
Types of team behaviours
Task/action behaviors - Occur after planning processes as team members work on the task
Ionores incidentals. Too Pre-occupied to ully communicate.
Lacks drive and ability to inspire others. Can be overly cititical
MANAGEMENT STYLES ACROSS FOUR DIFFERENT CULTURES
The influence of culture on the nature of trust and trust development
Building mutual trust: Can people be trusted?
Country
Agreement
Country
Agreement
Agreement
Brazil
7
Austria
32
United Kingdom
44
Turkey
10
Mexico
34
Ireland
44
Romania
16
South Korea
35
United States
47
Slovenia
17
Spain
35
Canada
52
Latvia
18
India
35
Netherlands
54
Portugal
23
Russia
37
Denmark
58
Chile
24
Germany
38
China
60
Nigeria
24
Japan
42
Finland
64
Argentina
24
Switzerland
43
Norway
67
France
24
Iceland
44
Sweden
68
Trust from the head v. trust from the heart
Cognitive/ Instrumental
Trust in the behaviors of others: consistency, competency, reliability
E.g. "He's predictable"
We can trust both friends and enemies under this definition
Critical to executing in teams
When you say you're going to do something we can rely on it
Affective
Rooted in shared values, emotions, and destinies
E.g. "She's got my back."
Allows for productive task conflict without relationship conflict
Conflict tipping point
The effects of affective trust
Teams without Affective Trust
Teams with Affective Trust 情感信任團隊
Task Conflict 任務衝突
Idea
Generation
and Problem
Solving
Good
Performance
and Team
Viability
Negotiations within teams and with partners
There are some similarities among ways how to negotiate with team members as well as with outsiders (i.e., customers, suppliers, partners, competitors, ...)
Presented in the following!
Preparing for cross-cultural negotiations
Selecting the right partner
Negotiating strategies and processes
-The competitive approach: a win-lose game
-The problem-solving approach: a win-win solution
Competitive v problem-solving approach
Stages in
negotiation
Competitive bargaining
Problem-solving bargaining
(1) Preparation
Identify current economic and other
benefits your firm seeks from the
deal. Prepare to defend your firm's
position.
Define the long-term strategic interests
of your firm. Prepare to overcome cross-
cultural barriers to defining mutual
interests.
(2) Relationship
building
Look for weaknesses in your
opponent's position. Learn about
your opponent, but reveal as little as
possible.
Adapt to the other side's culture.
Separate the people involved in
negotiation from the problems and goals
that need to be solved.
(3) Information
exchange and first
offer
Provide as little information as
possible to your opponent. Make
your position explicit. Make a hard
offer that is more favorable to your
side than you realistically expect to
achieve.
Give and demand to receive objective
information that clarifies each party's
interests. Accept cultural differences in
speed of response and type of
information needs. Make firm but
reasonable first offer.
(4) Persuasion
Use dirty tricks and pressure tactics
when appropriate to win.
Search for new creative options that
benefit the interests of both parties.
(5) Concessions
Begin with high initial demands.
Make concessions slowly and
grudgingly.
Search for mutually acceptable criteria
for reaching accord. Accept cultural
differences in starting position and in
how and when concessions are made.
(6) Agreement
Sign only if you win and then ensure
that you sign an ironclad contract.
Sign when the interests of your firm are
met. Adapt to cultural differences in
contracts when necessary.
FIGURE 1.1. COMMUNICATING
Low Context Good communication is precise, simple, and clear. Messages are expressed and understood at face falue. Repetition is appreciated if it helps clarify the communication.
High Context Good communication is sophisticated, nuanced, and layered. Messages are both spoken and read between the lines. Messages are often implied but not plainly expressed.
Strategies for working with people from highercontext cultures
Speak less, listen more
Read between the lines (listen to what is meant instead of what is said)
Clarify when unsure
Do not assume the other party purposely omits information or is unable to communicate explicitly
Strategies for working with people from lowercontext cultures
Be as transparent, clear, and specific as possible.
Tell them what you plan to say, say it, tell them what you've said.
FIGURE 8.1. SCHEDULING
Germany J
Japan Netherlands
Poland
Spain Italy
Brazil China
Saudi
Arabia
Switzerland
Sweden US UK
Czech Republic
France
Russia
Mexico
India Nigeria
Linear time Project steps are approached in a sequential fashion, completing one task before beginning the next. One thing at a time. No interruptions. The focus is on the deadline and sticking to the schedule. Emphasis is on promptness and good organization over flexibility.
Flexible time Project steps are approached in a fluid manner, changing tasks as opportunities arise. Many hings are dealt with at once and interruptions accepted. The focus is on adaptability and glexibility is valued over organization.
Sequential and holistic bargaining strategies
Holistic bargaining: Both parties negotiate the entire contact as a whole, moving back and forth across items until they are fully satisfied with the entire document. [items 1-3]
Getting to "Yes" across cultures
Preparing to Face Your Counterpart
The map below sorts nationalities according to how confrontational and emotionally expressive they are.
Although negotiators often believe that the two characteristics go hand in hand, that's not always the case.
In class discussion / group work:
Working in your groups, you are required to choose one of the topics from the list below and, as a group, prepare an oral presentation.
The presentation should be built on the heels of theory and industry examples. The presentation should be 3-5 minutes long.
Which team formation is better, homogenous or diverse?
Explain the role of diverse teams on performance
Mapping of international cultures (identify differences which are positively and which are negatively contributing to team success)
Define the characteristics of an Asian and an US manager
How is culture related to personality of group members?
What is the best way to manage the (cultural) difference?
Conflict resolution in international business
The Promise of Teams
On average teams outperform individuals on certain tasks and in certain contexts
Global virtual teams
Examples?
Leading virtual global teams: how do social, cognitive, and behavioral capabilities matter?
The framework seeks to identify and explain the role of social, cognitive, and behavioral capabilities as important determinants of effective VT leadership and success
To remain competitive and ensure growth
Team-members use technology
No physical movement across borders
Frequent interaction
Agile and flexible and are scattered across the globe/different time zones
Phased approach
Preparation
Launch
Performance observation and management
Training and team development
Disbanding
Virtual team perspective
The old normal, the new normal, the forever normal: Virtual Teams are the Norm, not the Exception...
A virtual team is a group of people with a common purpose, working on interdependent tasks...
...that functions across boundaries of space, time, and organization, and is supported by technology.
Shell SEOP T³ Background Information, Arie Baan
Most managers and professionals in today's multinational organizations work in two or more virtual teams at the same time.
Adding diversity and distance in teams
Diverse teams provide
A wide range of perspectives
A large variety of potential solutions for problems or opportunities
The potential for synergy
But ... there is the potential for conflict as individuals may interpret events and information differently
Distance in teams provides
Access to more resources, embedded in more contexts
Getting the right people on the task, no matter where they are located
But... invisible communication and high coordination costs
Manage diversity for opportunity.
Cultural diversity
Time zones
Local markets
Ecosystem connections and networks
Etc.
Overcome Barriers and Gain Opportunities
Overcoming barriers of virtuality is difficult for us, especially given our experiences with face-toface
Leading well in global teams requires tremendous effort and focus
Get the basics right.
Sequence communications "technology" to match task interdependence.
Lead the network, not just the team.
Manage diversity for opportunity.
Payoff is more focused travel, more connections, potential knowledge sharing and other synergies in multinational companies
MAN6038 The Global Manager Session 4a SUMMARY
Benefits and challenges of international teams
What factors affect international team performance
And how to manage them
MAN6038
The Global Manager
Session 4b
Developing a global mindset
MAN6038 The Global Manager
PPT from a Guest Lecture by Prof Mansour Javidan (US)
Traits of a Global Manager and Developing a Global Mindset
What do global managers need in order to succeed?
Global Managers need a
Global Mindset
Global Managing Starts with a Global Mindset
A global mindset is the capacity to analyse situations and develop criteria for personal and business performance that are independent from the assumptions of a single country, culture or context; and to implement those criteria appropriately in different countries, cultures and contexts.
(Lane & Maznevski, 2004)
Traits that global managers need
Research shows up to 250 competences are needed!
Only a superhero can be a global manager then?
Researchers created some frameworks to capture most important criteria in selecting these skills and competences
-> one is The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
GLOBAL MINDSET
The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
Social Capital (SC)
The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
Developing a Global Mindset
A global mindset is not something innate, it can be learned
However, it cannot be developed by simply reading a book on an airplane or by being lectured about in a classroom
It has to be shaped or developed, which implies changes have to take place
What kind of changes?
Developing your own Global Mindset
Requires active learning - engage problems where you must assess the situation, see options, make decisions, implement actions, and experience feedback
Requires mindfulness - pay close attention to your own reactions and to what is happening in the environment
Requires self-awareness - become aware of how your assumptions and frameworks shape perceptions, values and behaviour only as you confront different sets of assumptions guiding the views and practices of others
Developing your own Global Mindset
"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new
landscapes, but in having new eyes"
Marcel Proust (French novelist, 1871-1922)
and
Wrap-Up Session 4a and 4b
1.) Read the chapter about global team management in the assigned textbook!
2.) Study the provided article: Bowden (2013) The Global Mindset of Managers! This is essential for the assignment task part 2 as well as part 4, and indirectly driving the direction in part 3! It is essential to discuss and apply this model.
3.) Reflect on your own global mindset: What would you do to improve the skill level?
BIRMINGHAM CITY University
MAN6038
The Global Manager
Session 5
Implementing Strategy, Structure and Systems and related Value Based Considerations
Revision
-What are the key take aways from the previous session?
How does the content of the previous session relate to the assignment and global mindset development?
Any relevant examples to share?
Any clarifying questions?
Once again: The Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of academic references are required.
Your assignment and how the session content is related
"Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words) Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)"The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights
and concepts that you can use for your assignment
and when choosing a relevant case.
The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights and concepts that you can use for your assignment and when choosing a relevant case.
Global Managers must be able to make valuebased considerations
Global managers must analyse the complexities of global organisations and cultural, ethical and value-based considerations for managers wishing to pursue global strategies.
Global companies chose to place their activities there where they deliver the best value for their business:
Where to sell
Where to produce/ to do the service
Where to develop/ innovate products/ services
Executing Strategy: Value-Creation in the Global Environment
Managers must understand how culture influences a firm's strategy, structure, systems
Managers must use this understanding to
Scan for information from the MNC's multiple environments
Use their experientially acquired tacit knowledge of these environments to understand this information
Combine this understanding of the firm's complex environment with a clear understanding of its internal competences
Translate implications of such understanding to set the firm's strategy, structure and systems
Managers must
Recognize the firm's organizational heritage
Realize its roots in a home country culture
Create the firm's global culture
The Upsalla Model: In the early stage of globalization expansion internationally was stepwise.
Today, an increase of "born global" start-ups is observed.
Tensions from Operating Globally:
Global Integration vs Local Responsiveness
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Global Integration results from the need to achieve global efficiency
goods/ideas/systems moved around the world with little change across borders
economic efficiencies: causes
elimination of trade barriers
tariff barriers
non-tariff barriers
global media/communications: convergence of tastes, standards
information technology: facilitation of MNC's subsidiary coordination
Tensions from Operating Globally: Global Integration vs Local Responsiveness
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution
Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Local responsiveness results from the need to satisfy local needs
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Dependence on MNC's industry / competitive arena
Four strategies for organizing globally
Global
Multidomestic
International
Transnational
Global Customer influence on strategy implementation
Four Global Business Strategies
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989).Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Bartlett & Ghoshal - Diagram axis explained
Local responsiveness - Business considerations
The company might have to consider the requirements of the local population.
The company will have to consider domestic competition.
Cost pressure - Business considerations
Business must consider the implications/costs on the business of differentiating its product or service in a variety of global markets.
Business must consider if it will be able to use the same branding and marketing techniques and materials to be successful internationally.
Bartlett & Ghoshal - Diagram axis explained
Multi domestic: Low Integration and High Responsiveness
Aims to meet the needs of the local market.
Tailor products and services to suit the local market.
Low pressure for global integration.
Decentralised structure.
Unique marketing and sales approach to each individual market.
E.g. Nestle
Bartlett & Ghoshal - Diagram axis explained
Global: High Integration and Low Responsiveness e.g. Pfizer
Global companies are the opposite of multi-domestic companies.
They offer the same product worldwide.
Their goal is to maximize efficiencies in order to reduce costs as much as possible.
Global companies are highly centralised.
All worldwide branches are very dependent on the headquarters.
A company example would be Pfizer.
Bartlett & Ghoshal - Diagram axis explained
Transnational: High Integration and High Responsiveness e.g. Unilever
This is a mix between both transnational and multidimensional.
It will aim to respond both locally and gain benefits of integration.
They will be independent but also integrated with their headquarters and strive to achieve the company's global mission, aim and objective.
A great example of a transnational company is Unilever.
Bartlett & Ghoshal - Diagram axis explained
International: Low Integration and Low Responsiveness
This strategy was not originally in Bartlett & Ghoshal's theory. This part of the theory was created by others.
This part of the theory believes there is little need for local adaptation and global integration.
The majority of the main activities will be maintained at the headquarter.
This strategy is also often related to an exporting strategy.
A good example would be large wine brands around the world.
Strategies for Expanding Into Global Markets
But What is Strategy? 但什麼是戰略?
Henry Mintzberg defined strategy as a pattern in a stream of decisions to contrast with a view of strategy as planning 亨利-明茨伯格將策略定義為決策流中的一種模式,與將策略視為規劃的觀點形成對比
Henrik von Scheel defines the essence of strategy as the activities to deliver a unique mix of value - choosing to perform activities differently or to perform different activities than rivals 亨利克-馮-舍爾將策略的本質定義為提供獨特價值組合的活動--選擇以不同的方式進行活動,或進行與競爭對手不同的活動
Max McKeown argues that strategy is about shaping the future and is the human attempt to get to desirable ends with available means 麥克斯-麥基翁認為,策略是關於塑造未來的,是人類以現有手段達到理想目的的嘗試
Executing Global Strategy 執行全球策略
The formulation and implementation of a strategy requires understanding market demands, competitors, and external constraints, such as government policies.
However, in addition to choosing, for example, markets and manufacturing sites, important organizational actions include choosing structures, work systems, and administrative mechanisms to motivate employees toward the desired goals.
The success of any business is determined by the effectiveness of the strategy it follows.
A strategy explains how a company plans to compete in a market and how it intends to grow at a profit.
Executing Global Strategy
Today's global organisations need skilled global managers
Cultural understanding and good intercultural skills are important managerial competencies
However, as a manager in the global economy you will need more than intercultural competency
You also have to understand how the intercultural context may influence your company's strategy, structure, administrative systems, and operations
Strategy Execution Is Embedded In Context: Know Your Assumptions
As a company spreads beyond its home country and creates a global network, top managers need to recalibrate their cultural "filters" through education and the acquisition of personal experience.
Specifically, this should include knowledge about their different market environments, company activities in these countries, and the linkages among this network of activities.
With properly interpreted information, global executives can make informed strategic decisions and influence the design and implementation of culturally-sensitive organization structures and systems to achieve strategic goals.
Executives can put into use the global mindset they have developed in executing a global strategy.
But Which Strategy to Adopt?
Which part of strategy to globalize? Which to localize?
globalize activities which achieve economies of scale
localize activities which depend on local people for effective implementation, except those which need to keep the eye on the global picture
What legal constraints?
What do we know how to do well? What do we still need to learn and how?
How can we make sure that our strategy is interpreted correctly in each local culture? What are the "gaps" which will still offer resistance?
Can we take the time to implement our global strategy?
Do we know enough about a country to assess risk?
Culture and Strategy
Impact of Culture Differences on Strategy
Managers often make decisions on the basis of cultural/ governance system in their home country
use rational analyses with domestic assumptions
economic environment
cost-benefit analysis
competitive assessment
employee selection/training/motivation
develop structures, systems, practices with domestic assumptions
can these systems apply to other countries which operate with different assumptions?
if not, how can managers know what to do abroad?
In international business, organizations are more than sociotechnical systems, they are socio-cultural-technical systems
Impact of Culture Differences on Strategy
Managers use "judgment" to assess organization's environment and internal strengths/ weaknesses
"Judgment" requires use of explicit and tacit knowledge of differences among countries and cultures
As well as differences of international business from domestic business
government system
economic system
legal system
Methods to Expand Into Global Markets
Developing a Global Presence Overseas Entry Decisions
Geographic entry decisions
Where to go: culture distance vs geographic distance
How to go: mode of operation in overseas market
How to organize
Culture distance vs geographic distance
Mode
wholly owned subsidiaries (FDI)
international joint ventures (FDI, joint ownership)
Franchising/Licensing
Exports/Imports
How to organize: global vs multidomestic strategy
Developing a Global Presence Methods to Expand Into Global Markets
Exporting direct to international customers
Selling via international agents and distributc
Opening overseas operations
(i.e. Starbucks in Australia)
Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As)
(i.e. Exxnon and Mobil; Disney and Pixar)
International Joint Ventures
(i.e. Sony Erickson)
Strategic Alliances
(i.e. Spotify and Uber)
Opening Overseas Operations
Establishing a legal form in a new foreign market.
Benefits
Local contact with customers
and suppliers
Significant cost and management
time
Gain market experience first
hand
Potentially much higher investment
and lead time before up and running
Direct control over quality and
customer service
Need to understand and comply
with local legal and tax issues
Avoids protectionism (e.g.
tariffs, quotas)
Higher risk
Opening Overseas Operations
Examples:
Tesco (UK) entered in the US in 2007 but pulled out in 2015
Starbucks (US) entered Australia in 2000 but had a massive downturn in 2008
Mergers & Acquisitions (M&As)
A Merger is the combination of two firms which subsequently forms a new legal entity under the banner of one corporate name.
In an Acquisition one company purchases another outright.
Benefits
Drawbacks
Obtaining valuable assets, quality
staff or additional skills, knowledge
of industry
Could become expensive if terms do
not get agreed
Can save an unprofitable firm from
going out of business
Two very different firms may struggle
to merge
More investment and research
from higher profits
A firm with monopoly power may
become inefficient
Reducing costs and competition
Less choice for consumers and job
losses
Mergers & Acquisitions (M&As)
Examples:
Anheuser-Busch InBev - merger between Interbrew (Belgium) and AmBev (Brazil) in 2004, and Anheuser-Busch (US) in 2008
Disney acquired Pixar in 2006 and Marvel in 2009
Facebook (now Meta) acquired Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014
International Joint Ventures
Creating a new entity owned jointly by two or more "parent" organisations to enter a market where at least one of the parent organisations is non-resident.
Benefits
Drawbacks
Speedy and potentially
transformational
The highest risk - particularly if the
wrong JV partner is selected
Reduced risk if shared with joint
venture partner
Significant cost and investment of
management time
Buying into existing expertise and
market presence
Need to understand and comply with
local legal and tax issues
JVs may be a requirement to enter
some international markets
Costly to withdraw if the strategy goes
wrong
International Joint Ventures
Examples:
Sony (Japan) + Ericsson (Sweden) => Sony Ericsson (between 2001-2012)
Jaguar Land Rover (UK) + Chery Automobile (China) => Chery Jaguar Land Rover (since 2012)
Strategic Alliances
An agreement between two or more companies to engage in cooperative activities without equity involvement.
Benefits
A low-cost entry into new industries, risk and cost being shared between partner
Changing the competitive environment through creating new technology standards
Improving operations due to the ability to learn from the other partner(s)
Positively influence the brand and perception of the companies
Drawbacks
Partners may misrepresent what they bring to the table (lie about competencies that they do not have)
Partners may fail to commit resources and capabilities to the other partners
One partner may commit heavily to the alliance while the other partner does not
Partners may fail to use their complementary resources effectively
An organization needs to achieve alignment or "fit"
Internally
strategy, structure, work tasks, people
Externally
organization's strategy and environment
GLOBAL value considerations: how to create value WHERE
Impact of National Culture Differences
Managers use "judgment" to assess organization's environment and internal strengths/weaknesses
"Judgment" requires use of explicit and tacit knowledge of differences among countries
Difference of international business from domestic business
national culture
governance system
government system
economic system
legal system
Impact of National Culture Differences
Managers often make decisions on the basis of cultural/governance system in their home country
develop structures, systems, practices with domestic assumptions (VALUE CREATION)
can these systems apply to other countries which operate with different assumptions?
if not, how can managers know what to do abroad?
In international business, organizations are more than socio-technical systems, they are socio-cultural-technical systems: impact of cultural differences on process effectiveness and efficiencies!
Strategy-Structure-People-Performance
Factors that affect Value-based Considerations!
Global Strategy Success Factor: Global Learning (value creation)
Transfer and sharing of new ideas and knowledge across the MNC's "network" globally!
technology
marketing strategy and research
consumer understanding through identification of differences
product design
Transfer through global alignments of the "best of"
organization systems (formal and informal processes)
individuals
Overseas Entry Decisions: WHERE is value created
Geographic entry decisions Considerations:
Where to go: culture distance vs geographic distance
How to go: mode of operation in overseas market
How to organize
Culture distance vs geographic distance (Considerations)
Mode (Considerations)
wholly owned subsidiaries (FDI)
international joint ventures (FDI, joint ownership)
Franchising/Licensing
Exports/Imports
How to organize: global vs multidomestic strategy
Overseas Entry Decisions: What was the value-based consideration?
Examples:
Disneyland Tokyo, Paris, Hong Kong, Shanghai
Topshop in Hong Kong
Starbucks in Hong Kong
Walmart in Germany
Carrefour in Russia
Culture and Strategy: Considerations about...
About Strategy Formulation
About Start-up challenges
About Operational pitfalls
About Headquarters-subsidiary relations and communication
Joint-venture management
About Relationships
Value-based Considerations lead to Strategy Formulation and Decisions
Which part of strategy to globalize? Which to localize?
globalize activities which achieve economies of scale
localize activities which depend on local people for effective implementation, except...
those which need to keep the eye on the global picture
What legal constraints?
What do we know how to do well? What do we still need to learn and how?
How can we make sure that our strategy is interpreted correctly in each local culture? What are the "gaps" which will still offer resistance?
Can we take the time to implement our global strategy?
Framework created by Howard V Perlmuter and Wind and Douglas in 1969.
Ethnocentric
Polycentric
Geocentric
The ethnocentric approach is used by firms that operate internationally the same way they do domestically.
The polycentric approach is used by firms that customize their operations for each foreign market they serve.
The geocentric approach is used by firms that analyze the needs of their customers worldwide and then adopt standardized operations for all markets they serve.
Figure 14.1 Samsung's Global Product Design
Global Product Design
Advantages
Managerial expertise
Production efficiencies
Production flexibilities
Flexible response to change
Marketing flexibility
Disadvantages
Unnecessary duplication
Coordination and cooperation difficult
Global Area Design
The Global Area Design organizes
the firm's activities around specific
areas or regions of the world.
Figure 14.2 Cadbury Schweppes PLC Global Area Design
Disadvantages of Global Area Design
Firm may sacrifice cost efficiencies
Diffusion of technology is slowed
Design unsuitable for rapid technological change
Duplication of resources
Coordination across areas is expensive
Global Functional Design
The global functional design calls for a
firm to create departments or divisions that
have worldwide responsibility for the
common organizational functions-finance, operations, marketing, R&D, and
human resources management.
Figure 14.3 British Airways Global
Functional Design
Global Functional Design
Advantages
Transference of expertise
Highly centralized control
Focused attention of key functions
Disadvantages
Practical only when firm has few products or customers
Coordination difficult
Duplication of resources
Global Customer Design
The global customer design is used when a firm serves different customers or customer groups, each with specific needs calling for special expertise or attention.
Figure 14.4 Eastman Kodak's Global Customer Design
Global Matrix Design
A global matrix design, the most
complex of designs, is the result of
superimposing one form of
organization design on top of an
existing, different form.
Global Matrix Design (continued)
Advantages
Brings together the functional area and product expertise
Promotes organizational flexibility
Provides access to all advantages of other designs
Disadvantages
Appropriate for firms with many products and unstable environments
Employees accountable to multiple supervisors
Decisions may take longer
Figure 14.5 A Global Matrix Design 圖 14.5 全域矩陣設計
Internationalization of the Firm's Value Chain What is done best where 企業價值鏈的國際化 什麼地方做得最好?
Upstream Value-Chain Activities
Downstream Value-Chain Activities
Market
Research
R&D
Sourcing
Production
Marketing
Distribution
After-Sales
Service
Dell conducts
continuous
market research,
through direct
interaction with
thousands of
customers
everyday,
worldwide.
R&D allows Dell
to develop new
notebook
models and
improve existing
ones. Notebooks
are completely
redesigned every
twelve months.
Dell engineers in
the United
States conduct
R&D jointly with
specialized
notebook
designers in
Taiwan.
The parts for the
notebook are
sourced
worldwide, but
mainly from
suppliers in Asia.
For example, Intel
microprocessors
are sourced from
Intel factories in
China, Costa Rica,
and Malaysia; LCD
displays are
sourced from
factories in South
Korea, Japan, and
Talwan.
The notebook is
assembled and
software installed
at one of Dell's
six factories in
Brazill, China,
Ireland, Malaysia,
or the United
States.
Dell sells
computers to
buyers worldwide,
but especially in
the United States,
where it holds
one-third of the PC
market, and online
sales are common.
Outside the United
States, Dell has
about 12 percent
of total market
share.
For its U.S. sales,
Dell uses air
transport to ship
notebooks from its
factories to the
express delivery firm
UPS, in Nashille,
Tennessee. UPS
then ships the
notebooks to final
customers.
For sales in other
countries, Dell uses
local express
dellivery firms. The
time period from
order submission to
final order delivery is
typically less than
two weeks.
Dell performs service
and technical
support in its major
markets, especially
Europe, Japan,
and the United
States. It employs
technical support
personnel in Europe,
India, Japan, and the
United States.
Exhibit 16.1 證據 16.1
Sourcing for the Dell Inspiron Notebook Computer
See Appendix
Find examples for global companies that are
Product-centric (value created by focus on where to design and do manufacturing)
Or
Customer-centric (value created by focus on where to sell product / services)
BIRMINGHAM CITY University
MAN6038
The Global Manager
Session 5 TUTORIAL
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Four common forms
Stealing material from another source
Submitting material written by another
Copying material without quotation marks
Paraphrasing material without documentation
Adapted from Park (2003), cited in Easterby-Smith et al. (2008)
Plagiarism
- Turnitin
Turnitin is a tool that identifies levels of similarity between your writing and other student assignments and published work.
All written assignments have to be submitted to Turnitin. You are encouraged to submit your work ahead of the deadline to generate your own "Orginality report". This enables you to check how similar your work is to other sources. You can then withdraw the assignment to make any necessary changes and resubmit it in revised form.
Turnitin: What to change
Passages of highlighted text
The highlighted content in an Originality report shows you where your phrasing matches another source too closely.
In the example here, the writer has directly lifted the highlighted text from a film review. In addition, the original source has not been acknowledged via in-text referencing. Directly lifting content from other sources and presenting it verbatim in your assignments is considered plagiarism, unless you have both quoted and referenced this text (and even then you should quote sparingly).
This would be considered plagiarism by your markers. You therefore need to paraphrase or summarise this content into your own words to demonstrate you have understood it, as well as provide a reference to the source.
(2011) on its release. Indeed, aside from the ending the Coens' film is pretty similar to the
first movie in plot terms, and a sceptic might feel the Wayne classic has been fed into a
special machine which turns old movies into hip indie-arthouse product. However, Bridges'
Turnitin: What to change
Poor paraphrasing
The writer has directly lifted the highlighted text from a webpage, only changing a few words here and there (as shown by the gaps between the highlights). You can see that these changes are only superficial: the writer has not demonstrated that they have understood the material as they have not attempted to thoroughly translate it into their own words. So Turnitin still identifies this text as being similar to another source and, more importantly, your marker will too. The original source has not been referenced either, so this would be considered plagiarism.
consistently popular, by the late 1930 s Westerns were widely regarded as a 'pulp' genre in
Hollywood, but their prestige was dramatically revived in 1939 by several major studio
productions including Dodge City (with Errol Flynn), Jesse James (with Tyrone Power in the
lead role), Union Pacific (with Joel McCrea), Destry Rides Again (with James Stewart in his
first Western, alongside Marlene Dietrich) and perhaps most famously, the release of John
Turnitin: What to change
Copied the highlighted text from a journal article but provided an in-text reference
Although the reference acknowledges the source of this information, this would still be considered plagiarism because the writer has not paraphrased the content or indicated with quotation marks where content has been copied directly.
The Big Lebowski named The Stranger also serves as intertextual bridge between the two
films, representing a ghost of cowboys past, carrying traces of the mythic West into the contemporary world, focusing the audience's attention upon the spectral relations of that past to the present (Campbell et al. 2013, p. 315). This intertextual connection to The Big
Self Plagiarism
Formulations used in previously in other courses assessed assignments must be paraphrased as well.
Students might think that they do not have to paraphase as these were their own words. However, also here the same paraphrasing rules apply.
Using a full line of arguments and evidences and references used by another author
For example, when writing a literature review, it is not allowed to "borrow" a large portion of a literature review made by somebody else.
For example, in one journal article is a long paragraph with many references that the original writer compiled to support the topic review. Even if students would paraphrase the words of the original author but still use all of his/her references (without actually having read the original material of these references), it is stealing of another person's work.
In best case, if there would be any justification to use the set of references used by another author, then the reference must indicate "as cited in...".
Original source (disseration by another student):
However, the success or not of the partnership depends on various factors. Nijhof, Bruijn and Honders (2008) prove that the necessity to involve NGOs in embedding social issues in the strategies and day-today operations of businesses is not always justified. It presents arguments when certain forms of NGO involvement are required. The varied interest of NGOs has to take in consideration. Thus, it is important to determine appropriate criteria for partner selection before engagement and commitment to a partnership (Seitanidi & Crane, 2008). Elkington & Fennell (1998) developed a spectrum of eight possible types of relationship between an NGO and a company. They have devised a new typology of NGOs and companies based on their strategy towards stakeholder engagement and sustainability agenda that may improve the understanding of NGO-Business partnerships. They also stressed that NGOs have realized that with businesses participation was essential to the development of any long-lasting solutions.
"Stolen version":
If partnerships are successful depends on various factors, such as where Nijhof, Bruijn and Honders (2008) prove that the necessity to let NGOs embed social issues in the strategies and day-to-day operations of businesses is only sometimes justified.
This is only when certain forms of NGO involvement are required. The interests of NGOs have to be taken in consideration. Important is to determine appropriate criteria for partner selection before engagement and commitment to a partnership (Seitanidi & Crane, 2008). Elkington & Fennell (1998) described a spectrum of eight types of relationship between an NGO and a firm. They have developed a new typology of NGOs and companies based on their strategy towards stakeholder engagement and sustainability to improve the understanding of NGO-Business partnerships. They also stated that NGOs have realized that businesses participation was essential to their development of long-lasting solutions.
REFERENCING
Please make yourself familiar with the details here:
Harvard Referencing Guide
This includes information on formatting the In-text references and the reference list
Referencing Roadmap (Harvard) Identify your source
To work out how to reference a source you must first identify what it is
Choose whether your source is Print, Electronic, Sound/Visual or Other
Select the appropriate link below to enter the Roadmap
Read the description each time you choose a source type to ensure that your source matches
Read the notes as well as the format and layout to find out how to reference using the Harvard style
References: An article published in an academic journal
In-text citation
Format and layout:
Author's family name (year, page number if applicable)
(Author's family name year, page number if applicable)
One author
O'Hara (2009, p. 1548) supports... ...received some support (O'Hara 2009, p. 1548).
Two authors
Wolff and Perry (2010, p. 296) note... ..marked trends (Wolff & Perry 2010, p. 296).
Three authors
Marques, Azevedo and Pereira (2012, p. 293) argue... ...is important (Marques, Azevedo & Pereira 2012, p. 293).
Four or more authors
Yuile et al. (2012, p. 53) suggest... ...has been suggested (Yuile et al. 2012, p. 53).
Reference List / Bibliography
Format and layout:
Author's family name, Initial(s) year, 'Title of article', Title of Journal, vol. , no. .
One author
O'Hara, MJ 2009, 'Flood basalts, basalt floods or topless bushvelds? Lunar petrogenesis revisited', Journal of Petrology, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1545-651
Two authors
Wolff, H & Perry, L 2010, 'Trends in clean air legislation in Europe: particulate matter and low emission zones', Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 293-308.
Three authors
Randhawa, B, De Lacey, P & Saklofske, D 1986, 'Personality and behavioural measures: gender, age, and race contrasts in an Australian setting', International Journal of Psychology, vol. 21, no. 4/5, pp. 389-402.
Four or more authors
Yuile, C, Chang, A, Gudmundsson, A & Sawang, S 2012, 'The role of life friendly policies on employees' work-life balance', Journal of Management & Organization, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 53-63.
References: A whole book, edited book, book chapter or translated book
In-text citation
Format and layout:
Author's family name OR Authoring body (year, page number if applicable)
(Author's family name OR Authoring body year, page number if applicable)
One author
Chabon (2008, p. 108) discusses...
...was discussed in the study (Chabon 2008, p. 108).
Authoring body/organisation
Deni Green Consulting Services (2008, p. 5) proposes..
...a better world (Deni Green Consulting Services 2008, p. 5).
Two or three authors
Campbell, Fox and de Zwart (2010, p. 46) argue...
...alternatives are preferable (Campbell, Fox & de Zwart 2010, p. 46).
Four or more authors
As suggested by Henkin et al. (2006, p. 14)...
...has been suggested (Henkin et al. 2006, p. 14).
Book with no date or an approximate date
This is emphasized by Seah (n.d.) when...
This is emphasised by Seah (c. 2005) when...
2nd, revised or later edition of a book
Bordwell and Thompson (2009, p. 33) explain...
...influenced his work (Pearce 2015).
Reference List / Bibliography
Format and layout:
Author's family name, Initial(s) OR Authoring body year of publication, Title of book, edition if necessary, Publisher, Place of publication.
One author
Chabon, M 2008, Maps and legends, McSweeney's Books, San Francisco.
Authoring body/organisation
Deni Green Consulting Services 2008, Capital idea: realising value from environmental and social performance, Deni Green Consulting Services, North Carlton, Victoria.
Two or three authors
Campbell, E, Fox, R & de Zwart, M 2010, Students' guide to legal writing, law exams and self assessment, 3rd edn, Federation Press, Sydney.
Seah, R n.d., Micro-computer applications, Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington.
Seah, R c. 2005, Micro-computer applications, Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington. 2nd, revised or later edition of a book
Bordwell, D & Thompson, K 2009, Film art: an introduction, 9th edn, Mc-Graw Hill, New York.
Pearce, B 2015, Master of stillness: Jeffrey Smart, rev. edn, Wakefield Press, Mile End, South Australia.
References: An article in a newspaper containing news or editorial
Notes
Omit initial The in English language newspaper titles, e.g. The Australian is written as Australian.
If a newspaper article has no author, cite the newspaper title as author and include the specific date of publication in
brackets in-text, e.g.
In-text: The Australian Financial Review (22 October 2012, p. 46) examines...
Reference list: Australian Financial Review 2012, 'US comes to a turning point', 22 October, p. 46.
In-text citation
Format and layout:
Author's family name OR Authoring body (year, page number if applicable)
(Author's family name OR Authoring body year, page number if applicable)
Examples
Westwood (2012, p. 15) states...
...in contemporary literature (Westwood 2012, p. 15).
Reference List / Bibliography
Format and layout:
Author's family name, Initial(s) year, 'Title of article', Title of newspaper, date OR publication information, .
Examples
Westwood, M 2012, 'Welcome into an exclusive fold', Australian, 4 September, p. 15.
References: A collection of pages or individual HTML documents on the World Wide Web. translated book
Webpage
Description: A single page that is part of a website Notes
One webpage usually has a separate title and is taken from a larger website.
If you are having difficulty identifying authorship of a single webpage, try visiting the website's homepage. A homepage is the main, opening page on a website. It usually provides information about the website, its owner, its purpose and some sort of table of contents with links to other parts. It may also contain an 'About us' or 'Contact' link where authors or authoring bodies are clearly identified.
Italicise the title of the specific webpage you are referencing and present the whole website name in plain font.
In-text citation
Format and layout:
Author's family name OR Authoring body (year)
(Author's family name OR Authoring body year)
Examples
...viable options (Department of Immigration and Citizenship 2012).
Reference List / Bibliography
Format and layout: 格式和佈局:
Author's family name, Initial(s) OR Authoring body year, Title of webpage, Title of website, Publisher where known, viewed date, . 作者姓名、首字母縮寫或創作機構年份、網頁標題、網站標題、已知出版商、瀏覽日期、......、......。
Also: foreign (non-English) publications - how to convert them (i.e. a reference is originally in Mandarin and needs to be changed into an English equivalent).
Look up for the exact formatting requirements and apply accordingly!
MAN6038 The Global Manager Session 5 SUMMARY
What factors affect international strategy, structure and systems?
And how are they inter-related?
MAN6038 The Global Manager
Session 6
Cross-cultural adaptation, effectiveness and culture shock - Expats
Revision
-What are the key take aways from the previous session?
How does the content of the previous session relate to the assignment and global mindset development?
Any relevant examples to share?
Any clarifying questions?
Once again: The Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of academic references are required.
Your assignment and how the session content is related
"Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words) Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)"The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights
and concepts that you can use for your assignment
and when choosing a relevant case.
The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights and concepts that you can use for your assignment and when choosing a relevant case.
Managing the Global Organization
Culture influences human resource systems
what they are
must fit global strategy
to what extent and how they can be designed
HR systems dependency on external influences varies
government and of unions less important in US than Europe
external constraints must be integrated in HR system
Standardization vs adaptation
outcome should be the "driving" force
systems are tools not ends in themselves
MNCs challenges in internationalising
Since the 1990s there has been:
An increase in companies operating in multiple states (MNCs)
Increase in labour mobility (migration).
Problems of expatriate managers' performance abroad.
Failures of cross-border business ventures (Harris et al, 2007) which are (in part) linked to HR.
Organisational culture(s) within single businesses (Scullion and Starkey, 2000).
euphoria, unrealistically positive attitudes towards host country, stay in hotel shields from mundane difficulties, house hunting/school hunting exciting, sightseeing!!
irritation and hostility (the crisis stage)
problems adjusting at work, local clocks don't fit yours, difficulties getting the routine daily tasks done (always taking "tests" to meet the daily needs), everything stinks, some never recover
gradual adjustment
can manage, cope with situation now
adjustment
ability to function in both cultures, acceptance of local customs and values for what they are (not going native), possible to get by, positive and growth gaining experience
Four Orientations to Adjustment
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Appl. Psychol. 46, 5-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
Host Culture
Right
What to do?
tolerate ambiguity; react to new and unexpected situations without irritation
display empathy; be able to put yourself in others' shoes
personalize observations; recognize that your truth is not everybody's truth...
show respect; this does not mean "go native" but it does mean knowing why the locals do what they do
be non judgmental; what is "appropriate" or not is different across cultures, your wish to "get things done quickly" may be resisted for example
be resourceful; do your best with limited resources to cope with new situations
keep you sense of humor; don't take yourself too seriously.
What else to do?
Avoid home country ghettos
Be adventurous
Involve the whole family
Manage stress
Stay healthy
Be realistic
Let go of home
Realize there are no absolutes
Have self-confidence and confidence in locals. Mistakes you will make.
Your good-will shall come across in the long run.
How People Change during an assignment abroad
Positive changes in themselves
Changed attitudes
Improved work skills
Increased knowledge
Closer family relationships
Re-Entry (returning home from a foreign assignment
problem finding new niche in corporate structure: responsibility span diminished, old colleagues/allies gone, career options unclear
while coping with culture shock abroad expatriate may over-idealize the attributes of home culture; on return great disappointment
changed executive may never fit the old culture again
standard of living may actually go down on return
anger at how unaware of world friends, colleagues and neighbors are... and how uninterested they are in trying to learn
total lack of psychological support for the returnee; he/she is expected to fit back home!!
no interest on part of home colleagues and friends to learn from returnee's experiences
Return to the home country
Making meaning of the experience
Step over the portal...
The Return: The Challenge of Readjustment
High degree of uncertainty
Lack of interest in one's experience
Idealization of home and false expectations
Test: really changed abroad?
Missing life abroad
Loss of prestige, autonomy, being special
The Return - The Reward of Readjustment
Master of two worlds
Freedom to pass back and forth across the world's divisions
Biculturalism and use of skills/ attitudes learned abroad
More well-rounded
Ability to adapt to change
International network of contacts
Ability to perceive paradox
Broader world perspective
If so problematic, why using expatriates?
Control (historically)
Learning/knowledge transfer
Global integration
Management development; careers
Fill skills gap (technical > managerial)
Relocation problems:
Results
"Failure" rate: estimates of
But Brookfield data shows of respondents
Reasons for failure*
Partner dissatisfaction
Family concerns
Inability to adapt back
Job not meeting expectations
Source: Global Relocation Trends, 2005 and 2008 Survey Reports, GMAC and 2012 Survey
To minimize attrition
Use existing international experience
Greater choice of position
Greater recognition
Repatriation career support
Trends in global management assignments
20 years ago
Now*
Expat assignment
duration
years
Diverse: Long-term (1-5
years), Short-term (< 1 year),
Permanent, Commuter,
Extended business traveler (30-
180 days)
Focus
People management
Projects
Accompanied by
Trailing spouse
Dual career partner
Viewpoint
Interesting; $
Career development
Success
Survival
Performance criteria
On return
Stay in company
Leave
Cross-cultural training
None
Approx. 37% (for all
assignments); 24% mandatory
Characteristics for expat selection
Professional skills?
Technical expertise, past performance, company knowledge
Spouse's support, dual career issues, children, elderly parents
Research on expatriate selection
Historically decisions not made in an organized and coherent manner
Confidence
Similarity to decision-maker
Available and interested
However, it seems to be improving somewhat
Expat Selection based on Crosscultural Adaptation and Effectiveness
Effectiveness is the ability to live and work effectively in the cross-cultural setting of an assignment
satisfaction effectiveness
previous experience effectiveness
previous experience increased satisfaction, ease of adjustment, less stress
Effectiveness (PAIS)
PAIS Professional expertise + Adaptation + Intercultural interaction + Situational readiness
Trend: Women expatriates
Year
1994
2005
2007
2012
of expatriate
population
Historical average is
Sources: Global Relocation Trends, 2005 and 2008 Survey Reports, GMAC and 2012 Survey Report Brookfield Global Relocation services
Women in International Business:
Two Views*
Employer's View
Woman
potential customer problems
potential office problems
potential spouse problems
Customer's View
Professional
experienced
qualified
corporate sponsored
decision-maker
gender not relevant
-Adapted from a presentation, “Women in International Business" by Gail Ellement, Ivey Business School, Canada.
Lessons Learned
The problem is more with men in the home country than men in the foreign country.
Possible tendency to protect women from imaginary difficulties and foreign men.
Being foreign is more noticeable than being female.
A foreign woman is not expected to act like a local woman.
Relationships are critical and women tend to be relationship oriented. They:
tend to approach negotiations with a win-win orientation
tend to be good listeners and are empathetic
tend to be participative
Suggestions for male colleagues to work with female managers
Senior executives
Don't make decisions based on stereotypes
Peers
Clarify relationships
Include women in conversations and diversify topics of conversations
Diversify social activities
Subordinates
Introductions and relationships
Re-direct questions as appropriate
Recommendations
Send the best person for the job
If a woman is sent on an international assignment she should
be at a senior level
have significant decision-making responsibility
Prepare women well for the difficult assignments
Case/ Example discussions
Case 1:
Long-term US expat in Korea behaves more Korean than US-like
Case 2:
Role of women in leadership positions in Japan
MAN6038 The Global Manager Session 6 SUMMARY
Role of expatriates
Adaptation to the unfamiliar cultural work environment
Factors that influence effectiveness
Women expats
and
Wrap-Up WEEK 2 (Session 4 -6)
What you should do in the next days before we continue with session 7:
1.) Read the chapters 4-6 in the assigned textbook! Some topics link to chapters 1-3.
2.) Identify some major theories/concepts to manage value-based considerations (summarize each to 1-2 sentences and write down the full HARVARD reference)!
3.)Find (in the internet) a global company about which is something written about any value creation problem or how they manage value creation globally well. Apply some theory (not all) to explain the case incident/s.
4.) Reflect on your own global management skills: are you already fit to design and implement global strategies to create best value,? Do you meet already the selection criteria? Can you acculturate? If not, what would you do to improve the skill level?
MAN6038
The Global Manager
Session 7
Leading innovation and change through value-based considerations
Revision
-What are the key take aways from the previous session?
How does the content of the previous session relate to the assignment and global mindset development?
Any relevant examples to share?
Any clarifying questions?
Once again: The Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of academic references are required.
Your assignment and how the session content is related
"Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words) Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)"The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights
and concepts that you can use for your assignment
and when choosing a relevant case.
The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights and concepts that you can use for your assignment and when choosing a relevant case. 以下各節都包含大量有價值的觀點和概念,您可以在作業和選擇相關案例時加以利用。
Leading Innovation & Change and value considerations 引領創新與變革以及價值考量
Value considerations 價值考慮
is defined as the degree to which an innovation is perceived as better than the idea or product that it supersedes (Wang et al, 2018)
Strategic change
strategically-aligned alterations in systems and patterns of employee behavior
Strategic Alignment
Strategic Change and Renewal
Three Faces of Change*
Turnaround
targets
Assets
e.g. Physical assets
Human assets
Techniques /
tools
targets
Process
e.g. Balanced scorecard
Six Sigma
MBO
Transformation
targets
Behaviors
May target all 3 in crisis
change
*Adapted from Spector, Bert Implementing Organizational Change: Theory Into Practice, 3rd Edition,
trans . for . ma . tion, n.
an intervention designed to motivate employees to alter their patterns of behavior to meet the shifting needs of the external environment
Why Change Behaviors?
Three components in strategy
Who is our target market?
What is our product/service?
How do we develop/deliver our product or service? Changes in how may be driven by changes in who and/or what or may be independent
When the how changes, behaviors often will need to change
New roles
New skills (technical & interpersonal)
New responsibilities & relationships
Key questions: can employees change (knowledge, skills) and will they change (motivation)?
Ultimately, all change is behavioral
Understanding Change
Change means behavioral change.
Behavior = f(beliefs/assumptions, perceptions, roles and responsibilities).
Change often brings discomfort and resistance.
People need to understand
Cost of the status quo vs. payoffs of the new way
You need to work with
People (individuals and groups)
Structures, systems and practices
Appraising the Readiness for Change
Adopting the New Behavior
Training or selection
Building Support
Communication/education
Negotiation
Force
Gaining commitment
Involvement in determining the problem/solution
Feedback on change process
Reinforcing the Change
Change Management: Global Implications
Change local ways into the home country ways? Do in Rome as the Romans do only?
Understanding what motivates the people to do the change?
Change usually brings discomfort and, often, resistance.
Effective communication is essential.
"Telling" is not communication or execution.
People "see" and understand the same situation differently.
Understand what other people "see".
They need to understand what you "see".
Create a shared frame of reference.
Your way? Their way? Or a New way?
Understanding Change
They need to understand
Cost of the status quo vs. payoffs of the new way
You need to work with
People (individuals and groups)
Structures, systems and practices
You need a way of thinking about the process - a framework
Basic models of managing change stemming from
value-based considerations
Implement change carefully don't leave success to chance!
Change does not just "happen"; it must be managed
The content of change (the "what") often receives a lot more attention than the planning and management of the change process (the "how")
This is a mistake!
The "how" can have an enormous impact on the outcome - as shown in the simulation
Successful change requires good content as well as a good change process
How motivated are people to change?
MC , where
MC Motivation to Change
Vision of desired state
Process that removes obstacles that block access to desired state
D = Dissatisfaction with current state
What if you don't have all three of Vision, Process, and Dissatisfaction?
without is the bottom of the inbox
without is a fast start that fizzles
D without is anxiety and frustration
Adapted from Harvard Business School
What is the context of the change?
Reactive Change
+ easy to get buy-in,
align people
- few options, can't
build capabilities
}
How do we approach different stakeholders?
Adapted from Gilbert & Buechel Capability to Make the Change
Don't forget the S-curve dynamics!
Adapted from Prof. John Weeks, IMD
Time
Sources of Organizational Resistance to Change
Lewin's Three-Step Change Model
Unfreezing Movement Refreezing
Lewin's Three-Step Change Model
Unfreezing
Change efforts to overcome the pressures of both individual resistance and group conformity.
Refreezing
Stabilizing a change intervention by balancing driving and restraining forces.
Driving Forces
Forces that direct behavior away from the status quo.
Restraining Forces
Forces that hinder movement from the existing equilibrium.
Kotter's 8-Step Model
Kotter's eight-step model is one of the best known:
Establish the need for urgency
Ensure there is a powerful change group to guide the change
Develop a vision
Communicate the vision
Empower the staff
Ensure there are short-term wins
Consolidate gains
Embed the change in the culture
Dimension
Promoting innovation
Inhibiting innovation
Challenge
people experience challenge, joy and
meaning in work and invest high energy
people are alienated, indifferent,
unchallenged, and are apathetic
Freedom
people make contacts, give and receive
information freely, discuss problems, make
decisions, take initiative
people are passive, rule-bound,
anxious to remain within their
well-established boundaries
Idea support
people listen to each others; ideas and
suggestions are received in a supportive
way by bosses and colleagues
suggestions are quickly rejected with
counter-arguments; usual response
is to find faults and obstacles
Trust and
openness
high trust climate; ideas can be expressed
without fear of reprisal or ridicule;
communications are open
low trust climate; people are suspicious
of each other, afraid to make mistakes,
fear having their ideas stolen
Dynamism
and liveliness
new things happening all the time; new
ways of thinking and solving problems;
'full speed'
slow jog with no surprises; no new
projects or plans; everything as usual
Playfulness
and humour
relaxed atmosphere with jokes and
laughter; spontaneity
gravity and seriousness; stiff and
gloomy; jokes improper
Debates
many voices are heard, expressing
different ideas and viewpoints
people follow an authoritarian pattern
without questioning
Conflicts
conflict of ideas not personal; impulses
under control; people behave in a mature
manner; based on psychological insight
personal and emotional tensions; plots
and traps; gossip and slander; climate
of 'warfare'
Risk taking
decisions and actions prompt and rapid;
concrete experimentation is preferred
to detailed analysis
cautious, hesitant mentality; work
'on the safe side'; 'sleep on the matter';
set up committees before deciding
Idea time
opportunities to discuss and test fresh
ideas that are not part of planned work
activity; these chances are exploited
every minute booked and specified;
pressures mean that thinking outside
planned routines is difficult
Table 18.4 Dimensions of the creative organization climate
Achieving change: Lessons from the models
Don't forget the how.
Vision and dissatisfaction without a plan for a process will lead to anxiety and frustration.
Don't ignore the context.
Is this anticipatory? Urgent? Crisis? How can you communicate that and use it?
Don't wait until everyone's on board.
Start with a core of high motivation - high capability people and organizations.
Don't get discouraged.
Change takes time and discipline.
And now think: What are the issues for global managers and MNCs?
Examples:
Japanese family business considers consent of all key stakeholders, often family interest, private interests, sensitive to how it affects friends and long-term partners
Daimler with focus on long-term success rather than quick profits with low quality
Google, Apple, other?
Remember: cultural differences, ie. trust, hierarchies, time orientation, face, ... - but it all depends (sub-cultures, personalities,...)
MAN6038 The Global Manager
Session 7b ADD ON
Leading innovation and change through value-based considerations
Examples for Value Considerations in GLOBAL CORPORATIONS 全球公司價值考量實例
Cost Savings 節約成本
Sales Revenue Increase
Product Attributes (to deliver better Value for Users)
Social Gains: Improving Situation for People/ Planet
Context:
Market Differentiation, Iong-term Serviceablility
Organisational Learning 組織學習
Other?
Issues about Global Value Creation
Cost Savings through outsourcing to i.e. low cost manufacturers in less developed countries ethical considerations, cultural considerations, leadership considerations
M&A, Joint Ventures with local firms cultural considerations, how to facilitate that the combination of both cultures results in better organizational learning or product improvement etc?
Entering Foreign Markets how to understand the customers and the legal etc environment there?
Sustainability by being "a good global citizen" how to contribute to CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) activities that go beyond economic values (profit, revenue) and help Planet and People?
Aperian Global Consulting states:
"A well-designed human integration strategy is vital not only during mergers & acquisitions, but also in design and implementation of other large-scale global transformations and change initiatives, such as downsizing, outsourcing, digitization, global IT implementation, and the launch of a new product. An appropriately planned global change management process is also crucial for smaller-scale alterations such as departmental reorganizations, opening a new branch and IT integrations."
Some websites that give some inspirations about these topics:
BEWARE! THESE WEBSITES ARE COMMERCIAL CONSULTING COMPANY WEBSITES AND CANNOT BE USED AS REFERENCES!
STILL, THEY ARE HELPFUL TO GET IDEAS ABOUT THE TOPICS AND TRIGGER ABOUT WHICH TOPICS TO SEARCH WHEN DESIGNING “VALUE BASED CONSIDERATIONS" FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENT!!
Example
Remember the DAIMLERCHRYSLER case:
They wanted to create the largest automotive company in the world by combining the USA and EUROPE market strength of both partners into ONE global successful corporation.
To achieve benefits from cross-cultural teams to improve product and market development it needs good cross-cultural team management
However, cultural differences were not considered well and led to poor cooperation and finally to a separation of the partners.
and
Assignment Instructions:
Have you found literature, which, where?
And have you found (one) case for your assignment? Any difficulties?
MAN6038 The Global Manager
Session 8
Competing with integrity: personal integrity
Revision
-What are the key take aways from the previous session?
How does the content of the previous session relate to the assignment and global mindset development?
Any relevant examples to share?
Any clarifying questions?
Once again: The Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of academic references are required.
Your assignment and how the session content is related
"Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words) Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)"The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights
and concepts that you can use for your assignment
and when choosing a relevant case.
The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights and concepts that you can use for your assignment and when choosing a relevant case.
Global Mindset Framework Applied to Ethics
Individual/Personal
Self
Clarify and understand my beliefs about
ethical behavior.
Clarify and understand my organization's
approach to corporate sustainability.
Other
Clarify and understand other beliefs about
ethical behavior in the context of other
cultures and principal theories of moral
philosophy.
Clarify and understand other corporate
approaches to sustainability in the context of
other industries, other cultures and principal
codes of conduct.
Choice
Belief in and commitment to a set of ethical
principles.
Belief in and commitment to an approach to
corporate sustainability.
Behavior Classification Framework
Competing with Integrity
Ethics:
principles of conduct concerned with right/wrong or should's/should not's of human decisions
Concerned with:
duties, obligations between people, groups, organizations human consequences of decisions and actions, not solely profits, technology, or larger market share
- Requires:
extending consideration beyond one's own self-interest and
behaving according to a better or higher standard of conduct
Philosophy and the study of ethics
The complicated and controversial nature of moral theory
The role of rationality
Knowledge, experience and intuition
Philosophical analysis enables us to reflect critically on the hidden commitments in the things people say, so as to test out assumption, biases and preconceptions
What are ethics?
Metaethics vs applied ethics
ethical vs moral decisions
Ethics is 'the study of individual and collective moral awareness, judgement, character and conduct' [Petrick and Quin, 2000]
the dominant ethical perspectives:
deontological and consequentialist perspectives
other approaches:
virtues, justice, rights based, feminist
Approaches to ethics: Deontology
Emphasises duties, rights and principles
Good or bad is evident in the act itself, irrespective of consequences
Often take the form of lists of types of actions that be encouraged or refrained from
Approaches to ethics: Libertarianism
Centrality of individuals' rights to choose
Role of government would be minimal
Approaches to ethics: Consequentialism
Utilitarianism
Happiness of the greatest number
The end justifies the means
Economic utility
Business Ethics
Why the surge of interest?
Private sector scandals
Public sector and its ethos
Nolan committee and the set of guiding principles
Ethical issues and the management of people
Ethics and HRM
Deontological: notion of duty to fellow members of the community; respecting the moral agency of humans; treating employees not solely as a means to and end but an end in themselves.
Consequentialist: net benefits accruing from employment practices; regular and continuing employment.
Libertarian: employment as an important means by which an employer and a worker can freely exchange labour for reward.
Ethics and its legitimacy in employment practice
Greater ethical awareness is to be applauded if it results in more balanced consideration of the ethical dynamics involved in employment relationships
Parker (1999:295) argues that a study of ethics can 'encourage us to challenge our deeply held beliefs, taken for granted assumptions and not merely wrap us in certainties that prevent us from thinking the absurd'
Professional codes of conduct
The promotion of ethical behaviour
Standard setting
Guidelines in difficult circumstances
Establish rights and responsibilities
Professional statement of principles
Contractual
Developmental
Status enhancing
Client expectations
Codes of conduct
Who draws them up?
What function do they perform?
What do they consist of?
Who do they apply to?
Are they necessary and do they make a difference?
Private sector use of codes of conduct
Employee conduct and the acceptance of gifts (100%)
community and environmental interests (65%)
Customer service and product quality (58%)
shareholder return (39%)
suppliers and contractors (23%)
political interests (13%)
innovation and technology (6%)
Why ethical codes?
Provide employees with guidelines
socially responsible
improve the public image
improve management
better corporate culture
comply with government guidelines
reduce white collar crime
Critiques of ethical codes of conduct
A false sense of security
Can't cover all eventualities
Vague and generalised
Minimises responsibility
Protect from public criticism
Interests of the weakest stakeholders may be marginalised
ineffective in dealing with systemic corruption
self-regulation may not be in the interests of clients, customers and citizens
assumed homogeneity of the organisation
ETHICAL MANAGEMENT IS FIRMLY ON THE AGENDA
The impact on managers of managing in an increasingly complex and ambiguous environment
The increasing demands for managers to take more responsibility
Reconciling individual values with organisational values
The nature of CSR
The changing organisational context and the resulting pressure on staff
The motivation of those working in organisations
The ascription of responsibility to managers
The pressures that are brought to bear on managers
SISSION'S MODEL OF RHETORIC AND REALITY IN HRM
Rhetoric Customer first Total quality management Lean production Flexibility Core and periphery Devolution/delayering Downsizing/right-sizing
Reality
Market forces supreme
Doing more with less
Mean production
Management 'can do' what it wants
Reducing the organisation's commitment
Reducing the number of middle managers
Redundancy
SISSION'S MODEL OF RHETORIC AND REALITY IN HRM (Cont'd)
New working patterns
Empowerment
Training and Development
Employability
Recognising contribution of individual
Teamworking
Part-time instead of full-time jobs
Making someone else take the risk and responsibility
Manipulation
No employment security
Undermining the trade union and collective bargaining
Reducing the individual's discretion
Business Ethics Objectives
Create an awareness of the ethical components of the decision
Legitimize the consideration of ethical issues in the decision process
Analyze the ethical components with some framework
Apply technique of ethical analysis to decision situations
Competing with Integrity
Integrity and ethical behavior
the imperative to act with integrity does not insist on moral perfection, but demands taking ethics seriously
"Integrity is consistency among what you believe in your heart; think in your head; what you say with your mouth; and what you do your behavior and actions."
Professor Glen Rowe from the Ivey Business School
Competing with Integrity
- Ethical frameworks
Person X: "If we don't pay what he is asking we will lose the contract and people back home will lose jobs. Is that ethical when people can't feed their families?" (utilitarianism)
Person Y: "I don't care. What you are suggesting is absolutely wrong." (categorical imperative)
Person Z: "Now hold on, it doesn't seem to be against the rules there. It is different in that culture. Everyone is doing it. They need the extra money to support their families. Besides, we should not impose our system of morality on other cultures." (cultural relativism)
- Process of intellectual and ethical development
dualism
relativism
commitment in relativism
A Manager's Context
Many conflicting interests may impinge on manager's decisions!
Guidelines
Who are stakeholders with interest in the decision?
Competing with integrity: corporate sustainability
Revision
-What are the key take aways from the previous session?
How does the content of the previous session relate to the assignment and global mindset development?
Any relevant examples to share?
Any clarifying questions?
Once again: The Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words)
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words)
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words)
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of academic references are required.
Your assignment and how the session content is related
"Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words)
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words) Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)"The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights
and concepts that you can use for your assignment
and when choosing a relevant case.
The following sections are all full of valuable in-sights and concepts that you can use for your assignment and when choosing a relevant case.
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability - the ability to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs around the world.
Corporate Social Responsibilities for
Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)
Recommended by International Organizations
Table 17.1 Corporate Social Responsibilities for Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) Recommended by International Organizations
MNEs and Host Governments
Should not interfere in the internal political affairs of the host country (OECD, UN)
Should consult governmental authorities and national employers' and workers' organizations to ensure that their investments conform to the economic and social development policies of the host country (ICC, ILO OECD, UN
Should reinvest some profits in the host country (ICC)
MNEs and Laws, Regulations, and Politics
Should respect the right of every country to exercise control over its natural resources (UN)
Should refrain from improper or illegal involvement in loca politics (OECD
Should not pay bribes or render improper benefits to public servants (OECD, UN)
MNEs and Technology Transfer
Should develop and adapt technologies to the needs of host countries (ICC, ILO, OECD)
Should provide reasonable terms and conditions when granting licenses for industrial property rights (ICC, OECD)
MNEs and Environmental Protection
Should respect the host country laws and regulations concerning environmental protection (OECD, UN)
Should supply to host governments information concerning the environmental impact of MNE activities (ICC, UN)
MNEs and Consumer Protection
Should preserve the safety and health of consumers by disclosing appropriate information, labeling correctly, and advertising accurately (UN)
MNEs and Employment Practice
Should cooperate with host governments to create jobs in certain locations (ICC)
Should give advance notice of plant closures and mitigate the adverse effects (ICC, OECD
Should respect the rights for employees to engage i collective bargaining (ILO, OECD)
MNEs and Human Rights
Should respect human rights and fundamental freedoms in host countries (UN)
Sources: Based on (1) ICC: The International Chamber of Commerce Guidelines for International Investrnent (www.iccwbo.org); (2) ILO: The International Labor Office Tripartito De (1) The international Chamber of Commerce Guideines for international investment (www.iccwbo.org. (2) The international Labor Office Tripartite Declarations of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (www.ilo.org); (3) OECD. The Organization for Economic tions (www.un.org).
Stakeholder Groups
Primary Stakeholder Group - constituent on which the firm relies for its continuous survival and prosperity.
Secondary Stakeholder Group - those who influence or affect, or are influenced or affected by, the firm but are not engaged in transactions with the firm and are not essential for its survival.
Triple Bottom Line - economic, social, and environmental performance that simultaneously satisfies the demands of all stakeholder groups.
A Stakeholder View of the Firm
Figure 17.1 A Stakeholder View of the Firm
Source: Adapted from T. Donaldson & L. Preston, 1995, The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications (p. 69). Academy of Management Review, 20: 65-91.
Fundamental Debate
Free market advocates argue that if firms attempt to attain social goals, such as providing employment and social welfare, managers will lose their focus on profit maximization.
CSR advocates argue that a free market system that takes the pursuit of self-interest and profit as its guiding light may breed greed, excesses, and abuses.
Institutions, Resources, and Corporate Social Responsibility
Figure 17.3 Institutions, Resources, and Corporate Social Responsibility
Institution-Based View
Formal institutions governing
CSR in home/host countries
Informal norms, values, and culture
governing CSR
Corporate Social
Responsibility
Resource-Based View
Generic Strategies of Social Responsiveness
Carroll (1979) has identified four generic strategies of social responsiveness:
Reaction - the firm denies responsibility for social issues, e.g. by blaming others or by pointing to the responsibility of government.
Defence - the firm admits responsibility but tries to do the very least; e.g., the firm uses CSR superficially to improve PR without pursuing CSR seriously.
Accommodation - the firm accepts responsibility and does whatever is demanded by the key stakeholders.
Proaction - the firms seeks to exceed industry norms and anticipates future expectations by doing more than is expected.
The US Chemical Industry Responds to Environmental Pressures
Table 172
The US Chemical Industry Responds to Environmental Pressures
Phase
Strategic response
Representative statements from the industry's trade journal, Chemical Week
Reactive
Denied the severity of environmental problems and argued that these problems could
be solved independently through the industry's technological prowess.
"Congress seems determined to add one more regulation to the already 27 health
and safety regulations we must answer to. This will make the EPA [Environmental
Protection Agency] a chemical czar. No agency in a democracy should have that
authority" (1975).
1983-88
Accommodative
"The EPA has been criticized for going too slow. . Still, we think that it is doing a
good job" (1982). "Critics expect an overnight fix. The EPA deserves credit for its pace
and accomplishments" (1982).
1989-
present
"Green line equals bottom line-The Clean Air Act (CAA) equals efficiency. Everything
you hear about the 'costs' of complying with the CAA is probably wrong ... Wiser
competitors will rush to exploit the Green Revolution" (1990).
Sources: Extracted from text from A. Hoffman, 1999, Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry, Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351-371. Hoffman's last phase ended in 1993. Its extension to the present is done by the present author.
Business Benefits of CSR
Key business benefits of CSR:
Brand value and reputation
Risk management
Human capital
Revenue
However, it is often difficult to assign a monetary value to CSR strategies and many business benefits from CSR are intangible.
Indeed, it is wrong to see CSR as a return on investment because there are always better alternative investment opportunities.
Key Areas:
Ethics
Motivations for corporate social responsibility (CSR)
Dimensions of CSR
Approaches to CSR
Ethics in international business
Ethics is an individual's personal beliefs about whether a decision, behaviour, or action is right and wrong.
Determined mainly by:
Person's belief system shaped by parenting, education and religion.
Society - social norms, national cultures and customs.
Business Ethics refers to how the company integrates values such as honest, integrity, respect and fairness into its policies, practices and decision-making.
Ethics in cross-cultural and international contexts
Defining corporate social responsibility
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is:
An obligation, beyond that required by the law and economics, for a firm to pursue long term goals that are good for society.
The continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as that of the local community and society at large.
About how a company manages its business process to produce an overall positive impact on society.
Possible motivations for engaging in CSR (see Graafland and Van de Ven, 2006)
Economic motives
Economic CSR implies that it is a strategic tool to enhance economic objective., increase profit and wealth creation.
- Moral (Ethical) motives
Ethical CSR implies that a firm has a moral duty towards society to behave responsibly.
The role of business is create value and improve societal and environmental health.
Prominent Areas of CSR
- Legal Compliance
Companies are obligated to comply with local, national and international law with regards areas such as employment, environmental protection, corruption, human rights and product safety.
Philanthropy
Refers to the idea of giving back to society. Through philanthropic donations.
Corporate Philanthropy in Practice: Example
Johnson & Johnson, which made cash gifts and project contributions of to world causes in 2004 , regards India as one of the biggest emerging markets in the next 20 years.
One of its worthy projects is facilitating the administration of vitamin A and anti-parasitic tablets to 250,000 children in the country, in partnership with the Vitamin Angel Alliance.
Prominent Areas of CSR
Worker rights and welfare
Concerned with the prevention of worker exploitation such as forced labour, child labour and discrimination.
- Environmental Management
Avoiding damage to the natural environment - pollution, contamination and resource depletion.
Summary: The Triple Bottom Line - People, Planet, Profits
Although there may be some minor differences in the specific categories, dimensions or values that each of the three organizations use, it is clear that there is convergence around the idea that corporate sustainability encompasses continued, strong economic performance, a broad concept of social justice and a concern for environmental quality; and recognizes the interdependency between the three areas. John Elkington, founder of SustainAbility coined the concept and term, "triple bottom line," in his 1994 book, Cannibals wilh Forks. Susainability is about performance and progress on the "three pillars" of sustainability - people, planet and profits - and the triple bottom line is a way of measuring and reporting this performance.
TABL.E 9.3 GE's Areas of Sustainability Focus
Peopole
Rlanat
Econowy
Helping Our Gustomers
Succeed
- Partnerships on
Sustainahility
- Keeping Our Employees
Confident & Productive
- Health & Safety
- Soliciting Opinions
- Diversity
- Integrity & Privacy
- Labor Relations
- Building Enduring
Commurnities
- Volunterism
- Education
- Health
Creating Shareholder Value
- Water Scarcity
- Management
- Footprint
- Products
Energy Consumption
. Management.
- Footprint
- Products
Environment & Resource
Management
- Environment, Health
&c Safety Program
- Management
- Supply Chain
- Suppliciency Expectations
- Supplier Program
- Metrics
- Resource Optimization
- Public Policy
- Rule of Iaw
- Human Rights
- Conflict Minerals
- Political Activities
- Climate & Energy
- Healthcare
- Strengthening
Global Economy
- Countries of
Concern
Compliance
- Compliance
- Controllership
- Government
- Business
Sustainable Systems
Climate
- Transportation
- Responsible Lending
- Accessible
- Healthcare
-
- Creation
Violations of CSR Principles - Nike:- From Sinner to Saint
The sportswear manufacturer's business model depends heavily on outsourcing and critics were quick to complain about standards within the factories of its Third World suppliers.
Activists regard prominent organizations as fair game and not surprisingly set out to damage Nike's standing. Like any wounded animal, the company soon went on the defensive.
Nike's next goal was to create policies commonly agreed with suppliers and competitors.
Violation of CSR principles- Case of Coca Cola in India:
The high degree of public protests against the Coca Cola plant in Plachimada, Kerala, India got international attention and also led to government intervention for closure of the plant.
The plant at Plachimada was alleged to have exploited the ground water resources leading to drying up of wells and other natural water resources in the area.
However the protests from the local community have led to world wide reaction and has even led to open campaigns for boycott of products of Coca Cola. The government of Kerala also ordered the stopping of operations of the plant at Plachimada to safeguard the interests of the local community.
Coca Cola's behavior in its expanding Indian market has led to world wide apprehension with the international media and agencies showing support to the protests against the multinational.
Approaches to social responsibility
Approaches to social responsibility
- Obstructionist stance
Do as little as possible
Deny or avoid accepting responsibility for actions.
- Defence stance
Adhere to legal obligations only and nothing more.
Will generally admit to mistakes when they are identified and then take appropriate action.
E.g Nike
Approaches to social responsibility
Accommodative stance
Meets its legal and ethical requirements but will go beyond these requirements in selected cases.
Pro-active stance
Exceed the accommodative stance and indicates a sincere and potent commitment to the general social welfare of a country.
E.g. Body Shop, Ben and Jerry and Timberland
CSR: some criticisms?
CSR is anti-business
A threat to the effective functioning of capitalism and free markets, and hence to global prosperity.
Distraction to management - managing multiple stakeholders.
The scope of CSR is too narrow
Criticised for not addressing what are seen as important areas of corporate behaviour.
CSR fails to achieve its goals
Bennett and Burley (2005) point out that only 3% of MNEs report on social and environmental performance.
Ethic Conflicts
Can an organization be unethical or is it the people that would make it unethical?
Tobacco: Smoking can cause cancer!
Coffee: Buying for extremely low price.
Slave labor: Below minimum wage, 16h/d
Child labor: Two sides of the coin.
Tuna, shark fin, etc.: Animal protection
Discuss:
Should companies take advantage of people and environments in lower developed countries?
What about the saying "when in Rome do as the Romans do"?
Does a better understanding of cultural differences make better global managers and better global companies?
and
Wrap-Up WEEK 2 (Session 7 - 9)
What you should do in the next days before we start with the assignment:
1.) Read the chapters in the assigned textbook!
2.) Identify some major theories/concepts to manage ethical behaviours globally (summarize each to 1-2 sentences and write down the full HARVARD reference)! 3.)Find (in the internet) a global company about which is something written about any ethical problem or how they manage ethics globally well. Apply some theory (not all) to explain the case incident/s.
4.) Reflect on your own global mindset: What would you do to improve the skill level?
MAN6038
The Global Manager
Session 10
How to do the Self-Audit
Final Assignment Clarifications (Q&A)
MAN6038 The Global Manager
Skills Self-Audit and Developing as a Global Manager
One of this module's learning outcomes and the correspondent assignment task
marking band
Outstanding attempt made to undertake a self-audit to identify skills and competencies.
Based on audit findings, outstanding attempt to prepare a personal development plan suitable for operating in global business arena.
There is not only clear integration of literature but also the cross-referencing is evident to support the building up of the personal development plan.
Self-awareness
Self-awareness - "arguably the most fundamental issue in psychology, from both a developmental and an evolutionary perspective“ (Rochat, 2003)
Self-awareness theory (Duval & Wicklund, 1972) - when we focus our attention on ourselves, we evaluate and compare our current behaviour to our internal standards and values objective self-awareness
self-a・ware.ness
noun
conscious knowledge of one's own character, feelings, motives, and desires.
Self-assessment
In psychology - the process of looking at oneself in order to assess aspects that are important to one's identity
In business - a performance management tool where employees share which skills they believe they have developed and how much progress they believe they have made during a certain amount of time on the job, used to keep employees on track to meet goals, but also to grow, develop, and
ultimately reach their full potential
Self-assessment tools
BCU Career+ Online Tools-support you with understanding your own skills, strengths, experience, personality, preferences and potential career matches - click HERE to check online tools available.
Psychometric Tests - questionnaires used by employers as part of the recruitment process to identify your skills, knowledge, aptitudes and personality, usually during the preliminary screening stage or as part of an assessment centre. They are very common in graduate jobs, work placements and internships - click HERE for skills assessment and HERE for psychometric tests on UK Government National Careers Service website.
Know yourself
Self-assessment for The Global Manager assignment
Required Task:
Part 4. Using a self-audit, score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words)
Self-assessment for The Global Manager assignment
Choose 3 skills from the Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
Alternatively
You may want to focus on one specific area and analyse it in depth
Carry out your self assessment - select the global mindset skills/ competencies/ traits that you feel are most relevant to you and your future career path. Specific test results (if you take any) can go into appendices.
We recommend to be displayed in a table as this will not add to the word count
We are more interested in the process of you being aware of your own global mindset skills. It is important that you are realistic and forward focussed. You need to demonstrate your self-awareness of how you can develop as an effective future global business professional/ Global Manager.
Self-assessment for The Global Manager assignment
Skill
Knowledge
Low High
E.g.
Interest in
getting to
know
people
from other
parts of
the world
How much do I know/ understand about this
trait?
How important is this? Can I evidence this?
How far do I demonstrate/ practice this?
Am I confident that I really understand what
this means and how it relates to a global
mindset?
How important is this to my future career as a
global manager/ business professional?
1
2
3
7
9
10
...
1
2
5
1
9
10
...
1
2
3
45
6
7
9
10
The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
GLOBAL MINDSET
The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013)
Social Capital (SC)
Developing your own Global Mindset
Requires active learning - engage problems where you must assess the situation, see options, make decisions, implement actions, and experience feedback
Requires mindfulness - pay close attention to your own reactions and to what is happening in the environment
Requires self-awareness - become aware of how your assumptions and frameworks shape perceptions, values and behaviour only as you confront different sets of assumptions guiding the views and
practices of others
PDP to develop your own Global Mindset for The Global Manager assignment
the process of creating a written documented action plan based on awareness, values, reflection, goal-setting and planning for personal development.
This should be a natural consequence of your self-assessment and can be as detailed as you like.
We recommend to be displayed in a table as this will not add to the word count.
Targets need to be SMART and the plan is expected to be used as a template for your future development.
PDP to develop your own Global Mindset for The Global Manager assignment
In your skills self-audit section you will identify the traits/ competencies you need to develop (table given)
In your PDP section you will show how you intend to do this (table given), for example:
To (actively) listen to what others have to say
To be more willing to collaborate (rather than trying to do everything yourself)
To learn to be comfortable in uncomfortable situations (taking opportunities to push yourself out of you comfort zone)
PDP to develop your own Global Mindset for The Global Manager assignment
Create SMART objectives - these may be short/ medium/ long term
Identify resources which may help your achieve this: can the learning centre help?
Workshops available? Internet? Student services? Careers+ service? Self-help reading/ self-discovery/ exposing yourself to new situations and people? Developing an interest in those who aren't similar to you/ making time to talk to people and get to know them?
Establish a realistic timeframe
PDP to develop your own Global Mindset for The Global Manager assignment
What is the
skill?
Why is it
important?
How can you
do it?
Specific
actions
Target end
date
Measure: How
will you know if
you have
achieved it?
E.g. Interest in
getting to
know people
from other
parts of the
world
...
PDP to develop your own Global Mindset for The Global Manager assignment
Summary
Concepts covered:
Self-awareness, self-assessment and Global Mindset skills self-audit
Personal Development Plan (PDP) to develop your own Global Mindset
Where you can use these concepts in your assignment:
Part 4 - skills self-audit and PDP (what are the global mindset skills needed in your future career, and how do you plan to develop them to succeed as a future global manager/ business professional?)
MAN6038 The Global
Manager
Final Assignment Guidelines
Assignment Brief
Assignment method:
An approximate -word portfolio weighting of the final mark.
- Deadline:
Class A: Saturday July 2024
Class B: Saturday July 2024
- Required task:
Using academic theories and a case study, evaluate and analyse key traits of a global manager from a global mindset perspective, include elements of cultural, ethical and value-based considerations, following which carry out a self-audit of your global mindset skills and a personal development plan.
Assignment Brief
Assignment indicative structure:
Introduction. Clearly outline the structure of the work (approx. 100 words).
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments (approx. 700 words).
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words).
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations (approx. 700 words).
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits (approx. 700 words).
Conclusion. Clearly summarise your work (approx. 100 words).
List of references (not included in the word count). In-text citations and the list of references should follow BCU Harvard Referencing style. A minimum of 10-15 academic references are required.
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments ( words)
Evaluate key traits, skills and competences of global managers from a theoretical perspective using frameworks and models studied throughout the module, as well as elements related to the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments. These have been covered in:
Lecture - Introduction to The Global Manager Module: Global companies; Globalisation and de-globalisation/ localisation; Global Mindset.
Lecture - Cultural Considerations in a Global Business Context: Cultural Intelligence (CQ).
Lecture - Traits of a Global Manager and The Global Mindset Model (Javidan & Bowen, 2013).
Lecture - Critical thinking and writing a critical literature review.
Part 1. A literature review about key traits of a global manager and the importance of a global mindset in today's rapidly changing global environments ( words)
You can use any theoretical model delivered in the lecture slides or from your wider reading. Use relevant references based on the materials given on the Moodle page or from your wider reading. Check also the additional resources section available on the Moodle page.
Try to be more critical then descriptive and explain the relevance of the theories analysed - how to do this has been covered in the Lecture.
Remember: Part 1 & 2 should reflect only theoretical concepts, whereas Part 3 should explain how your chosen business applies concepts into practice!
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations ( 700 words)
Evaluate cultural, ethical AND/ OR value-based considerations from a theoretical perspective using frameworks and models studied throughout the module. You can choose one, two or all the three areas, if you choose one single area then you will analyse it in depth. These have been covered in:
Lecture - Cultural Considerations in a Global Business Context: Cultural differences and various theoretical frameworks in assessing cultural differences (GLOBE, Hofstede, Kluckholn...)
Lecture - Ethical Considerations in A Global Context: Personal ethics - global managers behaviour and ethical integrity; Corporate ethics - corporate accountability, corporate responsibility, corporate sustainability.
Lecture - Value-Based Considerations in A Global Context: Value-Based Management Model (McKensey, 1990) - manage the organisation to create value; Values-Based Leadership Model (Kraemer, 2010) - manage the organisation aligned with the managers' and the company's core values.
Lecture - Critical thinking and writing a critical literature review.
Part 2. A literature review about cultural, ethical and value-based considerations ( 700 words)
You can use any theoretical model delivered in the lecture slides or from your wider reading. Use relevant references based on the materials given on the Moodle page or from your wider reading. Check also the additional resources section available on the Moodle page.
Try to be more critical then descriptive and explain the relevance of the theories analysed - how to do this has been covered in the Lecture.
Remember: Part 1 & 2 should reflect only theoretical concepts, whereas Part 3 should explain how your chosen business applies concepts into practice!
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations ( words)
Chose a real global company, start by making a short introduction to the company, and then identify some specific issues related to cultural, ethical AND value-based considerations, in which the business has been successful or has failed:
For cultural-based considerations: you can analyse the company's issues related to cultural differences (Lectures), strategies and methods of expanding into global markets and developing a global presence (Lectures), managing global teams and networks (Lectures), and any other relevant topic discussed in this module.
For ethical-based considerations: you can analyse the company's issues related to their global managers behaviour and ethical integrity (personal ethics), or corporate accountability, corporate responsibility and corporate sustainability (corporate ethics) (Lecture).
For value-based considerations: you can analyse the company's issues related to value creation, as well as the managers' and the company's core values (Lecture).
Part 3. A case study about a business of your choice highlighting how the business has or has not benefited from elements related to cultural, ethical, and value-based considerations ( words)
Explain how the company managed those issues, whether and to which extent it is considered a success or a failure, and what you can learn from this from a global perspective.
You can use the model we followed during the seminars when analysed different examples of company case studies.
Remember: Part 1 & 2 should reflect only theoretical concepts, whereas Part 3 should explain how your chosen business applies concepts into practice!
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits ( 700 words)
Using the Global Mindset Model discussed this semester, identify 3 global mindset skills/ traits/ competences of a global manager that you consider relevant having in mind your future career plans. Alternatively, you can focus on one specific area and analyse it in depth.
Score yourself on a scale of to about these three traits, based on the table provided in the final Week Seminar (tables are not word counted).
Then draw a detailed personal development plan (PDP) about how and by when you intend to develop these same traits, based on the table provided (tables are not word counted).
Part 4. A self-audit, in which you score yourself on a scale of 1-10 about global mindset skills and competences, followed by a detailed personal development plan about how and by when you intend to develop these traits ( 700 words)
The Global Manager module it is about your FUTURE, about what you want to achieve from this point on, about how you plan to succeed in your career as a potential global manager or global business professional working in today's rapidly changing global context.
No evidence from the past is needed, no reflective models either, and your selfscore can be at the minimum, but you need to explain why and how you consider the respective global mindset traits relevant in your future career.
Remember: Part 4 of your assignment should reflect how you intend to develop as a future successful global manager with a cultivated global mindset, by showing self-awareness of the main skills needed in your future career, as well as an action plan to enhance these skills further!
File Submission
Make sure you fully respect the structure given in the assignment brief and in the previous slides, covering all 4 parts corresponding to the 4 learning outcomes of this module.
Throughout the text embed your references using BCU Harvard Referencing format available on the Moodle page, and don't forget to add a detailed List of References at the end of your assignment, again using BCU Harvard Referencing guidelines.
Remember this is a level 6 final year final semester undergraduate piece of work and the quality of the content is everything.
Before submitting, please proof read and check for spelling errors - this is important and first impressions count!
Please submit your file together with your BCU feedback and coversheet in Word, a copy of this is on Moodle next to the submission link.
Final Wrap-Up
Q&A
Good luck!
We hope you have enjoyed this module!
Good luck with your assignment submission as well as in your future careers!
Egalitarian The ideal distance between a boss and a subordinate is low. The best boss is a facilitator among equals. Organizational structures are flat. Communication often skips hierarchical lines.
Hierarchical The ideal distance between a boss and a subordinate is high. The best boss is a strong director who leads from the front. Status is important. Organizational structures are multi-layered and fixed. Communication follows set hierarchical lines.
Good bridging leads automatically to good integrating; poor bridging prevents integrating.