Exhibition Review (20%)
展览回顾（20%）
Due: 7 November 2024
截止日期：2024 年 11 月 7 日
Assignment type: Audio-visual submission of an exhibition review (e.g. video essay, recorded PPP)
作业类型：视听提交展览评论（例如视频论文、录制的 PPP）
Assignment guidance:
作业指导：
Put yourself in the position of a young art journalist whose task it is to provide viewers with a short
将自己置于一名年轻的艺术记者的位置，其任务是为观众提供短片
reportage on the Living with Death exhibition, currently shown at Leeds City Museum (Millenium
关于“与死亡共存”展览的报道，目前在利兹市博物馆（千禧年博物馆）展出
Square). We will visit the Museum together in Week 4, to gain a first impression of this exhibition.
正方形）。第四周我们将一起参观博物馆，以获得对这个展览的第一印象。
Over the following days and in Week 6, you are asked to produce an audio-visual exhibition review
在接下来的几天和第六周，您需要制作一份视听展览评论
(e.g. video essay or recorded PPP) as your first assignment.
（例如视频论文或录制的 PPP）作为您的第一份作业。
1. When we visit Leeds City Museum, first take a good overall look at the special exhibition.
1、我们参观利兹市博物馆时，首先整体看一下专题展览。
2. Then dive in deeper, choose a few individual works that resonate with you and take notes, take
2.然后深入研究，选择一些与你产生共鸣的个人作品并做笔记，
photographs, start filming with your phone. Possibly, make use of lecture material from previous
照片，开始用手机拍摄。可能的话，利用以前的讲座材料
class sessions as well as terminology and concepts you learned through secondary literature
课堂课程以及您通过二手文献学到的术语和概念
provided by your tutor.
由你的导师提供。
3. Try to come up with one central thought (your ‘argument’) in the video essay or recorded PPP.
3. 尝试在视频文章或录制的 PPP 中提出一个中心思想（你的“论点”）。
Start thinking about creating a voice-over and sound/music score for your audio-visual production.
开始考虑为您的视听作品创建画外音和声音/乐谱。
Describe in your voice-over not only what you see (let your accompanying images/photographs do
在画外音中不仅要描述您所看到的内容（让您随附的图像/照片来描述您所看到的内容）
this job for you) but, more importantly, reflect critically on the curatorial aspects of the exhibition.
这项工作适合你），但更重要的是，批判性地反思展览的策展方面。
4. For initial ideas, inspiration, clarity on what the criteria are to produce a good audiovisual review,
4. 获得初步想法、灵感、明确制作良好视听评论的标准，
go through the ‘Assignment material’ that I attached to Wk6.
浏览我附加到第 6 周的“作业材料”。
Learning outcomes assessed:
评估的学习成果：
• Creative encounter with diverse art forms and cultural artefacts
• 与不同艺术形式和文化文物的创造性邂逅
• Exploration of contexts of production, collection and exhibition
• 探索生产、收藏和展览的脉络
Skills Learning outcome:
技能学习成果：
• Creative, reflective audio-visual analysis
• 创造性的、反思性的视听分析
• Skilled presentation and time-management
• 熟练的演示和时间管理
Rationale:
理由：
This assignment supports your learning of basic research skills, using creative practice-based
这项作业支持您使用基于创造性实践的基础研究技能的学习
research tools such as the audio-visual essay. The assignment also sharpens your capabilities to
研究工具，例如视听论文。这项任务还可以提高您的能力
work to time constraints, conduct and present, orally and in a foreign language, a basic analysis of a
工作在时间限制下，以口头和外语进行和呈现，对一个问题进行基本分析
visit to an exhibition and its specifically curated artistic and cultural artefacts.
参观展览及其专门策划的艺术和文化文物。
Word/time limit and guidance:
字数/时间限制和指导：
Your audio-visual exhibition review should not be longer than 5 minutes. If you exceed the time limit,
视听展评时长不宜超过5分钟。如果超过时间限制，
5 points will be taken off your grade.
您的成绩将被扣 5 分。
Use of Gen AI in this assessment:
Gen AI 在此评估中的使用：
RED: AI tools cannot be used. You must not use GenAI tools. The purpose and format of the
红色：无法使用人工智能工具。您不得使用 GenAI 工具。目的和格式
assessments makes it inappropriate or impractical for AI tools to be used.
评估使得使用人工智能工具不合适或不切实际。
Weighting
加权: 20%
Deadline: Thursday, 7 November 2024, 14:00
截止日期：2024 年 11 月 7 日星期四 14:00
Submission method:
提交方式：
Upload your audio-visual review to Blackboard, under the ‘Assessment and Feedback’ folder.
将您的视听评论上传到 Blackboard 的“评估和反馈”文件夹下。
Feedback provision:
反馈规定：
You will receive formative verbal feedback for your audio-visual exhibition review from student peers
您将收到学生同学对您的视听展览评论的形成性口头反馈
and myself in Wk7 and written feedback from me by Wk9. Formative feedback helps you to
和我自己在第七周，并在第九周收到我的书面反馈。形成性反馈可以帮助您
recognize gaps in your knowledge, areas to improve, what support resources you may need, and
认识到您的知识差距、需要改进的领域、您可能需要哪些支持资源，以及
learning strategies you might change or adapt to meet the course outcomes.
您可能会改变或调整学习策略以满足课程成果。
General guidance:
一般指导：
General guidance to assessment is provided in the School student handbook. Guidance on
学校学生手册中提供了评估的一般指导。指导
submitting assessments is available here.
可以在此处提交评估。
Assessment criteria and process:
评审标准及流程：
• Analytical skills (i.e. strength of your analysis) – 25 points
• 分析能力（即分析的强度） – 25 分
• Structure (i.e. coherence of your review) – 25 points
• 结构（即评论的连贯性） – 25 分
• Form and clarity of review – 25 points
• 审查的形式和清晰度 – 25 分
• Originality and overall flow – 25 points
• 原创性和整体流程 – 25 分
Further information about the school’s marking and moderation processes can be found in Section 4
有关学校评分和审核流程的更多信息，请参阅第 4 节
of the School’s Code of Practice of Assessment. The re-sit task will be the same as the original task.
学校的评估实践守则。重考任务将与原始任务相同。
Presentation and referencing:
介绍和参考：
Referencing is the acknowledgement of the sources you used when producing your piece of work.
引用是对您在制作作品时使用的来源的认可。
Referencing correctly is important to demonstrate how widely you have researched your subject, to
正确引用对于展示你对你的主题的研究有多广泛很重要，
show the basis of your arguments and conclusions, and to avoid plagiarism. You need to give the
展示你的论点和结论的基础，并避免抄袭。您需要提供
person watching your review enough information to find the sources you have consulted. This is done
观看您的人会审查足够的信息以找到您咨询过的来源。这样就完成了
by including citations in your work and providing a list of references. This can be done at the end of
通过在您的作品中包含引用并提供参考文献列表。这可以在结束时完成
your audio-visual work.
你的视听作品。
You can use either the MHRA or Leeds Harvard referencing systems. For both styles, you should
您可以使用 MHRA 或利兹哈佛参考系统。对于这两种风格，你应该
ensure you include page numbers in your citation if you quote directly from a text.
如果直接引用文本，请确保在引文中包含页码。
Marking of all submitted coursework will be informed by this guidance and will correspond to the style
所有提交的课程作业的评分将通过本指南进行通知，并将与风格相对应
outlined on the Library’s referencing pages.
图书馆的参考页面上有概述。
Technical written English will be assessed according to the Assessment Criteria. A Marking
技术书面英语将根据评估标准进行评估。 A 标记
Consideration cover sheet is sent by the School Disability contact to all students who are known to
考虑封面表由学校残疾联系人发送给所有已知有以下情况的学生：
have a Specific Learning Difficult (e.g. Dyslexia). Such students must submit the cover sheet with
有特定的学习困难（例如阅读障碍）。此类学生必须提交封面页
each assessment submission. This cover sheet identifies to the marker students who require specific
每次评估提交。此封面向评分者标识了需要特定要求的学生
feedback and support. Please contact your Disability Contact if you think this applies to you and you
反馈和支持。如果您认为这适用于您和您，请联系您的残疾联系人
have not received the cover sheet.
还没有收到封面。
Academic misconduct and plagiarism:
学术不端行为和抄袭：
Academic integrity is a commitment to good study practices and shared values, which ensures that
学术诚信是对良好学习实践和共同价值观的承诺，这确保了
your work is a true expression of your own understanding and ideas, giving credit to others where
你的工作是你自己的理解和想法的真实表达，在哪里给予他人荣誉
their work contributes to yours. This University definition of academic integrity recognises that each
他们的工作对你的工作有所贡献。大学对学术诚信的定义承认每个
individual has a responsibility to contribute honestly within our academic community. Breaching
个人有责任在我们的学术界做出诚实的贡献。突破
academic integrity standards can lead to serious penalties.
学术诚信标准可能导致严重处罚。
More information about the school and university’s approach to Academic Integrity and Academic
有关学校和大学学术诚信和学术方法的更多信息
Misconduct can be found in section 3.4 of the Code of Practice of Assessment.
不当行为可参见《评估实践守则》第 3.4 节。