Issue 8, 2024
第 8 期, 2024

Advances of in situ transmission electron microscopy research on gas phase catalyst particles

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has been extensively employed to explore catalytic mechanisms in recent years. Nevertheless, traditional TEM techniques cannot clarify the true active states in the reaction process. In contrast, in situ TEM has made remarkable progress in simulating reactions, allowing the record of dynamic events at the atomic scale. In addition, it provides a wealth of information on the material morphology, microstructure, and dynamics of chemical properties at the micro-nano scale. In this review we introduce the principles, characteristics and research progress in the field of in situ TEM techniques, with particular emphasis on their roles in exploring in the fields of catalysts' synthesis, catalytic behaviors, thermal catalysis, and structure reconstruction of the catalysis process. The challenges and obstacles facing in situ TEM, as well as outlook for emerging research opportunities are discussed in the final part.

Graphical abstract: Advances of in situ transmission electron microscopy research on gas phase catalyst particles

Ming-Jun Xiao   肖明军

Ming-Jun Xiao received his Ph.D. degree in 2023 from Lanzhou University. In 2023, he was appointed as an assistant professor by the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Non-ferrous Metals/School of Materials Science and Engineering of Lanzhou University of Technology. Dr. Ming-Jun Xiao is interested in using in situ TEM to dissect material growth mechanisms and relate them to energy storage and conversion properties. He has published more than 50 research papers on peer reviewed international journals. His current research directions include: in situ TEM; lithium/sodium ion batteries; photoelectrocatalysis; DFT calculation; recycling of secondary resources.
Ming-Jun Xiao 于 2023 年获得兰州大学博士学位。2023 年,他被兰州理工大学材料科学与工程学院聘为有色金属先进加工与回收国家重点实验室助理教授。Ming-Jun Xiao 博士对使用原位 TEM 剖析材料生长机制并将其与储能和转换特性联系起来感兴趣。他在同行评审的国际期刊上发表了 50 多篇研究论文。他目前的研究方向包括:原位 TEM;锂/钠离子电池;光电催化;DFT 计算;二次资源回收利用。

1. Introduction
1. 引言

The development of sustainable, efficient, and environmentally friendly catalysts, along with their corresponding catalytic production processes, is a crucial endeavor aimed at addressing energy shortages, environmental crises, and air pollution. In order to develop efficient catalysts and gain comprehensive insights into reaction mechanisms, the exploration of intricate chemical reactions,1 synthesis and structural evolution of catalysts,2,3 and catalytic processes has become increasingly significant.4 However, conventional research methods have largely involved analysis after catalysis. Researchers must interrupt the reaction, retrieve samples from the setup, and perform characterization, a process that is not only time consuming but also does not guarantee the complete observation of the same catalytic particle's morphological and structural changes. What's more important, the catalyst after the reaction might not accurately present the true state of the reaction process. To address these issues, in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques have been employed to elucidate catalytic mechanisms at the atomic scale.5,6
开发可持续、高效和环保的催化剂及其相应的催化生产工艺,是解决能源短缺、环境危机和空气污染的一项重要工作。为了开发高效的催化剂并全面了解反应机理,对复杂化学反应的探索,1 催化剂的合成和结构演变,2,3 和催化过程变得越来越重要。4 然而,传统的研究方法主要涉及催化后的分析。研究人员必须中断反应,从装置中取出样品,并进行表征,这一过程不仅耗时,而且不能保证完全观察同一催化粒子的形态和结构变化。更重要的是,反应后的催化剂可能无法准确呈现反应过程的真实状态。为了解决这些问题,已经采用了原位透射电子显微镜 (TEM) 技术来阐明原子尺度的催化机制。5,6

Gaining a profound understanding of the relationships between the size, composition, morphology, crystal structure, surface atomic distribution, and properties of these materials is crucial for the design of new materials.7,8 However, real-time observation of structural changes often proves to be a formidable task. Furthermore, a material's performance is directly linked to operating conditions such as temperature, gas pressure, and gas composition.9,10 This has fueled interest in various in situ techniques to elucidate mechanisms of material structural transformation, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). However, for gas solid catalysis, the in situ TEM technique can not only realize the change of the whole structure of the catalyst, but also the change of the structure of the single particle of the catalyst, which is more suitable for studying the catalytic process of the catalyst, including catalyst synthesis, catalytic behavior, thermal catalysis, and structural reconstruction. Nonetheless, the in situ TEM technique has its own limitations, such as the effect of electron beam irradiation on the catalyst and the lack of macroscopic characterization.11,12 They are also affected by gas, pressure and temperature, which affects spatial resolution. Among them, electron beam irradiation can cause radiation damage, thermal effects, charge effects, phase transitions, and dissolution of the catalyst. Therefore, before conducting in situ TEM experiments, the electron beam dose tolerance of the catalyst can be obtained by adjusting the electron beam dose while ensuring resolution.
深入了解这些材料的尺寸、组成、形态、晶体结构、表面原子分布和性能之间的关系对于新材料的设计至关重要。7,8 然而,实时观察结构变化通常被证明是一项艰巨的任务。此外,材料的性能与温度、气体压力和气体成分等作条件直接相关。9,10 这激发了人们对各种原技术的兴趣,以阐明材料结构转变的机制,包括 X 射线衍射 (XRD)、X 射线光电子能谱 (XPS)、X 射线吸收精细结构 (XAFS) 和透射电子显微镜 (TEM)。然而,对于气固催化,位TEM技术不仅可以实现催化剂整体结构的变化,还可以实现催化剂单个颗粒结构的变化,更适合研究催化剂的催化过程,包括催化剂合成、催化行为、热催化和结构重构。尽管如此,位TEM技术有其自身的局限性,如电子束辐照对催化剂的影响和缺乏宏观表征。11,12 它们还受气体、压力和温度的影响,从而影响空间分辨率。其中,电子束辐照会导致催化剂的辐射损伤、热效应、电荷效应、相变和溶解。 因此,在进行原位 TEM 实验之前,可以在保证分辨率的情况下,通过调整电子束剂量来获得催化剂的电子束剂量容差。

TEM, which originated in the 1930s, is a potent technique for characterizing micro and nanostructures through imaging, electron diffraction, and spectroscopy.13 The electron beam's wavelength enables TEM to achieve atomic level resolution. In recent years, advancements such as aberration correctors and monochromators have led to exceptional spatial resolution (0.0405 nm) and energy resolution (4.2 meV).14,15 By incorporating aberration corrected optics, pixelated array detectors, and full field imaging, the spatial resolution for material analysis has been further improved to 0.039 nm. This advancement allows spectroscopic techniques such as energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) to detect chemical information at the atomic scale.16 TEM is a valuable approach for exploring catalytic chemical reactions. Notably, the development of in situ TEM techniques, encompassing heating, biasing, liquid and gas environments, efficient digital recording systems, and enhanced computational capabilities, has extended the speed of image acquisition and improved time resolution, making it possible to explore rapid reaction kinetics.17In situ TEM enables real-time, direct observation of atomic scale chemical reactions under typical operating conditions, offering crucial insights into the workings principle of catalysts.18
TEM 起源于 1930 年代,是一种通过成像、电子衍射和光谱学来表征微纳米结构的有效技术。13 电子束的波长使 TEM 能够达到原子级分辨率。近年来,像差校正器和光栅等进步带来了出色的空间分辨率 (0.0405 nm) 和能量分辨率 (4.2 meV)。14,15 通过结合像差校正光学器件、像素化阵列探测器和全场成像,材料分析的空间分辨率进一步提高到 0.039 nm。这一进步使能量色散 X 射线光谱 (EDX) 和电子能量损失光谱 (EELS) 等光谱技术能够在原子尺度上检测化学信息。16 TEM 是探索催化化学反应的宝贵方法。值得注意的是,位 TEM 技术的发展,包括加热、偏压、液体和气体环境、高效的数字记录系统和增强的计算能力,提高了图像采集速度并提高了时间分辨率,从而可以探索快速反应动力学。17原位 TEM 能够在典型作条件下实时、直接地观察原子级化学反应,为催化剂的工作原理提供重要的见解。18

In this paper, we will delve into the pivotal roles and emerging opportunities that in situ TEM offers within recent major advancements, spanning catalyst synthesis, catalytic behaviors, thermal catalysis, and structure reconstruction (Fig. 1). Firstly, we will provide a concise overview of the evolutionary progression of the in situ TEM technique and its operational mechanisms. Subsequently, we will outline the application of the in situ TEM technique in investigating gas phase catalysis. Lastly, we will explore the potential that the in situ TEM technique holds in shaping the trajectory of catalytic material evolution. By offering an atomic level perspective on catalytic processes, in situ TEM paves the way for the advancement of sophisticated catalytic materials.
在本文中,我们将深入探讨原位 TEM 在最近的重大进展中提供的关键作用和新兴机会,涵盖催化剂合成、催化行为、热催化和结构重建(图 1)。首先,我们将简要概述原位 TEM 技术的演变进程及其作机制。随后,我们将概述位 TEM 技术在研究气相催化中的应用。最后,我们将探讨位 TEM 技术在塑造催化材料进化轨迹方面的潜力。通过提供催化过程的原子级视角,原位 TEM 为复杂催化材料的发展铺平了道路。

Fig. 1 Application of in situ TEM in gas phase catalysis investigation.
图 1 原位 TEM 在气相催化研究中的应用。

2. Construction of in situ TEM
2. 原位 TEM 的构建

2.1 In situ TEM technologies
2.1 原位 TEM 技术

To enhance catalytic performance, extensive investigations have been conducted into the structures of various catalysts, including single atom catalysts21 and bimetallic catalysts.22 TEM has proven to be an effective technique for studying catalyst structures and chemical properties at the atomic scale, although it was traditionally limited to vacuum conditions. Currently, both environmental transmission electron microscopes (ETEM) and windowed holders enable the direct observation of catalytic reactions in high spatial resolution within gas environments.
为了提高催化性能,已经对各种催化剂的结构进行了广泛的研究,包括单原子催化剂21 和双金属催化剂。22 TEM 已被证明是在原子尺度上研究催化剂结构和化学性质的有效技术,尽管它传统上仅限于真空条件。目前,环境透射电子显微镜 (ETEM) 和窗口支架都可以在气体环境中以高空间分辨率直接观察催化反应。

Different pumping systems of ETEM have undergone the following developmental stages: firstly, in 1968, Hashimoto et al. popularized and developed a high temperature gas reaction chamber employing a differential pumping system.23 About two decades later, in the 1970s, Gai and her team achieved a TEM spatial resolution of 0.23 nm, sufficient to address lattice fringes within catalytic processes.24 From then on, the use of field emission electron guns elevated the spatial resolution to the atomic level. In 1988, Suzuki et al. conducted analyses on in situ samples using TEM and EELS, demonstrating the capability to monitor the chemical and physical behavior of materials.25 The current ETEM operates by employing differential pumping apertures to confine gases to the high pressure region around the sample and connecting an external pump to the microscope column (Fig. 2a and b),19,26 This setup enables the capture of atomic scale images, with gas pressures typically below 10 Torr and time resolutions reaching up to 1 ms.27,28
ETEM 的不同泵送系统经历了以下发展阶段:首先,在 1968 年,Hashimoto 等人推广并开发了一种采用差动泵送系统的高温气体反应室。23 大约二十年后,在 1970 年代,Gai 和她的团队实现了 0.23 nm 的 TEM 空间分辨率,足以解决催化过程中的晶格条纹。24 从那时起,场发射电子枪的使用将空间分辨率提高到原子水平。1988 年,Suzuki 等人使用 TEM 和 EELS 对原位样品进行了分析,证明了监测材料化学和物理行为的能力。25 当前的 ETEM 的工作原理是采用差分泵孔将气体限制在样品周围的高压区域,并将外部泵连接到显微镜柱(图 2a 和 b),19,26这种设置能够捕获原子级图像,气体压力通常低于 10 Torr,时间分辨率高达 1 ms27,28

Fig. 2 (a) Schematic diagram of a differentially pumped ETEM, copyright 2014, reprinted with permission from springer Royal Society of Chemistry.19 (b) Environmental chamber with differential apertures, copyright 2016, reprinted with permission from springer WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.20 (c) Schematic diagram of the gas sample holder system.
图 2 (a) 差动泵浦 ETEM 示意图,版权所有 2014,经施普林格皇家化学学会许可转载。19 (b) 环境室带差分孔径,版权2016,经springer WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA许可转载。20 (c) 气体样品架系统示意图。

Compared to other in situ systems, the windowed holder (gas reaction system) enables material characterization in a gas and heating environment within a traditional TEM (as shown in Fig. 2c and Table 2). The principle involves using upper and lower windows to seal both the material and gas within the reactor of the sample holder. This prevents gas from escaping into the electron microscope chamber when inserted for characterization. The reaction zone can be heated up to 1000 °C while achieving a spatial resolution of 0.1 nm. Unlike the conventional TEM sample holder, the detachable reactor features a gas supply system to introduce a reaction atmosphere into the sample chamber. It also incorporates a temperature control system for heating the materials and gas inside the reactor.
与其他原位系统相比,开窗支架(气体反应系统)能够在传统 TEM 内的气体和加热环境中进行材料表征(如图 2c表 2 所示)。该原理涉及使用上下窗口来密封样品架反应器内的材料和气体。这可以防止气体在插入进行表征时逸出到电子显微镜室中。反应区可加热至 1000 °C,同时实现 0.1 nm 的空间分辨率。与传统的 TEM 样品架不同,可拆卸反应器具有供气系统,可将反应气氛引入样品室。它还包括一个温度控制系统,用于加热反应器内的材料和气体。

Table 1 provides a comparison of the two current in situ techniques. One of the significant advantages of the in situ sample holder compared to the ETEM is its compatibility with conventional standard TEM instruments, enabling more research groups to conduct in situ TEM experiments. The windowed holder also permits in situ experiments within a pressure range from several mbar up to 4.5 bar, facilitating studies of catalytic reactions under high pressure conditions by simulating such conditions within reactors.29,30 However, the presence of SiNx windows can lower the spatial resolution and reduce the EDX signal. Additionally, the preparation of in situ experimental samples using the in situ sample holder is more complex and potentially hazardous.
表 1 提供了两种当前原技术的比较。与 ETEM 相比,位样品架的显着优势之一是它与常规标准 TEM 仪器的兼容性,使更多的研究小组能够进行原位 TEM 实验。窗口支架还允许在几毫巴至 4.5 巴的压力范围内进行原位实验,通过模拟反应器内的高压条件下的催化反应来促进此类条件的研究。29,30 然而,SiNx 窗口的存在会降低空间分辨率并降低 EDX 信号。此外,使用原位样品架制备原实验样品更加复杂且具有潜在危险。

Table 1 Comparison of two current in situ TEM technologies
表 1 两种电流原位 TEM 技术的比较
Instrument  仪器 Advantages  优势 Disadvantages  
Windowed holder  开窗支架 (1) Low cost; (2) high pressure; (3) stable sample; (4) rapid heating
(1) 成本低;(2) 高压;(3) 稳定的样品;(4) 快速加热
(1) Low resolution; (2) high danger
(1) 分辨率低;(2) 高危险性
ETEM (1) Gas directly into the lens barrel; (2) high TEM resolution
(1) 气体直接进入镜筒;(2) 高 TEM 分辨率
(1) Restricted gas type; (2) high cost; (3) low pressure
(1) 限制气体类型;(2) 成本高;(3) 低压
Table 2 Type and characteristics of windowed holder system
表 2 窗式支架系统的类型和特点
In situ system  原位系统 Unique advantages  独特优势 Application field  应用领域
Self-sealing reaction system
自密封反应系统
(1) Good stability; (2) good sealing
(1) 稳定性好;(2) 密封性好
Self-assembly; metal corrosion; drug transport
自组装;金属腐蚀;药物运输
Electrochemical reaction system
电化学反应系统
(1) Superior performance; (2) easy use
(1) 性能优越;(2) 使用方便
Electrochemical corrosion; small molecule
电化学腐蚀;小分子
Photocatalytic reaction system
光催化反应系统
(1) Wide usage; (2) easy to use
(1) 用途广泛;(2) 易于使用
Photocatalytic reaction; solar cell; photosynthesis
光催化反应;太阳能电池;光合作用
Gas reaction system  气体反应系统 (1) Temperature control; (2) high security
(1) 温度控制;(2) 安全性高
Thermocatalysis; two dimensional
热催化;二维
Liquid reaction system  液体反应系统 (1) High sensitivity; (2) good stability
(1) 灵敏度高;(2) 稳定性好
Nanocatalyst synthesis; solvothermal process
纳米催化剂合成;溶剂热工艺
Solid heating system  固体加热系统 (1) High accuracy; (2) good stability
(1) 精度高;(2) 稳定性好
Nanomaterials; energy materials
纳米材料;能源材料
High temperature heating system
高温加热系统
(1) Easy operation; (2) cost effective
(1)作简便;(2) 成本效益
Phase transition; structure transformation
相变;结构改造
Mechanical control system
机械控制系统
(1) Good stability; (2) modular design
(1) 稳定性好;(2) 模块化设计
Crystal transition; material mechanics
晶体转变;材料力学
Refrigeration system  制冷系统 (1) Temperature range; (2) good stability
(1) 温度范围;(2) 稳定性好
Semiconductor devices; life sciences
半导体器件;生命科学
Freezing transfer system
冷冻输送系统
(1) Freezing time; (2) good stability
(1) 冻结时间;(2) 稳定性好
Structural biology; medical treatment
结构生物学;医疗
Table 3 Type and characteristics of in situ chip
表 3 原位芯片的类型和特点
In situ chip  原位芯片 Product parameters  产品参数 Application field  应用领域 Ref.  裁判。
Self-sealing  自密封 Top chip  顶部筹码 Size: 2.7 × 3.2 mm
尺寸:2.7 × 3.2 毫米
Window thickness: 10/25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 10/25/50 毫米
Nano materials; biological materials; magnetic materials
纳米材料;生物材料;磁性材料
35
Bottom chip  底筹码 Size: 3 × 3.5 mm
尺寸:3 × 3.5 毫米
Window thickness: 25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 25/50 mm
Vacuum heated  真空加热 Size: 4 × 6 mm
尺寸:4 × 6 毫米
Window thickness: 10/25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 10/25/50 毫米
Solid material heating  固体材料加热 36
Thickness: 0.2 mm  厚度: 0.2 毫米 Heating zone: Ø 180 μm
加热区:Ø 180 μm
Electrochemical  电化学 Top chip  顶部筹码 Size: 3 × 3.2 mm
尺寸:3 × 3.2 毫米
Window thickness: 10/25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 10/25/50 毫米
Electric corrosion; electrical properties; photoelectric effect
电腐蚀;电气性能;光电效应
37
Bottom chip  底筹码 Size: 4 × 6 mm
尺寸:4 × 6 毫米
Window thickness: 25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 25/50 mm
Liquid flow  液体流动 Top chip  顶部筹码 Size: 3.5 × 7 mm
尺寸:3.5 × 7 毫米
Window thickness: 10/25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 10/25/50 毫米
Temperature observation of most liquid phase fluids
大多数液相流体的温度观察
38
Bottom chip  底筹码 Size: 3.9 × 7.9 mm
尺寸:3.9 × 7.9 毫米
Window thickness: 25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 25/50 mm
Fluid heated  流体加热 Top chip  顶部筹码 Size: 3.5 × 6 mm
尺寸:3.5 × 6 毫米
Window thickness: 10 × 30 μm
窗口厚度:10 × 30 μm
Temperature control of gas and liquid samples
气体和液体样品的温度控制
39
Bottom chip  底筹码 Size: 3.9 × 7.9 mm
尺寸:3.9 × 7.9 毫米
Window thickness: 25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 25/50 mm
Vacuum heated  真空加热 Size: 4 × 6 mm
尺寸:4 × 6 毫米
Heating zone: Ø 180 μm
加热区:Ø 180 μm
Nano materials; FIB flakes
纳米材料;FIB 薄片
40
Thickness: 0.2 mm  厚度: 0.2 毫米
Electrochemical  电化学 Top chip  顶部筹码 Size: 4 × 6 mm
尺寸:4 × 6 毫米
Window thickness: 25/50 mm
窗口厚度: 25/50 mm
Electrochemistry; electrocatalysis; electrocorrosion
电化学;电催化;电腐蚀
41
Bottom chip  底筹码 Size: 4 × 10 mm
尺寸:4 × 10 毫米
Interlayer height: 200–2000 nm
层间高度:200–2000 nm
Table 4 Present works of in situ TEM techniques
表 4 TEM 技术的现有工作
Stimulus  刺激物 Topics  主题 Setup  设置 Ref.
Windowed holder (gas)  带窗支架(燃气) Structural kinetics of Pt in hydrogenation of ethylene
Pt 在乙烯加氢中的结构动力学
Hitachi 2700C STEM  日立 2700C STEM 79
Observe the transformation of yolk shell into gold atoms
观察蛋黄壳向金原子的转变
Aberration-corrected STEM
像差校正 STEM
54
Growth trajectory of interface bismuth
界面铋的生长轨迹
JEOL model JEM2100  JEOL 型号 JEM2100 80
In situ study of atomic mechanism
原子机理的原位研究
JEOL 2100  JEOL 2100 系列 81
In situ TEM observation of silver oxidation
原位银氧化的 TEM 观察
JEOL 2010LaB6 82
Nanoscale kinetics of asymmetrical corrosion
不对称腐蚀的纳米级动力学
JEM-ARM200F 83
Morphology changes of gold nanoparticle supported on CeO2
CeO2负载的纳米金颗粒的形貌变化
FEI Tecnai F20 equipped
配备 FEI Tecnai F20
84
Dynamic structural evolution of palladium ceria core–shell catalysts
钯铈核壳催化剂的动态结构演变
JEOL JEM-2100F  杰尔 JEM-2100F 85
In situ study of noncatalytic metal oxide nanowire growth
非催化性金属氧化物纳米线生长的原位研究
FEI Titan 80-300  飞 泰坦 80-300 86
Gas molecules interacting with nanoparticulate catalysts
气体分子与纳米颗粒催化剂相互作用
200MC TEM  200MC 有 87
Surface faceting of PdCu by H2
PdCu 的 H2 表面刻面
FEI Tecnai F20 88
Sintering behaviors of Au on TiO2
Au 在 TiO2 上的烧结行为
Hitachi H-9500/Protochips
日立 H-9500/原型芯片
89
Au single atoms and nanoporous Au for methane pyrolysis
用于甲烷热解的 Au 单原子和纳米多孔 Au
Talos F200X 90
Reversible loss of yolk–shell structure
蛋黄-壳结构的可逆性损失
JEOL 2100F 63
Structural changes in noble metal nanoparticles during CO oxidation
一氧化碳氧化过程中贵金属纳米颗粒的结构变化
Thermo Fisher Titan TEM 78
Metal–support interaction of catalysts
催化剂的金属-载体相互作用
JEOL3100-R05 91
Dynamic co-catalysis of Au single atoms and nanoporous Au
Au 单原子和纳米多孔 Au 的动态共催化
Talos F200X 92
Dynamic shape changes in supported copper nanocrystals
支撑的铜纳米晶的动态形状变化
JEOL 3100-R05  电 3100-R05 93
Gold dissolution and tunneling across Ni2P shell
金溶解和穿过 Ni2P 壳层的隧穿
Aberration corrected STEM
像差校正的 STEM
94
Quantification of critical particle distance for mitigating catalyst sintering
量化临界颗粒距离以减少催化剂烧结
JEM ARM200F 53
In situ observation of the crystal structure transition of Pt–Sn
Pt-Sn 晶体结构转变的原位观察
FEI Talos F200S  菲利 Talos F200S 74
Atomic scale imaging of carbon nanofibre growth
碳纳米纤维生长的原子尺度成像
Philips CM300 FEG TEM
飞利浦 CM300 FEG TEM
4
High entropy alloy nanocrystal
高熵合金纳米晶
JEOL 2100 FEG TEM 95
Synthesis of high entropy alloy nanoparticles by a step alloying strategy
通过阶梯合金化策略合成高熵合金纳米颗粒
Fei Titan G2  飞泰坦 G2 96
ETEM Formation of core–shell Pt3Co nanoparticles
核壳 Pt3Co 纳米颗粒的形成
FEI Titan 80-300  飞 泰坦 80-300 97
Atomistic mechanisms of the interfacial reaction during alloy oxidation
合金氧化过程中界面反应的原子机制
FEI Titan ETEM  FEI 泰坦 ETEM 98
Single walled carbon nanotubes in source gases
源气中的单壁碳纳米管
200 kV TEM  200 kV 透射电镜 99
Probing the deactivation of NiGa nanoparticles as catalyst
探索作为催化剂的 NiGa 纳米颗粒的失活
Environmental TEM  环境透射电镜 100
Surface reconstruction of Au nanoparticle
Au 纳米颗粒的表面重构
FEI Titan ETEM equipped
配备 FEI Titan ETEM
101
Double bilayer multistep growth in gallium nitride nanowires
氮化镓纳米线中的双双层多步生长
Environmental TEM  环境透射电镜 102
Mesoscale oxidation mechanisms of aluminum nanoparticles
铝纳米颗粒的介尺度氧化机制
Hitachi 9500  日立 9500 103
Atomic scale dynamic interaction of H2O molecules with Cu surface
H2O 分子与 Cu 表面的原子尺度动态相互作用
FEI®Titan ETEM equipped  配备 FEI®Titan ETEM 104
Deciphering atomistic mechanisms of the gas solid interfacial reaction
破译气固界面反应的原子机制
FEI Titan ETEM equipped
配备 FEI Titan ETEM
105
Gas adsorbate induced Au atomic segregation and clustering from Cu
气体吸附物诱导的 Au 原子与 Cu 的偏析和聚集
Thermo Fisher Titan ETEM 106
Dynamic atom clusters on AuCu nanoparticle surface during CO oxidation
CO 氧化过程中 AuCu 纳米颗粒表面的动态原子团簇
ETEM (ETEM) chamber  ETEM (ETEM) 暗室 107
Real time atomic scale visualization of reversible copper surface activation during the CO oxidation reaction
CO 氧化反应过程中可逆铜表面活化的实时原子尺度可视化
FEI®TITAN ETEM 80-300  飞®泰 ETEM 80-300 108
Carbon monoxide gas induced 4H-to-fcc phase transformation of gold
一氧化碳气体诱导的金 4H 到 fcc 相变
FEI Environmental TEM  FEI 环境 TEM 109
Atomic origin of CO interaction effect of PtPb@Pt catalyst
PtPb@Pt 催化剂的 CO 相互作用效应的原子来源
FEI Environmental TEM  FEI 环境 TEM 110
Direct visualization of dynamic atomistic processes of Cu2O crystal growth
直接可视化 Cu2O 晶体生长的动态原子过程
FEI®ETEM Titan G2 80-300
FEI®ETEM 泰坦 G2 80-300
111
Structural evolution of Cu/ZnO catalysts during water gas shift reaction
Cu/ZnO 催化剂在水煤气变换反应过程中的结构演变
FEI Titan G2 80-300
飞鸿泰坦G2 80-300
112
Facet dependent oxidative strong metal support interactions of palladium–TiO2
钯-TiO2 的刻面依赖性氧化强金属支持相互作用
FEI Titan G2 80-300
飞鸿泰坦G2 80-300
113
In situ resolving the atomic reconstruction of SnO2 (110) surface
原位解析 SnO2 (110) 表面的原子重建
FEI Titan G2 80-300
飞鸿泰坦G2 80-300
114
Direct in situ observation of the initial oxide nucleation and growth
直接原位观察初始氧化物成核和生长
Titan G2 80-300  泰坦 G2 80-300 115
Growth modes of single walled carbon nanotubes
单壁碳纳米管的生长模式
FEI Titan G2 80-300 ETEM
飞扬 Titan G2 80-300 ETEM
116
Revealing temperature-dependent oxidation dynamics of Ni nanoparticles
揭示 Ni 纳米颗粒的温度依赖性氧化动力学
Titan G2 80-300  泰坦 G2 80-300 69

2.2 Gas cell
2.2 气室

Thin electron transparent windows can provide unique gas environment conditions. In 1962, the concept of a “sealed cell” was introduced for in situ TEM observations.33 The initial design of gas cells utilized two sample grids separated by a thin metal foil and sealed by a sample holder. However, thermal drift remained a primary challenge in this setup due to the expansion and contraction of the metal grids during heating and cooling. Subsequently, the development of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) alleviated this challenge and extended the maximum heating temperature.34 The developmental progression of in situ cells, as depicted in Fig. 3a, has evolved from open cells to liquid cells and further to gas flow cells. In comparison to open and liquid cells, gas flow cells offer several advantages: (1) control of conditions like temperature, pressure, and gas flow rate; (2) higher resolution; (3) more conducive to the environment closer to real world operating conditions. As illustrated in Fig. 3b, the concept involves introducing gas into the TEM holder. The sample will be placed in a controlled heating and atmospheric external field environment, the path of the illuminated electron beam will pass through the reactive gas and the sample, and the signals generated by interaction with the sample will be used for analysis of information such as structure and composition. As shown in Table 3, the comparison of different chips shows that the in situ chip of fluid heated is the most suitable for studying gas phase catalyst particles. Fig. 3c depicts a typical gas in situ TEM holder. Electron transparent windows are set on both upper and lower chips, facilitating precise alignment for optimal overlap and high resolution imaging. The cell design permits large angle electron diffraction and high angle dark field (HAADF) imaging. However, the thickness of the dual window membrane and the gas layer between them can reduce spatial resolution. Moreover, achieving proper alignment of windows on both top and bottom chips is intricate and challenging.
薄电子透明窗口可以提供独特的气体环境条件。1962 年,“密封单元”的概念被引入原 TEM 观察。33 气体池的初始设计使用两个样品网格,由薄金属箔隔开并由样品架密封。然而,由于金属板栅在加热和冷却过程中的膨胀和收缩,热漂移仍然是该设置中的主要挑战。随后,微机电系统 (MEMS) 的发展缓解了这一挑战并延长了最高加热温度。34 如图 3a 所示,原位细胞的发育过程已经从开放细胞发展到液态细胞,并进一步发展到气体流动池。与开放式和液体流通池相比,气体流通池具有几个优点:(1) 控制温度、压力和气体流速等条件;(2) 更高的分辨率;(3) 更有利于更接近真实世界作条件的环境。如图 3b 所示,该概念涉及将气体引入 TEM 支架。样品将被放置在受控的加热和大气外场环境中,被照亮的电子束的路径将穿过反应气体和样品,与样品相互作用产生的信号将用于分析结构和成分等信息。如表 3 所示,不同芯片的比较表明,加热的流体原芯片最适合研究气相催化剂颗粒。图 3c 描述了典型的气体原位 TEM 支架。 上下芯片上均设置了电子透明窗口,有助于精确对准,以实现最佳重叠和高分辨率成像。该单元设计允许大角度电子衍射和高角度暗场 (HAADF) 成像。然而,双窗口膜的厚度和它们之间的气体层会降低空间分辨率。此外,在顶部和底部芯片上实现窗口的正确对齐是复杂且具有挑战性的。

Fig. 3 (a) In situ TEM cell's development path and application. (b) Gas cell specimen holder and MEMS. I: Bottom chip with gas flow and heating. II: Spiral shaped heater. III: An assembled reactor with bottom and top chips. IV: A typical gas in situ TEM holder. Copyright 2017, reprinted with permission from Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany,31 (c) Schematic cross section of the reactor. Copyright 2019, reprinted with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.32
图 3 (a) 原位 TEM 电池的发展路径和应用。(b) 气室样品架和 MEMS。I:带气流和加热的底部芯片。II:螺旋形加热器。III:带有底部和顶部芯片的组装反应器。IV:典型的气体原位 TEM 支架。版权所有 2017,经清华大学出版社和德国 Springer-Verlag GmbH 许可转载,31 (c) 反应器的横截面示意图。版权2019,经Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.32许可转载

2.3 Spatial resolution
2.3 空间分辨率

The 5 mm thick gap in the gas reactor is equivalent to a solid carbon with a thickness of 20 nm, so the refractive index change of the gas can be ignored. Moreover, a uniformly distributed gas has no directional impact on the propagation of electron waves.42 Additionally, we can overlook the energy dispersion of electrons in the thin gas. Nevertheless, despite these factors, imaging in a gaseous medium still presents challenges like resolution reduction due to chromatic aberration, contrast loss, and beam spreading caused by elastic scattering.43 However, we can address these difficulties by reducing the thickness of the chip window and selecting imaging modes to provide improved contrast and resolution. The resolution in both TEM and STEM modes is defined as.44,45 image file: d3cy01600e-t1.tif (1) image file: d3cy01600e-t2.tif (2) where α represents the objective half angle, Cc stands for the chromatic aberration coefficient, E denotes the electron beam energy, T signifies the chip thickness, L is the average free path length for elastic scattering, and N0 corresponds to the incident electron count. Clearly, it can be seen that with the decrease of chip thickness, the spatial resolution can be greatly improved.
气体反应器中 5 mm 厚的间隙相当于厚度为 20 nm 的固体碳,因此可以忽略气体的折射率变化。此外,均匀分布的气体对电子波的传播没有方向影响。42 此外,我们可以忽略稀薄气体中电子的能量分散。然而,尽管存在这些因素,在气态介质中成像仍然存在挑战,例如由于色差、对比度损失和弹性散射引起的光束扩散而导致的分辨率降低。43 然而,我们可以通过减少芯片窗口的厚度和选择成像模式来提供更高的对比度和分辨率来解决这些困难。TEM 和 STEM 模式下的分辨率定义为。44,45 元 其中 α 代表物镜半角,Cc 代表色差系数,E 表示电子束能量,T 表示芯片厚度,L 是弹性散射的平均自由程长度,N0 对应于入射电子数。显然,可以看出,随着芯片厚度的减小,空间分辨率可以大大提高。

2.4 Measurement of gas composition
2.4 气体成分的测量

During the course of reactions, accurate measurement of gas composition is challenging due to the lack of effective methods. Li et al.46 employed combined approach of XAFS and STEM to study phase transitions in Pt catalysts during ethylene hydrogenation. The spatial resolution was limited to 1 nm due to the influence of SiNx (50 nm) windows. Despite experimental constraints, this work demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing XANES, EXAFS, and STEM in combination to characterize gas components. Another study involving in situ EELS measurements of gas composition was reported.47 The authors generated gases (H2, CH4, etc.) from catalytic reactions and used ETEM to directly detect catalyst structural evolution through in situ imaging and diffraction. Besides characterizing the catalysts, gas environments should also be assessed to understand the mechanisms of the catalytic process. Crozier et al. noted that inner shell EELS can measure gas composition with an accuracy of about 15%. However, due to the presence of ionization edges (around 12.5 eV), inner shell EELS cannot evaluate gas composition containing H2. This work illustrated the potential of real time determination of gas composition and volume fractions during catalytic processes.
在反应过程中,由于缺乏有效的方法,准确测量气体成分具有挑战性。Li 等人。46 采用 XAFS 和 STEM 的组合方法来研究乙烯加氢过程中 Pt 催化剂的相变。由于 SiNx (50 nm) 窗口的影响,空间分辨率被限制在 1 nm。尽管存在实验限制,但这项工作证明了结合使用 XANES、EXAFS 和 STEM 来表征气体成分的可行性。报道了另一项涉及气体成分原位 EELS 测量的研究。47 作者从催化反应中产生气体(H2、CH4 ),并使用 ETEM 通过原位成像和衍射直接检测催化剂结构演变。除了表征催化剂外,还应评估气体环境以了解催化过程的机制。Crozier 等人指出,内壳 EELS 可以以约 15% 的精度测量气体成分。然而,由于存在电离边缘(约 12.5 eV),内壳 EELS 无法评估含有 H2 的气体成分。这项工作说明了在催化过程中实时测定气体成分和体积分数的潜力。

While in situ TEM offers the capability to characterize local structure and chemical information of catalysts, its research landscape is still in its infancy. An obstacle for in situ TEM studies is the limited availability of instrument resources and high costs. Additionally, the lack of expertise in both catalytic processes and electron microscopy hampers the development of in situ TEM techniques. However, some breakthroughs have been achieved in catalytic reaction research using in situ TEM, showcasing its potential and prospects.
虽然原位 TEM 能够表征催化剂的局部结构和化学信息,但其研究前景仍处于起步阶段。 原位 TEM 研究的一个障碍是仪器资源有限且成本高。此外,缺乏催化过程和电子显微镜方面的专业知识阻碍了原位 TEM 技术的发展。然而,使用原位 TEM 的催化反应研究已经取得了一些突破,展示了其潜力和前景。

2.5 The importance of in situ TEM in heterogeneous catalysis
2.5 位 TEM 在多相催化中的重要性

Understanding the composition and surface structure of catalysts, as well as exploring the mechanisms of catalytic reactions, is of crucial importance and significance for the design and optimization of catalysts. Eren et al. observed that the (111) surface of copper (Cu) becomes unstable when exposed to carbon monoxide (CO) gas. It was further demonstrated that the inactive (111) facet of Cu, employed in the hydrolysis step crucial for the water-gas shift reaction, undergoes significant activation due to CO induced clustering.48 Tao et al. discovered that the stepped platinum (Pt) surface undergoes extensive and reversible restructuring when exposed to CO pressures exceeding 0.1 Torr. The occurrence of large scale surface reconstruction on stepped Pt crystals highlights the close correlation between the coverage of reactant molecules under reaction conditions and the atomic structure of the catalyst surface.49 An et al. found that the catalytic activity of different Pt/oxide systems is influenced by varying CO and O2 ratios. In situ characterization under catalytically relevant reaction conditions using near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) and ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (APXPS) revealed a strong correlation between the oxidation state of the oxide support and the catalytic activity at the oxide metal interface.50 Crozier et al. employed the in situ electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) method for quantitative gas analysis under an environmental TEM. They demonstrated that the in situ gas analysis can also be utilized to reveal mass transport issues associated with differential gas diffusion through the system.47 Crozier et al. utilized time resolved in situ aberration corrected TEM to characterize the sub-nanometer scale motion of cations, thereby pinpointing atomic level variations in the generation and annihilation rates of oxygen vacancies on the surfaces of oxide nanoparticles. The observation of the highest cation displacement at low coordination sites suggests enhanced surface oxygen vacancy activity at these sites.51 Therefore, the application of in situ TEM in the study of heterogeneous catalysis by providing real time, high resolution information offers a crucial tool for a deeper understanding of the catalyst's surface structure, active sites, and reaction mechanisms. This is indispensable for catalyst design, optimization, and the enhancement of catalytic performance. In the following sections, the application of in situ TEM in important catalytic reactions will be discussed.
了解催化剂的组成和表面结构,以及探索催化反应的机理,对于催化剂的设计和优化至关重要。Eren 等人观察到,当暴露于一氧化碳 (CO) 气体时,铜 (Cu) 的 (111) 表面变得不稳定。进一步证明,在水解步骤中用于对水气变换反应至关重要的 Cu 的非活性 (111) 面由于 CO 诱导的团簇而发生显着激活。48 Tao 等人发现,当暴露于超过 0.1 Torr 的 CO 压力时,阶梯状铂 (Pt) 表面会发生广泛且可逆的重组。阶梯状 Pt 晶体上大规模表面重构的发生突出了反应条件下反应物分子的覆盖率与催化剂表面的原子结构之间的密切关联。49 An 等人发现,不同 Pt/氧化物体系的催化活性受不同 CO 和 O2 比率的影响。使用近边缘 X 射线吸收精细结构 (NEXAFS) 和环境压力 X 射线光电子能谱 (APXPS) 在催化相关反应条件下进行原位表征, 揭示了氧化物载体的氧化态与氧化物金属界面处的催化活性之间具有很强的相关性。50 Crozier 等人采用原位电子能量损失光谱 (EELS) 方法在环境 TEM 下进行定量气体分析。 他们证明, 原位气体分析也可用于揭示与通过系统的差分气体扩散相关的质量传输问题。47 Crozier 等人利用时间分辨原位像差校正 TEM 来表征阳离子的亚纳米级运动,从而精确定位氧化物纳米颗粒表面氧空位的产生和湮灭速率的原子水平变化。在低配位点观察到最高的阳离子置换表明这些位点的表面氧空位活性增强。51 因此,原位 TEM 通过提供实时、高分辨率信息应用于多相催化研究,为更深入地了解催化剂的表面结构、活性位点和反应机制提供了重要工具。这对于催化剂设计、优化和增强催化性能是必不可少的。在以下部分中,将讨论原位 TEM 在重要催化反应中的应用。

3. The use of in situ TEM in catalysts' synthesis
3. 原位 TEM 在催化剂合成中的应用

3.1 Transformation from metal particles to single atoms
3.1 从金属粒子到单个原子的转变

Single atom or active site catalysis has proven to be highly efficient compared with its traditional bulk or nanoparticle catalysis. With the development of TEM, it is possible to observe the synthesis process of single atom catalysts. In general, single atoms or small clusters easily agglomerate during thermal heating. However, Liu et al. conducted in situ TEM studies to investigate the evolution and stability of subnanometric metal species confined within a specific space.52 To observe the evolution of atomically dispersed Pt species, an area featuring only a few Pt clusters without Pt nanoparticles was selected for the experiments. Upon exposing the sample to H2 (0.1 torr) at 350 °C, a few Pt clusters (below 0.5 nm) emerged (Fig. 4a). Raising the temperature to 550 °C and 700 °C under H2 atmosphere led to the appearance of more subnano Pt (below 0.8 nm) and an increase in their average size (Fig. 4b and c). Pt cluster sizes continued to grow up to 0.8–1 nm when the temperature reached 800 °C (Fig. 4d). Upon switching from H2 to O2 after the reduction treatment, the behavior of Pt clusters in an oxidative atmosphere was examined. As shown in Fig. 4e, Pt clusters began to disperse after exposure to O2 at 550 °C. Notably, both the number and size of Pt species decreased upon switching the gas from H2 to O2, validating the redispersion behavior of Pt species in O2. At 700 °C in O2, the majority of Pt clusters vanished, leaving only a few small Pt nanoparticles (1 nm) in the region (Fig. 4f). Importantly, it should be noted that the MCM-22 zeolite seemed to undergo damage from beam irradiation at high temperatures. Having studied the dynamics of Pt nanoparticles and subnano species with various gas treatments, the focus shifted to examining the stability and evolution of subnano Pt species during CO oxidation with O2, using the 0.17%Pt@MCM-22-300 sample. As depicted in Fig. 4g–l, the highly dispersed Pt species transformed into Pt clusters as the reaction temperature for CO oxidation was raised to 100–150 °C. This agglomeration was attributed to the interaction between Pt and CO. Notable, subnano Pt clusters and small Pt nanoparticles (1–2 nm) remained stable as the reaction temperature was elevated up to 300 °C. Yin, et al. quantified the critical particle distance needed to impede catalyst sintering.53 Pt/XC-72R samples were prepared at 300 °C with loadings of 1.0 wt% and 10.0 wt% for initiating in situ HAADF-STEM investigations. These samples represented instances of long and short particle distances, respectively. As anticipated, 10.0 wt% Pt/XC-72R exhibited significantly higher particle density and a shorter particle distance compared to the 1.0 wt% Pt/XC-72R counterpart (Fig. 4m and n).
与传统的本体或纳米颗粒催化相比,单原子或活性位点催化已被证明非常有效。随着 TEM 的发展,可以观察单原子催化剂的合成过程。一般来说,单个原子或小团簇在热加热过程中很容易团聚。然而,Liu 等人进行了原位 TEM 研究,以研究局限在特定空间内的亚纳米金属种类的演变和稳定性。52 为了观察原子分散的 Pt 物质的进化,选择了一个只有几个 Pt 簇而没有 Pt 纳米颗粒的区域进行实验。将样品在 350 °C 下暴露于 H2 (0.1 torr) 中后,出现了一些 Pt 簇(低于 0.5 nm)( 图 4a)。在 H2 气氛下将温度提高到 550 °C 和 700 °C 导致出现更多的亚纳 Pt(低于 0.8 nm)并增加它们的平均尺寸( 图 4b 和 c)。当温度达到 800 °C 时,Pt 簇大小继续增长至 0.8-1 nm( 图 4d)。还原处理后从 H2 切换到 O2 后,检查 Pt 簇在氧化气氛中的行为。如图 4e 所示,Pt 簇在 550 °C 暴露于 O2 后开始分散。 值得注意的是,当气体从 H2 切换到 O2 时,Pt 物质的数量和大小都减少了,验证了 Pt 物质在 O2 中的再分散行为。在 O2 中 700 °C 时,大多数 Pt 簇消失,在该区域只留下少量小的 Pt 纳米颗粒 (1 nm)( 图 4f)。 重要的是,应该注意的是,MCM-22 沸石似乎在高温下受到光束照射的损坏。在研究了各种气体处理下 Pt 纳米颗粒和亚纳米物种的动力学后,重点转移到使用 0.17%Pt@MCM-22-300 样品检查 O2 氧化过程中亚纳米 Pt 物种的稳定性和演变。如图 4g-l 所示,当 CO 氧化的反应温度升高到 100–150 °C 时,高度分散的 Pt 物质转化为 Pt 簇。 这种团聚归因于 Pt 和 CO 之间的相互作用。值得注意的是,当反应温度升高到 300 °C 时,亚纳米 Pt 簇和小 Pt 纳米颗粒 (1-2 nm) 保持稳定。 Yin 等人量化了阻碍催化剂烧结所需的临界粒子距离。在 300 °C 下制备 53 个 Pt/XC-72R 样品,负载量分别为 1.0 wt% 和 10.0 wt%,用于启动原位 HAADF-STEM 研究。这些样本分别表示长和短粒子距离的实例。正如预期的那样,与 1.0 wt% 的 Pt/XC-72R 相比,10.0 wt% 的 Pt/XC-72R 表现出明显更高的颗粒密度和更短的颗粒距离( 图 4m 和 n)。

Fig. 4 Structural evolution of 0.17%Pt@MCM-22 350 °C in H2 for 15 min (0.1 torr) (a), 550 °C in H2 (0.1 torr) for 15 min (b), 700 °C in H2 (0.1 torr) for 15 min (c), 800 °C in H2 (0.1 torr) for 10 min (d), 500 °C in O2 (0.1 torr) for 15 min (e), 700 °C in O2 (0.1 torr) for 15 min (scale bar: 20 nm) (f); the structural evolution of 0.17% Pt@MCM-22-300 at CO + O2: room temperature (g), 100 °C (h), 150 °C (i), 200 °C (j), 300 °C (k), and 400 °C (scale bar: 10 nm) (l). Copyright 2018, reprinted with permission from Nature.52In situ aberration corrected HAADF-STEM images (①–⑤) of 10%Pt/XC-72R (m) and 1%Pt/XC-72R (n) at different stages (scale bar: 2 nm). Copyright 2021, reprinted with permission from Nature.53

3.2 Yolk shell transforming to single atoms and clusters

Precious metal particles and atoms, due to their inert nature, do not react with other media even at elevated temperatures. Herein, Cai et al. unveiled the diffusion behavior of gold within the Ni2P matrix, leading to the formation of individual gold atoms and clusters. The researchers employed in situ STEM to directly observe the dynamic process of atom diffusion.54 As depicted in Fig. 5a, an Au yolk is present within the Ni2P shell, with the initial size of the hole in Ni2P measuring approximately 16 nm. In Fig. 5b, Au atoms initiate diffusion into Ni2P at 350 °C, resulting in the emergence of numerous bright clusters and individual atoms within the Ni2P matrix. With prolonged temperature exposure, these Au atoms continue to diffuse into Ni2P, giving rise to an increasing number of Au single atoms and bright clusters, both within the Ni2P interior and on its surface. By further elevating the temperature to 500 °C for 5 min (Fig. 5c), the Au yolk undergoes complete dissolution, causing the entire Ni2P particles to adopt a uniform and luminous appearance. Detailed high resolution images in Fig. 5d reveal a lattice spacing of 2.89 Å, corresponding to the (110) plane of Ni2P. However, the fast Fourier transform (FFT) diffraction pattern in Fig. 5e exhibits elongation and splitting, indicative of lattice distortion resulting from the diffusion of Au atoms within the Ni2P lattice. Subsequently, Han et al. reported a distinct diffusion phenomenon within an Au–Ni2P yolk shell structure through in situ TEM analysis.55 In Fig. 5f, a yolk–shell structure is depicted at room temperature, where the Au yolk makes contact with the Ni2P shell at three regions. As displayed in Fig. 5g, the bright field STEM image at lattice resolution within the dashed square region of Fig. 5f reveals the epitaxial correlation between the yolk and shell. Specifically, the (111) surface planes of Ni2P are aligned with the (111) crystal plane of Au. Despite a significant lattice mismatch of 5.96% between the bulk Au (111) crystal plane spacing (2.35 Å) and the Ni2P (111) crystal plane spacing (2.21 Å), no dislocations or defects are observed at the interface. Upon heating at 350 °C for 48 min and 110 min (Fig. 5h and i), a transformation in the shape of the Au yolk is noticed. Simultaneously, the upper contact regions of the Au yolk undergo enlargement. The volume of the Au yolk significantly increases (Fig. 5j). Subsequently, maintaining the temperature at 500 °C for an additional 67 min reveals the complete diffusion of the gold yolk from the Ni2P shell, forming a new particle around the upper left yolk (Fig. 5k). In situ TEM examination of the diffusion process demonstrates that the (111) plane of the Au yolk aligns with the (001) plane of Ni2P (Fig. 5l–n). After heating at 350 °C for 1.5 h, both the Ni2P shell and the Au yolk retain their original microstructures, with outward Au diffusion progressing slowly (Fig. 5o–q). At 450 °C for 1 h, STEM analysis clearly showcases the dissolution of the Au yolk into the shell, with aggregated Au atoms in the Ni2P shell (Fig. 5r). The bright field STEM image and FFT in Fig. 5s and t indicate diffraction spots corresponding to Ni2P lattice spacing, but no gold crystal plane spacing, signifying an intermediate phase with a single gold atom state within the Ni2P matrix due to the diffusion of Au in Ni2P. Upon further heating at 500 °C for approximately 0.5 h (Fig. 5u–w), phase separation between Ni2P and Au recurs, marked by the emergence of Au aggregates outside the Ni2P shell. Notably, Fig. 5w highlights separated Ni2P (300) and Au (220) diffraction spots, indicating a strain free and non-epitaxial interface between the Au particle and Ni2P matrix.

Fig. 5 Fresh sample materials (a), after heating at 350 °C, stable for 64 min (b), and after additional heating at 500 °C, stable for 5 min (c); atomic scale image (d) and FFT (e) after the Au dissolved in the Ni2P lattice. Copyright 2019, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.54 Au@Ni2P yolk shell (f), high resolution BF-STEM image between Au and Ni2P (g), and HAADF image of the particle after heating at 350 °C for 48 min (h), 350 °C for 110 min (i), 500 °C for 38 min (j), and 500 °C for 67 min (k). HAADF (l, o, r and u), BF (m, p, s and v), FFT (n, q, t and w) of the sample at room temperature, 350 °C for 1.5 h; 450 °C for 1 h; and 500 °C for 0.5 h. Copyright 2019, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.55

3.3 Growth of metal nanoparticles on the support

Designing efficient and stable catalysts on carrier materials has captured the widespread research interest of scientists. Lang et al. demonstrated stable isolated Pt atoms through strong covalent metal support interactions with α-Fe2O3 during high temperature calcination.56In situ gas holder and TEM monitored dispersion under 1 bar of flowing O2 at 800 °C (Fig. 6a–c). Pt nanoparticles dissociated within the support, forming thermally stable single atoms. Ganzler et al. used in situ ETEM and XAFS to study Pt nanoparticles on CeO2 under reducing and oxidizing conditions.57 They revealed the high mobility and redispersion of Pt nanoparticles in O2 at around 400 °C (Fig. 6e). In contrast, slight sintering of Pt nanoparticles was observed in hydrogen at 250 °C (Fig. 6d and f). Dai et al. reported the cyclic precipitation and dissolution of Rh nanoparticles on a CaTiO3 support in alternating hydrogen and oxygen environments at 600–700 °C.58 Most Rh nanoparticles disappeared during oxidation treatment but reappeared during hydrogen treatment (Fig. 6g–i). They also utilized an in situ gas holder and STEM to investigate the structural evolution of atomically dispersed Pt loaded on TiO2 during oxidation and reduction processes. Under oxidation (300 °C, 760 Torr of O2) and mild reduction (250 °C, 760 Torr of 5% H2) conditions, Pt single atoms remained in the same positions on the TiO2 support (Fig. 6j–l).59 However, under severe reduction (450 °C, 760 Torr of 5% H2), Pt atoms migrated by 1.6 nm, indicating the mobility endowed to Pt single atoms (Fig. 6l). Sun et al. achieved in situ formation of Co nanoparticles on PBMCo, offering a potential avenue for preparing supported nanocatalysts on perovskite materials.60 They proposed a simple and feasible method for generating uniformly distributed Co nanoparticles and utilized in situ TEM to observe the precipitation of nanoparticles and the formation of ordered layered oxygen reactions. As shown in Fig. 6m, no nanoparticles were detected at 770 °C. However, the formation of Co nanoparticles was evident at 810 °C as seen in Fig. 6n–o. Upon further increasing the temperature to 850 °C, the size of Co nanoparticles increased. Fig. 6p–r show a series of TEM images of the PBMCo material. These images were captured at 850 °C, in 0.5 Pa of H2, over a time span of 500 s. At 0 s, no significant detachment of nanoparticles was observed (Fig. 6p). After 250 s, TEM detected some nanoparticles with a diameter of approximately 5 nm (Fig. 6q). By 500 s, nanoparticles with an average diameter of 15 nm became more distinct (Fig. 6r). These results once again demonstrate that in situ TEM is a valuable tool for studying the sintering and dispersion processes of metal catalysts. It can be combined with other experimental methods for practical catalysis research.

Fig. 6 HAADF images show the Pt nanoparticles supported on α-Fe2O3 during heating at 800 °C under 1 bar O2 (a–c). Copyright 2019, reprinted with permission from nature.56 ETEM images of Pt/CeO2 acquired after reducing treatment in 10 mbar H2 at 250 °C (d), followed by an oxidizing in 10 mbar O2 at 400 °C (e), and by reducing treatment again (f). Copyright 2017, reprinted with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.57 HAADF images of Rh–CaTiO3 during annealing at 600 °C (g), followed in pure O2 (h), and in H2 again (i). Copyright 2017, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.58 HAADF images of Ptiso/TiO2 after 30 min at different annealing conditions: 300 °C (j); 250 °C (k); and 450 °C (l). Copyright 2019, reprinted with permission from nature.59In situ TEM images of PBMCo from 770 to 850 °C with one image captured every 40 °C with a ramping rate of 20 °C min−1 (m–o). TEM images of PBMCo at 850 °C a time period of 500 s (p–r). Copyright 2016, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.60

4. In situ TEM on structure reconstruction

4.1 Phase evolution

Bimetallic nanoparticles hold great potential as catalysts. Wang et al. recently published a study on the PtPb@Pt catalyst, where they investigated the CO gas induced phase separation and the formation of ultrathin Pb nanosheets.61Fig. 7a–h illustrate the phase and morphology changes of the nanoplates during heating from room temperature to 300 °C. Initially, very thin sheets began peeling off from the catalyst, marked by red arrows in Fig. 7b. These nanosheets increased in size over time, as depicted in Fig. 7c. After 720 s at 300 °C (Fig. 7d), these ultrathin nanosheets underwent rapid growth, forming significantly larger flakes. With further heating (Fig. 7e and f), these ultrathin nanosheets merged, leading to the formation of even larger nanosheets, as highlighted in white circles. In Fig. 7f, the original particles “1” and “2” transformed into three particles labeled as “1–3”. Detailed lattice images (Fig. 7g and h) at the initial phase of separation revealed the amorphous structure of the newly formed Pb islands when they were extremely small (3.5 nm). These islands quickly crystallized as their size reached around 3.5 nm. The lattice constants of these nanosheets matched the (111) crystal planes of the FCC-Pb crystal, indicated by white lines in Fig. 7h. In situ heating of PtPb@Pt in a vacuum was conducted and compared with results obtained in a CO gas environment to illustrate the influence of CO gas on phase separation. Sharp differences were observed in Fig. 7i–n. Fig. 7i–k show the intact shape and atomic structure of PtPb@Pt after heating to 250 °C and 300 °C in a vacuum. No significant changes were observed compared to the initial core–shell state, indicating the stability of the catalyst in a vacuum at high temperatures. However, in a CO gas environment, phase separation occurred when heated to 250 °C. Due to the ultrathin thickness of the formed Pb nanosheets, their contrast was lower than that of the original PtPb@Pt particles. Fig. 7l–n demonstrated that a significant amount of ultrathin Pb nanosheets detached from the PtPb particles, while the original particles became more aggregated after heating in CO gas. Yun et al. captured the atomic shifts and rearrangements associated with diffused solid phase transformations in Pt–Sn systems to reveal the atomic mechanisms driving these transformations.62 The transformation of PtSn4 to PtSn2 was observed under TEM (Fig. 7o). When the temperature reaches 250 °C, a black transverse stripe appears in the PtSn4 region and expands due to the transition to the PtSn2 phase. To investigate the atomic mechanism of the phase transition, the phase transition was initiated by slowly heating PtSn4/PtSn2 sheets to 300 °C. First, at 150 °C, the structure of the parent PtSn4 is modulated. These modulations are very subtle, resulting in no change in contrast in the HAADF-STEM images. However, they are clearly visible in BF-STEM images, with transverse dark contrast occurring every four to five layers of PtSn4 (Fig. 7p). At ∼200 °C, a new intermediate phase appears in the layer between the dark bands of the BF-STEM image. Upon further heating, the mesophase develops into PtSn2 (Fig. 7q). The atomic structure of the intermediate is not only different from that of the parent (PtSn4) and product (PtSn2), but also from any existing PtxSny phase.

Fig. 7 TEM images revealed the stripping of Pb from PtPb@Pt (a–f). The red arrows in panel (b) indicate the formation of ultrathin Pb nanosheets, while the orange arrows in panel (c) represent the gap formed between particle 1 and particle 2. HRTEM displays the amorphous state of lead in the initial stage (g); as transformed crystalline Pb ultrathin sheet (h). Overall TEM image (i) and lattice resolution TEM image (j) of PtPb@Pt heated at 250 °C under vacuum for 20 min; TEM image of PtPb@Pt heated to 300 °C for 10 min (k); TEM images of PtPb@Pt heated in 1 mbar of CO gas at 250 °C for 20 min and (l and m) at 300 °C for 10 min (n). Copyright 2019, reprinted with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.61 Nucleation phase of the transition from PtSn4 to PtSn2. (o) In situ PtSn4 to PtSn2 phase formation captured in a series of STEM images. The scale bar is 100 nm. (p) HAADF and BF-STEM images of PtSn4 in the direction [110] at 150 °C. Scale bars are 2 nm. (q) HAADF-STEM images show the initial phase of the transition from PtSn4 to PtSn2 at 210 °C. The scale bar is 3 nm. (i) A three-layer mesophase appears in PtSn4. (ii) The intermediate stage evolved into PtSn4. Copyright 2023, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.62

4.2 Reversible change of structure

Bimetallic core shell catalysts have garnered extensive attention due to their exceptional catalytic performance across a wide range of electrochemical reactions. It is generally believed that their catalytic properties are determined by the synergistic interplay between the electronic and geometric features at the core and shell interface. Zhang et al. used in situ TEM and revealed that the Ni–Au catalytic system is highly selective for the formation of CO in the CO2 hydrogenation reaction.63 The Ni core remains enveloped by a complete ultrathin Au shell both before and after the reaction. The TEM image in Fig. 8a illustrates a Ni–Au nanoparticle after being heated to 450–600 °C and subsequently cooled to 400 °C, as indicated by the yellow arrow. Within the temperature range of 450–500 °C, the ultrathin Au shell becomes visibly apparent, appearing as dark edges surrounding the Ni–Au nanoparticles. At 600 °C, the disappearance of these dark edges indicates the dissolution of the outermost Au layer into the Ni core, forming a mixed Ni–Au alloy. Upon cooling to 450–400 °C, the reappearance of the darker gold edges signifies the restoration of the Ni–Au core shell structure. The identical contrast distribution between the high resolution HAADF and BF images (Fig. 8b and c) provides clear proof of the phase-contrast properties inherent in TEM imaging. In the BF image, the dark spots along the particle edges can be precisely recognized as individual Au atomic columns. Notably, the greater depth of field in the BF-TEM image suggests that the Au shell enveloping the NiAu core is more comprehensively formed than what is apparent in the HAADF image. This uniformly covered Au-rich shell additionally attributed to the CO selectivity at low reaction temperatures. Yuan et al. conducted a study focused on the in situ manipulation of the active Au–TiO2 interface with atomic precision during CO oxidation.64 In the course of the CO oxidation reaction, periodic cessation of CO injection was employed. Remarkably, transitioning from S= to S// was observed upon halting CO injection and reverting to an O2 environment (1 mbar) (Fig. 8d–f). Subsequently, changing the O2 pressure from 1 mbar (Fig. 8f) to 4 mbar did not notably alter the interface structure (Fig. 8g). Upon reintroducing CO (Fig. 8g–i), a rotation from S// to S= occurred once more (Fig. 8e–h). These findings demonstrate the reversibility of the Au–TiO2 (001) interface's dynamic response to the external environment at elevated temperatures. Additional top view observations indicated that the rotation of the Au NP in CO and O2 reactive environments exhibited temperature dependence. Unlike the reversible rotation behavior at 500 °C (Fig. 8j and k), the rotation of the Au nanoparticles prompted by changes in the gas environment could be “frozen” by cooling to 20 °C. Cooling the Au nanoparticles from 500 °C to 20 °C (Fig. 8k and l) in an oxygen environment preserved the S// state. At 20 °C, CO injection did not induce Au nanoparticle rotation, and the S// state remained constant during the 25 min observation (Fig. 8m) in both CO and O2 reactive environments. These outcomes suggest the stability of the S// configuration during low temperature CO oxidation. Upon elevating the temperature back to 500 °C, the dynamic shift between S// and S= was once again observed. Therefore, by combining gas and temperature control, atomic level interface tunability was achieved.

Fig. 8 TEM images of alloying and dealloying evolution during the CO2 hydrogenation reaction (a). Scale bar, 2 nm. The simultaneously HAADF-STEM (b) and BF-STEM (c) images of Ni@Au core–shell structure after CO2 hydrogenation reaction. Copyright 2020, reprinted with permission from Nature.63 Manipulating Au–TiO2 (001) interface configurations through environment dependent rotation: side-view ETEM images show the structural evolution of the Au–TiO2 (001) nanocatalyst (d–i). Images in (j) and (k) were acquired at 500 °C; images in (l) and (m) were acquired at 20 °C. The image in (m) was captured after 25 min of exposure to a reactive environment. Copyright 2021, reprinted with permission from Nature.64

4.3 Atomistic mechanisms of the interfacial reaction

From multiphase catalysis to stress corrosion cracking, gas solid interfacial reactions play a pivotal role in many technological applications. However, understanding how gases and solids interact to form stable interfaces has become even more crucial. Wang et al. conducted a study where they investigated the structure–activity relationship by observing the real time sulfurization processes of ZnO nanowires using in situ TEM.65 The results from in situ TEM confirmed that there was no observable diffusion of Zn ions out of the shell layer. This observation supported the hypothesis that SO2 molecules diffused through the formed shell layer to reach the core shell interface for the reaction to occur. As the reaction time increased, the thickness of the shell layer also increased. Simultaneously, the ZnO nanowire underwent a progressive reduction in diameter. This phenomenon is illustrated in Fig. 9b, where the shell thickness reached 5 nm after 86 s of reaction. Upon extending the reaction time to 516 s, the shell thickness expanded to 21 nm, leading to a decrease in the diameter of the ZnO nanowire to 75 nm (Fig. 9a–g). The findings presented in Fig. 9a–g clearly depict the gradual consumption of surface atoms on the nanowire, ultimately forming the shell structure. Additionally, Fig. 9h offers a high resolution lattice image. Through high resolution TEM analysis, lattice fringes corresponding to the (002) crystal plane were observed along the ZnO core. Further insight from EDX mapping is provided in Fig. 9i, indicating that S was predominantly located within the shell layer, while Zn was primarily situated within the core of the nanowire. Luo et al. directly witnessed the dynamic transformation of CeO2-supported AuCu alloy nanoparticles at the atomic level during CO oxidation. Their observations revealed that gas molecules play a role in liberating metal atoms on the (010) surface, leading to the creation of highly mobile atomic clusters.66Fig. 9j presents the experimental arrangement for in situ CO oxidation reactions employing CeO2-supported AuCu catalysts within the ETEM. Fig. 9k shows a HRTEM image that captures the configuration of an AuCu nanoparticle situated on CeO2. The nanoparticle assumes a face-centered cubic (FCC) structure, evident from both the associated FFT pattern in the upper-right and the simulated diffraction pattern in the bottom-right. These patterns collectively affirm that the AuCu alloy nanoparticle exists in a solid-solution phase. When subjected to a gas mixture of CO and O2 at room temperature, the (010) surface undergoes activation by gas molecules, resulting in the formation of an atomic-scale “adlayer” as illustrated in Fig. 9l. The simulated HRTEM image of this “adlayer” on the alloy surface in Fig. 9m closely corresponds to the depiction in Fig. 9l. As depicted in Fig. 9n, gas molecules engage in strong interactions with the surface atoms of the AuCu nanoparticle via chemisorption, thereby releasing low-coordinated surface metal atoms through robust Au–CO bonding. The interaction dynamics of atom clusters with edge atoms are vividly portrayed in the time-resolved HRTEM images of Fig. 9o. Over a 2 s interval, the progression is evident: the dynamic atom cluster attaches (at 0.5 s) and merges (at 1 s) with edge atoms, forming an FCC atomic structure, before ultimately disintegrating/detaching (at 1.5 s) from the edge position as delineated by the dashed-line box. Concurrently, white arrows in Fig. 9o indicate that adatoms at the lower edge position maintain their positions under the reaction conditions. These observations underscore the dynamic nature of atom clusters, which could expedite gas adsorption and diffusion on the nanoparticle.

Fig. 9 In situ TEM images of the ZnO: morphological evolution of the ZnO (a–g), the high resolution image in (h) shows the zigzag interface after reaction and the crystal planes were indexed. The EDS mapping of ZnO after completely reacted with SO2 molecules (i). Copyright 2021, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.65 Activation of the (010) surface of a AuCu nanoparticle in CO oxidation. (j) Schematic of the AC-ETEM experimental setup showing a AuCu supported on CeO2 illuminated by an electron beam from a cross-sectional view with the surrounding CO and O2 gas environment. (k) HRTEM image showing different surfaces of AuCu and corresponding FFT image and simulated diffraction pattern of the nanoparticle. (l) Snapshot of the real-time video capturing a surface adlayer formed under CO reaction conditions. (m) Simulated HRTEM reflecting the atomic structure. (n) Schematic of the dynamic adlayer composed of surface metal atoms (red) and CO molecules and O atoms. (o) HRTEM images showing the atomic structure and their interaction with the nanoparticle surface at two edge sites. Copyright 2020, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.66

5. In situ observations of catalytic behaviors

5.1 Size redistribution during catalytic reactions

The size of nanoscale catalysts is crucial for maintaining catalytic performance, as materials often experience sintering under high temperature reaction gas conditions, resulting in the loss of active sites and ultimately leading to a decline in catalytic activity. Therefore, comprehending the sintering process of catalysts during chemical reactions holds significant importance. Simonsen et al. studied the sintering mechanism of Pt nanoparticles dispersed on an Al2O3 substrate over 7.5 Torr of air at 650 °C.67 They postulated that the sintering process of Pt is governed by an Ostwald ripening mechanism (Fig. 10a–j). Initially characterized by a Gaussian distribution, the particle diameter distribution underwent a transformation from a skewed distribution to the Lifshitz–Slyozov–Wagner distribution. However, the observations for an individual nanoparticle deviated from the Ostwald model due to the influence of the local environment on the atom exchange process. Huang et al. used in situ TEM to study the particle shape plasticity and carbon graphitization enhancement of Ir/C catalysts under heating from atomic scale imaging.68Fig. 10k–m show HRTEM images of several Ir nanoparticles monitored over a long period of time at 800 °C. Apart from morphological particle remodeling, little significant change in particle size was found at 800 °C for 30 minutes. At lower temperatures, the mobility of Ir atoms is limited by the presence of a stable carbon, which hinders the size growth of nanoparticles during Ostwald ripening. In addition, the overlayer Ir nanoparticles allow particle migration and subsequent fusion to be also largely avoided.

Fig. 10 TEM images of different randomly chosen areas of the Pt/Al2O3 catalyst over 10 mbar in air at 650 °C (a–e). PSDs based on measurements from a number of TEM images of areas previously unexposed to the electron beam (f–j): Gaussian (f), log normal (g) and two dimensional LSW (j). Copyright 2010, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.67 (k–m) Sequential HRTEM images of Ir NPs with different sizes recorded at 800 °C, showing high thermal stability against sintering and migration at 800 °C. Copyright 2023, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.68

5.2 Shape changing

The dynamic response of catalyst shapes to changes in gas environments has surpassed previous expectations. In order to gain a deeper understanding of catalytic mechanisms, research into this area has become increasingly crucial. However, due to limitations imposed by permissible pressures, the aforementioned in situ ETEM experiments have not been able to adequately capture the properties of nanoparticles under the actual working conditions of varying gas pressures. With the advancement of gas containment technology, it has become possible to observe metal catalysts under high temperature environmental conditions. Wang and co-workers investigated the dynamic oxidation process of Ni nanoparticles at different temperatures by in situ TEM, revealing the temperature dependent oxidation behavior (Fig. 11a).69 At relatively low temperatures (600 °C), the oxidation of Ni nanoparticles undergoes the classic Kirkendall process and is accompanied by the formation of an oxide shell. In contrast, at higher temperatures (800 °C), oxidation begins with a single crystal nucleus on the metal surface and proceeds along the metal/oxide interface, without forming a cavity throughout the process. Song et al. used in situ high-resolution TEM combined with molecular dynamics to find that there is tension in the asymmetric 5 folding twin of Au nanoparticles, which is due to dislocation slip on the 5 folding axis under the electron beam and the double boundary migration of dislocation reaction. The migration of one or two layers of biplanes is controlled by energy carriers. But in general, the total energy, including surface, lattice strain and boundary energy, is released after successive boundary migrations (Fig. 11b).70

Fig. 11 In situ TEM images show a typical oxidation process of Ni NP at 600 °C (O2 (20% vol)/N2 at 1000 mbar; scale bar: 10 nm) (the yellow lines outline the void caused by the Kirkendall effect) (a). Copyright 2023, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.69 Structural tension analysis of 5-FTAu nanoparticles during detwinning and corresponding MD simulated detwinning (b). Copyright 2024, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.70

5.3 Catalytic growth of nanocarbon

Due to the extensive potential applications of carbon nanotubes in various nanotechnologies, there has been in-depth research into their growth mechanisms. Simultaneously, the growth of carbon plays a crucial role in catalytic reactions. Hofmann et al. conducted a notable study focused on the growth of carbon nanotubes.71 Their work delved into the fundamental formation mechanisms of single walled carbon nanotubes (Fig. 12a–f) and nanofibers (Fig. 12g–j) containing metallic nanoparticles, utilizing TEM. The research sheds light on how these structures develop via chemical vapor deposition. The study reveals that the nucleation of single walled carbon nanotubes is initiated by metal catalysts, and their subsequent growth is accompanied by dynamic reshaping. The formation process of carbon nanofibers involves the elongation and contraction of the nanoparticle catalyst. Wang et al. achieved a precise identification of the active phase within cobalt catalysts for carbon nanotube growth.72 In their work, representative TEM images (Fig. 12k–o) showcased the growth of CNTs via both the base and tangential growth modes originating from the catalyst nanoparticles. The growth rate of the CNTs averaged around 10 nm s−1, which exhibit an oscillatory pattern. FFT patterns (Fig. 12p–t) of the catalyst nanoparticles revealed a single crystal nature. The study observed dynamic alterations in the nanoparticle morphology (Fig. 12k–m), transitioning from a spherical shape (Fig. 12k) to an ellipsoidal one (Fig. 12m). Additionally, the orientation of the Co3C nanoparticles underwent shifts during CNT growth, with the zone axis transforming from [142] to [613] (Fig. 12p–q). This research meticulously investigated the phase evolution of Co catalyst nanoparticles across the incubation, nucleation, and growth stages of CNTs under near atmospheric pressure conditions, utilizing an in situ ETEM. Rigorous statistical analysis of electron diffraction patterns was conducted to accurately determine the phases of the catalyst nanoparticles.

Fig. 12 ETEM image sequence of Ni catalyzed CNT root growth recorded in 8 × 10−3 mbar C2H2 at 615 °C (a–c). The time of the respective stills is indicated: schematic ball and stick models of different SWNT growth stages (d–f); ETEM image sequence showing a growing CNF in NH3 : C2H2 (3 : 1) at 1.3 mbar and 480 °C (g–j); drawings (lower row) indicate schematically the Ni catalyst deformation and C–Ni interface. Copyright 2007, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.71 Phase structure of cobalt catalyst nanoparticles during CNT growth: sequential TEM images of one Co nanoparticle during CNT growth (k–o); FFT patterns of the nanoparticles from the square regions marked (p–t). Copyright 2020, reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society.72

6. Application of in situ TEM in thermal catalysis

6.1 Oxidation and reduction reactions

Noble metals, as reaction catalysts, exhibit outstanding catalytic performance and good stability. However, the high cost often poses a barrier. Therefore, the search for low cost and non-toxic catalysts is currently a widely recognized concern. Supported nickel nanoparticles have garnered significant attention due to their high activity. Nevertheless, the severe deactivation caused by coking and mass loss during continuous production remains a major issue for nickel catalysts. Hence, establishing a correlation between catalytic performance and structural information is of paramount importance for understanding the deactivation mechanisms. Chenna et al. employed in situ TEM to investigate the structural and phase alterations of nickel nanoparticles under varying redox conditions.73 Their findings revealed that when exposed to oxidative conditions (at 130 Pa with CH4 : O2 ratio of 2 : 1), the originally spherical metallic nickel nanoparticles supported on silica underwent a transformation into hollow NiO nanoparticles at around 300 °C (Fig. 13a and b). Unfortunately, these hollow NiO nanoparticles exhibited no catalytic activity. Across all methane (CH4) environments, the NiO nanoparticles gradually transitioned into metallic Ni nanoparticles (Fig. 13c and d) at elevated temperatures. This transition led to the development of core–shell structures consisting of Ni–NiO. Nevertheless, the catalytic performance of Ni–NiO was notably poor, and significant activity recovery only occurred following reduction of the catalysts at higher temperatures. Zhang et al. conducted in situ observations regarding the crystalline structural transitions of Pt–Sn intermetallic nanoparticles during deactivation and subsequent regeneration.74In situ TEM images are presented in Fig. 13e–g, showcasing the progressive decarbonization process. Moreover, author explored the reverse regeneration of oxidized PtSn@mSiO2 (Fig. 13k–p). The focus was on the most prominent nanoparticles within the observed field. Over a brief interval, the constituents within the nanoparticles initiated fusion, as depicted in Fig. 13k and l. Subsequently, after approximately 11 s (Fig. 13m), the nanoparticles underwent further fusion, leading to a nearly completely merged region on the left side of the nanoparticles. The reduction process led to the expansion of this fused region (Fig. 13n–p), ultimately resulting in the formation of uniform nanoparticles (Fig. 13p). Author observations indicated that the oxidized PtSn@mSiO2 nanoparticles could regain their original spherical shape following hydrogen reduction.

Fig. 13 In situ TEM images at 100 Pa of H2 at 400 °C (a) and 100 Pa of gas mixture (CH4 : O2 = 2 : 1) at 400 °C (b). In situ TEM images of NiO reduction and formation of Ni–NiO core shell nanostructures (40 Pa of CH4 at 500 °C) (c, d). Copyright 2010, reprinted with permission from Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.73 Sequential in situ TEM images of the PtSn@mSiO2 nanoparticles obtained during the decarbonization process under 760 torr of pure O2 at 500 °C (e–j) and the regeneration process under 760 torr of H2/N2 = 1/10 mixed gas at 350 °C (k–p). The scale bars are 10 nm. Copyright 2021, reprinted with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry.74

6.2 Ammonia synthesis and methane pyrolysis

Catalyst promoters are employed in industrial catalysts to enhance catalytic activity and selectivity, and they themselves remain unreactive. The morphology plays a decisive role in determining the exposed surface facets and atomic active sites, thereby enabling control over activity and stability. As a result, the catalyst's structural changes under various environmental conditions constitute a critical determinant of its catalytic performance. The alterations in material morphology during chemical reactions can be tracked through in situ TEM, thereby unveiling the underlying reaction mechanism. Hansen et al. utilized in situ TEM to investigate the effects of Ba promotion on a Ru catalyst employed in ammonia synthesis.75 Their findings revealed that during the course of the reaction, the Ru nanoparticles' surfaces become enveloped in an amorphous coating, with the morphology of the Ru nanoparticles remaining unchanged. This observation signifies that even as the catalytic activity is enhanced, the overall count of active surface sites remains unaltered. Through analysis of TEM images and EELS spectra, the researchers observed that Ba exhibits notable mobility and predominantly exists in oxide form. Throughout the reaction, the amorphous coating on the majority of Ru surfaces incorporates Ba and oxygen (Fig. 14a–d). Xi et al. utilized in situ TEM with high spatial and temporal resolutions to monitor the dynamic process of nanoporous gold (NPG) catalyzing methane pyrolysis. Their work revealed an intricate interplay between heterogeneous catalysis processes involving both nanocatalysts and single atom catalysts, thereby demonstrating the existence of dynamic co-catalysis.76 In the images, a carbon zone, outlined by dashed circles in Fig. 14e–g, was observed at a distance from the NPG surface. This carbon zone exhibited changing contrast within a brief 2 s interval. In contrast, when the CH4 flow was halted, the contrast changes transformed from intense to rather gentle and eventually disappeared, as illustrated in Fig. 14e–g. This comparative analysis highlights that the pronounced contrast alterations within the distant amorphous carbon segments weren't a result of the TEM's electron beam, but rather were attributed to specific reactions occurring within the carbon regions. Further insight is provided by Fig. 14h–j, which captures an amorphous carbon region removed from the NPG surface. In this region, a nanoparticle with an Au crystal structure momentarily materialized and then swiftly vanished before 0.4125 s during CH4 pyrolysis. Concurrently, the contrast within the carbon region experienced changes similar to those observed in the zone marked by dashed circles. As a result, the cumulative observations suggest that the catalytic reaction of CH4 pyrolysis was jointly facilitated by Au single atom catalysts and NPG.

Fig. 14 HRTEM image showing the three to four layers of BN covering a Ru crystal (a); representative in situ TEM image of the unpromoted Ru catalyst recorded (331 °C, 3.0 mbar, H2/N2 (3 : 1)) (b); amorphous patches that contain Ba cover on the Ru surface (c); enlarged view of the edge of the Ru nanoparticle surface (d). Copyright 2001, reprinted with permission from Science.75 HRTEM images at three different moments of the catalytic CH4 pyrolysis reaction on NPG (the yellow, the green, and the blue dashed lines indicate the positions at 0 s, 1 s, and 2 s, respectively, the white dashed circles denote the positions of a randomly selected carbon region, and the arrows indicate the thickness of the amorphous carbon at 0 s, 1 s, and 2 s) (e–j). Copyright 2020, reprinted with permission from Nature.76

6.3 CO oxidation

The dynamic structure of a catalyst dictates the accessibility of its surface active site. However, the manner in which nanoparticle catalysts reconfigure under reaction conditions and how these changes correlate with catalytic activity remain largely unexplored. Yoshida et al. presented a study on the surface reconstruction of Au nanoparticles supported by CeO2 when exposed to CO at room temperature. This reconstruction process was visualized in real space and time, shedding light on atomic behavior.77 The investigation involved employing TEM with lower energy electrons to explore both the adsorption and the subsequent reconstruction of the gold nanoparticle. The study revealed that under vacuum conditions, the (100) facets of the nanoparticles remained unreconstructed, as highlighted in the magnified images depicted in Fig. 15a. However, in a specific reaction environment, as shown in Fig. 15b, the atomic columns of gold on the topmost and second topmost (100) layers shifted from their normal positions on the clean surface. The reconstructed surface exhibited a distinct arrangement: the topmost Au atoms formed an undulating hexagonal lattice, while the second topmost layer adopted a slightly distorted normal square lattice. This research proposed that the modified stacking sequence of the Au (100) surface contributed to unique bonding configurations favorable for CO adsorption with high affinity. Chee et al. employed TEM to reveal intriguing findings regarding the reversible structural and activity alterations of Pd nanoparticles when subjected to heating and cooling cycles in mixed gas environments containing both O2 and CO. Remarkably, Pt and Rh nanoparticles did not demonstrate such reversible transformations under similar conditions.78 In Fig. 15c, Pd nanoparticles with nearly atomically flat (100) and (111) facets at 200 °C are depicted, featuring sharp corners. However, these nanoparticles adopted a more rounded shape at temperatures of 500 °C and above. Notably, when the temperature was subsequently reduced back to 300 °C, the facets of the nanoparticles reformed. In contrast, Pt nanoparticles exhibited more subtle restructuring, as depicted in Fig. 15d. Upon introducing CO into the O2 environment at 200 °C, the Pt nanoparticles appeared to undergo slight shape changes while maintaining their rounded appearance. Elevating the temperature to 500 °C and 600 °C resulted in some faceting of the Pt nanoparticles, albeit less pronounced than the changes observed in Pd. For Rh nanoparticles (Fig. 15e), no significant structural modifications or notable changes in CO2 production were observed between 500 °C and 600 °C. Lowering the temperature from 500 °C led to a decline in CO2 production, yet no discernible oxidation of the nanoparticles was evident from the images.

Fig. 15 Enlarged images of these regions in a vacuum and in CO in air gas mixture are shown at the bottom of (a) and (b), respectively. The images in (a) and (b) were obtained by averaging four acquired images. Copyright 2012, reprinted with permission from Science.77 TEM images of 10 nm Pd (c), Pt (d), and Rh (e) during CO oxidation. Copyright 2020, reprinted with permission from Nature.78

7. Summary and challenge

The advancement of in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) presents promising prospects for delving into the catalytic mechanisms of materials. This technique enables the direct observation of material metamorphosis and facilitates spectroscopic scrutiny of reactive and conversion procedures. This paper succinctly outlines the extensive array of applications for in situ TEM methodologies in the investigation of catalytic materials, particularly in recent times. Furthermore, it offers our perspectives on the forthcoming enhancements of this potent methodology. The compilation of notable contributions can be found in Table 4. By employing the in situ TEM technique, scientists have succeeded in creating a controlled environment around the specimen. This environment allows for the acquisition of atomic scale insights into materials' structure, composition, and chemical characteristics. Undoubtedly, this approach has ushered in a revolutionary shift in research within these domains, enabling a profound comprehension of processes that were previously elusive to other technologies. Despite the remarkable strides made over the last decade, several challenges persist. For instance, the resolution of this method still requires enhancement due to the scattering effects of materials like SiNx and the presence of gaseous media. Furthermore, the utilization of these media introduces instability and human associated factors into microscopic observations, placing physical constraints on the spatial and temporal resolutions achievable through TEM. From our viewpoint, sustained improvements are necessary in the following areas to unlock greater research possibilities in the future.

Firstly, in situ TEM experiments have showcased their capacity to manipulate atmospheric conditions. However, pinpointing the precise atomic structure at the surface remains a challenge within gas nano-reactors. This challenge arises due to electron scattering stemming from both the gas layer and the upper and lower window films. Typically, gas nano-reactors employ SiNx, with a thickness ranging from 10 to 50 nm, while the gas channel's height is maintained at less than 1 mm. In the foreseeable future, there arises a need for ultrathin and diminutive electron scattering films for the reactor's windows. Concurrently, the prospect of reducing the gas channel's height holds promise for elevating the spatial resolution of the resultant images.

Secondly, while in situ TEM proficiently captures dynamic insights into catalyst microstructures and chemical compositions within chemical environments, a comprehensive comprehension of catalysis requires more than just microscopic investigations. Given the large number of catalytic reactions and their complex mechanisms, a holistic approach requires extensive and statistically meaningful measurements, including both catalysts and reactants. To achieve effective and thorough analyses, the integration of in situ TEM with other characterization methods emerges as a valuable strategy. This amalgamation presents an opportunity to glean broader perspectives on catalytic reactions. Of paramount importance is the real-time qualitative and quantitative assessment of evolving reactants, a key aspect in establishing the structure–activity relationships. Nevertheless, due to the scant quantities of catalysts used in in situ TEM studies, conventional techniques like gas chromatography and quadrupole mass spectrometry often fall short in detecting minute product quantities. In response, an array of other in situ characterization methodologies have rapidly emerged, including in situ Raman spectroscopy, in situ infrared spectroscopy, in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD), in situ nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and in situ X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS). These techniques have complemented the field, addressing the limitations of conventional methods. Furthermore, the synergy between advanced in situ methodologies and traditional characterization instruments paves the way for the development of novel characterization approaches, enabling a comprehensive understanding of catalytic reactions.

Thirdly, in situ observations based on a cryo bias holder in cryo-TEM can dynamically capture the nucleation and growth of sensitive materials. Advances in TEM in terms of resolution significantly benefit in situ characterization. By combining with high resolution three dimensional reconstruction techniques, the spatial distribution of materials can be visualized. Additionally, developing cryo-TEM coupled with a spectrometer can yield the real time structure evolution of materials and synchronous regional component analysis during operando experiments. However, the cryogenic temperature is a significant challenge for the operation of typical instruments.

Finally, the temporal resolution stands as a crucial factor in capturing transient reaction dynamics effectively. In recent times, researchers have made notable progress by utilizing an independently developed electronic detection camera. This advancement has yielded an impressive resolution of 0.04 nm under low voltage (80 kV) imaging conditions. However, it's important to ensure a sufficient number of electrons to generate clear and informative images. This requisite hinges upon the brightness of the electron gun and the interaction between the electron beam and the specimen. Comparatively, electron diffraction offers a faster acquisition process without compromising quality when contrasted with imaging and spectroscopy. A particularly noteworthy domain in this regard is ultrafast electron microscopy, particularly ultrafast electron diffraction. This field is experiencing rapid growth as it delves into material structure changes with significantly elevated temporal resolutions.

In the foreseeable future, we anticipate that the progression of in situ TEM techniques will continue to advance on several fronts: (1) incorporation with more in situ capabilities: the expansion of in situ TEM methods is likely to encompass a broader range of capabilities, including magnetic field control and measurement, laser pump-probe techniques, and the ability to operate within varying environmental atmospheres. (2) Enhanced temporal resolution: as electron detection technologies evolve, the temporal resolution of in situ TEM is poised for improvement. The development of swifter electron detectors and innovative dynamic TEM techniques holds the promise of achieving finer temporal resolutions. (3) Robust data analysis tools: as the complexity and volume of data associated with high spatial and temporal resolution or information rich characterizations like 4D-STEM increase, the need for robust and standardized data analysis tools becomes paramount. The field is expected to develop efficient tools to handle high throughput raw data, facilitating meaningful insights from advanced characterizations. Overall, these anticipated developments are set to usher in an exciting phase of growth and innovation in the realm of in situ TEM.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52064035) and the Key Research and Development Program of Gansu Province (21YF5GA078). The authors thank the Electron Microscopy Center of Lanzhou University.

References

  1. N. Bejenaru , C. Lancelot , P. Blanchard , C. Lamonier , L. Rouleau , E. Payen , F. Dumeignil and S. Royer , Chem. Mater., 2009, 21 , 522 —533 CrossRef CAS .
  2. A. Baldi , T. C. Narayan , A. L. Koh and J. A. Dionne , Nat. Mater., 2014, 13 , 1143 —1148 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  3. Y. Xia , Y. Xiong , B. Lim and S. E. Skrabalak , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48 , 335 —344 Search PubMed .
  4. S. Helveg , C. Lopez-Cartes , J. Sehested , P. L. Hansen , B. S. Clausen , J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen , F. Abild-Pedersen and J. K. Norskov , Nature, 2004, 427 , 426 —429 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  5. S. Meister , S. Kim , J. J. Cha , H. S. P. Wong and Y. Cui , ACS Nano, 2011, 5 , 2742 —2748 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  6. F. Tao and P. A. Crozier , Chem. Rev., 2016, 116 , 3487 —3539 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  7. D. Wang , H. L. Xin , R. Hovden , H. Wang , Y. Yu , D. A. Muller , F. J. Disalvo and H. D. Abruña , Nat. Mater., 2013, 12 , 81 —87 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  8. M. E. Wise , G. Biskos , S. T. Martin and L. M. Russell , Aerosol Sci. Technol., 2005, 39 , 849 —856 CrossRef CAS .
  9. V. Colic , M. D. Pohl , D. Scieszka and A. S. Bandarenka , Catal. Today, 2016, 262 , 24 —35 CrossRef CAS .
  10. B. Zugic , L. Wang , C. Heine , D. N. Zakharov , B. A. J. Lechner , E. A. Stach , J. Biener , M. Salmeron , R. J. Madix and C. M. Friend , Nat. Mater., 2016, 16 , 558 —564 CrossRef PubMed .
  11. Y. H. Jian , Z. Li , M. W. Chong , J. P. Sullivan , X. Wu , Q. Z. Li , S. X. Mao , N. S. Hudak , H. L. Xiao and A. Subramanian , ChemInform, 2011, 330 , 1515 —1520 Search PubMed .
  12. K. Stenn and G. F. Bahr , J. Ultrastruct. Res., 1970, 31 , 526 —550 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  13. E. Rotunno , A. H. Tavabi , E. Yucelen , S. Frabboni , R. E. Dunin Borkowski , E. Karimi , B. J. McMorran and V. Grillo , Phys. Rev. Appl., 2019, 11 , 044072 CrossRef CAS .
  14. J. Yi , C. Zhen , Y. Han , P. Deb and D. A. Muller , Nature, 2018, 559 , 343 —347 CrossRef PubMed .
  15. N. Shibata , S. D. Findlay , T. Matsumoto , T. Seki , G. Sánchez-Santolino , Y. Kohno , H. Sawada , H. Sasaki , Y. G. So and R. Ikuhara , Microsc. Microanal., 2016, 22 , 906 —907 CrossRef .
  16. P. Schattschneider , S. Rubino , C. Hébert , J. Rusz , J. Kuneš , P. Novák , E. Carlino , M. Fabrizioli , G. Panaccione and G. Rossi , Nature, 2006, 441 , 486 —488 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  17. R. Ishikawa , Y. Jimbo , M. Terao , M. Nishikawa , Y. Ueno , S. Morishita , M. Mukai , N. Shibata and Y. Ikuhara , Microscopy, 2020, 69 , 240 —247 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  18. D. Alsem , N. Salmon , R. Unocic , G. Veith and K. More , Microsc. Microanal., 2012, 18 , 1158 —1159 CrossRef .
  19. J. R. Jinschek Chem. Commun., 2014, 50 , 2696 —2706 RSC .
  20. J. Wu , H. Shan , W. Chen , X. Gu , P. Tao , C. Song , W. Shang and T. Deng , Adv. Mater., 2016, 28 , 9686 —9712 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  21. B. Qiao , A. Wang , X. Yang , L. F. Allard , Z. Jiang , Y. Cui , J. Liu , J. Li and T. Zhang , Nat. Chem., 2011, 3 , 634 —641 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  22. B. Lim , M. Jiang , P. H. C. Camargo , E. C. Cho , J. Tao , X. Lu , Y. Zhu and Y. Xia , Science, 2010, 40 , 1302 —1305 Search PubMed .
  23. H. Hashimoto , T. Naiki , T. Eto and K. Fujiwara , Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 1968, 7 , 946 —952 CrossRef .
  24. E. D. Boyes and P. L. Gai , Ultramicroscopy, 1997, 67 , 219 —232 CrossRef CAS .
  25. S. Suzuki , C. Bower and O. Zhou , Chem. Phys. Lett., 1998, 285 , 230 —234 CrossRef CAS .
  26. R. Sinclair , Y. Liu , S. C. Lee and A. L. Koh , Microsc. Microanal., 2019, 25 , 3 —4 CrossRef PubMed .
  27. P. Grob , D. Bean , D. Typke , X. Li , E. Nogales and R. M. Glaeser , Ultramicroscopy, 2013, 133 , 1 —7 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  28. C. Han , J.-M. Jeung , J.-G. Kim and S.-C. Lee , Microsc. Microanal., 2019, 25 , 546 —547 CrossRef .
  29. H. L. Xin , K. Niu , D. H. Alsem and H. Zheng , Microsc. Microanal., 2013, 19 , 1558 —1568 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  30. N. Lobato-Dauzier , M. Denoual , T. Sato , S. Tachikawa , L. Jalabert and H. Fujita , Ultramicroscopy, 2019, 197 , 100 —104 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  31. Y. Jiang , Z. Zhang , W. Yuan , X. Zhang , Y. Wang and Z. Zhang , Nano Res., 2017, 11 , 42 —67 CrossRef .
  32. S. Hwang , X. Chen , G. Zhou and D. Su , Adv. Energy Mater., 2020, 10 , 1902105 CrossRef CAS .
  33. H. G. Heide J. Cell Biol., 1962, 13 , 147 —152 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  34. J. F. Creemer , S. Helveg , G. H. Hoveling , S. Ullmann and H. W. Zandbergen , Ultramicroscopy, 2008, 108 , 993 —998 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  35. X. Chen , R. M. de Boer , A. Kosari , H. van Gog and M. A. van Huis , J. Phys. Chem. C, 2023, 127 , 21387 —21398 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  36. A. Casu , A. Lamberti , S. Stassi and A. Falqui , Nanomaterials, 2018, 8 , 40 CrossRef PubMed .
  37. Y. Sasaki , A. Mizushima , Y. Mita , K. Yoshida , A. Kuwabara and Y. Ikuhara , Microscopy, 2022, 71 , 238 —241 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  38. A. Rodriguez-Palomo , V. Lutz-Bueno , X. Cao , R. Kádár , M. Andersson and M. Liebi , Small, 2021, 17 , 2006229 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  39. L.-A. DiCecco , R. Gao , J. L. Gray , D. F. Kelly , E. D. Sone and K. Grandfield , Nano Lett., 2023, 23 , 9760 —9768 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  40. L. Lari , S. Steinhauer and V. K. Lazarov , J. Mater. Sci., 2020, 55 , 12897 —12905 CrossRef CAS .
  41. R. Girod , N. Nianias and V. Tileli , Microsc. Microanal., 2019, 25 , 1304 —1310 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  42. N. de Jonge , N. Poirier-Demers , H. Demers , D. B. Peckys and D. Drouin , Ultramicroscopy, 2010, 110 , 1114 —1119 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  43. J. K. Hyun , P. Ercius and D. A. Muller , Ultramicroscopy, 2008, 109 , 1 —7 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  44. N. D. Jonge , D. B. Peckys , G. J. Kremers and D. W. Piston , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2009, 106 , 2159 —2164 CrossRef PubMed .
  45. N. de Jonge and F. M. Ross , Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, 6 , 695 —704 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  46. Y. Li , D. Zakharov , S. Zhao , R. Tappero , U. Jung , A. Elsen , P. Baumann , R. G. Nuzzo , E. A. Stach and A. I. Frenkel , Nat. Commun., 2015, 6 , 7583 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  47. P. A. Crozier and S. Chenna , Ultramicroscopy, 2011, 111 , 177 —185 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  48. B. Eren , D. Zherebetskyy , L. L. Patera , C. H. Wu , H. Bluhm , C. Africh , L.-W. Wang , G. A. Somorjai and M. Salmeron , Science, 2016, 351 , 475 —478 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  49. F. Tao , S. Dag , L.-W. Wang , Z. Liu , D. R. Butcher , H. Bluhm , M. Salmeron and G. A. Somorjai , Science, 2010, 327 , 850 —853 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  50. K. An , S. Alayoglu , N. Musselwhite , S. Plamthottam , G. Melaet , A. E. Lindeman and G. A. Somorjai , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135 , 16689 —16696 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  51. E. L. Lawrence , B. D. A. Levin , T. Boland , S. L. Y. Chang and P. A. Crozier , ACS Nano, 2021, 15 , 2624 —2634 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  52. L. Liu , D. N. Zakharov , R. Arenal , P. Concepcion , E. A. Stach and A. Corma , Nat. Commun., 2018, 9 , 574 CrossRef PubMed .
  53. P. Yin , S. Hu , K. Qian , Z. Wei , L.-L. Zhang , Y. Lin , W. Huang , H. Xiong , W.-X. Li and H.-W. Liang , Nat. Commun., 2021, 12 , 4865 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  54. C. Cai , S. Han , Q. Wang and M. Gu , ACS Nano, 2019, 13 , 8865 —8871 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  55. S. Han , T. Chen , C. Cai , D. He , S. Li , X. Xiang , X. Zu , S. Zhang and M. Gu , ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11 , 46947 —46952 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  56. R. Lang , W. Xi , J.-C. Liu , Y.-T. Cui , T. Li , A. F. Lee , F. Chen , Y. Chen , L. Li , L. Li , J. Lin , S. Miao , X. Liu , A.-Q. Wang , X. Wang , J. Luo , B. Qiao , J. Li and T. Zhang , Nat. Commun., 2019, 10 , 234 CrossRef PubMed .
  57. A. M. Gänzler , M. Casapu , P. Vernoux , S. Loridant , F. J. Cadete Santos Aires , T. Epicier , B. Betz , R. Hoyer and J.-D. Grunwaldt , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56 , 13078 —13082 CrossRef PubMed .
  58. S. Dai , S. Zhang , M. B. Katz , G. W. Graham and X. Pan , ACS Catal., 2017, 7 , 1579 —1582 CrossRef CAS .
  59. L. DeRita , J. Resasco , S. Dai , A. Boubnov , H. V. Thang , A. S. Hoffman , I. Ro , G. W. Graham , S. R. Bare , G. Pacchioni , X. Pan and P. Christopher , Nat. Mater., 2019, 18 , 746 —751 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  60. Y.-F. Sun , Y.-Q. Zhang , J. Chen , J.-H. Li , Y.-T. Zhu , Y.-M. Zeng , B. S. Amirkhiz , J. Li , B. Hua and J.-L. Luo , Nano Lett., 2016, 16 , 5303 —5309 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  61. Q. Wang , Z. L. Zhao and M. Gu , Small, 2019, 15 , e1903122 CrossRef PubMed .
  62. H. Yun , D. Zhang , T. Birol , J.-P. Wang and K. A. Mkhoyan , Nano Lett., 2023, 23 , 7576 —7583 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  63. X. Zhang , S. Han , B. Zhu , G. Zhang , X. Li , Y. Gao , Z. Wu , B. Yang , Y. Liu , W. Baaziz , O. Ersen , M. Gu , J. T. Miller and W. Liu , Nat. Catal., 2020, 3 , 411 —417 CrossRef CAS .
  64. W. Yuan , B. Zhu , K. Fang , X. Y. Li , T. W. Hansen , Y. Ou , H. Yang , J. B. Wagner , Y. Gao and Y. Wang , Science, 2021, 371 , 517 —521 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  65. X. Wang , F. Yao , P. Xu , M. Li , H. Yu and X. Li , Nano Lett., 2021, 21 , 1679 —1687 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  66. L. Luo , S. Chen , Q. Xu , Y. He , Z. Dong , L. Zhang , J. Zhu , Y. Du , B. Yang and C. Wang , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142 , 4022 —4027 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  67. S. B. Simonsen , I. Chorkendorff , S. Dahl , M. Skoglundh , J. Sehested and S. Helveg , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132 , 7968 —7975 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  68. P. Liu , A. Klyushin , P. Chandramathy Surendran , A. Fedorov , W. Xie , C. Zeng and X. Huang , ACS Nano, 2023, 17 , 24395 —24403 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  69. R. You , Y. Ou , R. Qi , J. Yu , F. Wang , Y. Jiang , S. Zou , Z.-K. Han , W. Yuan , H. Yang , Z. Zhang and Y. Wang , Nano Lett., 2023, 23 , 7260 —7266 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  70. M. Song , J. Cui , C. Ophus , J. Lee , T. Yan , K. A. Fichthorn and D. Li , Nano Lett., 2024, 24 , 1153 —1159 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  71. S. Hofmann , R. Sharma , C. Ducati , G. Du , C. Mattevi , C. Cepek , M. Cantoro , S. Pisana , A. Parvez , F. Cervantes-Sodi , A. C. Ferrari , R. Dunin-Borkowski , S. Lizzit , L. Petaccia , A. Goldoni and J. Robertson , Nano Lett., 2007, 7 , 602 —608 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  72. Y. Wang , L. Qiu , L. Zhang , D. M. Tang and H. M. Cheng , ACS Nano, 2020, 14 , 16823 —16831 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  73. S. Chenna , R. Banerjee and P. A. Crozier , ChemCatChem, 2011, 3 , 1051 —1059 CrossRef CAS .
  74. Z. Q. Zhang , Y. C. Pei , M. J. Xiao , G. Hu , Z. P. Huang , T. Song , Q. Wang , W. Y. Huang , Y. Peng and H. L. Zhang , Chem. Commun., 2021, 57 , 5454 —5457 RSC .
  75. T. W. Hansen , J. B. Wagner , P. L. Hansen , S. Dahl , H. Topsøe and C. J. H. Jacobsen , Science, 2001, 294 , 1508 —1510 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  76. W. Xi , K. Wang , Y. Shen , M. Ge and J. Luo , Nat. Commun., 2020, 11 , 1919 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  77. H. Yoshida , Y. Kuwauchi , J. R. Jinschek , K. Sun , S. Tanaka , M. Kohyama , S. Shimada , M. Haruta and S. Takeda , Science, 2012, 335 , 317 —319 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  78. S. W. Chee , J. M. Arce-Ramos , W. Li , A. Genest and U. Mirsaidov , Nat. Commun., 2020, 11 , 2133 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  79. Y. Li , D. Zakharov , S. Zhao , R. Tappero , U. Jung , A. Elsen , P. Baumann , R. G. Nuzzo , E. A. Stach and A. I. Frenkel , Nat. Commun., 2015, 6 , 7583 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  80. Y. Li , B. R. Bunes , L. Zang , J. Zhao , Y. Li , Y. Zhu and C. Wang , ACS Nano, 2016, 10 , 2386 —2391 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  81. Y. Li , L. Zang , D. L. Jacobs , J. Zhao , X. Yue and C. Wang , Nat. Commun., 2017, 8 , 14462 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  82. L. Sun , K. W. Noh , J.-G. Wen and S. J. Dillon , Langmuir, 2011, 27 , 14201 —14206 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  83. H. Shan , W. Gao , Y. Xiong , F. Shi , Y. Yan , Y. Ma , W. Shang , P. Tao , C. Song , T. Deng , H. Zhang , D. Yang , X. Pan and J. Wu , Nat. Commun., 2018, 9 , 1011 CrossRef PubMed .
  84. T. Uchiyama , D. H. Yoshida , Y. Kuwauchi , D. S. Ichikawa , S. Shimada , P. M. Haruta and P. S. Takeda , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50 , 10157 —10160 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  85. S. Zhang , C. Chen , M. Cargnello , P. Fornasiero , R. J. Gorte , G. W. Graham and X. Pan , Nat. Commun., 2015, 6 , 7778 CrossRef PubMed .
  86. S. Rackauskas , H. Jiang , J. B. Wagner , S. D. Shandakov , T. W. Hansen , E. I. Kauppinen and A. G. Nasibulin , Nano Lett., 2014, 14 , 5810 —5813 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  87. H. Yoshida , Y. Kuwauchi , J. R. Jinschek , K. Sun , S. Tanaka , M. Kohyama , S. Shimada , M. Haruta and S. Takeda , Science, 2012, 335 , 317 —319 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  88. Y. Jiang , H. Li , Z. Wu , W. Ye , H. Zhang , Y. Wang , C. Sun and Z. Zhang , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 2016 , 12427 CrossRef PubMed .
  89. W. Yuan , D. Zhang , Y. Ou , K. Fang , B. Zhu , H. Yang , T. W. Hansen , J. B. Wagner , Z. Zhang , Y. Gao and Y. Wang , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57 , 16827 —16831 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  90. W. Xi , K. Wang , Y. Shen , M. Ge , Z. Deng , Y. Zhao , Q. Cao , Y. Ding , G. Hu and J. Luo , Nat. Commun., 2020, 11 , 1919 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  91. S. Zhang , P. N. Plessow , J. J. Willis , S. Dai , M. Xu , G. W. Graham , M. Cargnello , F. Abild-Pedersen and X. Pan , Nano Lett., 2016, 16 , 4528 —4534 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  92. H. Yoshi Da and S. Take Da , Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2005, 72 , 1954281 —1954287 Search PubMed .
  93. P. L. Hansen , J. B. Wagner , S. Helveg and J. Rostrup-Nielsen , Science, 2002, 295 , 2053 —2055 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  94. S. Han , T. Chen , C. Cai , D. He and M. Gu , ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11 , 46947 —46952 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  95. M. L. De Marco , W. Baaziz , S. Sharna , F. Devred , C. Poleunis , A. Chevillot-Biraud , S. Nowak , R. Haddad , M. Odziomek , C. Boissière , D. P. Debecker , O. Ersen , J. Peron and M. Faustini , ACS Nano, 2022, 16 , 15837 —15849 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  96. Y. Wang , W. Luo , S. Gong , L. Luo , Y. Li , Y. Zhao and Z. Li , Adv. Mater., 2023, 35 , 2302499 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  97. Y. He , J.-C. Liu , L. L. Luo and Y. G. Wang , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2018, 115 , 7700 —7705 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  98. H. L. Xin , K. Niu , D. H. Alsem and H. Zheng , Microsc. Microanal., 2013, 19 , 1558 —1568 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  99. H. Yoshida and S. Takeda , Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2005, 72 , 195428 CrossRef .
  100. C. D. Damsgaard , L. D. L. Duchstein , D. Gardini , J. B. Wagner and S. Dahl , Microsc. Microanal., 2012, 18 , 1380 —1381 CrossRef .
  101. H. Yoshida , Y. Kuwauchi , J. R. Jinschek , K. Sun , S. Tanaka , M. Kohyama , S. Shimada , M. Haruta and S. Takeda , Science, 2012, 335 , 317 —319 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  102. A. D. Gamalski , J. Tersoff and E. A. Stach , Nano Lett., 2016, 16 , 2283 —2288 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  103. J. Gao , J. Yan , B. Zhao , Z. Zhang and Q. Yu , Nano Res., 2019, 13 , 183 —187 CrossRef .
  104. Y. Nian , Z. Dong , S. Wang , Y. Wang , Y. Han , C. Wang and L. Luo , Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020, 125 , 156101 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  105. L. Luo , L. Li , D. K. Schreiber , Y. He , D. R. Baer , S. M. Bruemmer and C. Wang , Sci. Adv., 2020, 6 , eaay8491 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  106. L. Zhang , Z. Dong , S. Wang and L. Luo , Sci. China Mater., 2020, 64 , 1256 —1266 CrossRef .
  107. L. Luo , S. Chen , Q. Xu , Y. He , Z. Dong , L. Zhang , J. Zhu , Y. Du , B. Yang and C. Wang , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142 , 4022 —4027 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  108. L. Luo , Y. Nian , S. Wang , Z. Dong , Y. He , Y. Han and C. Wang , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59 , 2505 —2509 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  109. S. Han , C. Cai , G. J. Xia , C. Sun , X. Shi , W. Zhou , J. Li , Y. G. Wang and M. Gu , Inorg. Chem., 2020, 59 , 14415 —14423 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  110. Q. Wang , G.-J. Xia , Z. L. Zhao , Y. Zhu , X. Shi , L. Huang , Y.-G. Wang and M. Gu , Nano Energy, 2020, 76 , 105099 CrossRef CAS .
  111. Z. Dong , L. Zhang , S. Wang and L. Luo , Nano Energy, 2020, 70 , 104527 CrossRef CAS .
  112. Z. Dong , W. Liu , L. Zhang , S. Wang and L. Luo , ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13 , 41707 —41714 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  113. M. Tang , S. Li , S. Chen , Y. Ou , M. Hiroaki , W. Yuan , B. Zhu , H. Yang , Y. Gao , Z. Zhang and Y. Wang , Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2021, 60 , 22339 —22344 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  114. G. Li , S. Li , Z.-K. Han , C. Zou , H. Wu , W. Yuan , B. Zhu , Y. Gao , H. Yang , Z. Zhang and Y. Wang , Nano Lett., 2021, 21 , 7309 —7316 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  115. S. Wang , Z. Dong , L. Zhang , P. Tsiakaras , P. K. Shen and L. Luo , ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13 , 1903 —1913 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  116. F. Yang , H. Zhao , R. Li , Q. Liu , X. Zhang , X. Bai , R. Wang and Y. Li , Sci. Adv., 2022, 8 , eabq0794 CrossRef CAS PubMed .

Footnote

  1. These authors contributed equally to this work.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024

Article information

Article type
Review Article
Submitted
17 Nov 2023
Accepted
04 Mar 2024
First published
05 Mar 2024

Catal. Sci. Technol., 2024,14, 2040-2063

Advances of in situ transmission electron microscopy research on gas phase catalyst particles

M. Xiao, H. Sun, Y. Meng and F. Zhu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2024, 14, 2040 DOI: 10.1039/D3CY01600E

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight  聚光灯

Advertisements  广告