This is a bilingual snapshot page saved by the user at 2024-5-3 18:07 for https://app.immersivetranslate.com/pdf-pro/c23bef22-02aa-4fd8-8cbb-d447ef4a77e9, provided with bilingual support by Immersive Translate. Learn how to save?
2024_05_03_c8a3771fa07f799e4326g

 Section Two: Heterogeneity Analysis


In addition to the main effect analysis, we studied the average intervention effects of three experimental groups on political aspirations at different values of moderating variables. Combining domestic and foreign studies, we analyzed the heterogeneity of twelve moderating variables and classified them into three categories: psychological cognitive category (gender, extraversion personality, anger emotion, social dominance orientation, life satisfaction), external environment category (parents' party membership, cadre experience, academic pressure, perception of economic environment), and political ideology category (party identification, political efficacy, "official-oriented"). The detailed heterogeneity effect regression coefficients for each variable are shown in Appendix (Six).

  Moderation analysis of psychological cognitive factors

 1. Gender

图 2

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for different experimental groups under the condition of controlling for student gender. In the Y1 direction, interventions for female students in all three experimental groups were not significant, and the intervention effects were weaker for male students. This may be because female participation in competition and their overall evaluation of their qualifications for running for public office are lower than those of males.

(Lawless and Fox, 2010) found that female political aspirations and ambitions are generally lower than those of males (Adam M. Dynes, 2021). However, interventions in experimental groups 3 and 4 had a significant positive effect on male students. In other words, males are more likely than females to be driven by public spirit to choose to serve as student leaders. We speculate that this may be related to the societal roles assigned to males, as males are expected to take on more responsibilities in public life. The differences in interventions for males and females may be related to the differences between males and females in pursuing self-worth realization, with males more willing to demonstrate their self-worth through taking on public responsibilities and participating in public life. Additionally, the differences in motivations for male and female participation in student work may be related to males being more concerned with personal development and networking, having a stronger sense of competition, while females are more focused on enriching extracurricular activities, developing their abilities, and relatively lacking a competitive spirit or disliking competition (Liu Daoning, 2013; Schneider et al., 2016). Both male and female groups did not show a significant response to personal interest incentives, which may indicate that for undergraduate students at Peking University, there are many channels available for personal development and opportunities to expand their network, and becoming a student leader may not be the best choice among them. In the direction, the intervention for female students in experimental group 2 was significantly positive, indicating that females are more likely to enter institutional work under the stimulus of personal interests. We speculate that for female groups, the personal interest stimulus of serving as a student leader is not as strong as that of entering institutional work, with the personal benefits of serving as a student leader mainly including campus networking, student work experience, and political advantages, while the benefits of holding public office are more realistic and direct, and females may have a unique preference for the latter. In the Y3 direction, the intervention for male students in experimental group 2 was significantly positive, which may be related to the political reality in our country, where officials with certain status can enjoy higher political status and treatment, and the top official system in our country is still dominated by males, so the stimulus for male groups may be stronger.

However, overall, the absolute difference in the impact of the three experimental interventions on male and female students is not significant. In other words, the influence of gender on political aspirations of Peking University students is not as huge as traditionally believed in academia. This is different from the emphasis by foreign scholars on the existence of "gender psychology" as a hindering factor for women's participation in public life (for example, Lawless and Fox, 2005, 2011, 2014; Melody Crowder-meyer, 2020), which may be related to the fact that the selection and appointment of student cadres in the university environment is not closely related to gender itself and the values of gender equality among university students.

 2. Extraverted Personality

图 3

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for the three experimental groups under the condition of controlling for extraversion personality trait (hereinafter referred to as "extraversion"). Overall, extraversion enhances the average intervention effect of the experimental groups. This means that individuals with stronger extraversion traits are more likely to "get into politics" under interventions related to personal interests, public spirit, and self-fulfillment (although some confidence intervals overlap with 0, at least the graph shows us this trend).

In the Y1 direction, the intervention of Group 4 on individuals with stronger extraversion (values greater than 6) is significantly positive, meaning that more energetic and proactive individuals are more likely to choose to become student cadres under the stimulus of self-fulfillment. In the Y2 direction, there seems to be different trends in the moderation of extraversion among the three experimental groups, but since the results are not significant, no conclusion can be drawn. In the and directions, we found consistent results: the intervention of Groups 2 and 4 on individuals with stronger extraversion (values greater than 7) is significantly positive, indicating that individuals with strong extraversion traits are more likely to choose to engage in political life for personal interests and inner sense of achievement. This conclusion is easy to understand, as extraverted individuals often have greater enthusiasm, and when there are clear interest goals and internal motivation stimuli in the political field, they will channel their enthusiasm towards the external world. Our findings are also consistent with previous research. Vecchione and Caprara (2009) reported that higher extraversion is closely related to strong self-efficacy, which may lead to higher political participation among college students; Dynes et al. (2021) also pointed out a strong positive correlation between extraversion personality and political aspirations. Essentially, because a political career requires extraverted behaviors (such as public speaking, voting, and debating), individuals with stronger extraversion are more likely to consider a political profession, believe they are qualified for politics, and expect electoral success (Blais et al., 2019). Our study validates and extends their theory, revealing the significant moderating effect of extraversion personality on the two key factors influencing political aspirations - personal interest stimuli and self-fulfillment incentives.

 3. Social Dominance Orientation

图 4

The figure shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for the three experimental groups under the condition of controlling the social dominance orientation (SDO) of the subjects. From to , the average intervention effects of the three experimental groups show different results. In the direction, except for , under other conditions, the intervention effect of experimental group 3 on the willingness to serve as student cadres is significantly positive. However, the intervention effect of experimental group 3 weakens as the subjects' SDO increases, indicating that students' social dominance orientation weakens the average intervention effect of public spirit. This is because individuals with high SDO often do not endorse values such as kindness, universalism, and other self-transcendent values, reject autonomy ethics such as caring, fairness, and reciprocity (Radkiewicz, 2016), and are therefore not influenced by public spirit, gradually weakening their intervention effects. In the and directions, the interventions of experimental groups 3 and 4 are not significant under any conditions, but when SDO values are 3, 4, 5 (i.e., agreeing that some groups should have more power than others), the intervention for personal interests is significantly positive, and with the increase of SDO, the intervention effect becomes stronger. This indicates that social dominance orientation enhances the average intervention effect of personal interests in entering the system and becoming political figures. This is because individuals with high SDO value self-values such as power and achievement, and their pursuit of power leads them to strive to become leaders of organizations or teams (Son Hing et al., 2007). When students with high SDO know that entering the system and becoming political figures can gain more power, higher status, and broader influence, they are more willing to engage in politics, thus the intervention effect of personal interests strengthens with the increase of SDO. In the direction, the conclusion is similar to the results of , where the interventions of public spirit and self-fulfillment are not significant, but under high SDO conditions, the intervention of personal interests is significant and gradually strengthens.

 4. Anger Emotion

图 5

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for the three experimental groups under the condition of controlling the degree of student anger (hereinafter referred to as "anger"). Overall, anger strengthens the average intervention effect of experimental group 4, which means that angrier individuals are more likely to "get into politics" under the stimulus of self-satisfaction, and this result is significant.

In the Y1 direction, anger consistently modulated the interventions of the three experimental groups, and the interventions of experimental groups 3 and 4 on individuals with high anger were significant. This means that angrier individuals are often influenced by public spirit and self-satisfaction stimuli to choose to become student cadres. They may feel dissatisfied with the status quo, yet harbor the idea of working for the collective, while also wanting to change things by their own efforts to demonstrate their self-worth. In the Y2 direction, we found differences between experimental groups 3 and 2, 4, indicating that angry individuals often find it difficult to choose to work within the system under the stimulus of public spirit. Perhaps the grand ideal of "serving the public" at this point can no longer offset their existing anger, and they are no longer willing to be confined to the "cage" of the system. In the Y3 direction, the gap between experimental groups 4 and 2 further widened, with the positive intervention effect of experimental group 4 significantly higher than the negative intervention effect of experimental group 2. This means that when facing the decision of "whether to become a political figure," anger significantly inhibits the stimulus of public spirit and significantly reinforces the stimulus of self-satisfaction. In other words, for those students who are already "burning with anger," the motivation to inspire them to become political figures is more likely to come from their intrinsic self-achievement motivation. In the direction, we found conclusions similar to those in the Y2 direction.

Existing research has confirmed the political effects of emotions, emotions are a well-documented prelude to action, and certain important emotions (such as excitement, anger) can be seen as predictors of action. Anger emotions significantly influence students' political actions (Huddy et al., 2015). Anger makes partisans less influenced by external information, more likely to take action, and more likely to take greater risks, thereby driving politics towards polarization (Huddy et al., 2007). It can be seen that anger emotions often play an important role in political actions and political participation, acting as a catalyst, playing an intensifying role. Our findings can be seen as a development of emotional political theory.

 5. Life satisfaction

图 6

The figure above shows the situation in which the happiness of students' lives is controlled (hereinafter referred to as "happiness"), the average marginal effect of different experimental groups in predicting direction.


Overall, the happiness of students will weaken the ATE of the experimental group, and the trend of regulating Y1 to Y is basically consistent. This indicates that students with stronger happiness are less likely to be stimulated by our experiments. On the contrary, the more unhappy they feel, the stronger the stimulating effect of the experiment.

The more unhappy they feel, the stronger the stimulating effect of the experiment.

Specifically, in the Y1 direction, when the sense of happiness is very unhappy or not very happy, the marginal effects of the three experimental groups on the willingness to serve as student cadres are significantly positive; when feeling very happy, the average impact of experimental groups 3 and 4 on the willingness to serve as student cadres is not statistically significant, and the impact of experimental group 2 is significantly negative. This indicates that among students who feel very happy, there is a negative relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable in experimental group 2. This may be because very happy students have a strong sense of responsibility and public spirit, and they disdain the behavior of those who take on the role of student cadres for self-interest, thus receiving negative interference from self-interest. In the Y2 direction, experimental groups 2 and 4 have a significant positive impact on students who feel unhappy (very unhappy or not very happy). This may be because, on the one hand, in China, self-satisfaction is strongly positively correlated with happiness (M. Verkuyten, G. A. Kwa, 2012), and students with lower levels of happiness want to achieve more self-satisfaction, thus receiving stronger interference from self-satisfaction. On the other hand, working within the system may be positively correlated with personal benefits, and participants know that once they enter the party and government institutions, they may obtain some political conveniences, thus receiving a significant stimulus from personal benefits. In the Y3 direction, the average marginal effects of the three experimental groups are not significant. In the direction, the conclusions are basically consistent with the results in the direction. When participants feel unhappy, the intervention effects of the three experimental groups are all significantly positive. This may be because self-satisfaction is strongly positively correlated with happiness, and personal interests and public spirit will enhance personal influence, sense of value, and sense of achievement to a certain extent, thereby achieving self-satisfaction. Therefore, the stimuli of the three experimental groups on the political aspirations of participants who feel unhappy are all significant.

 (2) Moderation analysis of external environmental factors

 6. Parent's membership in the Communist Party

图 7

The figure shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for different experimental groups under the condition of controlling parental party membership. From to , the average intervention effects of the three experimental groups show different results. In the direction, when neither parent is a party member or only the mother is a party member, only the intervention of experimental group 3 is significantly positive; when only the father or mother is a party member, the intervention of experimental group 4 is significantly positive; when both parents are party members, the influence of the three experimental groups on the willingness to serve as student cadres is not significant. At the same time, compared to when neither parent is a party member, having a mother who is a party member weakens the intervention effect of public spirit on serving as student cadres; compared to when only the mother is a party member, having a father who is a party member enhances the average intervention effect of self-fulfillment. The influence of whether parents are party members on students' willingness to serve as student cadres is complex. When the mother is a party member, public spirit is more likely to be the dominant factor. Studies on leadership suggest that women are more likely to focus on the needs of others than men (Eagly and Johannesen-Schmitdt, 2002), meaning that women's behavior is more public-oriented. The role of a mother as a party member has a subtle influence on the public spirit of children. When only the father is a party member, self-fulfillment is more likely to be the dominant factor. This may be related to the different impacts of parents on children's values, with the mother taking on more family and community responsibilities, while male behavior is more confident and competitive (Wood and Eagly, 2012). Therefore, the influence of the father's role is more reflected in encouraging children to pursue self-realization. In the Y2 direction.


In the intervention of the three experimental groups, there was no significant difference. It is generally believed that in China, the likelihood of cadres being members of the Communist Party of China is relatively high, that is, there is a strong correlation between cadres and party members. In theory, the impact of parents' party membership on whether their children serve as student cadres or enter the system should be similar (Li Fengliang, 2006). However, the empirical test results of Y1 and Y2 do not support this, indicating that university students have certain differences in their pursuit of social work (such as serving as student cadres) and political pursuits. This also reflects that the influence of parental background on the two is not the same. At the same time, Bourdieu (1986) defines social capital as the actual or potential set of resources that individuals can obtain through institutionalized social relationships. The social capital passed down from parents to children can provide children with more and better opportunities. According to the previous analysis, when both parents are party members, it may mean that the family can provide more social capital, so children's choices are more comprehensive, and there is no strong preference for working within the system. In the direction of , when both parents are not party members and only the mother is a party member, the intervention of experimental group 2 is significantly positive. Moreover, compared to when neither parent is a party member, having only the mother as a party member weakens the intervention effect of personal interests. This may be because for students from non-party member families, the social capital that the family can provide is limited, and they have to rely more on personal efforts. In this case, personal interests have a significant impact on their willingness to become political figures, that is, to gain greater development space through obtaining status and power. When the mother is a party member, her access to social capital increases, reducing the attractiveness of personal interests to her. However, since only the mother is a party member, her access to capital is limited, and she still needs to consider personal interests, so the intervention of experimental group 2 remains significant. As for , its conclusion is basically consistent with .

 7. Cadre Experience

图 8

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for the three experimental groups under the condition of having pre-university student cadres experience (hereinafter referred to as "cadre experience"). Obviously, cadre experience will weaken the average intervention effect of the experimental groups, with a consistent trend of moderation from to . This indicates that students who served as student cadres before university (such as class monitors, Youth League secretaries, etc.) are less likely to be stimulated by the interventions of our three experimental groups. Conversely, students who have not served as cadres are more responsive to the experimental stimuli.

It is easy to see that in the Y1 direction, experimental groups 3 and 4 have a significant positive intervention effect on individuals without cadre experience, meaning that students who have not previously served as cadres are more likely to become student cadres under the impetus of public spirit and self-satisfaction. This may be because they lack this experience, their understanding of student cadres mainly revolves around the public image of "serving classmates," and the psychological satisfaction of receiving attention and recognition. Therefore, they are curious and eager to become student cadres under the stimuli of experimental groups 3 and 4. In the Y2 direction, experimental group 3 has a significant intervention effect on students who have not served as cadres, indicating that students without cadre experience are more likely to choose to work within the system for the public interest in the future, reflecting a simple understanding of working within the system. In the Y3 direction, we did not find a significant moderating effect of cadre experience on the three experimental groups.


In the direction, the conclusion is approximately consistent with that in the direction, meaning that students without cadre experience are more likely to enhance their political ambitions under the stimulation of public spirit and self-satisfaction.

Early research has confirmed that past political participation experiences can increase people's interest in politics and serve as a better predictor of people's political participation (Verba et al., 1995). Fox and Lawless (2005) also found that individuals who participated in student elections in high school or college may have stronger political ambitions compared to the general public. Lundin et al. (2016) studied whether winning a public position in high school would affect future formal political candidacy. The above studies can be seen as evidence of political socialization theory, which is defined as "the developmental process by which adolescents acquire cognitive, attitudinal, and behavioral orientations toward politics in their environment" (Atkin and Gantz, 1978). Our findings can be seen as an extension of these studies, as we examined how past leadership experiences significantly moderated the effects of public spirit and self-fulfillment on students' political ambitions.

 8. Academic Pressure


图 9

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for different experimental groups under the condition of controlling students' learning pressure (hereinafter referred to as "learning pressure"). Obviously, overall, learning pressure reinforces the average intervention effects of the three experimental groups.


The trend of moderation from to is nearly consistent, meaning that students with high learning pressure are more likely to have stronger political ambitions under the stimulation of personal interests, public spirit, and self-satisfaction.

In the Y1 direction, when the learning pressure value is greater than 4, the interventions of the three experimental groups are significantly positive. This means that the intervention effects of the three experimental groups on individuals with higher learning pressure are stronger. This may be because individuals who perceive high learning pressure set higher demands for themselves, and high academic pressure also implies intense competition, making them more inclined to gain additional competitive advantages by serving as student cadres. In the Y2 direction, when the learning pressure value is greater than 4, the intervention of experimental group 2 is significantly positive, indicating that individuals with higher learning pressure are more likely to choose to work within the system under the stimulation of personal interests. We speculate that this is related to the fiercely competitive social environment in China today. Rational behavior of job seekers is the process of choosing a future job position with lower future work intensity but higher returns under established acquisition costs, depending on variables such as position income level, stability, self-development space, probability of acquisition, post-acquisition work intensity, etc. (Yuan Kuangji, 2010). Students with high learning pressure usually have high self-demands, and pressure is the "cost" they have already paid. Therefore, to offset this high cost, they are usually more utilitarian, tending to choose occupations that can bring them greater benefits. Working within the system is relatively stable and offers security, which is more attractive to this group of people. When students face intensified competition, entering the system becomes a choice of maximizing utility. In the direction, the moderating effect of learning pressure on the three experimental groups is not significant. This may be because the goals of political figures are too distant, so we did not find a significant correlation between academic pressure at the university stage and their goals. Existing studies suggest that serving as student cadres can effectively influence students' learning motivation and promote academic performance (Wu Qiuxiang, Cui Sheng, 2019). However, our study found the changing situation of students' political ambitions under the intervention of personal interests, public spirit, and self-satisfaction due to learning pressure, which can be seen as a reflection of the current intensification of "internal competition" among university students.

 9. Perception of Economic Environment

 Figure 10

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction under the condition of controlling students' perception of the past economic situation (hereinafter referred to as "economic situation") for different experimental groups. In the direction, when students believe that the economic situation has not changed, the marginal effects of experimental groups 3 and 4 on the willingness to serve as student cadres are significantly positive, while the impact of experimental group 2 is not significant; when students believe that the economic situation has worsened, the marginal effect of experimental group 3 on the willingness to serve as student cadres is significantly positive, and the impact of experimental groups 2 and 4 is not significant. This indicates that for student groups who perceive no change or deterioration in the economic situation, public spirit is more likely to stimulate them to become a student cadre; for student groups who perceive no change in the economic situation, self-satisfaction is more likely to stimulate them to become a student cadre. This means that when students perceive economic stagnation, interventions of self-satisfaction stimulate them to change their environment and even the entire society by serving as student cadres, in order to achieve a strong desire for achievement and satisfaction; and when they perceive economic deterioration, this situation is evidently more serious, and contributing to society should be the primary consideration, rather than focusing too much on their own satisfaction. In other words, public spirit takes absolute precedence and suppresses the need for self-satisfaction, so they are significantly influenced by public spirit, and the intervention of self-satisfaction is not significant. In terms of marginal trend changes, the intervention effect of experimental group 3 on the willingness to serve as student cadres gradually increases with the pessimism of students' economic perception. This indicates that with the increase in the pessimism of students' economic perception, the intervention effect of experimental group 3 on the willingness to serve as student cadres gradually rises.


A pessimistic perception of the economic situation will increase the average intervention effect of the experimental group. This may also be because when students believe that the economic situation is worsening, they will feel a stronger sense of social responsibility compared to no change, thus the intervention of public spirit is more intense.

However, the situations in the Y2, Y3, and directions are significantly different. The intervention effects of groups 3 and 4 are no longer significant, and the intervention effect of group 2 has become significantly negative. That is, as the degree of pessimistic perception of the economic situation increases, the average marginal effect of group 2 decreases. This means that changes in the external economic environment will have an impact on students' future expectations. Those who believe that the economy is prosperous are more likely to enter politics under the stimulus of personal interests. This may be because economic prosperity also brings excellent opportunities for personal development, so they are more optimistic about future expectations and believe that entering politics will improve their well-being. Lawless and Fox's (2001) study of urban poverty populations revealed a significant impact of the economic environment on political participation. Our findings also provide a way and inspiration for further exploring the impact of economic environmental changes on students' political psychology, which has strong practical significance for understanding the political mentality of people in today's China under economic transformation.

 (3) Moderation analysis of political ideological factors

 10. Party Identification


 Figure 11

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for different experimental groups when controlling for participants' party identification. From to , the average intervention effects of the three experimental groups show different results. In the direction, regardless of the level of party identification, the intervention of personal interest is not significant. However, when party identification is low (less than or equal to 3.5), interventions of public spirit and self-satisfaction are significantly positive, and weaken as party identification increases. This indicates that party identification weakens the average intervention effects of public spirit and self-satisfaction. Generally speaking, party identification in our country refers to citizens' identification with the Communist Party of China, recognizing and approving the ruling status of the Communist Party of China, and consciously regulating their own political behavior according to the requirements of Communist Party members (Li Suhua, 2005). With the increase in participants' party identification, they should have altruistic motives, and serving as student cadres should be for public service and self-fulfillment. The interventions of public spirit and self-satisfaction should be enhanced. However, the results show the opposite. This may be partly due to the small sample size we selected, which may not represent Peking University students' identification with the Communist Party of China well. On the other hand, there may be a deviation between students' actual party identification and theoretical party identification. Their identification with the Communist Party is mainly due to utilitarian needs rather than public ideas. The intervention effects of experimental groups in show similar results. Experimental Group 3 and Experimental Group 4 are not significant in all cases. When party identification is strong (with a value of ), the intervention of personal interest is significantly positive, indicating that participants who highly identify with the Communist Party consider entering the system, becoming political figures, and political aspirations are significantly influenced by personal interest. And the intervention effects increase with the increase in party identification, indicating that party identification enhances personal interest's ATE. This may be because participants believe that the higher their identification with the Communist Party as the ruling party, the more legitimacy and legality they can obtain when entering the system and becoming political figures, making it easier to achieve personal interests. Those students with strong party identification hold utilitarian views, hoping to satisfy their own interests through the Communist Party, thus personal interest interventions are more significant.

 11. Political Efficacy

 Figure 12

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for different experimental groups when controlling for participants' external political efficacy. From to , the average intervention effects of the three experimental groups show different results. In the Y1 direction, experimental group 2 is not significant for all values of political efficacy, when political efficacy is low (values less than or equal to 3), public spirit and self-satisfaction have a significant positive intervention on the willingness to serve as student cadres. This indicates that respondents with low political efficacy are more strongly stimulated by public spirit and self-satisfaction. Moreover, in terms of trends, as political efficacy increases, the intervention of public spirit and self-satisfaction gradually weakens, indicating that political efficacy weakens the average intervention effects of public spirit and self-satisfaction. This may be because low external political efficacy can encourage people to participate in political activities (Shingles, 1981). They want to change the current situation where the government does not respond well to the needs of the people, and serving as student cadres is their choice driven by a sense of responsibility and public spirit. At the same time, by serving as student cadres, they enhance their responsiveness to student needs and achieve self-satisfaction, making the intervention of public spirit and self-satisfaction more significant. Meanwhile, when external political efficacy increases, their needs can receive positive responses from higher authorities, so they do not need to actively participate in student cadre work, resulting in a decrease in the intervention effects of the two experiments. In the direction, the three experimental groups are not significant for all values of political efficacy. In the Y3 direction, when participants' political efficacy is at a moderate level (values of 2, 2.5, 3,


At o'clock, the stimulus of personal interests to become a political figure is significantly positive, and its intervention effect weakens with the increase of political efficacy, indicating that political efficacy weakens the average intervention effect of personal interests in choosing to become a political figure. This may be because political figures have a responsibility to respond to the needs of the public. When the external political efficacy of the subjects increases, becoming a political figure requires a public spirit to actively respond to individual needs and desires. In contrast, they cannot focus primarily on the personal benefits obtained after becoming a political figure, so the intervention of personal interests in the willingness to become a political figure weakens with the enhancement of external political efficacy. In the direction, the conclusion is basically consistent with .

 12. Official-centric

 Figure 13

The figure above shows the average marginal effects in the predicted direction for different experimental groups under the control of the "official-oriented concept". In the Y1 direction, the intervention of Experiment Group 3 on students with weaker official-oriented concepts is significantly positive, which means that students who deny official-oriented thinking are more likely to take on student cadres under the drive of public spirit, showing that they may view student work as a channel for pursuing equal values. Some scholars view student work as a way to express the status of students, emphasizing that student power is an important component of university power structures. Universities should pay attention to students' rights to information, decision-making, participation, and expression (Li Fuhua, 2003). Therefore, when students do not agree


with the official-oriented concept, they may view student work as a way to resist overwhelming power from the school. Under the drive of public spirit, they are more willing to choose student cadre work that aligns with their values. It is worth noting that when students strongly disagree with the concept of "learning for official positions," the intervention of personal interests in the willingness to take on student cadres is also significantly positive. This may be because, in the subjects' original cognition, entering politics is no longer the primary choice for seeking benefits for themselves, and "entering official positions" is no longer the top choice for elites. When they are stimulated by personal interests and realize that entering politics can still bring personal benefits, their willingness to take on student cadres is affected. In the direction, when students disagree with the official-oriented concept of "learning for official positions," both Experiment Group 2 and Experiment Group 4 show significantly positive effects on entering the system, which is different from the common sense belief that "those with official-oriented concepts are more inclined to enter the system." This reflects the inconsistency between cognition and choice. Even though they do not agree with the official-oriented concept, the willingness to enter the system will still increase under the stimulus of personal interests or self-realization. In the Y3 direction, the intervention of Experiment Group 2 on individuals with stronger official-oriented concepts is significantly positive, which means that students with stronger official-oriented concepts are more likely to choose to become a politician in the future for personal interests.

Some scholars believe that the prominent "official-oriented" consciousness in China's historical and cultural traditions has many official-oriented phenomena and concepts in university administration and teaching (Zhong Binglin, 2010), which may have a certain impact on the behavioral choices of university students. We speculate that this "official-oriented" tradition has produced influences in different directions. Some students acknowledge and admire the "official-oriented" tradition, actively adapt to this tradition, and choose to "enter politics" under the stimulus of personal interests, public spirit, and self-satisfaction. Another group of students strongly oppose the "official-oriented" concept, considering it as dross, and aspire to change this tradition through the efforts of their generation. Therefore, they may become student cadres, enter the system, or even become a politician out of the motivation to change the status quo. This may explain the multi-directionality and diversity of the moderating effects of "official-oriented" on the three experimental groups.

 Chapter Six, Summary and Discussion

  and Summary


Through in-depth interviews and text analysis techniques, we listened to the voices of political aspirations deep within college students, capturing more subtle and diverse underlying motivations at the individual level. In conversations with the interviewees, our three hypotheses were confirmed. The introduction of this method provided qualitative support for our experimental section and added richer details, enabling our theory to have both qualitative and quantitative explanatory power.

We focus our attention on college students and introduce the theory of "political ambition" to study the motivation of student cadres. By selecting "whether to become a student cadre" as a preliminary measure of college students' political ambitions, we identified three stimuli that enhance students' political ambitions: personal interests, public spirit, and self-satisfaction, and the three have different intervention effects in the three dimensions of serving as student cadres, entering the system, and becoming political figures. Overall, our experimental intervention has been proven to be effective and successful. We observed significant changes in students' political ambitions before and after the intervention, as well as compared to the control group. Through a survey experiment, we demonstrated that for students at Peking University, improving public life and realizing self-worth are more likely to motivate them to make decisions when facing the choice of becoming a student cadre. However, students' behavioral motivations may be diverse, and when considering entering the system or even becoming a political figure in the future, their motivations change: personal interests take precedence. This finding made us realize that students' motivations for political ambitions vary significantly across different dimensions.

In addition, by including several covariates in heterogeneous analysis, we revealed the differences in the intervention effects of the above three motivations on different groups and derived a series of interesting and important new findings: (1) Men are more likely than women to be stimulated by public spirit and self-satisfaction to become student cadres, but they are also more likely to choose to become political figures under the stimulus of personal interests; (2) People under high academic pressure are more likely to enhance their political ambitions under the stimulus of personal interests; (3) Angry individuals are more likely to strengthen their political ambitions under the drive of self-satisfaction; (4) People with a stronger social dominance orientation are more sensitive to the stimulus of personal interests and are more likely to enter politics for personal gain; (5) People who perceive the economic environment pessimistically are more likely to respond to the stimulus of public spirit to enter politics, while those who perceive optimistically are more likely to enter politics for personal interests; (6) The concept of "official-oriented" has complexity in regulating students' political ambitions, and whether to support or oppose "official-oriented" has different motivational directions for becoming student cadres or political figures, and so on. The revelation of these results helps us to understand more deeply how the three main motivations act on different individuals and how these differences may have important implications for students' political ambitions.

或成为政治人物的动机刺激方向不同; 等等。这些结果的揭示有助于我们更深入地理解三种主要动机是如何作用于不同个体的, 以及这种差异可能对学生的政治抱负带来哪些重要的影响。

 (2) Discussion


The findings of this study help us better understand the student cadres in China, who are essentially altruistic and self-fulfilling, carrying the ideal of serving the collective and realizing personal values, actively participating in student work. As a response to the "refined selfishness" among Chinese university students, our research indicates that at least in the context of "becoming student cadres," self-interest motivation is not as effective as altruistic actions and self-satisfaction motivations, which seems to refute the accusations against elite university students in recent years. Furthermore, our conclusions also suggest that students' motivations for entering politics in the future are still utilitarian, in other words, satisfying and developing personal interests are key factors motivating them to enter the system and become political figures. This implies that as students develop higher political aspirations, they often pursue personal interests, gradually eroding the drive for public spirit and self-satisfaction. They climb the "political ladder," increasingly becoming self-centered. Perhaps we can outline a systematic trajectory of changes in the driving force of political aspirations: gradually shifting from altruistic incentives and a sense of achievement to selfish stimuli. However, why do public spirit and self-satisfaction gradually disappear as students enter the real political world? Will people tend to become secular and self-centered once they enter the "officialdom"? The differences in the driving factors of students' political aspirations on different dimensions are interesting, as they seem to reflect the evolution of Chinese "bureaucrats." If this is true, then this study predicts that the future Chinese political arena is likely to be filled with a group of "self-serving bureaucrats," which is undoubtedly detrimental to the country's long-term development and prone to abuse of power and corruption. Understanding this issue is important, but exploring this change is beyond the scope of this study, yet it may be an important and unavoidable issue for our future research.

In addition, based on our heterogeneity test results, we have developed existing theories. In the moderation effect of gender, we found differences in motivational factors when faced with different choices between males and females. Compared to females, males seem to have stronger political aspirations, but also show more significant changes in different dimensions of political aspirations. Despite being universities where there is little difference in knowledge levels between men and women, and where everyone has elite consciousness, there are still gender differences in attitudes towards politics, which still conform to traditional Chinese societal perceptions of gender roles—males seem more likely to be "political animals," regardless of their motivations for entering politics. This finding also enriches previous research on gender political attitudes, revealing which aspects of male political aspirations are stronger.


It provides a possibility for further discussion on gender issues for women.

In addition, our research has also yielded new findings. In exploring the regulatory effect of academic stress, we investigated how academic stress affects students' political ambitions, reflecting the intensified "internal competition" in Chinese universities today and how students' political psychology is influenced by stress. Pressure makes students tend towards utilitarianism, often entering politics with self-interested motives, a phenomenon that should be taken seriously and vigilantly, as none of us want to see a future political elite in China filled with "self-serving bureaucrats." Therefore, reflecting on this phenomenon requires the state and universities to pay more attention to the mental health of young people, create a more relaxed and lively atmosphere, and nurture their public spirit. Another point worth mentioning is that the perception of the economic environment significantly regulates the political ambitions of young people. Peking University students do not seem to be rushing into the system seeking stability due to the economic downturn. Their decision reflects a public spirit of changing the status quo. That is to say, when they realize that the national economy is in trouble, their entry into politics is more motivated by the public interest of "wanting to change something," which is encouraging and heartening, demonstrating the responsibility of elite university students towards the country. Understanding this motivation helps us better understand the deeper implications of the recent "recruitment fever." The last interesting finding is that the concept of "official-oriented" does not consistently regulate students' political ambitions; on the contrary, its role is complex. We can understand that there are two types of people in the student group: some are loyal adherents of the "official-oriented" concept, who identify with this concept and are willing to become student cadres and enter politics under its guidance; however, there are also opponents of the "official-oriented" concept, or rebels, who choose to become student cadres and enter politics out of a motivation to change this bad tradition. Therefore, the regulatory effect of "official-oriented" on political ambitions is complex, reflecting the internal differentiation of elite universities and embodying the unique thinking of the new generation of young people on power and politics.

Overall, our research findings will help understand and comprehend Chinese university students, especially the elites of top universities, in their mindset before "entering politics." It is foreseeable that many of them will enter the political arena in the near future, participate in the game of power, and a detailed study of this group will outline a portrait of China's "future politicians" for us. The emergence of new political ambitions provides us with a direction and possibility. Although how many of the "budding bureaucrats" will eventually become true bureaucrats or even "political figures" in the future is still unknown, we believe that this research will provide insights for the academic community to understand the emergence and growth of future Chinese political elites.

Of course, it must be acknowledged that our research also has shortcomings. First, due to the limited sample size of this study, and the relatively high proportion of humanities and social science students in the composition, although we have adopted strict experimental methods to ensure the effect of causal identification, it is difficult to make more extensive and reliable inferences. In addition, since our research is limited to Peking University, a comprehensive university, and does not involve other types of universities (such as normal universities, professional universities, military universities, etc.), the conclusions should be very cautious in their general application. Moreover, there may be debates about whether the willingness to become a student cadre can reflect political ambitions, as student cadres may not be able to perfectly measure the political ambitions of students in the early stages. Those who want to become student cadres may have other motives, such as experiencing university life, seeking social groups, etc. Finally, our article may not delve into the issue of dynamic changes in political ambitions (dynamic ambition, Fox and Lawless, 2011) because this study only used cross-sectional data for analysis, which may not reveal the patterns of changes in students' political ambitions over time. As time passes, external environments and internal psychology change, personal experiences increase, and individuals' political efficacy also changes, all of which may cause potential candidates to gain or lose interest in politics, undoubtedly leading to changes in political ambition levels after a period of time. However, since our data includes highly homogenized samples of different age groups from freshman to senior year, we may also interpret the differences in political ambitions brought about by grade growth as time effects. Of course, our qualitative interviews also provide the possibility of revealing changes in individual political ambitions. The discussion of the above shortcomings provides us with issues worthy of further exploration in the future, and will also be the direction of our next efforts.


{{0}} Extraversion means being energetic in social and material worlds, including characteristics such as sociability, activity, confidence, and positive emotions.

  1. 外倾性 (extraversion) 意味着对社会和物质世界充满活力的方式, 包括社交、活动、自信和积极情绪等特征。

  2. selected a statement from the Social Dominance Orientation scale: To what extent do you agree with "Some groups should have more power than others."

  3. "It should be noted that the question in our survey about 'anger towards events in the country' is taken from the American National Election Studies (ANES) and is intended to measure the level of anger among respondents, not the specific cause of anger. Therefore, 'events in the country' is more like a general background summary.