Epicor Help for users of Epicor's variety of products. This forum serves as a means of discussion and troubleshooting as a complement to Epicor Technical Support.
Epicor 针对 Epicor 各种产品用户的帮助。该论坛作为讨论和故障排除的手段,作为 Epicor 技术支持的补充。



Hello, we noticed you are blocking ads.
We HATE intrusive ads too, however ads are helping us defray the cost of running this site
We would greatly appreciate it if you would consider making an exception for e10help

ADVERTISEMENT 广告

We have not been using the QA module as intended, I am trying to run some production parts through the proper nonconformance process. I began a non-conformance, I failed them in inspection processing and now I am on DMR. How do I tell kinetic that we reworked the parts? I didn’t see an area to specify this in any of the steps. We also do not use the “corrective action” module. Inspection data/results is not available to me either, so is this not working how I want it to because we do not have the enhanced QA module?
我们没有按预期使用 QA 模块,我正在尝试通过适当的不合格流程运行一些生产零件。我开始不合格,在检查处理中未通过,现在我在 DMR 上。我如何告诉kinetic我们重新加工了零件?我没有在任何步骤中看到指定这一点的区域。我们也不使用“纠正措施”模块。我也无法获得检查数据/结果,那么这是否无法按照我想要的方式工作,因为我们没有增强的 QA 模块?

Thanks for any help!
谢谢你的帮助!

Welcome @cdeblaere ! 欢迎@cdeblaere!

The way that I have interpreted how to use the Quality functionality is this way (not even sure if this is what Epicor intended :man_shrugging:).
我解释如何使用质量功能的方式是这样的(甚至不确定这是否是 Epicor 想要的 :man_shrugging: )。

  • Production Worker NCRs a part off of a job with a reason code.
    生产工人 NCR 是带有原因代码的作业的一部分。
  • Inspector reviews part. If it can be reworked, accept back to job for rework. Else reject to DMR.
    检查员审查部分。如果可以返工,接受返工返工。否则拒绝 DMR。
  • DMR reviewed. If it can be reworked, accept back to job for rework. Else reject.
    DMR 已审核。如果可以返工,接受返工返工。否则拒绝。

In your instance, I would put the comments on how to rework it in the Accept comments. Then I would instruct the worker to log into the same Operation and click the Rework flag to denote that time as rework.
在您的例子中,我会将有关如何修改它的评论放在接受评论中。然后,我将指示工作人员登录到同一操作并单击返工标志以将该时间表示为返工。

Welcome again @cdeblaere!
再次欢迎@cdeblaere!

To expand on what @jkane says, in your specific case you would need to first create a job with operations that will fix the item, whatever OTHER materials are required (if any), and this actual item as a material… so you have a job where the OUTPUT is the same as one of the INPUTs. It’s a logic trap, but it works. From the DMR Processing screen, open your DMR and go to “Accept Material Details”. Click the + to create a new record, and enter your Job Number, Assembly, and Material Sequence along with quantity to “issue” this material OUT of DMR and onto the job. Complete the job as any other job and accept this part back to stock when done.
为了扩展@jkane所说的内容,在您的具体情况下,您需要首先创建一个作业,其中包含将修复该项目的操作,无论需要什么其他材料(如果有),以及该实际项目作为材料......所以您有一个输出与输入之一相同的作业。这是一个逻辑陷阱,但它确实有效。从 DMR 处理屏幕中,打开 DMR 并转到“接受材料详细信息”。单击 + 创建新记录,然后输入您的作业编号、装配和材料序列以及数量,以将该材料从 DMR 中“发放”到作业中。像任何其他工作一样完成该工作,并在完成后将此零件放回库存。

ADVERTISEMENT 广告

@cdeblaere I concur with the other two responses.
@cdeblaere 我同意其他两个回复。

But something you might find helpful is setting up appropriate reason codes for DMR Accept that will provided the Reason for the Accept, in this case something like ‘Reworked.’
但您可能会发现有帮助的是为 DMR 接受设置适当的原因代码,它将提供接受的原因,在本例中类似于“返工”。

The other option is to Rework the parts on a different Job, or even a different Operation on the same job that is for Rework, or be sure to mark the Labor Entry as rework, which can help those reviewing the Job to understand why the Actual Job Costs are higher.
另一种选择是在不同的作业上对零件进行返工,甚至在同一个作业上进行不同的操作来进行返工,或者确保将劳工条目标记为返工,这可以帮助审查作业的人员了解为什么实际情况会发生变化。工作成本更高。

This makes so much sense and honestly feels really obvious in hindsight haha. We do not have “jobs” for the rework or a rework reason code so we will be setting those up
这很有道理,而且事后看来真的很明显哈哈。我们没有返工的“工作”或返工原因代码,因此我们将进行设置

Thank you!!  谢谢你!!


ADVERTISEMENT 广告

Powered by Discourse 由话语提供支持