Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Review - M3 Max challenges HX-CPUs from AMD & Intel
The MacBook Pro 16 is now available with Apple's new 3 nm chips M3 Pro as well as M3 Max and in addition to faster GPUs, it is the first time that the Max SoCs offer more CPU cores and therefore more CPU performance. Contrary to the five base models of the smaller MacBook Pro 14 (we already reviewed the entry-level model with the base M3 SoC), there are only three versions of the larger MBP 16. You can either get the highest spec M3 Pro or the two M3 Max options. In addition to the processor, Apple also increased the maximum SDR brightness from 500 to 600 nits, but that is it.
MacBook Pro 16 现已配备 Apple 全新 3 nm 芯片M3 Pro和M3 Max ,除了更快的 GPU 之外,Max SoC 还首次提供更多 CPU 内核,从而提高 CPU 性能。与较小的 MacBook Pro 14 的五个基本型号相反(我们已经审查了带有基本 M3 SoC 的入门级型号),较大的 MBP 16 只有三个版本。您可以购买最高规格的 M3 Pro 或两个 M3 Max 选项。除了处理器之外,苹果还将最大 SDR 亮度从 500 尼特提高到了 600 尼特,但仅此而已。
MBP 16 M3 Pro | MBP 16 M3 Max MBP 16 M3 最大 | MBP 16 M3 Max MBP 16 M3 最大 | |
---|---|---|---|
CPU | Apple M3 Pro 苹果M3 Pro 12-core CPU 12核CPU (6P & 6E) (6P & 6E) |
Apple M3 Max 苹果M3 Max 14-core CPU 14核CPU (10P & 4E) (10P & 4E) |
Apple M3 Max 苹果M3 Max 16-core CPU 16核CPU (12P & 4E) (12P & 4E) |
GPU | 18-core GPU 18核GPU | 30-core GPU 30核GPU | 40-core 40核 |
RAM | 18 GB (36 GB) | 36 GB (96 GB) 36GB(96GB) | 48 GB (64/128 GB) 48GB(64/128GB) |
SSD | 512 GB (1/2/4 TB) 512 GB(1/2/4 TB) | 1 TB (2/4/8 TB) 1TB(2/4/8TB) | 1 TB (2/4/8 TB) 1TB(2/4/8TB) |
Memory bandwidth 内存带宽 | 150 GB/s 150GB/秒 | 300 GB/s 300GB/秒 | 400 GB/s 400GB/秒 |
Ports 港口 | 3x USB-C 4.0 w/ Thunderbolt 4 3 个 USB-C 4.0 带 Thunderbolt 4 HDMI, SD card reader HDMI、SD读卡器 |
3x USB-C 4.0 w/ Thunderbolt 4 3 个 USB-C 4.0 带 Thunderbolt 4 HDMI, SD card reader HDMI、SD读卡器 |
3x USB-C 4.0 w/ Thunderbolt 4 3 个 USB-C 4.0 带 Thunderbolt 4 HDMI, SD card reader HDMI、SD读卡器 |
Price 价格 | from $2499 2499 美元起 | from $3499 3499 美元起 | from $3999 3999 美元起 |
Our review unit is the MacBook Pro 16 with the faster of the two M3 Max chips, which features 16 CPU cores and 40 CPU cores. The base price with 48 GB RAM as well as a 1 TB SSD is $3999, but our review unit is equipped with all options including 128 GB RAM as well as a massive 8 TB SSD, which increases the price to $7199.
我们的评测单位是 MacBook Pro 16,配备两个 M3 Max 芯片中速度更快的一个,具有 16 个 CPU 核心和 40 个 CPU 核心。配备 48 GB RAM 和 1 TB SSD 的基本价格为 3999 美元,但我们的评测设备配备了所有选项,包括 128 GB RAM 和大容量 8 TB SSD,这使得价格达到 7199 美元。
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max( MacBook Pro 16 2023 系列)
Apple M3 Max 16 核16 x 2.7 - 4.1 GHz,56 W PL1/持续
, LPDDR5-6400, 双通道, 板载
16.00 英寸 16:10、3456 x 2234 像素 257 PPI、Mini-LED、光泽:是、HDR、120 Hz
苹果 SSD AP8192Z,8192 GB
2.147 千克(= 75.73 盎司/4.73 磅),电源:347 克(= 12.24 盎司/0.77 磅)
注意:制造商可能使用来自不同供应商的组件,包括具有相似规格的显示面板、驱动器或记忆棒。
Potential Rivals 潜在竞争对手
Rating 等级 | Date 日期 | Model | Weight 重量 | Height 高度 | Size 尺寸 | Resolution 解决 | Price 价格 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
93.2 % v7 (old) v7 (旧) | 11 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU Apple M3 Max 16 核、M3 Max 40 核 GPU | 2.1 kg 2.1公斤 | 16.9 mm 16.9毫米 | 16.00" | 3456x2234 | |
93.7 % v7 (old) v7 (旧) | 03 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU M2 Max、M2 Max 38 核 GPU | 2.2 kg 2.2公斤 | 16.8 mm 16.8毫米 | 16.20" | 3456x2234 | from EUR 5069 5069 欧元起 |
91.2 % v7 (old) v7 (旧) | 02 / 2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Razer Blade 16 2023 年初 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU i9-13950HX,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 GPU | 2.4 kg 2.4公斤 | 21.99 mm 21.99毫米 | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | from EUR 3600 3600 欧元起 |
88.4 % v7 (old) v7 (旧) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU i7-13705H,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 GPU | 2.2 kg 2.2公斤 | 18.2 mm 18.2毫米 | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
86.1 % v7 (old) v7 (旧) | 06 / 2023 | Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU i9-13980HX,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU | 2.4 kg 2.4公斤 | 23.9 mm 23.9毫米 | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | from EUR 4000 4000 欧元起 |
87.9 % v7 (old) v7 (旧) | 10 / 2023 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 中) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU i9-13900H,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU | 2.6 kg 2.6公斤 | 19.9 mm 19.9毫米 | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
Case - MacBook Pro 16 in Space Black
保护壳 - 深空黑色 MacBook Pro 16
Apple keeps the familiar chassis we know from the two previous models, but the colors have changed. You can still get the MacBook in Silver, but instead of Space Gray, the second color is now Space Black. The laptop looks very good in black, and the color appears brighter or darker depending on the ambient lighting, but there is always a visible difference to the black keyboard, which is noticeably darker. The smaller MacBook Air in the color Midnight was a pure fingerprint magnet and you had to clean it all the time, but the new black model is better in this regard, but you will still see fingerprints faster compared to the silver model. Apple uses a chemical process, which is part of the anodizing and not a coating.
苹果保留了我们熟悉的前两款型号的底盘,但颜色发生了变化。您仍然可以获得银色的 MacBook,但第二种颜色现在是深空黑,而不是深空灰。笔记本电脑的黑色看起来非常好,根据环境光线,颜色显得更亮或更暗,但黑色键盘总是有明显的差异,明显更暗。较小的午夜色MacBook Air是纯粹的指纹磁铁,你必须一直清洁它,但新的黑色型号在这方面更好,但与银色型号相比,你仍然会更快地看到指纹。 Apple 使用化学工艺,这是阳极氧化的一部分,而不是涂层。
The quality of the chassis is still excellent and the aluminum chassis just feels premium and very stable. The display hinges also leave a good impression, only the maximum opening angle (135 degrees) could be larger. The hard front edge of the base unit can be an issue and cut into the wrist when you use the keyboard for longer periods. Like on the smaller MacBook Pro 14, the base unit is not tapered at any side, but due to the larger footprint, the larger MBP 16 does not feel as bulky.
底盘的质量仍然非常出色,铝制底盘给人一种优质且非常稳定的感觉。显示屏转轴也给人留下了不错的印象,只是最大开启角度(135度)可以再大一些。当您长时间使用键盘时,底座单元的坚硬前缘可能会成为一个问题,并且会割伤手腕。与较小的MacBook Pro 14一样,底座单元在任何一侧都不是锥形的,但由于占地面积较大,较大的 MBP 16 感觉不那么笨重。
The MBP 16 M3 Max is the lightest device within our comparison group at 2.147 kg and also one of the most compact devices. If you are traveling frequently, however, you should take a look at the smaller MacBook Pro 14, which is noticeably more compact and also half a kilogram lighter. The 140W power adapter including the black MagSafe cable (2 meters) only tips the scale at 347 grams.
MBP 16 M3 Max 是我们比较组中最轻的设备,重 2.147 千克,也是最紧凑的设备之一。不过,如果您经常旅行,您应该考虑一下较小的MacBook Pro 14 ,它明显更紧凑,而且还轻了半公斤。 140W 电源适配器,包括黑色 MagSafe 电缆(2 米),重量仅为 347 克。
Connectivity - MBP 16 with Thunderbolt 4
连接性 - MBP 16 带 Thunderbolt 4
The port situation did not change compared to the previous model and you still get three USB-C ports including Thunderbolt 4 as well as a modern HDMI 2.1 output. The MBP 16 with the M3 Max can drive up to four external displays simultaneously (3x 6K @60 Hz via Thunderbolt and 1x 4K @ 144 Hz via HDMI) and the maximum resolution via HDMI is 8K @60 Hz or 4K @240 Hz. In addition to the MagSafe connector, you can also charge the large MBP via USB-C and it works with a 65W power adapter (you obviously cannot use the full performance in this case).
与之前的型号相比,端口情况没有变化,您仍然可以获得三个 USB-C 端口,包括 Thunderbolt 4 以及现代 HDMI 2.1 输出。配备 M3 Max 的 MBP 16 最多可同时驱动四个外部显示器(通过 Thunderbolt 驱动 3x 6K @60 Hz,通过 HDMI 驱动 1x 4K @ 144 Hz),通过 HDMI 的最大分辨率为 8K @60 Hz 或 4K @240 Hz。除了 MagSafe 连接器之外,您还可以通过 USB-C 为大型 MBP 充电,并且它与 65W 电源适配器配合使用(在这种情况下显然无法发挥全部性能)。
SD Card Reader SD卡读卡器
The SDXC card reader on the right side is still very fast, and we determined up to 226 MB/s with our reference card (Angelbird AV Pro V60) and still 163 MB/s when we copied image files from the card, which is a good result as well. Inserted cards protrude by around 1.5 cm.
右侧的 SDXC 读卡器仍然非常快,我们使用参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)确定高达 226 MB/s,当我们从卡复制图像文件时仍然为 163 MB/s,这是一个也有好的结果。插入的卡片突出约 1.5 厘米。
Communication 沟通
Apple still uses last year’s Wi-Fi 6E module including Bluetooth 5.3 and the overall performance is very good with stable transfer rates in combination with our reference router from Asus. We did not experience any problems with large downloads or bad reception during our review period. Apple does not offer Wi-Fi 7 modules yet.
苹果仍然使用去年的Wi-Fi 6E模块,包括蓝牙5.3,与我们的华硕参考路由器结合使用,整体性能非常好,传输速率稳定。在我们的审查期间,我们没有遇到任何大下载或接收不良的问题。 Apple 尚未提供 Wi-Fi 7 模块。
Networking 联网 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 iperf3传输AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 iperf3接收AXE11000 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz iperf3 传输 AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz iperf3 接收 AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Razer Blade 16 2023 年初 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 iperf3传输AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 iperf3接收AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz iperf3 传输 AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz iperf3 接收 AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 iperf3传输AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 iperf3接收AXE11000 | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 iperf3传输AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 iperf3接收AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W 华硕 Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 iperf3传输AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 iperf3接收AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz iperf3 传输 AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz iperf3 接收 AXE11000 6GHz | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 中) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 iperf3传输AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 iperf3接收AXE11000 | |
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; iperf3传输AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1684-1758)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; iperf3接收AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1752 (1702-1776)
Webcam 摄像头
The image quality of the 1080p webcam is still good but not comparable to front cameras on iPads. Face ID or Center Stage are still not available, either.
1080p 网络摄像头的图像质量仍然不错,但无法与 iPad 上的前置摄像头相媲美。 Face ID 或 Center Stage 仍然不可用。
Maintenance 维护
The bottom panel is secured by Pentalobe screws (P5) as well as small metal hooks at the back, which means you have to push the cover towards the front once you removed all the screws. There are also two clamps in the middle of the sides that require some force (we recommend a suction cup). There is not much to do once you are inside, only the fan can be cleaned by the user. All other components are soldered and you cannot upgrade any components.
底部面板由五角螺钉 (P5) 以及背面的小金属挂钩固定,这意味着在卸下所有螺钉后,您必须将盖子向前推。侧面中间还有两个需要一定力量的夹子(我们建议使用吸盘)。进入内部后无需做太多事情,用户只需清洁风扇即可。所有其他组件均已焊接,您无法升级任何组件。
Warranty 保修单
The base warranty for the MacBook Pro is one year. You can purchase a warranty extension (Apple Care+) for three years, which costs $399. This also includes costs for accidental damage (each subject to a service fee of $99 for screen damage or external enclosure damage, or $299 for other accidental damage). It is also possible to pay $149.99 per year for AppleCare+.
MacBook Pro 的基本保修期为一年。您可以购买三年保修延期 (Apple Care+),费用为 399 美元。这还包括意外损坏的费用(屏幕损坏或外壳损坏每项收取 99 美元的服务费,其他意外损坏收取 299 美元的服务费)。还可以每年支付 149.99 美元购买 AppleCare+。
Input Devices - Perfect Trackpad
输入设备 - 完美触控板
The input devices are unchanged and the black keyboard still offers a comfortable and precise typing experience despite the comparatively shallow travel. There is still room for improvement compared to the best business laptops, but it is no problem to type for longer periods. The keystrokes could also be a bit quieter, and the arrow keys are very small. The MacBook is still superior to Windows laptops in terms of keyboard illumination, even after all these years. The brightness can be adjusted very precisely, and both the automatic activation as well as intensity based on the ambient lighting work perfectly. Apple does not integrate a dedicated numeric keypad but uses the space next to the keyboard for the speakers instead.
输入设备没有变化,黑色键盘尽管行程相对较浅,但仍然提供舒适、精确的打字体验。与最好的商务笔记本电脑相比仍有改进的空间,但长时间打字是没有问题的。击键也可以更安静一些,并且方向键非常小。即使过了这么多年,MacBook 在键盘照明方面仍然优于 Windows 笔记本电脑。亮度可以非常精确地调节,并且自动激活以及基于环境照明的强度都可以完美地工作。苹果没有集成专用的数字键盘,而是使用键盘旁边的空间作为扬声器。
The trackpad has been the benchmark for years and the implementation with macOS is just excellent. The clicking experience is also completely identical anywhere you touch since there are no moving parts. macOS also offers plenty of customization.
触控板多年来一直是基准,并且在 macOS 上的实现非常出色。由于没有移动部件,您触摸的任何地方的点击体验也完全相同。 macOS 还提供了大量的自定义功能。
Display - Mini-LED now with higher SDR brightness
显示 - Mini-LED 现在具有更高的 SDR 亮度
The basic specs of the Mini-LED panel inside the MacBook Pro 16 did not change. The camera notch in the middle still does not look very good but does not take any space from the 16:10 panel. The vertical area next to the notch (which is used for menu elements) has been added on top, which results in a resolution of 3456 x 2234 pixels. This means you have slightly more room compared to a regular 16:10 panel. The subjective picture quality is still excellent and benefits from the high refresh rate (120 Hz), which is dynamically applied by the system if necessary. Black contents are also pure black (like OLED screens), which creates an extremely high contrast ratio. The only drawback is clouding when bright objects appear on dark backgrounds. This is mainly noticeable when logos are shown, and you can obviously provoke this issue, but is usually not noticeable in practice. Both the brightness as well as the color temperature (True Tone) can automatically be adjusted based on the ambient lighting, which works flawlessly. There are no scaling issues in macOS, either.
MacBook Pro 16 内部 Mini-LED 面板的基本规格没有变化。中间的摄像头缺口看起来仍然不太好,但并没有占用 16:10 面板的任何空间。凹口旁边的垂直区域(用于菜单元素)已添加到顶部,这导致分辨率为 3456 x 2234 像素。这意味着与常规 16:10 面板相比,您有更多的空间。主观图像质量仍然非常出色,并且受益于高刷新率(120 Hz),系统会在必要时动态应用该刷新率。黑色内容也是纯黑色(如OLED屏幕),这创造了极高的对比度。唯一的缺点是当明亮的物体出现在黑暗的背景上时会出现浑浊。这主要在显示徽标时很明显,并且您显然可以引发此问题,但在实践中通常不明显。亮度和色温(原彩)都可以根据环境光线自动调节,效果完美。 macOS 中也不存在缩放问题。
Apple increased the maximum SDR brightness from 500 to 600 nits and we can even measure up to 630 nits in the center of our review unit (604 nits on average) and the contrast ratio is extremely high thanks to the low black value. The maximum HDR brightness is 1625 nits for small portions of the screen and up to 1241 nits when for a completely white image in full-screen mode. The Mini-LED panel of the Windows rival Yoga Pro 9i 16 cannot keep up with up to 1100 nits in HDR mode. Apple also still has the edge over its Windows rivals when it comes to the handling of HDR content because the display just increases the brightness when corresponding contents are shown and you do not have to do anything.
Apple 将最大 SDR 亮度从 500 尼特提高到 600 尼特,我们甚至可以在我们的评测设备的中心测量到高达 630 尼特(平均 604 尼特),并且由于黑色值较低,对比度非常高。屏幕小部分的最大 HDR 亮度为 1625 尼特,全屏模式下的全白图像最高 HDR 亮度为 1241 尼特。 Windows 竞争对手Yoga Pro 9i 16的 Mini-LED 面板在 HDR 模式下无法跟上高达 1100 尼特的亮度。在处理 HDR 内容方面,苹果仍然比其 Windows 竞争对手具有优势,因为显示器只是在显示相应内容时增加亮度,而您无需执行任何操作。
|
亮度分布
使用 X-Rite i1Pro 2 进行测试
最大值:630 cd/m²(尼特) 平均:603.9 cd/m² 最小值:2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
亮度分布:94%
Center on Battery: 630 cd/m²
电池中心:630 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
对比度: ∞:1(黑色:0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE 颜色 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
ΔE 灰度 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% 显示 P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29 伽玛:2.29
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16" 迷你 LED,3456x2234,16 英寸 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" 迷你 LED,3456x2234,16.2 英寸 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Razer Blade 16 2023 年初 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" 华星光电 T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16" LEN160-3.2K,迷你 LED,3200x2000,16 英寸 | Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" ATNA60BX01-1,OLED,3200x2000,16 英寸 | Asus Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W 华硕 Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" ATNA60BX01-1,OLED,3200x2000,16 英寸 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 中) BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" 京东方 CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display 展示 | 0% | -1% | -2% | 0% | 1% | -30% | |
Display P3 Coverage 显示 P3 覆盖范围 | 99.2 | 99 0% | 98.5 -1% | 97 -2% | 99.6 0% | 99.93 1% | 69.4 -30% |
sRGB Coverage sRGB 覆盖范围 | 100 | 100 | 99.8 | 100 | 100 | 98.2 | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage AdobeRGB 1998 报道 | 88.5 | 89.7 | 95.1 | 89.4 | 97.48 | 70.1 | |
Response Times 响应时间 | -9% | 81% | 32% | 33% | 32% | 82% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * 响应时间 灰色 50% / 灰色 80% * | 66.9 ? | 80.5 ? -20% | 6.6 ? 90% | 14 ? 79% | 0.59 ? 99% | 1.4 ? 98% | 12.2 ? 82% |
Response Time Black / White * 响应时间 黑/白 * | 43.6 ? | 47.2 ? -8% | 12 ? 72% | 9.2 ? 79% | 0.79 ? 98% | 2 ? 95% | 7.7 ? 82% |
PWM Frequency 脉宽调制频率 | 14877 | 14880 ? 0% | 5800 ? -61% | 240 ? -98% | 250 ? -98% | ||
Screen 屏幕 | -16% | -74% | -5% | -37% | -49% | -66% | |
Brightness middle 亮度中 | 630 | 504 -20% | 456.8 -27% | 539 -14% | 349 -45% | 331.8 -47% | 349 -45% |
Brightness 亮度 | 604 | 487 -19% | 437 -28% | 546 -10% | 350 -42% | 334 -45% | 348 -42% |
Brightness Distribution 亮度分布 | 94 | 94 0% | 83 -12% | 96 2% | 95 1% | 98 4% | 93 -1% |
Black Level * 黑电平 * | 0.001 | 0.35 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.32 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * 颜色检查器 dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.5 -25% | 3.7 -208% | 1.4 -17% | 2.1 -75% | 1.58 -32% | 1.98 -65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * Colorchecker dE 2000 最大* | 2.8 | 3.3 -18% | 6.42 -129% | 2.1 25% | 5.5 -96% | 4.23 -51% | 7.56 -170% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * 灰度 dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.1 -11% | 2.6 -37% | 2.2 -16% | 1.2 37% | 4.25 -124% | 3.3 -74% |
Gamma 伽玛 | 2.29 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.206 100% | 2.137 103% |
CCT | 6812 95% | 6882 94% | 6108 106% | 6479 100% | 6545 99% | 6249 104% | 6672 97% |
Contrast 对比 | 504000 | 1305 | 2994 | 17450 | 4740 | 1091 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * Colorchecker dE 2000 校准 * | 0.66 | 2.1 | 6.66 | 1.45 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) 总平均值(程序/设置) | -8% /
-12% | 2% /
-31% | 8% /
7% | -1% /
-12% | -5% /
-20% | -5% /
-29% |
* ... smaller is better
* ...越小越好
We analyzed the panel with the professional CalMAN software (X-Rite i1 Pro 2) and the factory calibration is already very good. Neither the colors nor the grayscale show a DeltaE-2000 deviation higher than 3 compared to the P3 reference color space. There is no color cast, either, only the color temperature is a bit too cool. We were not able to improve the image quality with our own calibration, so we do not offer a corresponding profile to download at this point. The panel covers 99.2 percent of the P3 reference.
我们使用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对面板进行了分析,工厂校准已经非常好。与 P3 参考色彩空间相比,颜色和灰度的 DeltaE-2000 偏差均不高于 3。也没有偏色,只是色温有点太冷了。我们无法通过自己的校准来提高图像质量,因此目前我们不提供相应的配置文件可供下载。该面板覆盖了 P3 参考的 99.2%。
Display Response Times 显示响应时间
显示响应时间显示屏幕从一种颜色变为另一种颜色的速度。响应时间过慢可能会导致残像,并导致移动的物体显得模糊(重影)。快节奏 3D 游戏的玩家应特别注意快速响应时间。
↔ Response Time Black to White ↔ 黑白响应时间 | ||
---|---|---|
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined 43.6 ms ... 上升 ↗ 和下降 ↘ 组合 | ↗ 13.6 ms rise ↗ 13.6 毫秒上升 | |
↘ 30 ms fall ↘ 30 毫秒下降 | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. 在我们的测试中,屏幕的响应速度很慢,对于游戏玩家来说并不令人满意。 In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. 相比之下,所有测试设备的时间范围为 0.1(最小)到 240(最大)毫秒。 » 98% 的设备都更好。 This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). 这意味着测量的响应时间比所有测试设备的平均值 (21 毫秒) 更差。 | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey ↔ 响应时间 50% 灰度至 80% 灰度 | ||
66.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined 66.9 ms ... 上升 ↗ 和下降 ↘ 组合 | ↗ 29.4 ms rise ↗ 29.4 毫秒上升 | |
↘ 37.5 ms fall ↘ 37.5 毫秒下降 | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. 在我们的测试中,屏幕的响应速度很慢,对于游戏玩家来说并不令人满意。 In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. 相比之下,所有测试设备的时间范围为 0.165(最小)到 636(最大)毫秒。 » 98% 的设备都更好。 This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). 这意味着测量的响应时间比所有测试设备的平均值 (32.9 ms) 更差。 |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
屏幕闪烁/PWM(脉冲宽度调制)
为了调暗屏幕,一些笔记本电脑会简单地快速连续地循环打开和关闭背光 - 这种方法称为脉冲宽度调制 (PWM)。理想情况下,该循环频率应该是人眼无法察觉的。如果所述频率太低,眼睛敏感的用户可能会感到疲劳或头痛,甚至完全注意到闪烁。
Screen flickering / PWM detected 屏幕闪烁/检测到 PWM | 14877 Hz 14877赫兹 | ||
The display backlight flickers at 14877 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 14877 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Like on the previous model, we can once again measure a constant flickering at 15 kHz on the new MacBook Pro 16, but there should not be any problems due to the high frequency. The constant flickering makes it harder to determine accurate response times and we determine rather slow values for the IPS panel with Mini-LED backlighting. You can see some ghosting with special tests, but it is usually not visible in everyday use and the increased frequency of 120 Hz definitely helps.
与之前的型号一样,我们可以在新款 MacBook Pro 16 上再次测量到 15 kHz 的持续闪烁,但由于频率较高,应该不会出现任何问题。持续闪烁使得确定准确的响应时间变得更加困难,我们为采用 Mini-LED 背光的 IPS 面板确定了相当慢的值。通过特殊测试,您可以看到一些重影,但在日常使用中通常不可见,并且 120 Hz 的增加频率肯定会有所帮助。
The MacBook Pro 16 uses a glossy screen, but it is not as reflective as many other glossy panels. The high values for the brightness as well as the contrast ratio obviously help as well. Our sample images show that you can even use the MacBook outdoors on sunny days as long as you avoid direct sunlight. There are no limitations in terms of the viewing angle stability.
MacBook Pro 16 采用镜面屏幕,但它不像许多其他镜面面板那样反光。高亮度值和对比度显然也有帮助。我们的示例图像显示,只要避免阳光直射,您甚至可以在阳光明媚的日子在户外使用 MacBook。视角稳定性方面没有限制。
Performance - M3 Max now with more CPU cores
性能 - M3 Max 现在拥有更多 CPU 核心
We already mentioned that the new M3 Max SoCs are equipped with additional CPU cores compared to the M3 Pro models for the first time. While the M3 Pro offers up to six performance and six efficiency cores, the M3 Max throws out two efficiency cores and offers more performance cores instead. The base M3 Max has 10 performance cores and the optional high-end version even has 12 performance cores.
我们已经提到,与 M3 Pro 型号相比,新的 M3 Max SoC 首次配备了额外的 CPU 内核。 M3 Pro 提供多达 6 个性能核心和 6 个效率核心,而 M3 Max 则放弃了两个效率核心,并提供更多性能核心。基础版 M3 Max 有 10 个性能核心,可选的高端版本甚至有 12 个性能核心。
Review Settings 查看设置
The MacBook Pro 16 with the M3 Max offers three energy settings on mains and battery power: Low Power, Automatic, High Power. The profile Low Power limits the chip consumption to 24 Watts, but we did not notice a performance difference between the other two modes, but the fans were much louder in the High Power mode. We performed the following benchmarks and measurements with the default Automatic mode.
配备 M3 Max 的 MacBook Pro 16 提供三种电源和电池电量设置:低功率、自动、高功率。低功耗配置文件将芯片功耗限制为 24 瓦,但我们没有注意到其他两种模式之间的性能差异,但高功率模式下风扇的声音要大得多。我们使用默认的自动模式执行了以下基准测试和测量。
Processor - M3 Max with 12 Performance cores
处理器 - M3 Max,具有 12 个性能核心
The M3 Max is manufactured in an advanced 3 nm process and the high-end model features four additional performance cores (total of 12) over the M2 Max. In addition to the four efficiency cores, the CPU can execute up to 16 threads simultaneously. The higher number of cores also results in a significant increase in power consumption because the M2 Max consumed up to 36 Watts in CPU benchmarks, and the new M3 Max consumes up to 56 Watts.
M3 Max 采用先进的 3 nm 工艺制造,高端型号比M2 Max多了四个性能核心(总共 12 个)。除了四个效率核心之外,CPU 还可以同时执行多达 16 个线程。核心数量增多也会导致功耗显着增加,因为在 CPU 基准测试中 M2 Max 的功耗高达 36 瓦,而新的 M3 Max 的功耗高达 56 瓦。
The performance cores can reach up to 4.056 GHz and around 3.6 GHz when you use all cores simultaneously. The four efficiency cores reach up to 2.567 MHz (2.418 GHz under full load) and are slower than the efficiency cores of the base M3 SoC. The performance is significantly better compared to the old M2 Max, and we see an advantage of 63 % in the Cinebench R23 Multi test. This means Apple overtakes Intel's regular H45 CPUs as well as the HS CPUs from AMD (Zen4) - only AMD's HX-CPUs as well as Intel's Core i9 HX-CPUs have an advantage. The Core i7-13700HX, on the other hand, is slower. The Geekbench Multi tests even put Apple's new high-end chip ahead of all rivals.
当同时使用所有内核时,性能内核最高可达 4.056 GHz,大约 3.6 GHz。四个效率核心的频率高达 2.567 MHz(满负载时为 2.418 GHz),并且比基础M3 SoC的效率核心慢。与旧版 M2 Max 相比,性能明显更好,我们在 Cinebench R23 Multi 测试中看到了 63% 的优势。这意味着苹果超越了英特尔的常规 H45 CPU 以及 AMD (Zen4) 的 HS CPU——只有 AMD 的 HX-CPU 和英特尔的 Core i9 HX-CPU 具有优势。另一方面, Core i7-13700HX速度较慢。 Geekbench Multi 测试甚至让苹果的新款高端芯片领先于所有竞争对手。
Cinebench R23:多核|单核
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench 2024: CPU 多核| CPU 单核
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5:多核|单核
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 6.3:多核|单核
Cinebench R23:多核|单核
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench 2024: CPU 多核| CPU 单核
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5:多核|单核
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 6.3:多核|单核
The single-core performance is also around 20 % better compared to the M2 Max and Apple can keep up with Intel's H45 CPUs. The HX models still have an advantage thanks to their extremely high turbo clocks, but they still require much more power.
与 M2 Max 相比,单核性能也提高了 20% 左右,苹果可以跟上英特尔的 H45 CPU。由于其极高的涡轮时钟,HX 型号仍然具有优势,但它们仍然需要更多的功率。
During our analysis of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, we checked the multi-core performance of the current HX processor from AMD and Intel at lower TDP levels, and the results once again show the impressive performance of the M3 Max. At 55 Watts, only the Ryzen 9 7945HX offers slightly more multi-core performance but uses 32 threads. Intel's HX CPUs do not stand a chance though, including the top model Core i9-13980HX (a 55-Watt processor in theory, but up to 157 Watts).
在我们对AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX的分析过程中,我们检查了AMD和Intel当前HX处理器在较低TDP水平下的多核性能,结果再次显示了M3 Max令人印象深刻的性能。在 55 瓦时,只有Ryzen 9 7945HX提供稍高的多核性能,但使用 32 个线程。不过,英特尔的 HX CPU 没有机会,包括顶级型号Core i9-13980HX (理论上是 55 瓦处理器,但最高可达 157 瓦)。
Power Limit 功率限制 | Core i9-13900HX 酷睿 i9-13900HX | Core i9-13950HX 酷睿 i9-13950HX | Core i9-13980HX 酷睿 i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX 锐龙 9 7945HX | Apple M3 Max 16-core CPU Apple M3 Max 16 核 CPU |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
170 Watts 170瓦 | 31,958 | 31,903 | |||
150 Watts 150瓦 | 30,655 | 30,623 | |||
130 Watts 130瓦 | 28,239 | 29,141 | 29,281 | 34,202 | |
115 Watts 115瓦 | 27,369 | 28,199 | 28,073 | 33,361 | |
100 Watts 100瓦 | 25,942 | 26,653 | 26,507 | 32,947 | |
80 Watts 80瓦 | 23,216 | 23,950 | 23,766 | 30,907 | |
55 Watts 55瓦 | 18,843 | 19,772 | 19,478 | 26,045 | 24,024 |
As per usual, the processor performance is not reduced on battery power until the battery level drops to 3 %. More CPU benchmarks are listed in our tech section and we also recommend our analysis article of the M3 Pro/M3 Max for more information about the efficiency, which will be published soon.
与往常一样,在电池电量降至 3% 之前,处理器性能不会因电池电量而降低。我们的技术部分列出了更多 CPU 基准测试,我们还推荐我们的 M3 Pro/M3 Max 分析文章,以获取有关效率的更多信息,该文章即将发布。
We also performed our Cinebench R15 Multi loop, but you have to keep in mind that this benchmark is emulated, which affects the performance. The performance is still very good and the loop clearly shows that the CPU performance is rock steady even under sustained workloads.
我们还执行了 Cinebench R15 Multi 循环,但您必须记住,该基准测试是模拟的,这会影响性能。性能仍然非常好,循环清楚地表明,即使在持续的工作负载下,CPU 性能也保持稳定。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop Cinebench R15 多循环
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16 核: Ø3354 (3260.25-3391.27)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max苹果 M2 Max: Ø2074 (2068.47-2081.27)
Razer Blade 16 2023 年初英特尔酷睿 i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8英特尔酷睿 i7-13705H: Ø2816 (2725.35-2987.08)
华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604英特尔酷睿 i9-13980HX: Ø4477 (4374.45-4604.05)
华硕 Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W英特尔酷睿 i9-13905H: Ø2785 (2594.71-2930.83)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 年中)英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H: Ø2574 (2525.07-2739.09)
System Performance 系统性能
All MacBooks with Apple’s own silicon are very responsive and fast systems and native apps, in particular, run very smoothly, even complex applications like Adobe Photoshop or DaVinci Resolve. The MacBook can also emulate Intel apps via Rosetta 2, which also works very well, but the performance usually takes a hit, especially in complex apps. We included the Pugetbench benchmark scores for Adobe Photoshop as well as Premiere Pro, but keep in mind that these tests use the emulated Intel versions of the apps. The native versions for Apple silicon are noticeably smoother.
所有配备 Apple 自家芯片的 MacBook 都具有非常灵敏且快速的系统和本机应用程序,尤其是运行非常流畅,甚至是 Adobe Photoshop 或 DaVinci Resolve 等复杂的应用程序。 MacBook 还可以通过 Rosetta 2 模拟英特尔应用程序,这也运行得很好,但性能通常会受到影响,尤其是在复杂的应用程序中。我们纳入了 Adobe Photoshop 和 Premiere Pro 的 Pugetbench 基准测试分数,但请记住,这些测试使用模拟的英特尔版本的应用程序。 Apple Silicon 的原生版本明显更加流畅。
CrossMark:总体|生产力|创意|反应能力
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Blackmagic RAW 速度测试: 12:1 8K 金属| 12:1 8K CPU
Photoshop PugetBench: Filter Score | General Score | GPU Score | Overall Score
Photoshop PugetBench:滤镜得分|总分| GPU 分数|总分
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Overall Score 0.98 | LongGOP 0.98 | Intraframe 0.98 | RAW 0.98 | GPU Effects 0.98
Premiere Pro PugetBench:总分 0.98 |长GOP 0.98 |帧内 0.98 |原始 0.98 | GPU 效果 0.98
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Jetstream 2:总分
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 3:总体
CrossMark / Overall 十字标记/整体 | |
Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max | |
Average Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU 平均Apple M3 Max 16 核、Apple M3 Max 40 核 GPU (2032 - 2051, n=2) ( 2032 - 2051,n=2 ) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W 华硕 Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 中) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 | |
Average of class Multimedia 多媒体班级平均分 (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) ( 978 - 2184, n=87, 过去 2 年) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Razer Blade 16 2023 年初 |
Storage Devices 存储设备
Our review unit of the MacBook Pro 16 is equipped with the highest SSD capacity you get: 8 TB. You can also clearly see all eight memory chips in the maintenance section above. The MacBook is one of the few devices that can be equipped with that much storage in the first place, but Apple charges a premium for that. You have to pay $2200 for the upgrade from 1 TB to 8 TB. For comparison: The 4 TB version of the Samsung 990 Pro (M.2-2280) costs $280. The performance of the Apple SSD (AP8192Z), however, is excellent with transfer rates of up to 8 GB/s. More SSD benchmarks are listed here.
我们评测的 MacBook Pro 16 配备了目前最高的 SSD 容量:8 TB。您还可以在上面的维护部分清楚地看到所有八个内存芯片。 MacBook 是少数能够配备如此大存储空间的设备之一,但苹果为此收取了溢价。从 1 TB 升级到 8 TB 需要支付 2200 美元。作为比较:三星 990 Pro (M.2-2280) 的 4 TB 版本售价 280 美元。然而,Apple SSD (AP8192Z) 的性能非常出色,传输速率高达 8 GB/s。此处列出了更多 SSD 基准测试。
GPU Performance GPU性能
The high-end M3 Max chip is equipped with a 40-core GPU, which means there are two additional cores compared to the previous 38-core unit. We also suspect the core clock is higher. The performance is between 13-25 % higher depending on the test, but the maximum power consumption dropped from 64 to 60 Watts. The big advantage of the GPU is still the shared memory, especially during video editing. We edit our review videos for YouTube with DaVinci Resolve and occasionally run into the 16 GB VRAM limit on the RTX 4090 during editing.
高端M3 Max芯片配备了40核GPU,这意味着与之前的38核单元相比,多了两个核心。我们还怀疑核心时钟更高。根据测试,性能提高了 13-25%,但最大功耗从 64 瓦下降到 60 瓦。 GPU 的一大优势仍然是共享内存,尤其是在视频编辑过程中。我们使用 DaVinci Resolve 编辑 YouTube 评论视频,在编辑过程中偶尔会遇到 RTX 4090 的 16 GB VRAM 限制。
Compared to current laptop GPUs from Nvidia, the M3 Max GPU can clearly beat the RTX 4070 Laptop in the cross-platform 3DMark Wildlife Unlimited test and is only 9 % behind the GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop at 125 Watts and 23 % the 4090 Laptop at 175 Watts, respectively. The GFXBench test shows a deficit of 4 % for the M3 Max compared to the RTX 4080 Laptop at 175 Watts. The OpenCL performance is worse and the faster RTX GPUs are clearly ahead, but the RTX 4070 Laptop at comparable 60 Watts TGP (Galaxy Book3 16 Ultra) is 11 % slower in Geekbench.
与 Nvidia 目前的笔记本电脑 GPU 相比,M3 Max GPU 在跨平台 3DMark Wildlife Unlimited 测试中明显击败了 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑,仅比GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑(125 瓦)低 9%,比 4090 笔记本电脑(175 瓦)低 23%分别为瓦特。 GFXBench 测试显示,与RTX 4080 笔记本电脑相比,M3 Max 在 175 瓦时的功率下降了 4%。 OpenCL 性能较差,更快的 RTX GPU 明显领先,但在 Geekbench 中,具有可比 60 瓦 TGP 的RTX 4070 笔记本电脑( Galaxy Book3 16 Ultra )慢了 11%。
The GPU performance is completely stable during longer workloads as well as on battery power, which is not the case for the powerful GeForce GPUs. More GPU benchmarks are listed in our tech section.
GPU 性能在较长的工作负载以及电池电量下完全稳定,而强大的 GeForce GPU 则不然。我们的技术部分列出了更多 GPU 基准测试。
3DMark | GFX 基准测试|极客跑分 5.5 |极客跑分 6.3 |混合器
* ... smaller is better
* ...越小越好
Gaming Performance 游戏性能
Gaming on the Mac is getting more interesting, and the new macOS 14 (Sonoma) also offers a Game mode when you play in full-screen mode. In addition to emulated titles (like Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and Total War: Three Kingdoms), you can also use CrossOver to play Windows games. Depending on the title, this works well (like GTA V, Far Cry 5), but sometimes you have to experiment a bit, and we do not always see the expected differences compared to the base M3-SoC. Sometimes the emulation cannot utilize the full performance of the hardware, and GTA V, for example, shows almost no GPU load while the main load is taken by the CPU.
Mac 上的游戏变得越来越有趣,新的 macOS 14 (Sonoma) 还提供了全屏模式下的游戏模式。除了模拟游戏(例如《古墓丽影:暗影》和《全面战争:三国》)之外,您还可以使用 CrossOver 玩 Windows 游戏。根据游戏的不同,这种方法效果很好(如 GTA V、Far Cry 5),但有时您必须进行一些试验,而且与基础M3-SoC相比,我们并不总是看到预期的差异。有时,仿真无法充分利用硬件的性能,例如,GTA V 几乎没有 GPU 负载,而主要负载由 CPU 承担。
Native games for Apple’s silicon obviously work much better, and this includes titles like Resident Evil Village or No Man’s Sky. The performance of the new Apple M3 Max is really impressive and both titles run completely smoothly (+100 fps) in QHD and maximum settings, which is also visible in the following video with gaming benchmarks.
苹果芯片上的原生游戏显然运行得更好,其中包括《生化危机村庄》或《无人深空》等游戏。新款 Apple M3 Max 的性能确实令人印象深刻,两款游戏在 QHD 和最大设置下都运行完全流畅(+100 fps),这在下面的游戏基准视频中也可见一斑。
巫师 3 |侠盗猎车手 V |古墓丽影之影|全面战争:三个王国|赛博朋克 2077 2.1 幻影自由|星球大战绝地幸存者
low 低的 | med. 和。 | high 高的 | ultra 极端主义者 | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) 侠盗猎车手 V (2015) |
77 | 53 | 51 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) 巫师 3 (2015) |
87 | 69 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) 孤岛惊魂 5 (2018) |
56 | 54 | 50 | 49 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 古墓丽影:暗影(2018) |
150 | 143 | 122 | 88 | |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 全面战争:三个王国(2019) |
170 | 113 | 84 | 58 | |
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) 星球大战绝地幸存者(2023) |
51 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 赛博朋克 2077 2.1 幻影自由(2023) |
45 | 44 | 43.7 | 42.8 | 37.4 |
Total War Pharaoh (2023) 法老全面战争(2023) |
212 | 139 | 121 | 82 |
Emissions - MBP with excellent speakers
排放 - MBP 具有出色的扬声器
System Noise 系统噪音
The cooling solution still uses two large fans with different speeds. One fan runs with 1350-5349 rpm and the other one with 1458-5777 rpm. The MacBook Pro is usually completely silent in everyday situations and it is not audible even when you edit/export small video projects (like the 1080p video with the gaming benchmarks above).
散热方案依然采用两个不同转速的大风扇。一台风扇的运行速度为 1350-5349 rpm,另一台风扇的运行速度为 1458-5777 rpm。 MacBook Pro 在日常情况下通常是完全静音的,即使您编辑/导出小型视频项目(例如具有上述游戏基准的 1080p 视频),也听不到声音。
The fan speed is increased smoothly and high loads (gaming, stress test) results in up to 42.8 dB(A) at ∼3600 rpm. The fan noise is very steady and obviously audible, but not really disturbing. We did not notice higher speeds during our tests, only when we used the High Performance mode the fan speed would increase to ∼5600 rpm, which results in a very loud noise of 55.2 dB(A). The fan speed drops to ∼1400 rpm in the Low Power mode, which is hardly audible at all (25.3 dB(A)). We did notice occasional coil whine (25.5 dB(A)) in some of our benchmarks.
风扇速度平稳增加,高负载(游戏、压力测试)导致在 ∼3600 rpm 时噪音高达 42.8 dB(A)。风扇噪音非常稳定,明显可以听到,但并不令人不安。我们在测试过程中没有注意到更高的速度,只有当我们使用高性能模式时,风扇速度才会增加到 ∼5600 rpm,这会导致 55.2 dB(A) 的噪音。在低功耗模式下,风扇速度降至 ∼1400 rpm,几乎听不到声音 (25.3 dB(A))。我们确实注意到在一些基准测试中偶尔会出现线圈呜呜声 (25.5 dB(A))。
Noise Level 噪音水平
Idle 闲置的 |
| 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 dB(A) 23.7 / 23.7 / 23.7 分贝(A) |
Load 加载 |
| 40.8 / 42.8 dB(A) 40.8 / 42.8 分贝(A) |
| ||
30 dB 30分贝 silent 沉默的 40 dB(A) 40分贝(A) audible 可听见的 50 dB(A) 50分贝(A) loud 大声 |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.7 dB(A) 分钟: ,医学: , 最大限度: Earthworks M23R,Arta(15厘米距离)环境噪音:23.7 dB(A) |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z M3 Max 40 核 GPU、Apple M3 Max 16 核、Apple SSD AP8192Z | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z M2 Max 38 核 GPU、M2 Max、Apple SSD AP2048Z | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Razer Blade 16 2023 年初 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 GPU,i9-13950HX,SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 GPU,i7-13705H,三星 PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU,i9-13980HX,Phison EM2804TBMTCB47 | Asus Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W 华硕 Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13905H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 GPU,i9-13905H,三星 PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 中) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU,i9-13900H,三星 990 Pro 1 TB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise 噪音 | 3% | -4% | -11% | -13% | -5% | -16% | |
off / environment * 关闭/环境* | 23.7 | 23.9 -1% | 23 3% | 24.7 -4% | 24.5 -3% | 24.9 -5% | 25 -5% |
Idle Minimum * 空闲最小值* | 23.7 | 23.9 -1% | 23 3% | 24.7 -4% | 24.5 -3% | 24.9 -5% | 26 -10% |
Idle Average * 空闲平均 * | 23.7 | 23.9 -1% | 23 3% | 26.2 -11% | 24.5 -3% | 24.9 -5% | 29 -22% |
Idle Maximum * 空闲最大 * | 23.7 | 23.9 -1% | 23.6 -0% | 26.2 -11% | 24.5 -3% | 24.9 -5% | 34 -43% |
Load Average * 平均负载 * | 40.8 | 36.6 10% | 39 4% | 39.7 3% | 47.6 -17% | 38 7% | 43 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * 巫师 3 超 * | 42.8 | 35.1 18% | 51.6 -21% | 53.2 -24% | 55.9 -31% | 48 -12% | |
Load Maximum * 最大负载* | 42.8 | 43.2 -1% | 51.3 -20% | 53.2 -24% | 56.7 -32% | 51 -19% | 48 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
* ...越小越好
Temperature 温度
The surface temperatures of the MacBook Pro 16 are completely uncritical. The chassis does not really warm up at all during light workloads, and we can only measure up to 42 °C during gaming and our stress test. The keyboard also warms up to more than 40 °C at some spots, but there are no limitations for typing, and you can put the MBP 16 comfortably on your lap even under maximum load. The SoC temperature was also quite low at 78 °C during the stress test.
MacBook Pro 16 的表面温度完全不重要。在轻负载期间,机箱根本不会真正升温,我们在游戏和压力测试期间只能测量到 42°C。键盘在某些地方也会升温到 40°C 以上,但打字没有任何限制,即使在最大负载下,您也可以将 MBP 16 舒适地放在腿上。在压力测试中,SoC 温度也相当低,为 78°C。
(±)最大负载下上侧的平均温度为 35.9 °C / 97 F,而多媒体类设备的平均温度为 31.3 °C / 88 F。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±)上侧的最高温度为 42.3 °C / 108 F,而多媒体类的平均温度为 36.9 °C / 98 F,范围为 21.1 至 71 °C。
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(±)底部最高加热温度为 42 °C / 108 F,而平均值为 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+)闲置使用时,上侧的平均温度为 22.4 °C / 72 F,而设备平均值为 31.3 °C / 88 F。
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±)玩《巫师 3》时,上侧平均温度为 36.9 °C / 98 F,而设备平均值为 31.3 °C / 88 F。
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+)掌托和触摸板的温度低于皮肤温度,最高温度为 30 °C / 86 F,因此触感凉爽。
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
(±)类似设备掌托区域的平均温度为 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F)。
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU Apple M3 Max 16 核、Apple M3 Max 40 核 GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max, Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU Apple M2 Max、Apple M2 Max 38 核 GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Razer Blade 16 2023 年初 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU 英特尔酷睿 i9-13950HX、NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU 英特尔酷睿 i7-13705H、NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 GPU | Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 英特尔酷睿 i9-13980HX、NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 中) Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU 英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H、NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat 热 | -1% | -17% | -15% | -29% | -47% | |
Maximum Upper Side * 最大上边 * | 42.3 | 44.2 -4% | 40 5% | 41.6 2% | 44.1 -4% | 55 -30% |
Maximum Bottom * 最大底部 * | 42 | 42.9 -2% | 37.6 10% | 50 -19% | 48 -14% | 66 -57% |
Idle Upper Side * 空闲上侧 * | 22.5 | 22.4 -0% | 32.4 -44% | 26.8 -19% | 32.7 -45% | 33 -47% |
Idle Bottom * 空闲底部 * | 22.9 | 22.3 3% | 31.4 -37% | 27.9 -22% | 34.9 -52% | 35 -53% |
* ... smaller is better
* ...越小越好
Stress test 压力测试
The system favors the GPU performance during the stress test and we can see a combined (CPU+GPU) consumption of 78 Watts at the start of the test. The GPU will quickly level off at around 37 Watts, but the processor drops to just 11 Watts after a couple of minutes, and the combined consumption is around 48 Watts.
系统在压力测试期间偏向 GPU 性能,我们可以看到测试开始时的综合(CPU+GPU)功耗为 78 瓦。 GPU 很快就会稳定在 37 瓦左右,但几分钟后处理器就会降至仅 11 瓦,总功耗约为 48 瓦。
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life 极限压力测试 GPU 功率: Ø36.3 (30.528-57.405)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life 极限压力测试 CPU 功耗: Ø12.1 (10.296-21.451)
Speakers 扬声器
The 6-speaker system is basically identical to the previous model, and it is still one of the best audio systems you can get in a laptop. Our audio analysis, however, shows a slightly worse bass coverage than before, but you cannot hear the difference. The Windows competition is also closing the gap, and the sound system of the Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16, for example, is not much worse.
6 扬声器系统与之前的型号基本相同,它仍然是笔记本电脑中最好的音频系统之一。然而,我们的音频分析显示低音覆盖范围比以前稍差,但您听不出差异。 Windows 竞争也在缩小差距,例如联想 Yoga Pro 9i 16的音响系统也差不了多少。
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max audio analysis
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 音频分析
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
(+) |扬声器可以播放相对较大的声音(84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
低音 100 - 315 赫兹
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(±) |低音减弱 - 平均比中值低 5%
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
(+) |低音是线性的(与前一个频率的增量为 5.6%)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
中频 400 - 2000 赫兹
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) |平衡中频 - 距离中值仅 1.2%
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
(+) |中频是线性的(与前一个频率的增量为 3.1%)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
高音 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) |平衡高点 - 距离中值仅 2.4%
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
(+) |高点是线性的(与前一个频率的增量为 2.4%)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
总体频率 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
(+) |整体声音呈线性(与中值相差 5.3%)
Compared to same class 与同班相比
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
»此类中所有测试设备中有 1% 更好,1% 相似,99% 更差
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
»最好的增量为 5%,平均为 18%,最差为 45%
Compared to all devices tested
与所有测试的设备相比
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
»所有测试设备中 0% 更好,0% 相似,100% 更差
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
»最好的增量为 4%,平均为 25%,最差为 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max audio analysis
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 音频分析
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
(+) |扬声器可以播放相对较大的声音(86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
低音 100 - 315 赫兹
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(+) |良好的低音 - 距离中值仅 3.9%
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
(+) |低音是线性的(与前一个频率的增量为 5.7%)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
中频 400 - 2000 赫兹
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) |平衡中频 - 距离中值仅 1.2%
(+) | mids are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
(+) |中频是线性的(与前一个频率的增量为 1.5%)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
高音 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) |平衡高点 - 距离中值仅 2.5%
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
(+) |高点是线性的(与前一个频率的增量为 1.7%)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
总体频率 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.9% difference to median)
(+) |整体声音呈线性(与中值相差 4.9%)
Compared to same class 与同班相比
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
»此类中所有测试设备中有 0% 更好,0% 相似,99% 更差
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
»最好的增量为 5%,平均为 18%,最差为 45%
Compared to all devices tested
与所有测试的设备相比
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
»所有测试设备中 0% 更好,0% 相似,100% 更差
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
»最好的增量为 4%,平均为 25%,最差为 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management - MBP 16 with improved runtimes
能源管理 - MBP 16 具有改进的运行时间
Power Consumption 功耗
The maximum idle consumption of the new MacBook Pro 16 M3 Max is slightly higher compared to the old MBP 16 M2 Max, but the differences are small considering the increased SDR brightness. The power consumption is also a bit higher under load, but we see the same 145W limit at the beginning of the stress test, which will level off at around 130 Watts after a few minutes. The included 140W power adapter is therefore sufficient, but there is not much headroom to charge the battery under load.
新款 MacBook Pro 16 M3 Max 的最大空闲功耗比旧款 MBP 16 M2 Max稍高,但考虑到 SDR 亮度的增加,差异很小。负载下的功耗也稍高一些,但我们在压力测试开始时看到相同的 145W 限制,几分钟后将稳定在 130 瓦左右。因此,附带的 140W 电源适配器足够了,但在负载下为电池充电的余量并不多。
Off / Standby 关闭/待机 | 0.25 / 0.48 Watt 0.25 / 0.48 瓦 |
Idle 闲置的 | 5.2 / 16.9 / 17.2 Watt 5.2 / 16.9 / 17.2 瓦 |
Load 加载 |
90.5 / 145.2 Watt 90.5 / 145.2 瓦 |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy 钥匙: 我的: , 和: , 最大限度: 梅特拉希特能源 |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP8192Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16" Apple M3 Max 16 核、M3 Max 40 核 GPU、Apple SSD AP8192Z、Mini-LED、3456x2234、16 英寸 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" M2 Max、M2 Max 38 核 GPU、Apple SSD AP2048Z、Mini-LED、3456x2234、16.2 英寸 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Razer Blade 16 2023 年初 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" i9-13950HX,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 GPU,SSSTC CA6-8D1024,IPS,2560x1600,16 英寸 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16" i7-13705H,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 GPU,三星 PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR,Mini-LED,3200x2000,16 英寸 | Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Phison EM2804TBMTCB47, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" i9-13980HX,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU,群联 EM2804TBMTCB47,OLED,3200x2000,16 英寸 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 中) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" i9-13900H,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU,三星 990 Pro 1 TB,IPS,2560x1600,16 英寸 | Average Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption 功耗 | -1% | -110% | -40% | -63% | -30% | 13% | 12% | |
Idle Minimum * 空闲最小值* | 5.2 | 5.2 -0% | 15.2 -192% | 10.9 -110% | 12.8 -146% | 8 -54% | 3.9 ? 25% | 6.96 ? -34% |
Idle Average * 空闲平均 * | 16.9 | 16.5 2% | 22.8 -35% | 22.6 -34% | 19.9 -18% | 12 29% | 14.4 ? 15% | 11.3 ? 33% |
Idle Maximum * 空闲最大 * | 17.2 | 16.8 2% | 49.8 -190% | 23.5 -37% | 20.3 -18% | 23 -34% | 14.7 ? 15% | 13.5 ? 22% |
Load Average * 平均负载 * | 90.5 | 113 -25% | 121.2 -34% | 84.6 7% | 131.4 -45% | 94 -4% | 95.2 ? -5% | 72.3 ? 20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * 巫师 3 超 * | 109 | 92 16% | 242 -122% | 159.5 -46% | 196.5 -80% | 181.5 -67% | ||
Load Maximum * 最大负载* | 145.2 | 145 -0% | 273.7 -88% | 177.3 -22% | 246.8 -70% | 215 -48% | 123.5 ? 15% | 119.2 ? 18% |
* ... smaller is better
* ...越小越好
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
巫师3功耗/压力测试
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ;巫师 3 ultra: Ø109 (97.7-114.8)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 和 Furmark 1.25: Ø133.2 (119.1-145)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ;闲置 150cd/m2: Ø7.91 (7.5-8.65)
Power consumption with external screen
外接屏幕功耗
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; Cinebench R15 Multi(外接显示器): Ø92.7 (90.7-94.2)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; Cinebench R23 Single(外接显示器): Ø17.3 (16.2-21.4)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; Cinebench R23 Multi(外接显示器): Ø78.6 (71.7-80.2)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ; 1920x1080 《巫师 3 ultra》(外接显示器): Ø95.4 (82.1-100.3)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max ;空闲 1 分钟(外部显示器): Ø6.49 (6.3-7.06)
Battery Runtime 电池运行时间
The size of the 99.6 Wh battery did not change, but Apple managed to improve the battery runtime in most scenarios. We can only observe one decreased result in the Wi-Fi test at maximum SDR brightness. Due to the brightness increase from 500 to more than 600 nits, the runtime drops by 20 minutes, but the result of 06:45 hours is still respectable. The result in the Wi-Fi test at 150 nits is much better with 16:39 hours instead of 14:47 hours on the predecessor. The direct Windows competition does not stand a chance against this result. You can drain the battery in around 70 minutes under load, but you also get the full performance.
99.6 Wh 电池的尺寸没有变化,但苹果在大多数情况下都设法提高了电池运行时间。在最大 SDR 亮度下的 Wi-Fi 测试中,我们只能观察到一项下降的结果。由于亮度从 500 尼特增加到 600 尼特以上,运行时间下降了 20 分钟,但 06:45 的结果仍然可观。在 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中,结果要好得多,为 16:39 小时,而不是前代产品的 14:47 小时。 Windows 的直接竞争没有机会对抗这个结果。在负载情况下,您可能会在大约 70 分钟内耗尽电池电量,但您也可以获得全部性能。
The video runtime at 150 nits also increases from 18:44 hours to 20:21 hours and HDR videos on maximum brightness will run for 05:40 hours before the battery is dead. The 140W power adapter recharges the battery in about 1.5 hours when the device is turned on; 80 % of the capacity is available after 50 minutes.
150 尼特的视频运行时间也从 18:44 小时增加到 20:21 小时,最大亮度下的 HDR 视频将运行 05:40 小时,然后电池耗尽。 140W电源适配器开机时约1.5小时即可充满电池; 50 分钟后可使用 80% 的容量。
PSU | 20 % | 40 % | 50 % | 80 % | 100 % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
140 Watts 140瓦 | 11 minutes 11分钟 | 23 minutes 23分钟 | 28 minutes 28分钟 | 50 minutes 50分钟 | 88 minutes 88分钟 |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh Apple M3 Max 16 核、M3 Max 40 核 GPU,99.6 瓦时 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max 苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max, M2 Max 38-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh M2 Max,M2 Max 38 核 GPU,99.6 瓦时 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Razer Blade 16 2023 年初 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh i9-13950HX,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 GPU,95.2 瓦时 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 联想 Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh i7-13705H,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 GPU,75 瓦时 | Asus ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 华硕 ProArt Studiobook 16 OLED H7604 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh i9-13980HX,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU,90 瓦时 | Asus Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W 华硕 Zenbook Pro 16X UX7602BZ-MY005W i9-13905H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 96 Wh i9-13905H,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 笔记本电脑 GPU,96 瓦时 | SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio (Mid 23) SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 Studio(23 中) i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh i9-13900H,NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU,73 瓦时 | Average of class Multimedia 多媒体班级平均分 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime 电池运行时间 | -9% | -25% | -54% | -49% | 25% | -59% | -12% | |
H.264 | 1221 | 1124 -8% | 449 -63% | 358 -71% | 793 ? -35% | |||
WiFi v1.3 无线网络v1.3 | 999 | 887 -11% | 365 -63% | 385 -61% | 334 -67% | 472.8 -53% | 405 -59% | 613 ? -39% |
Load 加载 | 71 | 66 -7% | 81 14% | 44 -38% | 65 -8% | 144 103% | 98.3 ? 38% |
Pros 优点
高品质坚固的底盘
出色的显示屏和准确的色彩
在日常场景中几乎总是保持沉默
非常高的系统性能
高效的 M3 Max SoC,CPU 性能大幅提升
增加电池运行时间
笔记本电脑中最好的扬声器
高达 128 GB RAM 和 8 TB 存储空间
Cons 缺点
CPU/GPU 组合工作负载的性能有限
持续 PWM 闪烁和响应时间慢
基本上没有维护选项
RAM 和 SSD 升级的价格非常高
没有 Face-ID 和 Center Stage 的网络摄像头
Verdict - MacBook Pro 16 with massive performance boost thanks to M3 Max
结论 - MacBook Pro 16 凭借 M3 Max 大幅提升性能
The new M3 Max is mostly about the CPU performance and the results are really good. The multi-core performance was increased by more than 60 % compared to the M2 Max, and even Intel's H45 chips, as well as AMD's HS processors (Zen4), are clearly beaten. The single-core performance (+20 %) is also comparable to Intel's H45 CPUs. Apple also improved the GPU performance, and the results are also very good considering the maximum power consumption of 60 Watts, but there are definitely faster GPUs from Nvidia, at least when a power adapter is attached.
新的M3 Max主要是关于CPU性能,结果非常好。多核性能相比M2 Max提升了60%以上,连Intel的H45芯片,以及AMD的HS处理器(Zen4)都明显被击败。单核性能(+20%)也可与英特尔的 H45 CPU 相媲美。苹果还提高了 GPU 性能,考虑到 60 瓦的最大功耗,结果也非常好,但 Nvidia 肯定有更快的 GPU,至少在连接电源适配器时是这样。
Otherwise, the MacBook Pro 16 is once again an excellent multimedia laptop even with the M3 Max, and is pretty much the perfect machine for video editing thanks to the unified memory (which is also used by the GPU). The case, including the ports as well as the input devices, did not change - only the maximum SDR brightness was increased by Apple and is now above 600 nits. The maximum HDR brightness is still extremely high, and the implementation of HDR content is still much more comfortable in macOS compared to Windows.
除此之外,MacBook Pro 16 再次成为一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑,即使配备了 M3 Max,而且由于统一内存(也由 GPU 使用),它几乎是视频编辑的完美机器。外壳(包括端口和输入设备)没有改变 - Apple 只是提高了最大 SDR 亮度,现在超过 600 尼特。最大 HDR 亮度仍然极高,并且与 Windows 相比,在 macOS 中实现 HDR 内容仍然要舒适得多。
The MacBook Pro 16 with the M3 Max is Apple's fastest laptop and the CPU performance is much higher thanks to additional CPU cores. The GPU Performance is also better and Apple managed to improve the efficiency, which is also noticeable by longer battery runtimes. The MBP 16 is still one of the best multimedia laptops and the best overall packages on the market, but it comes at a price.
配备 M3 Max 的 MacBook Pro 16 是 Apple 最快的笔记本电脑,由于额外的 CPU 内核,CPU 性能更高。 GPU 性能也更好,Apple 设法提高了效率,这通过更长的电池运行时间也很明显。 MBP 16 仍然是市场上最好的多媒体笔记本电脑和最好的整体套件之一,但它是有代价的。
The new M3 SoCs are more efficient because Apple managed to improve the battery runtime compared to previous models. The fans are a bit louder during medium workloads, but the maximum fan noise is pretty much identical. The new color Space Black looks very good and is not as susceptible to fingerprints as the Midnight color on the smaller MacBook Air, but you will still have to clean it from time to time.
与之前的型号相比,新的 M3 SoC 效率更高,因为苹果设法提高了电池运行时间。在中等工作负载期间,风扇的声音有点大,但最大风扇噪音几乎相同。新颜色 Space Black 看起来非常好,并且不像较小的 MacBook Air 上的 Midnight 颜色那样容易沾染指纹,但您仍然需要不时清洁它。
There are definitely individual areas where the rivals are better, but especially the lack of maintenance options in combination with Apple's extremely high prices for more RAM and SSD storage is a major drawback. With that said, you will have a hard time finding a better overall package for multimedia purposes or video editing. Apple is still not the best solution when you want to play games, especially AAA-titles, but the situation is slowly improving. Native games run really well on Apple's hardware, but the selection is just very limited.
竞争对手肯定在某些领域表现更好,但特别是缺乏维护选项,加上苹果为更多 RAM 和 SSD 存储提供的极高价格,这是一个主要缺点。话虽如此,您将很难找到用于多媒体目的或视频编辑的更好的整体包。当你想玩游戏,尤其是 AAA 游戏时,苹果仍然不是最好的解决方案,但情况正在慢慢改善。原生游戏在苹果的硬件上运行得非常好,但选择非常有限。
An upgrade from the MBP 16 with the M2 Max could be an option thanks to the massively increased CPU performance, but the new MBP 16 with the M3 Max is most likely interesting for users of the old M1 Max models or as an upgrade from a M1/M2 Pro when you simply need additional performance. The increased SDR brightness is certainly appreciated, but hardly a reason to switch.
由于 CPU 性能大幅提高,配备 M2 Max 的 MBP 16 升级可能是一种选择,但配备 M3 Max 的新 MBP 16 很可能对旧M1 Max 型号的用户或作为 M1 的升级版感兴趣。 /M2 Pro 当您只需要额外的性能时。 SDR 亮度的提高当然受到赞赏,但很难成为更换的理由。
Price and Availability 价格和供货情况
The new MacBook Pro is available from Amazon starting at $2,499 for the base model with the M3 Pro in Silver or Space Black.
新款 MacBook Pro 现已在亚马逊发售,基本型号 M3 Pro 的起价为 2,499 美元,有银色或深空黑色可供选择。
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
-
11/08/2023 v7 (old)
苹果 MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
- 11/08/2023 v7 (旧)
Andreas Osthoff 安德烈亚斯·奥斯托夫
多媒体- 加权平均
Transparency 透明度
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
要审查的设备的选择是由我们的编辑团队决定的。出于本次审查的目的,测试样品是制造商或零售商借给作者的。贷方对本次审查没有影响,制造商在发布之前也没有收到本次审查的副本。没有义务发表这篇评论。我们绝不接受补偿或付款来换取我们的评论。作为一家独立的媒体公司,Notebookcheck 不受制造商、零售商或出版商的授权。
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
这就是 Notebookcheck 的测试方式
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
每年,Notebookcheck 都会使用标准化程序独立审查数百台笔记本电脑和智能手机,以确保所有结果具有可比性。大约 20 年来,我们不断开发测试方法,并在此过程中制定了行业标准。在我们的测试实验室中,经验丰富的技术人员和编辑使用高质量的测量设备。这些测试涉及多阶段验证过程。我们复杂的评级系统基于数百个有充分依据的测量和基准,保持了客观性。有关我们测试方法的更多信息,请参见此处。
Price comparison
我是伴随着现代消费电子产品长大的,我的第一台计算机是 Commodore C64,这激发了我构建自己的系统的兴趣。在西门子的双重学习期间,我开始担任 Notebookcheck 的审稿编辑。目前,我主要负责处理商务笔记本电脑和移动工作站。能够回顾最新的设备和技术,然后将它们相互比较,是一种很棒的体验。