*QN | CLO | Criteria 标准 | Weight 重量 | Excellent 非常好 | Good 好 | Fair 公平 | Poor 穷 | Unsatisfactory 理想 | Max Marks 最大分数 |
| | | | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
1 | 3 | Introductions 介绍 Background of study of the selected industry. -Find the research gap, 所选行业的研究背景。- 找到研究差距, -Problem statement - 问题陈述 -Research problem and question. - 研究问题和疑问。 | 3.75 | The background study is very well written, use references within 5 years. 背景研究写得很好,使用 5 年内的参考资料。 | The background study is explained and good. use references within 6 years. 背景研究解释得很好。 在 6 年 内使用参考资料。 | The background study written, use references within 7 - 9 years. 撰写的背景研究,使用 7 - 9 年内的参考资料。 | The background study is written poorly, use references within 10 years. 背景研究写得很差,使用 10 年内的参考文献。 | No introduction is written. 没有写介绍。 | 15 |
2 | 3 | Literature review 文献综述 | 5 | Very clear literature review on the topic and the variables used for this assignment, the references is within 5 years 关于该主题和用于此作业的变量的非常清晰的文献综述 ,参考文献在 5 年内 | Good literature review on the topic and variables used for this assignment, the references is within 6 years 关于该作业所用主题和变量的良好文献综述,参考文献在 6 年内 | Fairly written literature review on the variables used for this assignment, the references is within 7-9 years 关于此作业使用的变量的公平书面文献综述,参考文献在 7-9 年内 | Vague written literature review on the variables used for this assignment, the references is within 10 years 关于此作业所用变量的模糊书面文献综述,参考文献在 10 年内 | No LR is written 不写入 LR. | 20 |
3 | 3 | Research Methodology 研究方法 -which methodology is used to collect data - 使用哪种方法收集数据 | 5 | Excellent discussion on Methodology and well explained. 关于方法论的精彩讨论 和很好的解释。 | The student written the methodology and explained well 学生编写了方法并很好地解释了 | Fairly written on the methodology 对方法 论写得相当 | Poorly written on the methodology 方法论写得很糟糕 | No Methodology is explained 未解释方法 | 20 |
4 | 3 | Data Analysis 数据分析 | 5 | Very good and clear explanation of data analyzed. Students can interpret the result well. 非常好,对分析的数据进行了 clear 解释。学生可以很好地解释结果。 | Good explanation of data analyzed. Students able to explain the result. 对分析的数据 进行了很好的解释。学生能够解释结果。 | Fair explanation of the data analyzed. Students can explain the result. 对分析的数据的公正解释。学生可以解释结果。 | Poor explanation of the data analyzed. Students poorly explained the result. 对分析数据的解释不佳。学生们对结果的解释很糟糕。 | No data analyzed 不分析数据 | 20 |
5 | 3 | Discussions, recommendations, and conclusions. 讨论、建议和结论。 | 5 | Excellent discussion & recommendations and conclusions. 优秀的讨论&建议和结论。 | Clear discussion & recommendations and conclusions. 清晰的讨论&建议和结论。 | Fairly discussed discussion and recommendations & conclusions. 公平讨论的讨论和建议与结论。 | Poorly discussed discussion, recommendations, and conclusions. 讨论ed 讨论建议和结论讨论不佳。 | No discussion was given. 没有进行讨论。 | 20 |
6 | 3 | Appropriate use of citation and references 适当使用引文和参考文献 | 1.25 | Student used appropriate citation and references excellently. 学生出色地使用了适当的引文和参考文献。 | Student used appropriate citation and references well. 学生很好地使用了适当的引用和参考文献。 | Student used appropriate citation and references fairly. 学生公平地使用了适当的引用和参考文献。 | Student didn’t use appropriate citation and references 学生没有使用适当的引文和参考文献 | No citation and references 没有引用和参考文献 | 5 |
Total 总 | 25 | | 100 |