Supply chain sustainability in emerging economy: A negative relationship conditions’ perspective
新興經濟體供應鏈永續性:負面關係條件的視角
International Journal of Production Economics, 2023/7
國際生產經濟學雜誌,2023/7
Purushottam L. Meena,
普魯肖坦‧米納 (Purushottam L. Meena )
Department of Supply Chain & Information Management, School of Business, College of Charleston, 5 Liberty St., Charleston, SC, 29401, USA
查爾斯頓學院商學院供應鏈與資訊管理系, 5 Liberty St., Charleston, SC, 29401, USA
Gopal Kumar,
戈帕爾·庫馬爾,
Operations Management Group, Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Atal Nagar, Kurru (Abhanpur), Raipur, 493 661, India
印度管理學院營運管理小組 Raipur, Atal Nagar, Kurru ( Abhanpur ), Raipur, 493 661, 印度
M. Ramkumar,
拉姆庫馬爾先生,
Operations Management Group, Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Atal Nagar, Kurru (Abhanpur), Raipur, 493 661, India
印度管理學院營運管理小組 Raipur, Atal Nagar, Kurru ( Abhanpur ), Raipur, 493 661, 印度
Operations Management Group, Indian Institute of Management Raipur, Atal Nagar, Kurru (Abhanpur), Raipur, 493 661, India
印度管理學院營運管理小組 Raipur, Atal Nagar, Kurru ( Abhanpur ), Raipur, 493 661, 印度
Abstract: Due to increasing reliance on suppliers, succeeding in supply chain sustainability hinges on the firm’s collaborative relationship with its supply chain partners, positioning relationship conditions as a linchpin in firms’ quest towards greater sustainability. This research scrutinizes if linkages between innovation, joint planning and resource sharing (i.e., JPRS or collaboration) and three dimensions of sustainability (i.e., supply chain, environmental, and social performance) are contingent on relationship conditions. Building on the force field theory and transaction cost economics, the moderation role of negative relationship conditions is examined using data collected from industries by deploying structural equation modeling (SEM) and SEM-based multi-group analysis. The relationship conditions include partner selection, power asymmetry, opportunistic behavior, and conflicting interests. Results show that the difficulty associated with partner selection played a considerable role in moderating the relationship between perceived interdependency and both collaboration and innovation. The influence of opportunistic behavior and conflicting interests to serve as a moderator in the relationships from innovation and collaboration to the three sustainability dimensions was tenuous, whereas the power asymmetry failed to serve as an influential moderator. This paper contributes to the planning and controlling supply chain sustainability literature by outlining paths to sustainability, considering negative relationship conditions within an emerging economy context, and offering pathways for economies of similar development to undertake these efforts.
摘要:由於對供應商的依賴日益增加,供應鏈永續發展的成功取決於企業與其供應鏈合作夥伴的協作關係,將關係條件定位為企業尋求更大永續性的關鍵。這項研究仔細檢視了創新、聯合規劃和資源共享(即 JPRS 或協作)以及永續性的三個維度(即供應鏈、環境和社會績效)之間的聯繫是否取決於關係條件。基於力場理論和交易成本經濟學,透過部署結構方程模型 (SEM) 和基於 SEM 的多組分析,使用從產業收集的數據來檢驗負關係條件的調節作用。關係條件包括夥伴選擇、權力不對稱、機會主義行為和利益衝突。結果表明,與合作夥伴選擇相關的困難在調節感知相互依賴與協作和創新之間的關係方面發揮了相當大的作用。機會主義行為與利益衝突在創新與協作與三個永續發展向度的關係中所扮演的調節角色是微弱的,而權力不對稱則未能起到有影響力的調節作用。本文概述了可持續發展的路徑,考慮了新興經濟背景下的負面關係條件,並為類似發展的經濟體提供了這些努力的途徑,為規劃和控制供應鏈永續性文獻做出了貢獻。
Keywords: Supply chain sustainability838, Relationship atmosphere/conditions, Collaboration147, Innovation446, Supply chain performance830
關鍵字:供應鏈永續性838 、關係氣氛/條件、協作147 、創新446 、供應鏈績效830
H1a-. Difficulty in strategic partner selection negatively moderates the relationship between perceived interdependency and JPRS.
H1a - .策略夥伴選擇困難對感知相互依賴與 JPRS 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H1b-. Difficulty in strategic partner selection negatively moderates the relationship between perceived interdependency and innovation.
H1b - .策略夥伴選擇的困難對感知的相互依賴與創新之間的關係產生負面影響。
H2a-. Power asymmetry negatively moderates the relationship between perceived interdependency and JPRS.
H2a - .權力不對稱對知覺相互依賴與 JPRS之間的關係產生負面影響。
H2b-. Power asymmetry negatively moderates the relationship between perceived interdependency and innovation.
H2b - .權力不對稱對感知的相互依賴與創新之間的關係產生負面影響。
H2c-. Power asymmetry negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCEP.
H2c - .權力不對稱對 JPRS 和 SCEP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H2d-. Power asymmetry negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCP.
H2d - .權力不對稱對 JPRS 和 SCP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H2e-. Power asymmetry negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCSP.
H2e - .權力不對稱對 JPRS 和 SCSP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H2f-. Power asymmetry negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCEP.
H2f - .權力不對稱對創新與 SCEP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H2g-. Power asymmetry negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCP.
H2g - .權力不對稱對創新與 SCP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H2h-. Power asymmetry negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCSP.
H2h - .權力不對稱對創新與 SCSP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H3a-. Opportunistic behavior negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCEP.
H3a - .機會主義行為對 JPRS 和 SCEP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H3b-. Opportunistic behavior negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCP.
H3b - .機會主義行為對 JPRS 和 SCP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H3c-. Opportunistic behavior negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCSP.
H3c - .機會主義行為對 JPRS 和 SCSP 之間的關係產生負面調節。
H3d-. Opportunistic behavior negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCEP.
H3d - .機會主義行為對創新與 SCEP 之間的關係有負面影響。
H3e-. Opportunistic behavior negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCP.
H3e - .機會主義行為對創新與 SCP 之間的關係有負面影響。
H3f-. Opportunistic behavior negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCSP.
H3f - .機會主義行為對創新與 SCSP 之間的關係有負面影響。
H4a-. Conflicting interest negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCEP.
H4a - .利益衝突對 JPRS 和 SCEP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H4b-. Conflicting interest negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCP.
H4b - .利益衝突對 JPRS 和 SCP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H4c-. Conflicting interest negatively moderates the relationship between JPRS and SCSP.
H4c - .利益衝突對 JPRS 和 SCSP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H4d-. Conflicting interest negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCEP.
H4d - .利益衝突對創新與 SCEP之間的關係產生負面影響。
H4e-. Conflicting interest negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCP.
H4e - .利益衝突對創新與 SCP 之間的關係產生負面影響。
H4f-. Conflicting interest negatively moderates the relationship between innovation and SCSP.
H4f-。利益衝突對創新與 SCSP 之間的關係產生負面影響。